Transition Integrity Project

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
See also:CCP virus in the United States#Blue State Civil War and 2020 Leftwing insurrection
Transition Integrity Project
Antifa DC.jpeg
Date May 28, 2020 - ongoing
Location United States
Democratic National Committee,
Joe Biden 2020 presidential campaign,
Deep State, Open Society Institute
American people
John Podesta,[1]
Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi[2]
Hillary Clinton[3] Rosa Brooks,[4]
Nils Gilman,
Michael McFaul[5]
John Kerry[6] Marc Elias,
Jennifer Granholm,
Al Gore[7] Donna Brazile[8]
~ 66,000 insurrectionists[9] ~ 233,000,000
law, order, justice, freedom, democracy

Democrats held a simulation in June 2020 on how to drive President Trump from office if he wins called Transition Integrity Project, It has nothing to do with integrity and everything to do with stealing back the election.

The project has links to Barack Obama and over 20 Obama White House staff. Former Obama associate White House Counsel, Ian Bassin

Bassin heads the anti-Trump litigation efforts Protect Democracy Project and United to Protect Democracy. Bassin previously headed the far-left Avaaz network, founded in by, as well as the Truman National Security Project, which has featured chief Joe Biden policy advisor Jake Sullivan and Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden on its board.[10] The project reported,

Marc Elias and John Podesta. Neither one were ever prosecuted for lying to Congress about making payments to FusionGPS for the Steele dossier.[11]
“All of our scenarios ended in both street-level violence and political impasse,” Rosa Brooks, a Georgetown law professor told the press. “The law is essentially…it’s almost helpless against a president who’s willing to ignore it.”

By “ignore” she means not bow to Democrats. By “law” she means Democrat election cheating.

“Scenario exercises don’t predict the future,” she said, adding, “They explore possible futures: some of the ‘what ifs.’ Our scenario exercises did not end in good places, but it’s important to note that this does not mean that there is something inevitable about chaos and constitutional crisis in the coming months — just that these particular exercises suggest that these are real possibilities.”

She’s training the media and the Democrats on what to say and how to react to a Trump victory or a Biden win by cheating. Her goal is to legitimize cheating. This session also serves to prime the pump of public opinion and get America used to talking about ousting President Trump, no matter the real election result. Brooks said,

“The goal of the exercises was not to give people nightmares, but rather to identify possible inflection points to prevent or mitigate catastrophic outcomes to the 2020 presidential election. … I think the exercises led to some important insights, one being that forewarned is forearmed; in all our exercises, events unfolded very quickly in the days after the election, and those who had thought in advance about the ‘what ifs’ were better positioned to respond than those who had not.”

Through her obfuscation, it is evident what this entire meeting was: Democrat election cheating and stealing boot camp. The “respond” she has in mind is to a legitimate Trump victory. The ostensible reason for the training is a scenario where Trump won’t leave office after a loss. But the actual goal of those who attended is to kill a Trump victory, with the help of the media, in any way they can.[12]

Former U.S. Attorney Andrew McCarthy wrote on the fake basis for the meeting: “There is no rational reason to indulge the anti-Trump hallucination of a defeated president holed up in the Oval Office refusing to leave. If ever any president were to try such an inane thing after the constitutionally mandated divestment of executive authority, he or she would be escorted from the premises — hopefully, with whatever dignity could still be mustered under the circumstances.”

See also



External links