Difference between revisions of "Atheism"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Clearing some stuff up.)
m (clean up, typos fixed: mid 1930s → mid-1930s, long term → long-term, ’s → 's, between 2008 to → between 2008 and)
 
(997 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
{{redirect|Atheist}}
+
[[File:Atheism.jpg|thumb|alt=atheism|right|225px|[[Portrait]] of [[Paul-Henri Thiry]], Baron d'Holbach (1723 - 1789) was an early advocate of atheism in [[Europe]]. ]]
−
{{pp-move-indef}}{{pp-semi-indef}}
+
In terms of contemporary definitions of '''atheism''', the ''Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary'' [[Definition of atheism|defines atheism]] in two ways: "1) a lack of [[belief]] or a strong disbelief in the existence of a god or any gods 2) a philosophical or religious position characterized by disbelief in the existence of a god or any gods."<ref>[https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/atheism. “Atheism”] (on or bef. 2019). ''The Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary'' (unk. place: Merriam-Webster).</ref> ''Lexico.com'' (Oxford University Press) defines atheism as "Disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God or gods."<ref>Oxford University Press (OUP) (2019). [https://lexico.com/definition/atheism "Atheism"]. ''Lexico.com'' (Oxford, UK: OUP).</ref> See: [[Definition of atheism]]
−
{{featured article}}
 
−
{{Atheism sidebar}}
 
−
<!----
 
−
  Please note:
 
−
    The consensus since April 2007 has been to include all three of the definitions of atheism presented in the first paragraph below. They are the result of extensive debate and searches through existing sources – see, for example, the archived talkpage threads [[Talk:Atheism/Archive 27#A survey of definitions for atheism]] and [[Talk:Atheism/Archive 29#List of definitions]] – and formed part of the article when it achieved "Featured Article" status.
 
  
−
    Please, therefore, do not change the contents of the first paragraph without prior discussion on the talkpage ([[Talk:Atheism]]), preferably after consulting at least these two threads. If you do make changes to the paragraph without prior discussion, be prepared to see them reverted as an invitation to discussion on the talkpage (see [[Wikipedia:BRD]]).
+
Atheism, as defined by the ''[[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]]'', the ''[[Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy]]'', and other [[philosophy]] reference works, is the denial of the existence of [[God]].<ref>Multiple references:
 +
*Smart, J. J. C. (August 8, 2011). [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/atheism-agnosticism "Atheism and agnosticism"]. ''The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy'' (Spring 2013 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.).
 +
*[https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/atheism "{{sc|atheism}}"] (n.d.). ''Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary''. "Definition of {{sc|atheism}} '''1 a''': a lack of belief or a strong disbelief in the existence of a god or any gods '''b''': a philosophical or religious position characterized by disbelief in the existence of a god or any gods [example sentences omitted] Origin and Etymology of {{sc|atheism}} Middle French ''athéisme'', from ''athée'' atheist, from Greek ''atheos'' godless, from ''a-'' + ''theos'' god"; [https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/god "{{sc|god}}"] (n.d.). ''Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary''. "Definition of {{sc|god}} '''1''' ''capitalized'': the supreme or ultimate reality: such as '''a''': the Being perfect in power, wisdom, and goodness who is worshipped as creator and ruler of the universe" [definitions 2 and 3 omitted.] Retrieved on April 22, 2018.
 +
*"Atheism:...a + theos, denying God." Onions, C. T. ''et al.'', ed. (1966). "Atheism". ''Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology'' (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press).
 +
*Sarfati, Jonathan, Ph.D. (23 June 2007). [https://creation.com/atheism-is-more-rational "Atheism is more rational?"] ''Creation.com''/feedback archive (Brisbane, Queensland, AU: Creation Ministries International). See [[Creation Ministries International]], [[Jonathan Sarfati]].
 +
*Day, Donn R. (2007). [https://web.archive.org/web/20140906135211/http://www.thedivineconspiracy.org/athart3.htm "Atheism - etymology"]. ''The Divine Conspiracy'' website/atheism articles (unk. publisher). Archived at ''Internet Archive'' on September 6, 2014.
 +
*Samples, Kenneth R. (Fall 1991 and Winter 1992). [http://www.iclnet.org/pub/resources/text/cri/cri-jrnl/web/crj0131a.html "Putting the atheist on the defensive"] ''Christian Research Institute Journal'', p. 7.</ref>  [[Paul Edwards (philosopher)|Paul Edwards]], who was a prominent atheist and editor of the ''[[Encyclopedia of Philosophy]]'', defined an atheist as "a person who maintains that there is no God."<ref name="CRI"/> See also: [[Strong atheism]]
  
−
----->
+
Beginning in the latter portion of the 20th century and continuing beyond, many [[agnosticism|agnostics]] and atheists have argued that the definition of atheism should be a lack of belief in God or gods.<ref name="CRI">Samples, Kenneth R. (Fall 1991 and Winter 1992). [http://www.iclnet.org/pub/resources/text/cri/cri-jrnl/web/crj0131a.html "Putting the atheist on the defensive"] ''Christian Research Institute Journal'', p. 7.</ref><ref name="Divine">Day, Donn R. (2007). [https://web.archive.org/web/20140906135211/http://www.thedivineconspiracy.org/athart3.htm "Atheism - etymology"]. ''The Divine Conspiracy'' website/atheism articles (unk. publisher). Archived at ''Internet Archive'' on September 6, 2014.</ref><ref>Craig, William Lane (July 16, 2012). [http://www.reasonablefaith.org/definition-of-atheism "The proper definition of atheism"]. ''Reasonable Faith'' website/Media/Reasonable [[faith]] podcast (Dallas TX: Reasonable Faith). See [[William Lane Craig]].</ref><ref>Britain is a less religious country than the United States, and the Oxford-dictionaries-based ''Lexico.com'' offers both the narrow/broad definitions of atheism (as noted in a previous footnote, the ''Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary'', which is a traditional American dictionary, offers a more narrow definition of atheism similar to the definition that major encyclopedias of philosophy use). ''Lexico.com'' and other Oxford dictionaries: "Disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God or gods". (Oxford University Press [OUP] [2019]. [https://www.lexico.com/definition/atheism "Atheism"]. ''Lexico.com'' [Oxford, UK: OUP].)</ref> See: [[Attempts to dilute the definition of atheism#Purpose of attempting to dilute the definition of atheism|Purpose of redefining atheism]] and [[Weak atheism]]
−
'''Atheism''' is, in a broad sense, the rejection of [[belief]] in the existence of [[Deity|deities]].<ref name="eb2011-atheism"/><ref name="encyc-philosophy"/> In a narrower sense, atheism is specifically the position that there are no deities.<ref name="RoweRoutledge"/><ref name="encyc-unbelief-def-issues"/><ref name="oxdicphil"/> Most inclusively, atheism is the absence of belief that any deities exist.<ref name="encyc-unbelief-def-issues"/><ref name="oxdicphil"/><ref name="religioustolerance"/><ref>{{cite encyclopedia |url=http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/atheism |encyclopedia=Oxford Dictionaries |title=Atheism |publisher=Oxford University Press |accessdate=2013-11-21}}</ref> Atheism is contrasted with [[theism]],<ref name="reldef"/><ref name="OED-theism"/> which, in its most general form, is the belief that [[Existence of God|at least one deity exists]].<ref name="OED-theism">{{cite book |title=Oxford English Dictionary |edition=2nd |year=1989 |quote=Belief in a deity, or deities, as opposed to atheism}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theism |title=Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary |quote=...belief in the existence of a god or gods... |accessdate=2011-04-09 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110514194441/http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/theism |archivedate=2011-05-14 <!--DASHBot-->|deadurl=no}}</ref><ref> Smart, J. J. C., "Atheism and Agnosticism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2013 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = [http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2013/entries/atheism-agnosticism/ http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2013/entries/atheism-agnosticism/] </ref>
 
  
−
The term "atheism" originated from the Greek {{lang|grc|[[:wikt:ἄθεος|ἄθεος]]}} (''atheos''), meaning "without god(s)", used as a pejorative term applied to those thought to reject the [[gods]] worshiped by the larger society.<ref name="drachmann"/> With the spread of [[freethought]], [[skeptical inquiry]], and subsequent increase in [[criticism of religion]], application of the term narrowed in scope. The first individuals to identify themselves using the word "atheist" lived in the 18th century during the [[Age of Enlightenment]].{{sfn|Armstrong|1999}} The [[French Revolution]], noted for its "unprecedented atheism," witnessed the first major political movement in history to establish the foundations of society on human reason, not divine authority.<ref name="HancockLambert">{{cite book |last=Hancock|first=Ralph|title=The Legacy of the French Revolution |year=1996 |publisher=Rowman and Littlefield Publishers|location=Lanham, United States|isbn=978-0847678426 |page=22|url=https://books.google.com/books?isbn=0847678423 |accessdate=2015-05-30}}</ref>
+
Atheism has been examined by many disciplines in terms [[Atheism statistics|of its effects]] on individuals and [[Atheism and culture|on societies]] and these effects will be covered below.
  
−
Arguments for atheism range from the philosophical to social and historical approaches. Rationales for not believing in deities include the lack of [[Existence of God#Empirical arguments|empirical evidence]];<ref name="logical"/><ref>{{cite web |url=http://shook.pragmatism.org/skepticismaboutthesupernatural.pdf |title=Skepticism about the Supernatural |last=Shook |first=John R. |accessdate=2012-10-02}}</ref> the [[problem of evil]]; the [[argument from inconsistent revelations]]; the rejection of concepts that cannot [[Falsifiability|be falsified]]; and the [[argument from nonbelief]].<ref name="logical"/><ref name="Drange-1996"/> Although some atheists have adopted [[Secularism|secular]] philosophies (eg. [[Secular humanism|humanism]] and [[Skepticism|skepticism]]),<ref name="honderich"/><ref>{{cite book |last=Fales |first=Evan |title=Naturalism and Physicalism |postscript=,}} in {{harvnb|Martin|2006|pp=122–131}}.</ref> there is no one ideology or set of behaviors to which all atheists adhere.<ref>{{harvnb|Baggini|2003|pp=3–4}}.</ref> Many atheists hold that atheism is a more [[parsimonious]] worldview than theism and therefore that the [[Philosophic burden of proof|burden of proof]] lies not on the atheist to disprove the existence of God but on the theist to provide a rationale for theism.<ref>{{harvnb|Stenger|2007|pp=17–18}}, citing {{cite book |last=Parsons |first=Keith M. |title=God and the Burden of Proof: Plantinga, Swinburne, and the Analytical Defense of Theism |year=1989 |location=Amherst, New York |publisher=Prometheus Books |isbn=978-0-87975-551-5}}</ref>
+
As far as individuals adopting an [[Atheist worldview|atheistic worldview]], atheism has [[causes of atheism|a number of causal factors]] and these will be elaborated on below as well.
  
−
Since conceptions of atheism vary, accurate estimations of current [[Demographics of atheism|numbers of atheists]] are difficult.<ref name="Martin2007">{{cite book |last=Zuckerman |first=Phil |editor=Martin, Michael T |title=The Cambridge Companion to Atheism |year=2007 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge, England |isbn=978-0-521-60367-6 |ol=22379448M |page=56 |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=tAeFipOVx4MC&pg=PA56 |accessdate=2011-04-09}}</ref> Several comprehensive global polls on the subject have been conducted by [[WIN/GIA|Gallup International]]: their 2015 poll featured over 64,000 respondents and indicated that 11% were "convinced atheists" whereas an earlier 2012 poll found that 13% of respondents were "convinced atheists."<ref name="wingia">{{cite web |url=http://www.wingia.com/web/files/news/14/file/14.pdf |title=Religiosity and Atheism Index |author=<!--none specified--> |publisher=[[WIN/GIA]] |date=27 July 2012 |location=[[Zurich]] |accessdate=2013-10-01}}</ref><ref name="wingia2">{{cite web |url=http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2015/04/13/399338834/new-survey-shows-the-worlds-most-and-least-religious-places |title=New Survey Shows the World's Most and Least Religious Places |author=<!--none specified--> |publisher=[[NPR]] |date=13 April 2015|accessdate=2015-04-29}}</ref> An older survey by the [[British Broadcasting Corporation|BBC]], in 2004, recorded atheists as comprising 8% of the world's population.<ref name="BBC-2004-demographics"/> Other older estimates have indicated that atheists comprise 2% of the world's population, while the [[Irreligion|irreligious]] add a further 12%.<ref name="eb2007-demographics"/> According to other studies, rates of atheism are among the highest in Western nations, again to varying degrees: the United States, for example, returned 4%,<ref name="Harris">{{cite web |url=http://www.harrisinteractive.com/news/allnewsbydate.asp?NewsID=1131 |title=Religious Views and Beliefs Vary Greatly by Country, According to the Latest Financial Times/Harris Poll |publisher=Financial Times/Harris Interactive |date=20 December 2006 |accessdate=2011-04-09}}</ref> while Canada returned 28%.<ref>http://www.pitzer.edu/academics/faculty/zuckerman/Zuckerman_on_Atheism.pdf</ref> The figures for a 2010 [[Eurobarometer]] survey in the [[European Union]] (EU), reported that 20% of the EU population claimed not to believe in "any sort of spirit, God or life force".<ref name="EU">{{cite book |author=<!--none specified--> |title=Social values, Science and Technology |publisher=Directorate General Research, European Union |year=2010 |pages=207 |url=http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_341_en.pdf |format=PDF |accessdate=2011-04-09 |archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20110430163128/http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_225_report_en.pdf |archivedate=2011-04-30 <!--DASHBot-->|deadurl=no}}</ref>
+
As of March 2025, data compiled by the [[Center for the Study of Global Christianity]] at [[Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary]] indicates that there are 831,000 fewer atheists in the world than a year ago.<ref>
 +
*[https://www.gordonconwell.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2025/01/Status-of-Global-Christianity-2025.pdf Status of Global Atheism/Christianity, 2025, in the Context of 1900–2050] (831,000 fewer atheists in the world than a year ago. See subsequent source)
 +
*[https://gordonconwell.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2019/04/StatusofGlobalChristianity20191.pdf Status of Global Atheism/Christianity/other religions, 2019, in the Context of 1900–2050]</ref> On March 15, 2024, Frontier Partners International reported concerning [[global atheism]]: "Simultaneously, atheism, which once saw a peak around 1970 with 165 million adherents, is on the decline. The current growth trend for atheism is -0.12 percent, with their number falling from 147 million in 2020 to 146 million in 2024."<ref>[https://www.frontierpartners.org/global-christianity-surges Global Christianity surges beyond projections in 2024], LiCAS.news • Mar 15, 2024, Frontiers Partners International, 2024</ref> The world's atheists have a below replacement level of births (See: [[Atheism and fertility rates]]). See also: [[Global atheism statistics]] and [[Desecularization]]
  
−
==Definitions and distinctions==
+
==Types of atheism==
−
[[File:AtheismImplicitExplicit3.svg|thumb|A diagram showing the relationship between the definitions of [[Weak and strong atheism|weak/strong]] and [[Implicit and explicit atheism|implicit/explicit]] atheism.
+
''See also:'' [[Schools of atheist thought]] and [[Atheist factions]]
 +
[[File:Diagoras of melos.jpg|thumbnail|150px|right|[[Diagoras of Melos]] was an [[Ancient Greece|ancient Greek]] atheist, poet and [[Sophism|Sophist]] of the 5th century BC.
 +
 
 +
See: [[History of Atheism|History of atheism]] ]]
 +
The [[History of Atheism|history of atheism]] can be dated as early as the 5th century B.C. [[Diagoras of Melos]] was a 5th-century B.C. [[Greek]] atheist, poet and [[Sophism|Sophist]]. Since then many [[schools of atheist thought]] have developed.
 +
 
 +
===Atheism and why do atheists state they disbelieve?===
 +
''See also:'' [[Weak Atheism|Weak atheism]] and [[Strong atheism]]
 +
 
 +
Atheists claim there are two main reasons for their denial of the existence of God and/or disbelief in God: the conviction that there is positive evidence or argument that God does not exist ([[strong atheism]], which is also sometimes called positive atheism), and their claim that [[theism|theists]] bear the burden of proof to show that God exists, that they have failed to do so, and that belief is therefore unwarranted ([[Weak Atheism|weak atheism]]).
 +
 
 +
As alluded to above, theists and others have posited a number of [[causes of atheism]] and this matter will be further addressed in this article.
 +
 
 +
=== Attempts to broaden the definition of atheism ===
 +
In 1876, [[Charles Bradlaugh]] proposed that atheism does not assert "there is no God," and by doing so he endeavored to dilute the traditional definition of atheism.<ref name="Divine"/><ref>
 +
*Discussion on Atheism: Report of a Public Discussion Between the Rev. Brewin Grant, B.A., and C. Bradlaugh, Esq., Held in South Place Chapel, Finsbury, London, on Tuesday Evenings, Commencing June 22, and Ending July 27, 1875, on the Question, "Is Atheism Or is Christianity the True Secular Gospel, as Tending to the Improvement and Happiness of Mankind in this Life by Human Efforts and Material Means.". Brewin Grant Charles Bradlaugh, January 1, 1890, Anti-liberation Society, page 10-12 [https://books.google.com/books?id=Dwk3yV5MOaAC&pg=PA10&lpg=PA10&dq=Charles+Bradlaugh+definition+of+atheism&source=bl&ots=JtjIlK7qaJ&sig=E0HjYgfEyKXdEA4zlLAd9m41cQU&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CEgQ6AEwB2oVChMIrcijucWLyAIVCXA-Ch00NACw#v=onepage&q=Charles%20Bradlaugh%20definition%20of%20atheism&f=false]
 +
</ref>  As noted above, in the latter portion of the 20th century, the proposition that the definition of atheism be defined as a mere lack of belief in God or gods began to be commonly advanced by agnostics/atheists.<ref name="Divine"/><ref>
 +
*[http://www.reasonablefaith.org/definition-of-atheism Definition of atheism] by [[William Lane Craig]]</ref>  It is now common for atheists/agnostics and theists to debate the meaning of the word atheism.<ref name="Divine"/><ref>
 +
*[http://www.apatheticagnostic.com/articles/meds2/med40/med796.html The Atheism Vs. Agnosticism “Debate”]
 +
*[http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/atheism Oxford Dictionaries]. Oxford Dictionaries, due to their British influence (Atheism is more popular in Britain than in the United States and many other countries where English is spoken, see: [[Atheist Population|Atheist population]] and [[Secular Europe]] and [[Atheism statistics]]), now offers the definition of atheism to be "Disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God or gods." which is a departure from its historical meaning before a broader definition of atheism began to be more widely advocated in the latter portion of the 20th century (see: [http://www.thedivineconspiracy.org/athart3.htm "Atheism - etymology"])</ref>
 +
 
 +
Critics of a broader definition of atheism as a mere lack of belief often point out that such a definition is contrary to the traditional/historical meaning of the word and that such a definition makes atheism indistinguishable from agnosticism.<ref name="CRI"/><ref name="Divine"/><ref>
 +
*[http://www.apatheticagnostic.com/articles/meds2/med40/med796.html The Atheism Vs. Agnosticism “Debate”]
 +
*[http://www.reasonablefaith.org/definition-of-atheism Definition of atheism] by [[William Lane Craig]]
 +
*[http://carm.org/cut-atheism Atheism] by Matt Slick
 +
</ref>
 +
 
 +
For more information, please see:
 +
 
 +
*[[Definition of atheism]]
 +
 
 +
*[[Definitions of Atheist and Agnostic|Definitions of atheist and agnostic]]
 +
 
 +
=== Some common types of atheism ===
 +
[[File:Stalin-140508 27880t.jpg|right|200px|thumb|[[Joseph Stalin]]'s atheistic regime killed tens of millions of people.
 +
 
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
See: [[Atheism and Mass Murder|Atheism and mass murder]] ]]
 +
Below are a few common ways that atheism manifests itself:
 +
 
 +
'''1.''' [[Militant atheism]], which continues to suppress and oppress religious believers today.
 +
 
 +
Topics related to militant atheism:
 +
 
 +
* [[Atheism and communism]]
 +
 
 +
* [[Atheism and intolerance]]
 +
 
 +
* [[New Atheism]]
 +
 
 +
* [[Atheism and dogmatism]]
 +
 
 +
* [[Atheism and open-mindedness]]
 +
 
 +
'''2.''' Philosophical atheism - Atheist philosophers assert that God does not exist. (See also: [[Naturalism (philosophy)|Naturalism]] and [[Materialism]])
 +
 
 +
[[Secular humanism]]  is a philosophy that holds that human beings are the most important figures, and that social problems are best solved without the involvement of religious doctrine.
 +
 
 +
The philosophy of [[postmodernism]] is atheistic (see: [[Atheism and postmodernism]]).
 +
 
 +
'''3.''' Atheistic [[Buddhism]] (some schools of Buddhism are [[theism|theistic]])
 +
 
 +
'''4.''' [[Practical atheism]]: atheism of the life - that is, ''living'' as though God does not exist.<ref>Dr. [[Martin Luther King]] in his sermon ''Rediscovering Lost Values'' spoke of "practical atheism".  King, Dr. Martin Luther (1954). [http://www.globatron.org/truth/rediscovering-lost-values-martin-luther-king-early-sermon "Rediscovering lost values"]</ref>
 +
 
 +
'''5.''' Other schools of atheist thought: [[Schools of atheist thought]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheist factions ===
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheist factions]] and [[Western atheism, schisms and political polarization]] and [[Atheist organizations]]
 +
 
 +
On July 24, 2020, the atheist [[PZ Myers]] wrote about atheism: "Deep rifts, ongoing fragmentation, and crumbling reputations seems to be the order of the day in atheism."<ref>[https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2020/07/24/i-dont-even-know-whats-going-on-in-atheism-anymore/ I don’t even know what’s going on in atheism anymore] by [[PZ Myers]]</ref> See also: [[Atheist factions]] and [[Atheist organizations and scandals]] and [[Atheist scandals]]
 +
[[File:Richard Dawkins Stockholm.JPG|alt=Richard Dawkins|thumbnail|250px|right|[[Richard Dawkins]] was a central figure in the [[Elevatorgate]] controversy.]]
 +
Jacques Rousseau wrote in the ''Daily Maverick'': "[[Elevatorgate]]..has resulted in three weeks of infighting in the secular community. Some might observe that we indulge in these squabbles fairly frequently."<ref>Rousseau, Jacques (July 13, 2011). [http://dailymaverick.co.za/opinionista/2011-07-13-sticks-and-stones-may-break-my-bones-but-words-can-rip-my-soul "Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words can rip my soul"]. Daily Maverick [South Africa].</ref> An ex-atheist wrote: "As an Atheist for 40 years, I noticed that there is not just a wide variety of [[Schools of atheist thought|Atheist positions]], but there exists an actual battle between certain [[Atheist factions]]."<ref>[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2013/04/internet-atheism-is-still-hostile.html "The atheist community and internet atheism is still a hostile wasteland"] (April 7, 2013).  Question Evolution Campaign [blog].</ref>
 +
 
 +
==== Atheist infighting ====
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheist movement]] and [[Atheism and anger]] and [[Atheists and conflict resolution]]
 +
 
 +
[[Blair Scott]] served on the [[American Atheists]] board of directors.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20140701062412/http://atheists.org/about-us/board-of-directors "Board of directors"] (July 1, 2014).  American Atheists</ref>  Mr. Scott formerly served as a State Director for the [[American Atheists]] organization in the state of [[Alabama]].  On December 1, 2012, he quit his post as a director of outreach for the American Atheists due to infighting within the American [[atheist movement]].<ref name="Blair Scott">Former 2012 web page at Atheist.org website entitled "An Open Letter from Blair Scott"</ref>
 +
 
 +
Mr. Blair wrote: "I have spent the last week mulling over what I want to do at this point in the movement. I’m tired of the in-fighting: at every level. I am especially tired of allowing myself to get sucked into it and engaging in the very behavior that is irritating...me."<ref name="Blair Scott"/>
 +
 
 +
The atheist Neil Carter wrote: "Friends of mine have noted lately how biting and critical the atheist community can be, not only toward outsiders, but even toward its own members. Has there ever been a subculture more prone to eating its own than this one? I really don’t know."<ref>[http://www.patheos.com/blogs/godlessindixie/2016/06/12/its-past-time-for-atheism-to-grow-up/ It’s Past Time for Atheism to Grow Up] by Neil Carter</ref>
 +
 
 +
The atheist [[David Smalley]] said about the atheist movement: "We're eating our own... We’re disintegrating."<ref name="patheos.com">[http://www.patheos.com/blogs/dogmadebate/2017/06/reasonably-controversial-regressive-left-killing-atheist-movement/ Reasonably Controversial: How the Regressive Left Is Killing the Atheist Movement] by David Smalley</ref>
 +
 
 +
{{See also|Antitheism and antisocial behavior}}
 +
 
 +
==== Atheist infighting causing fundraising difficulties ====
 +
[[File:Hemant Mehta at Skepticon 7.jpg|thumbnail|right|250px|The [[atheist]] [[Hemant Mehta]] said about raising money from fellow nonbelievers: "Meanwhile, I’ve had one hell of a time convincing people to give to the Foundation Beyond Belief — and I help lead that organization."
 +
<ref>[http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2014/01/08/a-few-thoughts-about-fundraising/ A Few Thoughts About Fundraising]</ref>
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
See also: [[Atheist organizations and fundraising]] and [[Atheism and charity]] ]]
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheist organizations and fundraising]] and [[Atheist fundraising vs. religious fundraising]] and [[Atheism and charity]]
 +
 
 +
In 2017, the [[atheist activist]] Lee Moore declared about [[American atheism|American atheist]] organizations:
 +
{{Cquote|If you look at the major atheist groups right now, like the national groups, the ones that are doing the real activist work... They are not bringing in the kind of donations they used to.  Most of them are starved for cash. They're downsizing left and right. Because people aren't just giving like they used to. And I talked to a lot of the major donors out there and they said, "Well, we're kind of tired of seeing the atheist community just fight amongst itself and not really get anything done. We'd rather not give money if we don't think it's going to go somewhere."<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QvG6LKUbOdk Lee Moore and Steve Shives Talk About the Future of the Atheist Movement]
 +
- video quote comes 21 minutes and 13 seconds into the video</ref>}}
 +
 
 +
==== Eddie Tabash on atheist argumentativeness ====
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism and social/interpersonal intelligence|Atheism and social intelligence]] and [[Atheism and emotional/intrapersonal intelligence|Atheism and emotional intelligence]]
 +
 
 +
The [[American atheism|American atheist]] activist [[Eddie Tabash]] said in a speech to the Michigan Atheists State Convention, "Since we are a bit of a cantankerous, opinionated lot...".<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ld9Rfw5HUs Atheists Speak Up - Eddie Tabash - Part 2 of 4]</ref>
 +
 
 +
==== Angry and bitter demeanor of militant atheists ====
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism and anger]] and [[Atheism and forgiveness|Atheism and unforgiveness]]
 +
 
 +
On January 1, 2011, [[CNN]] reported:
 +
{{cquote|People unaffiliated with organized religion, atheists and agnostics also report anger toward God either in the past, or anger focused on a hypothetical image - that is, what they imagined God might be like - said lead study author Julie Exline, Case Western Reserve University psychologist.
 +
 
 +
In studies on college students, atheists and agnostics reported more anger at God during their lifetimes than believers.<ref>Landau, Elizabeth (January 1, 2011).  [http://thechart.blogs.cnn.com/2011/01/01/anger-at-god-common-even-among-atheists/ "Anger at God common, even among atheists"].  CNN/The Chart website.</ref>}}
 +
[[File:Angry atheist.jpg|thumbnail|right|200px|An angry atheist speaking to a woman with a Bible in her hand.
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
The Christian philosopher James S. Spiegel says that the path from Christianity to atheism among several of his friends involved moral slippages such as resentment or unforgiveness.<ref>[http://www.christianpost.com/news/christian-philosopher-explores-causes-of-atheism-44353/ Christian Philosopher Explores Causes of Atheism]</ref> See:  [[Atheism and forgiveness|Atheism and unforgiveness]]]]
 +
According to Anthony DeStefano:
 +
{{cquote|But are (atheists) really dangerous, too?
 +
 
 +
You bet they are. The truth is, the atheist position is incapable of supporting any coherent system of morality other than ruthless social Darwinism. That’s why it has caused more deaths, murders and bloodshed than any other belief system in the history of the world.
 +
 
 +
Atheists, of course, are always claiming hysterically that Christianity has been responsible for most of the world’s wars, but that’s just another example of atheistic ignorance. The main reasons for war have always been economic gain, territorial gain, civil and revolutionary conflicts.  According to Philip Axelrod’s monumental "Encyclopedia of Wars," only 6.98 percent or all wars from 8000 BC to the present were religious in nature. If you subtract Islamic wars from the equation, only 3.2 percent of wars were due to specifically Christian causes.  That means that over 96 percent of all the wars on this planet were due to worldly reasons.<ref name="Today's atheists">[https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018/03/20/todays-atheists-are-bullies-and-are-doing-their-best-to-intimidate-rest-us-into-silence.html Today's atheists are bullies -- and they are doing their best to intimidate the rest of us into silence] at Fox News</ref>}}
 +
 
 +
Various studies found that traumatic events in people's lives have a positive correlation with "emotional atheism".<ref>Carter, Joe (January 12, 2011). [http://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2011/01/when-atheists-are-angry-at-god "When atheists are angry at God"].  First Things [The Institute on Religion and Public Life] website.</ref>
 +
 
 +
The atheist and [[lesbianism|lesbian]] [[Greta Christina]] told the journalist Chris Mooney on the Point of Inquiry podcast, "there isn't one emotion" that affects atheists "but anger is one of the emotions that many of us have ...[it] drives others to participate in the movement."<ref>Mooney, Chris (May 14, 2012).  [http://www.pointofinquiry.org/greta_christina_why_are_you_atheists_so_angry/ "Greta Christina—Why are you atheists so angry?"] [interview of Greta Christina] Point of Inquiry website.</ref>
 +
 
 +
Social science research indicates that [[Antitheism|antitheists]] score the highest among atheists when it comes to personality traits such as [[narcissism]], dogmatism, and anger.<ref>Multiple references:
 +
*[http://shadowtolight.wordpress.com/2013/07/18/science-shows-new-atheists-to-be-mean-and-closed-minded/ "Science shows new atheists to be mean and closed-minded"] (July 18, 2013).  Shadow to Light [blog].
 +
*Haidt, Jonathan (March 5, 2014).  [https://evolution-institute.org/article/why-sam-harris-is-unlikely-to-change-his-mind10/  "Why Sam Harris is unlikely to change his mind"]</ref>  Furthermore, they scored lowest when it comes to agreeableness and positive relations with others.<ref>[http://shadowtolight.wordpress.com/2013/07/18/science-shows-new-atheists-to-be-mean-and-closed-minded/ "Science shows new atheists to be mean and closed-minded"] (July 18, 2013).  Shadow to Light [blog].</ref>
 +
 
 +
For additional information, please see: [[Atheism and interpersonal intelligence|Atheism and social intelligence]] and  [[Atheism and emotional/intrapersonal intelligence|Atheism and emotional intelligence]] and [[Atheism and forgiveness|Atheism and unforgiveness]] and [[Atheism and bitterness]]
 +
 
 +
== Atheism and its retention rate in individuals ==
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism and its retention rate in individuals]] and [[Conversion from atheism to Christianity]] and [[Atheism and children]] and [[Desecularization]] and [[Atheism and apathy]]
 +
[[File:Georgetown 2.jpg|thumbnail|right|200px|In 2012, a [[Georgetown University]] study was published indicating that about 30 percent of those who grow up in an atheist household in the United States remain atheists as adults.<ref name="retention rate">Nazworth, Nap (July 11, 2012). [http://www.christianpost.com/news/study-atheists-have-lowest-retention-rate-compared-to-religious-groups-78029/ "Study: atheists have lowest 'retention rate' compared to religious groups"]. christianpost.com.</ref>
 +
 
 +
See: [[Atheism and its retention rate in individuals]] ]]
 +
In 2012, a [[Georgetown University]] study was published indicating that only about 30 percent of those who grow up in an atheist household remain atheists as adults.<ref name="retention rate"/>  See also: [[Atheism and children]]
 +
 
 +
A 2012 study by the General Social Survey of the social science research organization NORC at the University of Chicago found that belief in God rises with age, even in atheistic nations.<ref>Harms, William (April 18, 2012). [http://news.uchicago.edu/article/2012/04/18/belief-god-rises-age-even-atheist-nations "Belief in God rises with age, even in atheist nations".] UChicagoNews.</ref> The Pew Forum reports about [[American atheism|American atheists]]: "Among self-identified atheists and agnostics, the median age is 34, and roughly four-in-ten adults in these categories are between the ages of 18 and 29."<ref>[http://www.pewforum.org/2015/05/12/chapter-3-demographic-profiles-of-religious-groups/ Chapter 3: Demographic Profiles of Religious Groups], Pew Forum</ref> See also: [[Atheism and immaturity]].
 +
 
 +
In addition, in atheistic Communist China, [[Christianity]] is experiencing rapid growth (see: [[Growth of Christianity in China]]).  Also, there was a collapse of atheism in the former [[Soviet Union]] (see: [[Collapse of atheism in the former Soviet Union]]).
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
See also:
 +
 
 +
*[[Desecularization]]
 +
*[[Decline of the atheist movement]]
 +
*[[Atheism and inspiration]]
 +
*[[Atheist indoctrination]]
 +
 
 +
=== Difficulty in participating in atheist community ===
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism and loneliness]] and [[Atheism and apathy]] and [[Atheism and motivation]] and [[Internet atheism]]
 +
 
 +
According to an international study done by William Bainbridge, atheism is frequent among people whose interpersonal social obligations are weak and is also linked to lower fertility rates in advanced industrial nations (See also: [[Atheism and fertility rates]]).<ref>Bainbridge, William (2005). "[http://www.religjournal.com/pdf/ijrr01002.pdf Atheism]" (PDF). Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion. 1 (Article 2): 1–26.</ref> See also: [[Atheism and loneliness]] and [[Atheism and interpersonal intelligence|Atheism and social skills]]
 +
 
 +
In comparison to many religious groups, which have many meetings/conferences in numerous places in a given day or week that are convenient to attend, atheist meetings and [[atheist conferences]] are sparse.  One of the causes of this situation is the apathy of many atheists (see: [[Atheism and apathy]] and [[Atheism and motivation]]).
 +
 
 +
Most [[atheist organizations]] are relatively small in terms of active participants as most atheists are apathetic about organized atheism (see: [[Atheism and apathy]]). An exception is the [[Communist Party of China]], which requires its members be atheists (see: [[Atheism and China]] and [[Atheism and communism]]). At the same time, due to the explosive [[growth of Christianity in China]], there are now more Christians in China than Chinese who belong to the Communist Party of China (see also: [[East Asia and global desecularization]]).<ref>[https://www.dw.com/en/in-xi-we-trust-is-china-cracking-down-on-christianity/a-42224752 In Xi we trust - Is China cracking down on Christianity?], DW News</ref>
 +
 
 +
In recent times, the number of people attending atheist conferences has grown smaller.<ref>[http://www.patheos.com/blogs/tippling/2017/07/13/10923/ Whoever I Don’t Like Is Ruining the Atheist Movement] by Jeremiah Traeger
 +
*[http://www.patheos.com/blogs/dogmadebate/2017/06/reasonably-controversial-regressive-left-killing-atheist-movement/ Reasonably Controversial: How the Regressive Left Is Killing the Atheist Movement] by David Smalley
 +
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=luT2vQ3ctKU #ReasonRally Crash n burn. Thanks SJWs!] by [[Thunderf00t]]</ref> Atheist [[David Smalley]] wrote: "And we wonder why we’re [[Atheism and politics|losing elections]], [[Atheist fundraising vs. religious fundraising#Atheist organizations and fundraising|losing funding]], and our conferences are getting smaller."<ref name="patheos.com"/> In 2017, the atheist activist Lee Moore said about atheist conferences, "Most conferences are gone now. They're either gone or in some kind of life support form."<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QvG6LKUbOdk Lee Moore and Steve Shives Talk About the Future of the Atheist Movement], video, quote comes at the 11 minute and 44 seconds point of the video</ref>
 +
 
 +
[[File:Jerry Coyne at The Amazing Meeting - 2013.jpg|thumbnail|right|200px|[[Jerry Coyne]] speaking at a 2013 [[Atheist conferences|atheist meeting]] entitled The Amazing Meeting (TAM). TAM is an annual meeting. ]]
 +
Atheist Francois Tremblay wrote about the difficulty of motivating atheists to engage in activities related to atheism: "One last problem that undermines any propagation of atheism is inspiration. Let's be honest here, "there is no god!" is not a very motivating call for most people." (see also: [[Atheism and inspiration]]).<ref>[http://www.liberator.net/articles/TremblayFrancois/herdingcats.html Herding Cats: Why Atheism Will Lose] by Francois Tremblay</ref>  The atheist [[Jerry Coyne]] said about atheist meetings/conferences, "But to me the speakers and talks have often seemed repetitive: the same crew of jet-set skeptics giving the same talks."<ref>[https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2011/06/10/are-there-too-many-atheist-meetings/ Are there too many atheist meetings?] by Jerry Coyne</ref>
 +
 
 +
In an essay entitled ''How the [[Atheist movement|Atheist Movement]] Failed Me'', an [[atheism and women|atheist woman]] noted that participation in the atheist community is often expensive due to the cost of attending [[atheist conferences]] and even local atheist meetings in restaurants and bars challenged her modest budget.<ref>Amanda (August 10, 2012).  [http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2012/08/10/how-the-atheist-movement-failed-me-part-1-cost/ "How the atheist movement failed me–part 1: cost"].  Friendly Atheist blog.</ref>  As a result of the challenges that atheists commonly have in terms of socializing in person, many atheists [[Internet atheism|turn to the internet]] in terms of communicating with other atheists.<ref>Norris, Chuck (May 21, 2007).  [https://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55789 "How to outlaw Christianity (steps 2 & 3)"].  WorldNetDaily. See: [[Chuck Norris]].</ref> Often internet communication between atheists turns contentious (see: [[Atheist factions]]).
 +
 
 +
[[Christianity|Christian]] organizations have been significantly more successful than [[atheist organizations]] as far as evangelizing via the internet (see: [[Internet evangelism: Christians vs. atheists]] and [[Internet atheism]]). Beginning sometime between 2008 and 2012, there has been a big decline in [[internet atheism]] in terms of web traffic (See: [[Internet atheism web traffic volume]]).<ref name="questionevolution.blogspot.com">[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/05/internet-atheism-and-skepticism-thrill.html Internet atheism: The thrill is gone!]</ref>
 +
 
 +
For more information, please see: [[Atheism and loneliness]]
 +
 
 +
=== Abandonment of atheism and communist regimes ===
 +
*[[Growth of Christianity in China]]
 +
*[[Collapse of atheism in the former Soviet Union]]
 +
*[[Collapse of atheism in the former Soviet Union#Growth of Protestantism in Russia|Growth of Protestantism/Evangelicalism in Russia]]
 +
 
 +
== Decline of the atheist movement ==
 +
''See also:'' [[Decline of the atheist movement]] and [[Morale of the atheist movement]] and [[Desecularization]] and [[Atheist movement]]
 +
 
 +
[[File:Jacques Berlinerblau.jpg|thumbnail|250px|right|In 2011, atheist [[Jacques Berlinerblau]] declared: "The Golden Age of [[Secularism]] has passed."<ref name="chronicle.com">Berlinerblau, Jacques (February 4, 2011).  [http://chronicle.com/blogs/brainstorm/obama-at-the-national-prayer-breakfast-raging-christ-fest-secular-wake/31816 "Obama at the National Prayer Breakfast"].  The Chronicle of Higher Education/Brainstorm blog.  Retrieved on May 29, 2015.</ref>]]
 +
Numerous atheists have declared that the "[[atheist movement]] is dead" or that it is dying.<ref>
 +
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20190208025358/https://freethoughtblogs.com/reasoner/2017/10/21/the-atheism-movement-dead-or-alive/ The “Atheism Movement:” Dead or Alive?], [[Freethought Blogs]]
 +
*[http://examiningatheism.blogspot.com/2017/11/seth-andrews-keeps-hearing-reports-of.html Atheist activist Seth Andrews keeps seeing reports on social media and the media that the atheist movement is dying], ''Examining Atheism''
 +
*[http://examiningatheism.blogspot.com/2017/10/now-that-that-poseur-atheist-aron-ra.html Atheist Aron Ra indicates the atheist movement is dead. Now that that Aron Ra has surrendered....], ''[[Examining Atheism]]''
 +
*[http://www.atheistrev.com/2013/12/the-day-atheist-movement-died.html The Day the Atheist Movement Died] by Jack Vance at Atheist Revolution
 +
*[https://twitter.com/jennifurret/status/405391218273554433 Jennifer McCreight on Twitter about the Elevatorgate scandal destroying the atheist movement], [[Jen McCreight]], Twitter
 +
*[https://freethoughtblogs.com/atrivialknot/2019/03/26/the-ghost-of-atheist-past/ The ghost of atheist past], Freethought Blogs, 2015</ref> See: [[Decline of the atheist movement]]
 +
 
 +
Before the atheist movement died/declined, various atheists attempted to change the public's perception concerning atheism and atheists, but they were largely unsuccessful (see: [[Attempts to positively rebrand atheism]]).
 +
 
 +
At the 2018 [[American Atheists]] convention, the ex-president of the [[American Atheists]] organization [[David Silverman]] declared regarding the [[Morale of the atheist movement|atheist movement being in a demoralized state]]:
 +
{{Cquote|It is a hard time to be [[Atheist activist|an atheist activist]]. This has affected us. And it has affected our community...
 +
 
 +
...it has really affected us. We are suffering a level of [[defeatism]] that I have never seen before...
 +
 
 +
We feel the loss. And we feel like we have lost. We feel like [[Donald Trump and American atheists|we lost the election]]... We see this cascade of attack coming down at us over and over from all different directions and we feel like it's over. I have heard so many times it makes me sick. It makes me sad. It feels like we lost.
 +
 
 +
The [[Atheism and apathy|apathy that follows]]. It doesn't matter. We can't win anyways. It's useless to fight. This apathy is infecting us. It's hurting us.
 +
 
 +
And people are reacting to each other now. And so that is [[Atheist factions|causing a division]]. Lots and lots of division in our movement. Hard, bad division... And that has resulted in a splintering and factioning of the movement that I have never seen before and none of us have.
 +
 
 +
In other words, we're in a bad situation and it's getting worse.<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8VYLMYvImc David Silverman - How the Mighty Get Back Up]</ref>}}
 +
 
 +
In 2017, atheist [[David Smalley]] has indicated that [[leftism|leftist]]/[[progressivism|progressive]] atheists were "killing the atheist movement" through being contentious and divisive (see also: [[Atheist factions]]).<ref name="patheos.com"/>  Former [[New Atheism|new atheist]] [[PZ Myers]], who subscribes to progressive politics, says he is no longer a member of the atheist movement.<ref>[https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2017/08/26/get-out-a-message-for-the-atheist-movement/ Get Out! A message for the atheist movement] by PZ Myers</ref>
 +
 
 +
The atheist movement saw a number of setbacks during the latter portion of the 20th century and beyond in terms of historical events/trends (See: [[Causes of desecularization]]).  As a result, it has lost a considerable amount of confidence (see also: [[Decline of the atheist movement]] and [[Atheists and the endurance of religion]]).
 +
 
 +
Globally, the [[atheist population]] is declining in terms of the percentage of the world's population that are atheists (see: [[Global atheism statistics]]).
 +
 
 +
==Atheism and Communism ==
 +
''see also:'' [[Atheism and communism]] and [[Militant atheism]] and [[Atheism and economics]] and [[Atheism and Mass Murder|Atheism and mass murder]] and [[Atheist cults]] and [[Atheism and Karl Marx]]
 +
 
 +
[[Image:Khvhkgfiy.jpg|left|thumbnail|200px|[[Vladimir Lenin]]]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheists Karl Marx, Vladmir Lenin and Chou En-lai ===
 +
[[Karl Marx]] said "[Religion] is the opium of the people."  Marx also stated: "[[Communism]] begins from the outset (Owen) with atheism; but atheism is at first far from being communism; indeed, that atheism is still mostly an abstraction."<ref>Mulligan, Martin (1959). [http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/manuscripts/comm.htm "Private property and communism"] translation of Marx, Karl (1932), ''Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844'' (Moscow:  Progress Publishers).</ref>
 +
 
 +
[[Vladimir Lenin]] similarly wrote regarding atheism and Communism: "A Marxist must be a [[materialism|materialist]], i.e., an enemy of religion, but a dialectical materialist, i.e., one who treats the struggle against religion not in an abstract way, not on the basis of remote, purely theoretical, never varying preaching, but in a concrete way, on the basis of the [[class struggle]] which is going on in practice and is educating the masses more and better than anything else could."<ref>Rothstein, Andrew and Issacs, Bernard (1973). [http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1909/may/13.htm "The attitude of the worker's party to religion"] translation of Lenin, Vladimir (1909), ''Proletary'', No. 45, May 13 (26), ''Collected Works'', (Moscow: Progress Publishers) vol. 15, pp. 402-13.</ref>
 +
 
 +
In 1955, the [[China|Chinese]] Communist leader Chou En-lai declared, "We Communists are atheists".<ref>Noebel, David, The Battle for Truth, Harvest House, 2001.</ref> 
 +
 
 +
In 2014, the Communist Party of China reaffirmed that members of their party must be atheists.<ref>
 +
*[https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/asia/item/19567-china-s-communist-party-reaffirms-marxism-maoism-atheism China’s Communist Party Reaffirms Marxism, Maoism, Atheism], ''New American'', 2014
 +
*[https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/02/china-communist-party-atheism-zhejiang-ban-religious-members-christianity_n_6599722.html China's Communist Party Bans Believers, Doubles Down On Atheism]</ref>
 +
 
 +
In 2016, the ''International Business Times'' reported:
 +
{{cquote|A senior Chinese advisor on religious affairs has said the country should promote atheism throughout society, in remarks that appear to reflect a deepening campaign to reinforce traditional Marxist values in China — and could add to concern about official attitudes among believers in the country’s five officially recognized religions.<ref>[http://www.ibtimes.com/senior-chinese-religious-advisor-calls-promotion-atheism-society-2363850 Senior Chinese Religious Advisor Calls For Promotion Of Atheism In Society], ''International Business Times''</ref>}}
 +
 
 +
=== Russian Revolution caused the most notable spread of atheism ===
 +
According to the [[University of Cambridge]], historically, the "most notable spread of atheism was achieved through the success of the 1917 [[Russian Revolution]], which brought the [[Marxism-Leninism|Marxist-Leninists]] to power."<ref name="Marxism-Leninism">{{cite web|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130728215151/http://www.investigatingatheism.info/marxism.html|title=Investigating atheism: Marxism|publisher = [[University of Cambridge]]|quote=The most notable spread of atheism was achieved through the success of the 1917 Russian Revolution, which brought the Marxist-Leninists to power. For the first time in history, atheism thus became the official ideology of a state.|year=2008|accessdate=July 17, 2014}}</ref>
 +
 
 +
Vitalij Lazarʹevič Ginzburg, a Soviet physicist, wrote that the "[[Bolshevik]] communists were not merely atheists but, according to [[Lenin]]'s terminology, militant atheists."<ref name="Lenin & militant atheism">{{cite book|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=ufC9Ar8iuDcC&pg=PA161&dq=The+Bolshevik+communists+were+not+merely+atheists+but,+according+to+Lenin%27s+terminology,+militant+atheists.&hl=en&sa=X&ei=1oFUUdj6PIiK0QGvq4CAAw&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=The%20Bolshevik%20communists%20were%20not%20merely%20atheists%20but%2C%20according%20to%20Lenin's%20terminology%2C%20militant%20atheists.&f=false|title =''On Superconductivity and Superfluidity: A Scientific Autobiography'' |author=Vitalij Lazarʹevič Ginzburg|publisher = Springer Science+Business Media|pages=161|year=2009|quote=The Bolshevik communists were not merely atheists but, according to Lenin's terminology, militant atheists.|accessdate = July 17, 2014}}</ref> However, prior to this, the [[Reign of Terror]] of the [[French Revolution]] established a state which was anti-[[Roman Catholicism]]/Christian in nature <ref>Multiple references:
 +
*Tallet, Frank and Atkin, Nicholas (1991). [https://books.google.com/books?id=aL4lsWdd-rAC&dq=&hl=en ''Religion, Society and Politics in France Since 1789''] (London: A & C Black), pp. 1-17. GoogleBooks archive.
 +
*Spielvogel, Jackson J. (2006).  [https://books.google.com/books?id=ni4PSpOxb6MC&dq ''Western Civilization: Combined Volume''] (Belmont, CA:  Thomson Wadsworth), p. 549.  GoogleBooks archive.
 +
*Latreille, A. (2002).  "French Revolution", ''New Catholic Encyclopedia'' (2nd ed., Farmington Hills, MI:  Thomson/Gale), vol. 5, pp. 972–973.  ISBN 0-7876-4004-2</ref> (anti-clerical [[deism]] and anti-religious atheism and played a significant role in the French Revolution<ref>Multiple references:
 +
*Hunt, Lynn and Censer, Jack (2001).  [https://web.archive.org/web/20140905120047/http://chnm.gmu.edu/revolution/chap7c.html "War, Terror and Resistence", ch. 7, p. 3].  Liberty, Equality, Fraternity:  Exploring the French Revolution website.  George Mason University website/Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media website.
 +
*O'Leary, Margaret R. (June 1, 2012).  ''Forging Freedom: The Life of Cerf Berr of M Delsheim'' (iUniverse), pp. 1-2.</ref>), with the official ideology being the [[Cult of Reason]]; during this time thousands of believers were suppressed and executed by the [[guillotine]].<ref>Multiple notes:
 +
<!-- Guillotine -->*{{cite web|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=bf3m7IVAa9gC&pg=PA461&dq=France+atheism+guillotine++Christians+executed&hl=en&sa=X&ei=l4lUUaTRBufG0QGe0IHACA&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=France%20atheism%20guillotine%20%20Christians%20executed&f=false|title =''Christianity: The eBook''|last=Adair|first=James|publisher = JBE Online Books|year=2007|quote=Although the Civil Constitution called for religious liberty, which was extended to Jews as well as Christians, many revolutionaries pushed for the establishment of a new state religion, either the Cult of Reason (atheists) or the Cult of the Supreme Being (Deists). Changes to the calendar eliminated references to Christian holidays, and even the ancient seven-day week, and a list of officially recognized saints included such famous thinkers such as Socrates, Jesus, Marcus Aurelius, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. A period of political persecution, often with religious overtones, broke out, known as the Reign of Terror. Thousands of people were executed by the guillotine, including many of the original leaders of the French Revolution.|pages=461|accessdate = July 18, 2014}}
 +
:
 +
<!-- France -->*{{cite web|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=9WkBAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA105&dq=Reign+of+Terror+atheism&hl=en&sa=X&ei=HoRUUcD0NeXX0gGNo4HIDQ&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Reign%20of%20Terror%20atheism&f=false|title =''Memoirs of the Reign of George III. to the Session of Parliament ending A.D. 1793'', Volume 5|page=105|first=William|last=Belsham|publisher = G.G. & J. Robinson|year=1801|quote=In allusion to the monstrous transactions of this portentous period, it has been eloquently and energetically observed, 'that the reign of atheism in France was avowed the reign of terror. In the full madness of their career, in the highest climax of their horrors, they shut up the temples of God, abolished His worship, and proclaimed death to be an eternal sleep:—in the very centre of Christendom, Revelation underwent a total eclipse, while atheism, performing on a darkened theatre its strange and fearful tragedy, confounded the first elements of society, blended every age, rank, and sex, in indiscriminate proscription and massacre, and convulsed all Europe to its centre, that the imperishable memorial of these events might teach the last generations of mankind to consider religion as the pillar of society, the parent of social order, and the safe-guard of nations.'
 +
:"It is wonderful that, amid the horrors of this dismal period, while 'the death dance of democratic revolution' was still in rapid movement, among the tears of affliction, and the cries of despair, 'the masque, the song, the theatric scene, the buffoon laughter, went on as regularly as in the gay hour of festive peace.'|pages=105–6|accessdate = July 18, 2014}}<!-- Reign of Terror -->
 +
:
 +
*{{cite book no ws|title=Christianity, Islam, and Atheism: The Struggle for the Soul of the West|first=William|last=Kilpatrick|location=San Francisco, CA|publisher=Ignatius Press|year=2012|url=https://books.google.com?id=Tt5rqiCP1p8C&pg=PA57&dq=Reign+of+Terror+atheism&hl=en&sa=X&ei=HoRUUcD0NeXX0gGNo4HIDQ&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Reign%20of%20Terror%20atheism&f=false|quote=Actually, it's helpful to think in terms of two Enlightenments: the Enlightenment that was nourished by Christianity and the Enlightenment that cut itself off from God. The former led to the American Revolution, the Declaration of Independence, the abolition of slavery, and the civil rights movement. The latter led to the French Revolution, the Reign of Terror, the suppression of church by state, and the godless philosophies of Marx and Nietzsche and their offspring—National Socialism and communism. More recently the abandonment of God has led to the regime of cultural relativism that regards rights as arbitrary constructs.
 +
:"It's this second Enlightenment tradition that Cardinal Ratzinger referred to when he wrote, 'The radical detachment of the Enlightenment philosophy from its roots ultimately leads it to dispense with man.' Actually this transition happened not 'ultimately' but almost immediately. The first instance occurred when Enlightenment worship of abstract 'reason' and 'liberty' degenerated quickly into the mass murders committed during the antireligious Reign of Terror in France. 'Liberty, what crimes are committed in your name', said Madame Roland as she faced the statue of Liberty in the Place de la Revolution moments before her death at the guillotine. She was one of the early victims of a succession of secular systems based on rootless notions of 'liberty', 'equality', and 'reason'.
 +
:"As many historians have pointed out, the atheist regimes of modern times are guilty of far more crimes than any committed in the name of religion. Communist governments alone were guilty of more than one hundred million murders, most of them committed against their own people.|pages=p. 57|accessdate = July 18, 2014}}</ref>
 +
 
 +
=== Atheistic Communism and mass murder ===
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism and Mass Murder|Atheism and mass murder]] and [[Atheist atrocities]]
 +
[[File:Stalin-Lenin.jpg|right|202px|thumb|The militant atheistic regime of [[Joseph Stalin]] killed tens of millions of people.
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
Joseph Stalin is the figure on the right and [[Vladimir Lenin]] is the figure on the left,
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
See: [[Atheism and Mass Murder|Atheism and mass murder]] ]]
 +
It has been estimated that in less than the past 100 years, governments under the banner of Communism have caused the death of somewhere between 40,472,000 and 259,432,000 human lives.<ref>Multiple references:
 +
*[http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~hpcws/lelivrenoir.htm "''The Black Book of Communism''"].  Harvard University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences website:  Cold War Studies. 
 +
*Rummel, R. J. (November 1993).  [http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/COM.ART.HTM "How many did communist regimes murder?"]  University of Hawaii website; Freedom, Democracy, Peace; Power, Democide, and War
 +
*White, Matthew (February 2011).  [http://necrometrics.com/20c5m.htm "Source list and detailed death tolls for the primary megadeaths of the twentieth century"].  Necrometrics
 +
*Radosh, Ronald (February 2000).  [http://www.firstthings.com/article.php3?id_article=2526 "''The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression''"]. First Things [journal] website.</ref> Dr. R. J. Rummel, professor emeritus of political science at the University of Hawaii, is the scholar who first coined the term democide (death by government). Dr. R. J. Rummel's mid estimate regarding the loss of life due to communism is that communism caused the death of approximately 110,286,000 people between 1917 and 1987.<ref>Rummel, R. J. (November 1993).  [http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/COM.ART.HTM "How many did communist regimes murder?"]  University of Hawaii website; Freedom, Democracy, Peace; Power, Democide, and War.</ref> [[Richard Dawkins]] has attempted to [[Richard Dawkins, atheist atrocities, and historical revisionism|engage in historical revisionism concerning atheist atrocities]] and Dawkins was shown to be in gross error. See also: [[Atheism and historical revisionism]]
 +
 
 +
Christian apologist Gregory Koukl wrote relative to [[Atheism and Mass Murder|atheism and mass murder]] that "the assertion is that religion has caused most of the killing and bloodshed in the world.
 +
There are people who make accusations and assertions that are empirically false. This is one of them."<ref name="Koukl">Koukl, Gregory (February 20, 2013). [https://www.str.org/articles/the-real-murderers-atheism-or-christianity#.XdaqONVOk2w "The real murderers:  atheism or Christianity?"] Stand to Reason.</ref>
 +
Koukl details the number of people killed in various events involving theism and compares them to the much higher tens of millions of people killed under regimes that advocated atheism.<ref name="Koukl" />  As noted earlier, Richard Dawkins has attempted to [[Richard Dawkins, atheist atrocities, and historical revisionism|engage in historical revisionism concerning atheist atrocities]] and Dawkins was shown to be in gross error.
 +
 
 +
Koukl summarized by stating:
 +
{{cquote|It is true that it's possible that religion can produce evil, and generally when we look closer at the detail it produces evil because the individual people are actually living in a rejection of the tenets of Christianity and a rejection of the God that they are supposed to be following. So it can produce it, but the historical fact is that outright rejection of God and institutionalizing of atheism actually does produce evil on incredible levels. We're talking about tens of millions of people as a result of the rejection of God.<ref name="Koukl" />}}
 +
 
 +
Theodore Beale notes concerning atheism and mass murder:
 +
{{cquote|Apparently it was just an amazing coincidence that every Communist of historical note publicly declared his atheism … .there have been twenty-eight countries in world history that can be confirmed to have been ruled by regimes with avowed atheists at the helm … These twenty-eight historical regimes have been ruled by eighty-nine atheists, of whom more than half have engaged in democidal acts of the sort committed by Stalin and [[Mao Zedong|Mao]] …
 +
 
 +
The total body count for the ninety years between 1917 and 2007 is approximately 148 million dead at the bloody hands of fifty-two atheists, three times more than all the human beings killed by war, civil war, and individual crime in the entire twentieth century combined.
 +
 
 +
The historical record of collective atheism is thus 182,716 times worse on an annual basis than Christianity’s worst and most infamous misdeed, the Spanish Inquisition. It is not only Stalin and Mao who were so murderously inclined, they were merely the worst of the whole [[Atheism and Hell|Hell]]-bound lot. For every Pol Pot whose infamous name is still spoken with horror today, there was a Mengistu, a Bierut, and a Choibalsan, godless men whose names are now forgotten everywhere but in the lands they once ruled with a red hand.
 +
 
 +
Is a 58 percent chance that an atheist leader will murder a noticeable percentage of the population over which he rules sufficient evidence that atheism does, in fact, provide a systematic influence to do bad things? If that is not deemed to be conclusive, how about the fact that the average atheist crime against humanity is 18.3 million percent worse than the very worst depredation committed by Christians, even though atheists have had less than one-twentieth the number of opportunities with which to commit them. If one considers the statistically significant size of the historical atheist set and contrasts it with the fact that not one in a thousand religious leaders have committed similarly large-scale atrocities, it is impossible to conclude otherwise, even if we do not yet understand exactly why this should be the case. Once might be an accident, even twice could be coincidence, but fifty-two incidents in ninety years reeks of causation!<ref name="marry">Ammi, Ken (June 11, 2009).  [https://creation.com/atheism "Atheism"].  Creation Ministries International.</ref>}}
 +
[[File:Xi in Maoist outfit.PNG|thumbnail|right|390px|[[Xi Jinping]] is the current General Secretary of the Communist Party of China which requires that all their members be atheists.<ref>[https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/asia/item/19567-china-s-communist-party-reaffirms-marxism-maoism-atheism China’s Communist Party Reaffirms Marxism, Maoism, Atheism], New American, 2014</ref>
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
See: [[China and atheism]] and [[Atheism and communism]] ]]
 +
See also:
 +
 
 +
*[[Militant atheism]]
 +
*[[Atheism and communism]]
 +
*[[Soviet Union and morality]]
 +
*[[Secular left]]
 +
*[[Atheism and politics]]
 +
 
 +
=== Communism and religious oppression ===
 +
''See also:'' [[Communism and religious persecution]] and [[Atheistic communism and torture]] and [[Atheism and forced labor]] and [[China and involuntary organ harvesting]]
 +
 
 +
The atheism in Communist regimes has been and continues to be militant atheism and various acts of repression including the razing of thousands of religious buildings and the killing, imprisoning, and oppression of religious leaders and believers.<ref>Multiple references:
 +
*Kent, Jo Ling (April 28, 2011). [https://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/asiapcf/04/28/china.church.crackdown/index.html?hpt=T2 "Underground Christians fear China crackdown"]. CNN.com
 +
*Yakovlev, Alexander N. (2002). [https://books.google.com/books?visbn=0300103220&id=ChRk43tVxTwC&pg=PA165&lpg=PA165&ots=ICIxg28Jud&dq=a+century+of+violence+in+soviet+russia+the+Russian+Orthodox+clergy&ie=ISO-8859-1&sig=C9k9Hr7Vn222WCHf_1iSJOHVsgo#v=onepage&q=&f=false ''A Century of Violence in Soviet Russia''] translated by Austin, Anthony (New Haven: Yale University Press), p. 165. 
 +
*Braga, Fr. Roman (1996). [http://www.orthodoxinfo.com/ecumenism/frroman1.aspx "On compromise in the hierarchy during the Communist yoke"].  Orthodox Christian Information Center. 
 +
*Clyne, Meghan (November 16, 2005). [https://www.nysun.com/article/23082?page_no=1 "Korean reds targeting Christians"]. The New York Sun
 +
*Siemon-Netto, Uwe (May 7, 2003). [http://northkoreanchristians.com/chinese-atrocities.html "North Korean and Chinese atrocities against Christians worsen"].  NewsMax.  NorthKoreanChristians.com
 +
*[http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=35818 "China sends Bible owners to labor camp"] (November 26, 2003). WorldNetDaily.
 +
*[http://www.epm.org/resources/2003/Jun/12/chinese-police-proudly-record-their-torture-christ/ Chinese Police Proudly Record Their Torture of Christians], By Voice of the Marytrs|June 12, 2003</ref> 
 +
 
 +
==== Religious persecution in the Soviet Union ====
 +
''See also:'' [[Soviet atheism]]
 +
 
 +
The [[persecution of Christians in the USSR|persecution of Christians in the Soviet Union]] was the result of the violently atheist [[Soviet]] government.  In the first five years after the [[October Revolution]], 28 bishops and 1,200 priests were murdered, many on the orders of [[Leon Trotsky]].  When [[Joseph Stalin]] came to power in 1927, he ordered his secret police, under [[Genrikh Yagoda]] to intensify persecution of Christians.  In the next few years, 50,000 clergy were murdered, many were [[torture]]d, including [[crucifixion]].  "Russia turned red with the blood of martyrs", said Father Gleb Yakunin of the [[Russian Orthodox Church]].<ref>Ostling, Richard N. (December 4, 1989).  [http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,150718,00.html "Cross meets Kremlin: Gorbachev and Pope John Paul II"]. ''Time''. Time magazine website.</ref>  According to Orthodox Church sources, as many as fifty million Orthodox believers may have died in the twentieth century, mainly from persecution by [[Communists]].<ref>Moore, Rev. Fr. Raphael (October 1999). [http://www.serfes.org/printerVersion2.asp?URL=/orthodox/memoryof.htm "In memory of the 50 million victims of the Orthodox Christian Holocaust"], Spiritual Nourishment for the Soul, Serfes, Rev. Archimandrite Nektarios, compiler.</ref>
 +
[[File:China location.png|thumbnail|left|205px|With its large population, China has the largest population of atheists.<ref name=20Zuck>[http://www.thechapmans.nl/news/Atheist.pdf "Top 20 Countries With Largest Numbers of Atheists / Agnostics (Zuckerman, 2005)"] (November 28, 2007). ''The Largest Atheist/Agnostic Populations''. Chris & Terri Chapman website (March 19, 2013 or bef.), first publication date at website from archive at Internet Archive.</ref>
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
The religious landscape of China is quickly changing, however, due to the rapid growth of Christianity. See also: [[China and atheism]] and [[Global atheism]] ]]
 +
In addition, in the atheistic and Communist Soviet Union, 44 anti-religious museums were opened and the largest was the 'The Museum of the History of Religion and Atheism' in [[Leningrad]]’s Kazan Cathedral.<ref>Humphrey (December 16, 2008). [http://bedejournal.blogspot.com/2008/12/merry-anti-christmas.html "Merry Anti-Christmas!"] Quodlibeta.</ref>  Despite intense effort by the atheistic leaders of the Soviet Union, their efforts were not effective in converting the masses to atheism.<ref>Multiple references:
 +
*Humphrey (December 16, 2008). [http://bedejournal.blogspot.com/2008/12/merry-anti-christmas.html "Merry Anti-Christmas!"] Quodlibeta.
 +
*Froese, Paul (March 2004). [http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bpl/jssr/2004/00000043/00000001/art00003?crawler=true "Forced secularization in Soviet Russia:  why an atheistic monopoly failed" [abstract&#93;].  ''Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion'', vol. 43, 1, pp. 35-50.  Abstract: Ingentaconnect</ref>
 +
 
 +
====  Religious persecution in Communist China ====
 +
''See also:'' [[China and atheism]]
 +
 
 +
[[China]] has the world's largest atheist population (see: [[China and atheism]]).<ref>Double reference:
 +
*[http://www.thechapmans.nl/news/Atheist.pdf "Top 20 Countries With Largest Numbers of Atheists / Agnostics (Zuckerman, 2005)"] (November 28, 2007). ''The Largest Atheist/Agnostic Populations''. Chris & Terri Chapman website (March 19, 2013 or bef.), first publication date at website from archive at Internet Archive.
 +
*[https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/05/23/a-surprising-map-of-where-the-worlds-atheists-live/ A surprising map of where the world’s atheists live], ''Washington Post'' By Max Fisher and Caitlin Dewey May 23, 2013</ref>  China is a Communist country. In 1999, the publication [[Christian Century]] reported that "China has persecuted religious believers by means of harassment, prolonged detention, and incarceration in prison or 'reform-through-labor' camps and police closure of places of worship." In 2003, owners of [[Bible]]s in China were sent to prison camps and 125 Chinese churches were closed.<ref>[http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=35818 "China sends Bible owners to labor camp"] (November 26, 2003). ''WorldNetDaily''.</ref>  China continues to practice religious oppression today.<ref>[http://www.epm.org/resources/2003/Jun/12/chinese-police-proudly-record-their-torture-christ/ Chinese Police Proudly Record Their Torture of Christians], By Voice of the Martyrs|June 12, 2003</ref> 
 +
 
 +
The efforts of China's atheist leaders in promoting atheism, however, are increasingly losing their effectiveness and the number of Christians in China is rapidly growing (see: [[Growth of Christianity in China]]).  China's state-sponsored atheism and atheistic indoctrination have been a failure and a 2007 religious survey in China indicated that only 15% of Chinese identified themselves as atheists.<ref>Briggs, David (January 23, 2011).  [http://life.nationalpost.com/2011/01/23/huffington-post-chinas-state-sponsored-atheism-a-failure/ "Huffington Post: China’s state-sponsored atheism a failure" [excerpt&#93;].  National Post website.</ref>
 +
[[File:Martyred in the USSR Poster.jpg|thumbnail|right|200px|The above photograph shows the Russian Nikolai Khmara, a new Baptist convert in the [[Soviet Union]], after his arrest by the [[KGB]]. He was tortured to death and his tongue was cut out.<ref>[http://martyredintheussr.com/ Martyred in the USSR]</ref><ref>[http://www.anabaptists.org/books/russians/trs-1.html The Russians' Secret by Peter Hoover with Serguei V. Petrov, Speaking Without a Tongue, Chapter 1 (Pages 1-3)]</ref> ]]
 +
Researchers estimate that tens of thousands of [[Falun Gong]] prisoners in Communist China have been killed to supply a financially lucrative trade in human organs and cadavers, and that these human rights abuses may be an ongoing concern.<ref>[http://www.nyjournalofbooks.com/book-review/slaughter-mass-killings-organ-harvesting Review of: Ethan Gutmann, “''The Slaughter: Mass Killings, Organ Harvesting and China’s Secret Solution to Its Dissident Problem''”, (Prometheus Books, 2014).]</ref>
 +
 
 +
==== Religious persecution in North Korea ====
 +
 
 +
[[North Korea]] is a repressive Communist state and is officially atheistic.<ref>Lee, Sunny (May 12, 2007). [https://web.archive.org/web/20130521065544/http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Korea/IE12Dg01.html "God forbid, religion in North Korea?"]  Asia Times Online.  Archived at Internet Archive on May 21, 2013.</ref> The North Korean government practices brutal repression and atrocities against North Korean Christians.<ref>Multiple references:
 +
*Clyne, Meghan (November 16, 2005). [https://www.nysun.com/article/23082?page_no=1 "Korean reds targeting Christians"]. The New York Sun.
 +
*Siemon-Netto, Uwe (May 7, 2003). [http://northkoreanchristians.com/chinese-atrocities.html "North Korean and Chinese atrocities against Christians worsen"].  NewsMax.  NorthKoreanChristians.com</ref>  Open Doors, an organization based in the United States, has put North Korea at the very top of its list of countries where Christians face significant persecution - for 12 years in a row.<ref>[http://www.pri.org/stories/2014-10-22/repressive-atheist-north-korea-has-surprising-relationship-christian-missionaries Repressive, atheist North Korea has a surprising relationship with Christian missionaries]</ref>
 +
 
 +
=== Atheistic Communism and torture ===
 +
See: [[Atheistic communism and torture]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheistic Communist regimes and forced labor ===
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism and forced labor]] and [[Atheism and slavery]]
 +
 
 +
In atheistic Communist regimes forced labor has often played a significant role in their economies and this practice continues to this day (see: [[Atheism and forced labor]]).<ref>Multiple references:
 +
*Caplan, Bryan (2010).  [http://econfaculty.gmu.edu/bcaplan/museum/comfaq.htm "Museum of Communism FAQ version 1.3"]. George Mason University website/Department of Economics/Bryan Caplan/Museum of Communism.
 +
*[https://www.hrw.org/news/2012/06/13/north-korea-economic-system-built-forced-labor "North Korea: Economic system built on forced labor: New testimonies say even children must work or face detention camps"] (June 13, 2012).  Human Rights Watch website.
 +
*Pattisson, Pete (November 7, 2014).  [https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2014/nov/07/qatar-north-korean-forced-labour "Qatar’s ambitious future driven on by North Korean ‘forced labour’"].  ''The Guardian'' website/World/Global Development.
 +
*[https://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/1999/china.50/red.giant/prisons/wu.essay "Labor camps reinforce China's totalitarian rule"] (1999).  Cnn.com
 +
*[http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/china/2013-01/07/c_132086402.htm "China to reform re-education through labor system"] (January 8, 2013).  Xinhua.</ref>
 +
 
 +
== Atheism and the internet ==
 +
 
 +
''See also:'' [[Internet atheism]]
 +
 
 +
As noted above, sometime between 2008 and 2012, there has been a big drop in [[internet atheism]] in terms of web traffic (See: [[Internet atheism web traffic volume]]).<ref name="questionevolution.blogspot.com"/><ref>[https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&q=atheism,atheist,agnostic,agnosticism General atheism/agnostic terms - World]</ref>
 +
 
 +
In addition, in terms of reach and its ability to influence, internet atheism is ineffectual (See: [[Internet atheism has a small audience and an insignificant influence on the world]]).<ref>[https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0008429819854353?journalCode=sira ''Who is Not Afraid of Richard Dawkins? Using Google Trends to Assess the Reach of Influential Atheists across Canadian Secular Groups''] by Maryam Dilmaghani, ''Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses'', First Published December 13, 2019 Research Article
 +
https://doi.org/10.1177/0008429819854353</ref>
 +
 
 +
=== Google Trends: From 2004 to June 2025, the number of worldwide Google searches for the term atheist is significantly down ===
 +
 
 +
''See also:'' [[Google trends - Global searches for atheism and agnosticism terms]]
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
[[File:Global searches for the term atheism from 2004 to June 7, 2025.png|thumbnail|center|1500px|According to Google Trends, as of June 2025, worldwide Google searches for the term atheist is significantly below its levels in January 2024.]]
 +
{{Clear}}
 +
 
 +
== Atheism and politics ==
 +
 
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism and politics]] and [[Atheism and political science]]
 +
 
 +
Historically, atheists have favored the [[leftism|left]] side of the political aisle (see: [[Atheism and politics]]).
 +
 
 +
According to the Pew Forum, in the [[United States]]: "About two-thirds of atheists (69%) identify as [[Democrats]] (or lean in that direction), and a majority (56%) call themselves political [[liberal]]s (compared with just one-in-ten who say they are [[conservative]]s)."<ref>[https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/11/05/7-facts-about-atheists/ 7 facts about atheists], Pew Forum</ref>
 +
 
 +
In some regions where the [[secular left]] has considerable influence, they [[Decline of the secular left|are losing]] an increasing amount of their power. For example, in [[secular Europe]] right-wing, nationalist parties are growing and in China conservative [[Protestantism]] is growing rapidly (see: [[Growth of Christianity in China]]).<ref>[http://sputniknews.com/europe/20160114/1033149776/europe-rise-of-right-wing-parties-eu-failure.html EU Failures Fuel Rise of Right-Wing Populist Parties in Europe]. Sputnik News, 2016</ref> 
 +
 
 +
For more information please see:
 +
 
 +
*[[Atheism and politics]]
 +
*[[Atheism and authoritarianism]]
 +
*[[Secular left]]
 +
*[[Decline of the secular left]]
 +
*[[Atheism and socialism]]
 +
*[[Secular right]]
 +
*[[Atheism and political science]]
 +
*[[Western atheism, schisms and political polarization]]
 +
 
 +
== Atheism and history ==
 +
[[File: Voroshilov, Molotov, Stalin, with Nikolai Yezhov.jpg|right|225px]]
 +
[[File: The Commissar Vanishes 2.jpg|thumbnail|right|220px|Nikolai Yezhov walking with [[Joseph Stalin]] in the top photo taken in the mid-1930s. Subsequent to his execution in 1940, Yezhov was edited out of the photo by Soviet Union censors.<ref>From the book  The Commissar Vanishes: The Falsification of Photographs and Art in Stalin's Russia by David King</ref> ]]
 +
 
 +
''See also:'' [[History of Atheism|History of atheism]] and [[Atheists and historical illiteracy]] and [[Atheism and historical revisionism]] and [[Atheist indoctrination]]
 +
 
 +
The history of atheism: [[History of Atheism|History of atheism]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheists and historical illiteracy ===
 +
A common complaint concerning many atheists is their lack of depth when it comes to knowledge of [[history]] and [[historiography]] - particularly in areas such as [[historicity of Jesus|historicity of Jesus Christ]] and [[Atheism and Mass Murder|atheist mass murders in history]].<ref>Multiple references:
 +
* [https://voxday.net/2014/03/10/the-ignorance-of-cosmos/ "The ignorance of ''Cosmos''"], March 10, 2014.
 +
*Koukl, Gregory (February 20, 2013). [http://www.str.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=5527 "The real murderers:  atheism or Christianity?"] Stand to Reason.</ref>
 +
 
 +
For more information, please see:
 +
 
 +
*[[Atheists and historical illiteracy]]
 +
*[[Historicity of Jesus|Historicity of Jesus Christ]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheists and historical revisionism ===
 +
Atheists commonly engage in [[historical revisionism]] in order to illegitimately distort the historical record (see: [[Atheism and historical revisionism]]).
 +
 
 +
=== Religion/irreligion and war ===
 +
 
 +
''See also:'' [[Irreligion/religion and war]] and [[Atheism and world peace]]
 +
 
 +
Louise Ridley (assistant news editor at the ''Huffington Post UK''), Theodore Beale and others point out that academic studies and other research consistently challenge the link between religion and war.<ref>Multiple references:
 +
*Ridley, Louise [assistant news editor, ''Huffington Post'', UK] (November 18, 2014).  [http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/11/14/religions-war-cause-responsible-evidence_n_6156878.html "Does religion really cause war—and do atheists have something to answer for?"]  The Huffington Post, United Kingdom. 
 +
*Day, Vox (August 13, 2012).  [http://voxday.blogspot.com/2012/08/atheists-abandon-religion-causes-war.html "Atheists abandon 'religion causes war' argument"].  Vox Populi blog. 
 +
*Schumacher, Robin (April 2012).  [http://carm.org/religion-cause-war "The myth that religion is the #1 cause of war"].  Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry website.  Edited by Matt Slick. See [[CARM]].
 +
*Price, Tom (2014).  [http://www.bethinking.org/is-religion-harmful/religion-causes-wars "'Religion causes wars'"].  Bethinking.</ref>
 +
 
 +
== Atheism and economics ==
 +
*[[Atheism and economics]]
 +
*[[Atheism and sloth|Atheism and economic productivity]]
 +
*[[Atheism and economic prosperity]]
 +
*[[Atheists and income]]
 +
 
 +
== Analysis of atheism and common objections to atheism ==
 +
=== Commonly Cited Arguments Against Atheism and For Theism ===
 +
See: [[Arguments for theism and against atheism]]
 +
[[Image:Anselm.jpg|thumbnail|right|150px|[[Anselm of Canterbury]]'s  version of the [[ontological argument]] appeared in his work ''Proslogium''.]]
 +
The majority of philosophers of religion, or those who have extensively studied the issue of the existence of God, are [[theism|theists]] (72 percent).<ref>[http://www.strangenotions.com/atheist-scientists/ Does it matter that many scientists are atheists?]</ref>
 +
 
 +
In relation to the debate between theism and atheism, theists often criticize atheism as being contrary to persuasive argument and have a number of arguments against atheism (See: [[Arguments for theism and against atheism]]).
 +
 
 +
Within Christendom, the discipline of [[Christian apologetics]] has been developed. Christian apologetics is the defense of the [[Christianity|Christian]] faith through logic/evidence based arguments. The word [[apologetics]] comes from the Greek word apologia  (from Greek ἀπολογία), which means "speaking in defense".
 +
 
 +
[[Arguments for the existence of God]] include:
 +
 
 +
* [[Teleological argument]]: The universe exhibits overwhelming evidence of deliberate, intelligent, purposeful design, which implies an [[intelligent design]]er. See also: [[Evolution|Arguments against evolution]] and [[Origin of life]]
 +
 
 +
*[[Evidential apologetics]] is an approach in Christian apologetics which emphasizes the use of evidence to demonstrate that God exists and that there is compelling evidence to support Christianity and the Bible.  In addition, there are various arguments that atheists or other unbelievers weigh evidence improperly (see: [[Atheism and evidence]]).
 +
 
 +
*[[Moral Argument|Moral argument]]. [[Objective morality]] exists. Atheism lacks objective moral standards. Not possessing a coherent basis for [[morality]], atheists are fundamentally [[Moral relativism|incapable]] of having a coherent system of morality (See also: [[Atheism and morality]] and [[Atheist population and immorality]] and [[Atheism and hedonism]] and [[Atheism and lust]] and [[Atheist hypocrisy]]) .<ref>Multiple references:
 +
*Copan, Paul (2008). [http://www.paulcopan.com/articles/pdf/God-naturalism-morality.pdf "God, naturalism, and the foundations of morality"].  ''The Future of Atheism'', ed. Robert Stewart (Minneapolis: Fortress Press), pp. 141-161.  PaulCopan.com
 +
*Williams, Peter S. (2011). [http://www.bethinking.org/morality/can-moral-objectivism-do-without-god "Can moral objectivism do without God?"].  Bethinking.org
 +
*Meister, Chad (2010).  [http://www.equip.org/articles/atheists-and-the-quest-for-objective-morality/ "Atheists and the quest for objective morality"].  ''Christian Research Journal'', vol. 33, no. 2.  Christian Research Institute website
 +
*Slick, Matt (2009).  [http://carm.org/failure-of-atheism-to-account-for-morality "The failure of atheism to account for morality"].  Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry website.</ref> Atheism leads to moral and cultural decline (see: [[Atheism and culture]]).
 +
 
 +
* [[Cosmological argument]]: Every event in our [[universe]] necessarily has a cause. However, it is impossible that there should be an unending chain of causes going back. Therefore, there necessarily must be a cause ''distinct'' from the universe as we know it which is capable of causing all things and is itself uncaused. Atheism denies that that [[First Cause|first cause]] is God. Christians point out that the question "Who created God" is an illogical question.<ref>[https://creation.com/who-created-god Who created God] by Don Batten</ref> See also: [[Atheism and the origin of the universe]]
 +
[[File:Autumn.jpg|200px|right|thumbnail|The [[argument from beauty]] is a commonly used argument for the existence of God. ]]
 +
* Historical arguments for the existence of God (subset of evidential apologetics). For example, arguments stemming from historical accounts such as Christian historical apologetics, [[Christian Legal Apologetics|Christian legal apologetics]] and archaeological evidence such as [[Bible Archaeology|Bible archaeology]]
 +
 
 +
*[[Argument from beauty]]
 +
 
 +
*[[Argument from religious experience]]
 +
 
 +
*[[Bible prophecy]]
 +
 
 +
*[[Atheism and presuppositional apologetics]]
 +
 
 +
See also:
 +
 
 +
*[[Rebuttals to atheist arguments]]
 +
*[[Pascal's wager]]
 +
*[[Resources for leaving atheism and becoming a Christian]]
 +
 
 +
=== Biblical statements concerning atheism ===
 +
''See also:'' [[Bible verses relating to atheism]]
 +
 
 +
The writers of the [[Bible]] considered the existence of God to be self-evident and [[Moses]] simply wrote: "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." ([[Genesis]] 1:1).<ref>Harr, Ken and Lisle, Dr. Jason (August 9, 2007). [http://www.answersingenesis.org/is-god-real/is-there-really-god/ "Chapter 1: Is there really a God?"] ''The New Answers Book''.  Answers in Genesis.</ref>
 +
 
 +
Accordingly, the psalmist [[David]] declared:
 +
 
 +
"The fool has said in his heart, 'There is no God.' They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good." — [[Psalms]] 14:1 ([[King James Bible|KJV]])
 +
 
 +
==Atheism and debate==
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism debates]] and [[Atheism vs. theism]]
 +
[[Image:Bahnsen.jpg‎|thumb|right|150px|Dr. [[Greg Bahnsen]] became known as "the man atheists fear most" due to [[Michael Martin]]'s cancellation of their scheduled debate.<ref name="Pushing the Antithesis">[https://books.google.com/books?id=O1gPpUMzcEQC&pg=PA286&lpg=PA286&dq=%22the+man+atheists+fear+most%22+bahnsen&source=bl&ots=PyGQBd8Xrl&sig=ACfU3U1DpS53GaAc_ZfKLnfD6jrP1gozDQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiQqrLRu6vgAhXIqlkKHfuaBcQQ6AEwCHoECAAQAQ#v=onepage&q=%22the%20man%20atheists%20fear%20most%22%20bahnsen&f=false Pushing the Antithesis] on Greg Bahnsen</ref><ref name="Bahsen at the Stein debate">[http://www.frame-poythress.org/frame_articles/Bahnsen.htm Bahsen at the Stein debate] by John Frame</ref>]]
 +
As far as [[atheism debates]], the majority of the public debates are [[Atheism vs. Christianity debates]] (although there have been a few [[Atheism vs. Islam debates]]). 
 +
 
 +
Beginning in the latter part of the 20th century, there were a number of notable instances of prominent atheists being reluctant to debate (see: [[Atheism and debate#Notable cases of prominent atheists being reluctant to debate|Notable cases of prominent atheists being reluctant to debate]]).
 +
 
 +
On May 14, 2011, the [[Great Britain|British]] newspaper ''[[The Daily Telegraph]]'' published a news story entitled ''Richard Dawkins accused of cowardice for refusing to debate existence of [[God]]''.<ref name="cowardice">Ross, Tim (May 14, 2011).  [https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/8511931/Richard-Dawkins-accused-of-cowardice-for-refusing-to-debate-existence-of-God.html "Richard Dawkins accused of cowardice for refusing to debate existence of God"]. The Daily Telegraph website.  Retrieved July 25, 2014.  See ''[[Daily Telegraph]]''</ref> In ''[[The Daily Telegraph]]'' article Dr. [[Daniel Came]], a member of the Faculty of [[Philosophy]] at [[Oxford University]] was quoted as writing to fellow atheist Richard Dawkins concerning his refusal to debate Dr. [[William Lane Craig]],  "The absence of a debate with the foremost [[Christian apologetics|apologist]] for [[Christianity|Christian]] [[theism]] is a glaring omission on your [[Curriculum vitae|CV]] and is of course apt to be interpreted as cowardice on your part."<ref name="cowardice"/>
 +
 
 +
[[Greg Bahnsen]] became known as the "man atheists fear most".<ref name="Pushing the Antithesis"/><ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20080102084144/http://mywebpages.comcast.net/webpages54/ap/biobahn.html "A brief biography of Greg Bahnsen"] (2003).  Applied Presuppositionalism website.  Retrieved from January 2, 2008 archive at Internet Archive on May 14, 2015.</ref>
 +
This is because [[Harvard]]-educated [[Michael Martin]] was scheduled to debate Bahnsen but pulled out of the debate at the "eleventh hour".
 +
A [[Press Release Regarding Michael Martin Pulling Out of Martin-Bahnsen Debate|press release at the time]] said that Dr. Martin offered ruses on why he pulled out and didn't want the scheduled debate recorded but the real reason was that "...Michael Martin is afraid that he will be publicly humiliated just as his friend and fellow atheist, Dr. [[Gordon Stein]], was...".
 +
 
 +
In 1990, Michael Martin indicated there was a general [[Atheism and apathy|absence of an atheistic response]] to contemporary work in the [[philosophy]] of religion and in jest he indicated that it was his "cross to bear" to respond to [[theism|theistic]] arguments.<ref>''Open Questions: Diverse Thinkers Discuss God, Religion, and Faith'' by Luís F. Rodrigues, page 201</ref> See also: [[Atheology]] and [[Atheist apologetics]]
 +
 
 +
A majority of the most prominent and vocal defenders of the naturalistic [[evolution]]ary position since [[World War II]] have been atheists.<ref>Multiple references:
 +
*Batten, Don (December 1997).  [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/737/ "A ''Who’s Who'' of evolutionists"]. ''Creation'', vol 20, no. 1, p. 32.  Retrieved from Creation.com [Creation Ministries International] on May 15, 2015.  Don Batten
 +
*Sarfati, Jonathan, Ph. D. (1999).  [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3830 "Chapter 1: Facts and bias"].  ''Refuting Evolution''.  Retrieved from Creation.com [Creation Ministries International] on May 15, 2015.  See [[Jonathan Sarfati]]</ref> After doing poorly in a series of debates in the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s,  evolutionists are generally reluctant to debate (see: [[Creation vs. evolution debates]]).
 +
 
 +
== Atheism and morality/ethics ==
 +
[[File:PzMyers2.jpg|thumbnail|275px|right|The atheist [[PZ Myers]] declared: "I am so, so tired of hearing about [[atheist scandals]] and scumbaggery."<ref>[https://twitter.com/pzmyers/status/1362874184792039425 "I am so, so tired of hearing about atheist scandals and scumbaggery." - Twitter post]</ref>
 
<br />
 
<br />
−
Explicit strong/positive/hard atheists (in {{Font color|purple|'''purple'''}} on the '''right''') assert that ''"at least one deity exists"'' is a false statement.
 
 
<br />
 
<br />
−
Explicit weak/negative/soft atheists (in {{Font color|blue|'''blue'''}} on the '''right''') reject or eschew belief that any deities exist without actually asserting that ''"at least one deity exists"'' is a false statement.
+
See also: [[Atheism and morality]] ]]
 +
See also: [[Atheism and morality]] and [[Atheist population and immorality]] and  [[Atheist hypocrisy]] and [[Religion and morality]]
 +
 
 +
=== Objective morality incompatible with atheism ===
 +
 
 +
Under an atheist worldview, there is no logical basis for [[objective morality]] or ultimate meaning and purpose.<ref>
 +
*[https://creation.com/atheism-no-objective-morality Atheism—no objective morality?], [[Creation Ministries International]]
 +
*[http://www.bethinking.org/morality/can-moral-objectivism-do-without-god Can Moral Objectivism Do Without God?] by Peter S. Williams at Bethinking.org
 +
*[http://www.equip.org/article/atheists-and-the-quest-for-objective-morality-2/ Atheists and the Quest for Objective Morality] by Chad Meister at Christian Research Institute
 +
*[http://www.faithdefenders.com/articles/atheism/atheism_absolutes_at.html Atheism and absolutes]</ref> See also: [[Atheism and morality]] and [[Atheism and moral relativism]] and [[Atheism and meaninglessness]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and moral relativism ===
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism and moral relativism]] and [[Atheism and morality]]
 +
 
 +
Dr. Phil Fernandes states the following regarding atheism and [[moral relativism]]:
 +
{{cquote|[[Friedrich Nietzsche|Nietzsche]] preached that a group of "supermen" must arise with the courage to create their own values through their "will to power." Nietzsche rejected the "soft" values of Christianity (brotherly love, turning the other cheek, charity, compassion, etc.); he felt they hindered man's creativity and potential....
 +
 
 +
Many other atheists agree with Nietzsche concerning moral relativism. British philosopher [[Bertrand Russell]] (1872-1970) once wrote, "Outside human desires there is no moral standard." [[A. J. Ayer]] believed that moral commands did not result from any objective standard above man. Instead, Ayer stated that moral commands merely express one's [[Subjectivism|subjective]] feelings. When one says that murder is wrong, one is merely saying that he or she feels that murder is wrong. [[Jean-Paul Sartre]], a French [[existentialism|existentialist]], believed that there is no objective meaning to life. Therefore, according to Sartre, man must create his own values.
 +
 
 +
There are many different ways that moral relativists attempt to determine what action should be taken. [[Hedonism]] is probably the most extreme. It declares that whatever brings the most pleasure is right. In other words, if it feels good, do it. If this position is true, then there is no basis from which to judge the actions of [[Adolph Hitler]] as being evil.<ref>Dr. Phil Fernandez, Web article: ''Refuting Moral relativism'', Institute for Bible Defense (Web article is no longer online. Pages 120-121 of the book ''God, Government, and the Road to Tyranny: A Christian View of Government and Morality'' By Phil Fernandes, Eric Purcell and Rorri Wiesinger relates the same thoughts of his former web article.[https://books.google.com/books?id=u6XBuAQAiYUC&pg=PA120&lpg=PA120&dq=Nietzsche+preached+that+a+group+of+%22supermen%22+must+arise+with+the+courage+to+create+their+own+values+through+their+%22will+to+power.%22+Nietzsche+rejected+the+%22soft%22+values+of+Christianity+(brotherly+love,+turning+the+other+cheek,+charity,+compassion,+etc.);+he+felt+they+hindered+man%27s+creativity+and+potential.&source=bl&ots=kwDnaTOHqd&sig=0ywArBSb87JFleWRXZRv6DG3ZVo&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjty8qqyIzWAhXHg1QKHe8UAVYQ6AEIKDAA#v=onepage&q=Nietzsche%20preached%20that%20a%20group%20of%20%22supermen%22%20must%20arise%20with%20the%20courage%20to%20create%20their%20own%20values%20through%20their%20%22will%20to%20power.%22%20Nietzsche%20rejected%20the%20%22soft%22%20values%20of%20Christianity%20(brotherly%20love%2C%20turning%20the%20other%20cheek%2C%20charity%2C%20compassion%2C%20etc.)%3B%20he%20felt%20they%20hindered%20man's%20creativity%20and%20potential.&f=false])</ref>}}
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and various types of immorality ===
 +
[[Image:115523-004-FA619CA3.jpg|thumb|right|221px| The perverse and cruel atheist [[Marquis de Sade]] in prison, 18th century line engraving. See: [[Atheism and sadism]] ]]
 +
 
 +
*[[Atheism and human rights violations]]
 +
*[[Atheism and sexual immorality articles]]
 +
*[[Atheism and violence articles]]
 +
*[[Atheism and deception articles]]
 +
*[[Atheism and unforgiveness articles]]
 +
*[[Atheist mass shooters]]
 +
*[[List of atheist shooters and serial killers]]
 +
*[[Atheist population and immorality|Atheism and various types of immorality]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and sociopathy ===
 +
 
 +
See: [[Atheism and sociopathy]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheist mass shooters and serial killers ===
 +
 
 +
*[[Atheist mass shooters]]
 +
 
 +
*[[List of atheist shooters and serial killers]]
 +
 
 +
=== Study: U.S. public perception of atheist morality ===
 +
In 2014, a University of Kentucky study was published by Will M. Gervais, which was entitled "Everything is permitted? People intuitively judge immorality as representative of atheists", and the study indicated that "even atheist participants viewed immorality as significantly more representative of atheists than of other people."<ref>Gervais, Will M. (April 9, 2014).  "Everything is permitted?  People intuitively judge immorality as representative of atheists". ''PLOS ONE'', {{doi|10.1371/journal.pone.0092302}}.</ref>
 +
 
 +
=== Barna Group studies: Atheism and morality ===
 +
'''Barna Group study on the behavior of atheists vs. evangelical Christians:'''
 +
 
 +
[[Richard Deem]] wrote:
 +
{{Cquote|A random sample of 1003 adults were surveyed in May, 2008 by The Barna Group for their participation in a number of negative behaviors within the previous week. The results showed that there were vast differences in the behaviors of evangelicals compared to agnostics/atheists.
 +
 
 +
These results show that atheists/agnostics participate in morally questionable behaviors to a much greater degree than [[evangelicalism|evangelical Christians]] - an average of nearly five times the frequency!<ref>[http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/atheists_more_immoral.html Atheism Doesn't Lead to Immoral Behavior - Or Does It?] by Richard Deem</ref>}}
 +
 
 +
'''Barna Group study related to atheist beliefs about behaviors:'''
 +
 
 +
The [[Barna Group]] found that atheists and [[agnostics]] in America were more likely, than [[theist]]s in America, to look upon the following behaviors as morally acceptable:  illegal drug use; excessive drinking; sexual relationships outside of marriage; [[abortion]]; cohabitating with someone of opposite sex outside of marriage; obscene language; gambling; [[pornography]] and obscene sexual behavior; and engaging in [[homosexuality]]/bisexuality.<ref>[https://www.barna.com/research/practical-outcomes-replace-biblical-principles-as-the-moral-standard/ Practical outcomes replace biblical principles as the moral standard], Barna Group</ref>
 +
 
 +
Given the [[Homosexuality and health|many diseases]] associated with homosexuality, the [[Bible|biblical]] prohibition against homosexuality is quite arguably one of the many example where the Bible exhibited knowledge [http://creationwiki.org/Bible_scientific_foreknowledge that was ahead of its time].  See also: [[Atheism and sexual immorality articles|Atheism and sexual immorality]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and uncharitableness  ===
 +
:''See also: [[Atheism and charity]]'' and [[Atheist organizations and scandals]] and [[Atheism, uncharitableness and depression]]
 +
[[File:Beggar in Cambodia.jpg|thumb|right|200px|Most atheists likely live in [[East Asia]] (see: [[Asian atheism]]).
 +
<br />
 
<br />
 
<br />
−
Implicit weak/negative atheists (in {{Font color|blue|'''blue'''}} on the '''left''') would include people (such as young children and some agnostics) who do not believe in a deity, but have not explicitly rejected such belief.
+
A beggar in [[Cambodia]]. In Cambodia, the vast majority of the population adheres to a nontheistic form of [[Buddhism]] called the Theravada school of Buddhism.  
 
<br />
 
<br />
−
(Sizes in the diagram are not meant to indicate relative sizes within a population.)]]
+
<br />
 +
A comprehensive study by [[Harvard University]] professor Robert Putnam found that religious people are more charitable than their irreligious counterparts.<ref name="Burke Campbell">Multiple references:
 +
*Burke, Daniel, Religion News Service (May 13, 2009). [https://web.archive.org/web/20130310113024/http://www.pewforum.org/Religion-News/Religious-people-make-better-citizens-study-says.aspx "Religious people make better citizens, study says"]. Pew Research Forum. Archived on March 10, 2013 by Internet Archive.  Retrieved July 19, 2014.
 +
*Campbell, David and Putnam, Robert (November 14, 2010).  [https://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/forum/2010-11-15-column15_ST_N.htm "Religious people are 'better neighbors'"]. USA Today website.  Retrieved on July 19, 2014.</ref> ]]
  
−
Writers disagree on how best to define and classify ''atheism'',<ref name=eb1911-atheism/> contesting what supernatural entities it applies to, whether it is an assertion in its own right or merely the absence of one, and whether it requires a conscious, explicit rejection. Atheism has been regarded as compatible with [[agnosticism]],<ref name=agnosticism-compatible/><ref name=flint-agnostic-atheism/><ref name=encyc-unbelief-compatible/><ref name=martin-agnosticism-entails/><ref name=barker-agnostic-atheism/><ref name=besant-open-to-new-truth/><ref name=holyoake-question-of-probability/> and has also been contrasted with it.<ref name=eb2011-atheism-critique/><ref name=eb2011concise-atheism/><ref name=eb1911-atheism-sceptical/> A variety of categories have been used to distinguish the different forms of atheism.
+
Concerning the issue of [[Atheism and charity|atheism and uncharitableness]], the evidence indicates that [[per capita]] charitable giving by atheists and agnostics in America is significantly less than by theists, according to a study by the [[Barna Group]]:
 +
{{cquote|The typical no-faith American donated just $200 in 2006, which is more than seven times less than the amount contributed by the prototypical active-faith adult ($1500). Even when church-based giving is subtracted from the equation, active-faith adults donated twice as many dollars last year as did atheists and agnostics. In fact, while just 7% of active-faith adults failed to contribute any personal funds in 2006, that compares with 22% among the no-faith adults.<ref>[https://www.barna.com/research/atheists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians/ "Atheists and agnostics take aim at Christians"] (June 11, 2007).  Barna Update.</ref>}}
  
−
===Range===
+
A comprehensive study by [[Harvard University]] professor Robert Putnam found that religious people are more charitable than their irreligious counterparts.<ref name ="Burke Campbell"/>
−
Some of the ambiguity and controversy involved in defining ''atheism'' arises from difficulty in reaching a consensus for the definitions of words like ''deity'' and ''god''. The plurality of wildly different [[conceptions of God]] and deities leads to differing ideas regarding atheism's applicability. The ancient Romans accused Christians of being atheists for not worshiping the [[paganism|pagan]] deities. Gradually, this view fell into disfavor as ''theism'' came to be understood as encompassing belief in any divinity.{{sfn|Martin|2006}}
 
  
−
With respect to the range of phenomena being rejected, atheism may counter anything from the existence of a deity, to the existence of any [[spirituality|spiritual]], [[supernatural]], or [[Transcendence (religion)|transcendental]] concepts, such as those of [[Buddhism]], [[Hinduism]], [[Jainism]], and [[Taoism]].<ref name=eb2011-Rejection-of-all-religious-beliefs/>
+
See also: [[Atheism, social justice and hypocrisy]]  
  
−
===Implicit vs. explicit===
+
==== Church-state issues emphasis. Charity low priority ====
−
{{Main|Implicit and explicit atheism}}
+
See also: [[Atheism and charity|Atheism and uncharitableness]] and [[Western atheism and race]] and [[Atheism and love]]
−
Definitions of atheism also vary in the degree of consideration a person must put to the idea of gods to be considered an atheist. Atheism has sometimes been defined to include the simple absence of belief that any deities exist. This broad definition would include newborns and other people who have not been exposed to theistic ideas. As far back as 1772, [[Baron d'Holbach]] said that "All children are born Atheists; they have no idea of God."<ref>{{cite book |last=d'Holbach |first=P. H. T. |authorlink=Baron d'Holbach |title=Good Sense |url=http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/7319 |year=1772 |accessdate=2011-04-07}}
+
 
−
</ref>
+
In June 2014, the African-American atheist woman [[Sikivu Hutchinson]] wrote in the ''Washington Post'' that atheist organizations generally focus on church-state separation and creationism issues and not the concerns the less affluent African American population faces.<ref name="Hutchinson">Hutchinson, Sikivu (June 16, 2014).  [https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/06/16/blacks-are-even-discriminated-against-by-atheists/ "Atheism has a big race problem that no one’s talking about"].  Washington Post website.</ref> Hutchinson also mentioned that church organizations do focus on helping poor African Americans.<ref name="Hutchinson"/>
−
Similarly, [[George H. Smith]] (1979) suggested that: "The man who is unacquainted with theism is an atheist because he does not believe in a god. This category would also include the child with the conceptual capacity to grasp the issues involved, but who is still unaware of those issues. The fact that this child does not believe in god qualifies him as an atheist."<ref>{{harvnb|Smith|1979|p=14}}.
+
 
−
</ref>
+
==== Atheist nonprofit scandals ====
−
Smith coined the term ''implicit atheism'' to refer to "the absence of theistic belief without a conscious rejection of it" and ''explicit atheism'' to refer to the more common definition of conscious disbelief.
+
''See also:'' [[Atheist organizations and scandals]] and  ''[[Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science#Embezzlement allegation|Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science - Embezzlement allegation]]''
−
[[Ernest Nagel]] contradicts Smith's definition of atheism as merely "absence of theism", acknowledging only explicit atheism as true "atheism".<ref name= Nagel1959>
+
 
−
{{Cite book
+
In a 2018 YouTube video entitled ''[[David Silverman]] Ousted as President of [[American Atheists]]'', the atheist YouTube channel Utah Outcasts said in a video about David Silverman and atheist organizations: "Many other people were also like maybe he was embezzling funds because we know people in [[atheist activist]] communities where that kind of sh*t happens. Yes, it was kind of common."<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hUvX5wTf8TM David Silverman Ousted as President of American Atheists], Utah Atheists, Go to the 3 minute mark in the video</ref>
−
|title= Basic Beliefs: The Religious Philosophies of Mankind |chapter=Philosophical Concepts of Atheism
+
 
−
|first=Ernest |last=Nagel |authorlink=Ernest Nagel
+
Two atheist nonprofit scandals that recently received some publicity were the organizations [[Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science]] and the [[We Are Atheism]] organization.<ref>[http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2011/07/24/richard-dawkins-drops-his-lawsuit-against-former-employee/ Richard Dawkins Drops His Lawsuit Against Former Employee]
−
|year=1959 |publisher=Sheridan House
+
*[https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/an-ungodly-row-dawkins-sues-his-disciple-2115632.html An ungodly row: Dawkins sues his disciple]
−
|quote=I shall understand by "atheism" a critique and a denial of the major claims of all varieties of theism&nbsp;... atheism is not to be identified with sheer unbelief&nbsp;... Thus, a child who has received no religious instruction and has never heard about God, is not an atheist – for he is not denying any theistic claims. Similarly in the case of an adult who, if he has withdrawn from the faith of his father without reflection or because of frank indifference to any theological issue, is also not an atheist – for such an adult is not challenging theism and not professing any views on the subject.}}
+
*[http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2011/07/24/richard-dawkins-drops-his-lawsuit-against-former-employee/ Richard Dawkins Drops His Lawsuit Against Former Employee]
−
<br />reprinted in ''Critiques of God'', edited by Peter A. Angeles, Prometheus Books, 1997.
+
*[http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2015/09/15/an-update-on-we-are-atheism/ An Update on We Are Atheism] by Hemant Mehta, September 15, 2015]</ref>
 +
 
 +
In addition, David Gorski at Scienceblogs indicated that many atheist/skeptic organizations are poorly run from a financial standpoint.<ref>[http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2010/10/24/richard-dawkins-sues-josh-timonen/ Richard Dawkins sues Josh Timonen], Posted by David Gorski on October 24, 2010</ref>
 +
 
 +
For more information, please see: [[Atheist organizations and scandals]]
 +
 
 +
=== Irreligion and domestic violence ===
 +
''See also:'' [[Irreligion and domestic violence]] and [[Atheism and women]] and [[Atheism and rape]]
 +
[[Image:Cycle.gif|thumbnail|205px|right|Research suggests that irreligiousity is a causal factor for domestic violence.<ref name="vaw">Ellison, C. G., Trinitapoli, J. A., et al. (November 2007). [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17951587 "Race/ethnicity, religious involvement, and domestic violence"] [abstract with link to full article]. ''Violence Against Women'', doi: 10.1177/1077801207308259, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1094-1112.  Abstract from PubMed.gov</ref>]]
 +
The abstract for the 2007 article in the journal ''Violence Against Women'' entitled ''Race/Ethnicity, Religious Involvement, and Domestic Violence'' indicated:
 +
{{cquote|The authors explored the relationship between religious involvement and intimate partner violence by analyzing data from the first wave of the National Survey of Families and Households. They found that: (a) religious involvement is correlated with reduced levels of domestic violence; (b) levels of domestic violence vary by race/ethnicity; (c) the effects of religious involvement on domestic violence vary by race/ethnicity; and (d) religious involvement, specifically church attendance, protects against domestic violence, and this protective effect is stronger for African American men and women and for Hispanic men, groups that, for a variety of reasons, experience elevated risk for this type of violence.<ref name="vaw"/>}} 
 +
 
 +
===== Secular Europe and domestic violence =====
 +
See also: [[Secular Europe and domestic violence]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and racism ===
 +
 
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism and racism]] and [[East Asia, China, atheism and racism]] and [[Western atheism and race]]
 +
 
 +
The [[atheist population]] has a significant amount of racism within its midst (see: [[Atheism and racism]]).
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and empathy ===
 +
 
 +
See: [[Atheism and empathy]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and pornography ===
 +
[[File:Larry Flynt Wheelchair.jpg|thumbnail|200px|right|The [[pornography|pornographer]] [[Larry Flynt]] is an atheist.<ref>Multiple references:
 +
*Flynt writes, "I have left my religious conversion behind and settled into a comfortable state of atheism": see the epilogue of Flynt, Larry and Ross, Kenneth (June 1, 2008).  ''An Unseemly Man: My Life as Pornographer, Pundit, and Social Outcast''. 
 +
*"I am not saying he don't believe in God. I am just saying I don't believe in God. That puts me at odds with him." [https://www.cnn.com/SHOWBIZ/9701/11/falwell.v.flynt/lkl.00.html "Larry Flynt and Jerry Falwell" [transcript&#93;] (January 10, 1996).  Larry King Live.  Transcript from CNN.com on October 3, 2014.</ref>]
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism and pornography]]
 +
 
 +
One of the causes of atheism is a [[hedonism|hedonistic]] lifestyle. See: [[Atheism and hedonism]].
 +
 
 +
The infamous [[pornography|pornographers]] [[Hugh Hefner]] and [[Larry Flynt]] was and is (taken separately in the order indicated) both atheists (taken together).<ref>Multiple references:
 +
*Gottesdiener, Laura (February 23, 2010).  [https://www.salon.com/2013/02/23/10_celebs_you_didnt_know_were_atheists_partner/ "10 celebs you didn't know were atheists"].  Salon. 
 +
*Flynt writes, "I have left my religious conversion behind and settled into a comfortable state of atheism": see the epilogue of Flynt, Larry and Ross, Kenneth (June 1, 2008).  ''An Unseemly Man: My Life as Pornographer, Pundit, and Social Outcast''.
 +
*"I am not saying he don't believe in God. I am just saying I don't believe in God. That puts me at odds with him." [https://www.cnn.com/SHOWBIZ/9701/11/falwell.v.flynt/lkl.00.html "Larry Flynt and Jerry Falwell" [transcript&#93;] (January 10, 1996).  Larry King Live.  Transcript from CNN.com</ref>
 +
 
 +
In 2003, ''Arena magazine'' magazine listed Flynt as #1 on the "50 Powerful People in Porn" list.<ref>[http://www.onenewspage.us/people/ms9j0/Larry-Flynt.htm "Larry Flynt"].  One News Page.</ref>  Flynt is paralyzed from the waist down due to injuries sustained from a 1978 assassination attempt by the serial killer Joseph Paul Franklin.<ref>Multiple references:
 +
*Flynt, Larry and Ross, Kenneth (June 1, 2008).  ''An Unseemly Man: My Life as Pornographer, Pundit, and Social Outcast'', pp. 170–171.
 +
*[http://www.onenewspage.us/people/ms9j0/Larry-Flynt.htm "Larry Flynt"].  One News Page.</ref>
 +
 
 +
==== RationalWiki and web visitor interest in pornography ====
 +
 
 +
See: [[RationalWiki and web visitor interest in pornography]]
 +
 
 +
==== Atheism and child pornography ====
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism and child pornography]]
 +
 
 +
In 2005 [[Denmark]] was ranked the third most atheistic country in the world and the website adherents.com reported that in 2005 43 - 80% of Danes are agnostics/atheists/non-believers in God.<ref>[http://www.adherents.com/largecom/com_atheist.html Top 50 Countries With Highest Proportion of Atheists / Agnostics(Zuckerman, 2005)]</ref> 
 +
 
 +
The 2003 book entitled ''Overcoming Violence Against Women and Girls: The International Campaign to Eradicate a Worldwide Problem '' written by authors Rahel Nardos; Mary K. Radpour; William S. Hatcher and Michael L. Penn, declared:
 +
{{cquote|The largest source of commercial child pornography is Denmark. Denmark became the world's leading producer of child pornography when, in 1969, it removed all restrictions on the production and sale of any type of pornographic material. "The result," notes Tim Tate, "was a short-lived explosion in adult pornography, and the birth of commercial child pornography. ....by 1979 when Denmark finally banned the production and sale of child pornography it had already become such a financial success on the international market that it has proven to be nearly impossible to bring its spread under control.<ref>Nardos, Rahel, et. al. (2003).  ''Overcoming Violence Against Women and Girls: The International Campaign to Eradicate a Worldwide Problem'', p. 59.</ref>}}
 +
 
 +
Suzanne Ost, in her 2009 book ''Child Pornography and Sexual Grooming: Legal and Societal Responses'' published by Cambridge University Press, wrote about the child pornography created by Denmark/Holland during this period: "Taylor and Quayle note that the material produced during this period still constitutes the largest part of child pornography that is currently available, having been transferred into digital format and uploaded onto the internet."<ref>''Child Pornography and Sexual Grooming: Legal and Societal Responses'' by Suzanne Ost, Cambridge University Press, page 29, 2009</ref>
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism, pedophilia and NAMBLA ===
 +
[[Image:Harry Hay.jpg|thumb|150px|Many consider atheist [[Harry Hay]] to be the founder of the American homosexual movement.]]
 +
 
 +
''see also:'' [[Atheism, pedophilia and NAMBLA]] and [[Teenage homosexuality]]
 +
 
 +
The [[North American Man/Boy Love Association]] (NAMBLA) was founded in December 1978 and is an activist homosexuality and [[pedophilia]]/pederasty coalition group.
 +
 
 +
Some of the well known atheist advocates of the North American Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) are:
 +
 
 +
1. The atheist and homosexual [[David Thorstad]] was a founding member of the North American Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA).<ref>Abbott, Matt C. (August 22, 2010).  [http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/abbott/100822 "The mind of a pederast"]. RenewAmerica.</ref>
 +
 
 +
2. '''[[Harry Hay]]''' (1912 - 2002) was an [[liberal]] advocate of [[statutory rape]] and the widely acknowledged founder and progenitor of the  activist [[homosexual agenda]] in the [[United States]]. Hay joined the [[Communist Party of the United States]] (CPUSA) in 1934.<ref>Bronski, Michael (October 31, 2002).  [http://bostonphoenix.com/boston/news_features/other_stories/documents/02511115.htm "The real Harry Hay"].  The Phoenix.com.</ref>  Harry Hay was an atheist.<ref>Kincaid, Cliff, Accuracy in Media (January 7, 2010). [http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2010/ss_politics0010_01_07.asp "Twisted: administration's 'safe schools czar' and the North American Man-Boy Love Association"].  WorldTribune.com.</ref> He was a vociferous advocate of man/boy love.<ref>Multiple references:
 +
*Lord, Jeffrey (October 5, 2006).  [http://spectator.org/articles/46366/when-nancy-met-harry "Special report:  when Nancy met Harry"].  The American Spectator website.
 +
*Kincaid, Cliff, Accuracy in Media (January 7, 2010). [http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2010/ss_politics0010_01_07.asp "Twisted: administration's 'safe schools czar' and the North American Man-Boy Love Association"].  WorldTribune.com.</ref> In 1986, Hay marched in a [[homosexual|gay]] parade wearing a shirt emblazoned with the words "[[NAMBLA]] walks with me."<ref>Baldwin, Hon. Steve (2002). [http://www.mega.nu/ampp/baldwin_pedophilia_homosexuality.pdf "Child molestation and the homosexual movement"]. ''Regent University Law Review'', vol. 14, pp. 267-282. The Architecture of Modern Political Power</ref>
 +
 
 +
3. The writer [[Samuel R. Delany]] is an atheist and a homosexual.<ref>Multiple references:
 +
*Delany, Samuel R. (2006).  ''About Writing:  Seven Essays, Four Letters, and Five Interviews'' (Middletown: Wesleyan), p. 36.
 +
*[http://www.enotes.com/topics/samuel-r-delany/critical-essays/delany-samuel-r-vol-141#critical-essays-delany-samuel-r-vol-141-introduction "Introduction"] (2001).  ''Contemporary Literary Criticism'', ed. Hunter, Jeffrey W., vol. 141 (Gale Cengage).  eNotes.com</ref> Delaney said he was a supporter of NAMBLA.<ref>Freedman, Carl (2009).  ''Conversations with Samuel R. Delany'' (Jackson: Univ. Press of Mississippi), p. 143.</ref>
 +
 
 +
See also: [[Richard Dawkins on child molestation and so called "gentle pedophiles"]] and [[John Maynard Keynes and pederasty]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and slavery/forced labor ===
 +
*[[Atheism and slavery]]
 +
*[[Atheism and forced labor]]
 +
 
 +
=== Dietary practices of atheists. Eating of dogs, cats, horses and babies/children ===
 +
 
 +
See: [[Dietary practices of atheists]] (Dietary habits of various irreligious regions)
 +
 
 +
==== Atheists and the eating of babies/children ====
 +
 
 +
*[[Atheists eat babies meme#Atheistic China and baby eating|Communist China and baby eating]]
 +
*[[Atheists eat babies meme|Atheists and the eating of babies/children]] ([[China]], [[Soviet Union]], [[North Korea]] and other issues)
 +
 
 +
===== Major news organizations reporting on China baby flesh powder scandal =====
 +
 
 +
*[https://abcnews.go.com/Health/chinese-made-infant-flesh-capsules-seized-korea/story?id=16296176 Chinese-Made Infant Flesh Capsules Seized in S. Korea], ''ABC News''
 +
 
 +
*[https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/dec/31/chinese-cannibalism-infant-flesh-outrages-world/ Chinese cannibalism of infant flesh outrages the world], ''Washington Times''
 +
 
 +
*[https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2140702/South-Korea-customs-officials-thousands-pills-filled-powdered-human-baby-flesh.html Thousands of pills filled with powdered human baby flesh discovered by customs officials in South Korea], ''The Daily Mail''
 +
 
 +
*[https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2012/05/horrifyingly-ground-baby-pills-are-real-thing/328490/ Horrifyingly, Ground Baby Pills Are a Real Thing] by Alexander Abad-Santos, ''The Atlantic''
 +
 
 +
=== Immorality of prominent atheists ===
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism, polyamory and other immoral relationships]]
 +
[[File:JAMES RANDI.jpg|thumbnail|170px|left|[[James Randi]] ]]
 +
[[James Randi]] is a leader within the atheist community. Brian Thompson, former James Randi Educational Foundation (JREF) Outreach Coordinator, wrote:
 +
{{cquote|But I no longer identify with this community of benevolent know-it-alls, because not all of them are the best folks in the world. In fact, a good percentage of the top ten worst humans I’ve ever met are prominent members of the skeptics’ club. They’re dishonest, mean-spirited, narcissistic, [[misogyny|misogynistic]]. Pick a personality flaw, and I can probably point you to someone who epitomizes it. And that person has probably had a speaking slot at a major skeptical conference.
 +
 
 +
I grew particularly disgusted with the boys’ club attitude I saw among skeptical leaders and luminaries. The kind of attitude that’s dismissive of women, sexually predatory, and downright gross. When I first started going to skeptical conferences as a fresh-faced know-it-all, I started hearing things about people I once admired. Then I started seeing things myself. Then I got a job with the JREF, and the pattern continued.<ref>Myers, P. Z. (March 31, 2014).  [http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2014/03/31/when-will-this-situation-improve/ "When will this situation improve?"] Pharyngula.</ref>}}
 +
 
 +
See also:
 +
 
 +
*[[Atheism, polyamory and other immoral relationships]]
 +
*[[Richard Carrier, adultery, divorce and polyamory]]
 +
*[[Atheist conferences#Atheist events and inappropriate sexually related activities|Atheist conferences and inappropriate sexual activity]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and rape ===
 +
*[[Atheism and rape]]
 +
*[[Mass rape during the occupation of Germany|Mass rape of German women by the Soviet army]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and abortion ===
 +
The ''Journal of Medical Ethics'' wrote this about the atheist and [[sadism|sadist]] [[Marquis de Sade]]:
 +
{{cquote|In 1795 the Marquis de Sade published his ''La Philosophie dans le boudoir'', in which he proposed the use of induced abortion for social reasons and as a means of [[population control]]. It is from this time that medical and social acceptance of abortion can be dated, although previously the subject had not been discussed in public in modern times. It is suggested that it was largely due to de Sade's writing that induced abortion received the impetus which resulted in its subsequent spread in western society.<ref>Farr, A. D. (1980).  [https://jme.bmj.com/content/6/1/7.abstract "The Marquis de Sade and induced abortion"].  ''Journal of Medical Ethics'', 6, pp. 7-10.  Journal of Medical Ethics website</ref>}}
 +
 
 +
[[Population control]] is based on [[pseudoscience]] and ill founded [[economics|economic]] assumptions.<ref>Egnor, Michael (November 30, 2010).  [http://www.evolutionnews.org/2010/11/pz_myers_on_abortion040971.html "P. Z. Myers on abortion"].  Evolution News and Views.</ref> ''[[CBS News]]'' reported: "According to a mail-in survey of nearly 4,000 British doctors, those who were atheist or agnostic were almost twice as willing to take actions designed to hasten the end of life."<ref>Katz, Neil (August 26, 2010).  [https://www.cbsnews.com/news/study-atheist-doctors-twice-as-likely-to-pull-plug/ "Study: atheist doctors twice as likely to pull plug"]. CBSNews.com.</ref>
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and profanity ===
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism and profanity]] and [[Atheism and culture]]
 +
 
 +
Studies indicate that atheists engage in more [[profanity]] than Christians/theists and are more likely to believe that obscene language is acceptable to engage in.<ref>Multiple references:
 +
*[https://www.barna.org/component/content/article/5-barna-update/45-barna-update-sp-657/58-practical-outcomes-replace-biblical-principles-as-the-moral-standard#.VwcQ8jEn_7Y  "Practical outcomes replace biblical principles as the moral standard"] (September 10, 2001).  Barna Update.
 +
*Jay, Timothy and Janschewitz, Kristin (May/June 2012).  [http://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/publications/observer/2012/may-june-12/the-science-of-swearing.html "The Science of Swearing"].  ''Observer'', vol. 25, no. 5. The Association for Psychological Science website.
 +
*Ritter, Ryan S., Preston, J. L. et al. (June 18, 2013). [http://spp.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/06/18/1948550613492345.full.pdf+html "Happy tweets: Christians are happier, more socially connected, and less analytical than atheists on Twitter" [abstract&#93;].  ''Social Psychological and Personality Science'', 1948550613492345.  Abstract: Sage Journals Subscription required for full article.</ref>
 +
Use of profanity by individuals is negatively correlated with conscientiousness and agreeableness.<ref>Jay, Timothy and Janschewitz, Kristin (May/June 2012).  [http://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/publications/observer/2012/may-june-12/the-science-of-swearing.html "The Science of Swearing"].  ''Observer'', vol. 25, no. 5. The Association for Psychological Science website</ref>
 +
 
 +
For more information, please see: [[Atheism and profanity]]
 +
 
 +
=== Irreligion and crime/prison population ===
 +
*[[Religion and crime reduction]]
 +
*[[Irreligious prison population]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and psychopathy ===
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism and psychopathy]]
 +
[[File:Jeffrey Dahmer Milwaukee Police 1991 mugshot.jpg|thumbnail|right|200px|The [[serial killer]] [[Jeffrey Dahmer]] engaged in [[cannibalism]]. He was an atheist while he committed these acts.<ref>[http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1sv4ky_serial-killer-jeffrey-dahmer-blames-atheism-and-evolution-belief-for-murders_news Serial Killer Jeffrey Dahmer blames Atheism and Evolution belief for Murders]</ref> See: [[Atheism and cannibalism]] ]]
 +
A [[psychopath]] is someone with an anti-social [[personality disorder]] characterized by [[violent]], [[perverted]] or immoral behavior often leading to [[criminal]]ity. Psychopaths have little or no concern for other people. Some psychopaths equate [[love]] with sexual arousal.<ref>{{cite book |title=Without Conscience: The Disturbing World of the Psychopaths Among Us |author=Robert D. Hare |publisher=Guilford Press |place=New York and London |year=2011 |pages=52 |isbn=978-16062-35782 |url=https://books.google.com/books?isbn=1606235788}}</ref>
 +
 
 +
A 2016 study relating to atheism and psychopathy published in ''Plus One'' indicates:
 +
{{Cquote|Similarly, a survey of 312 college students examining the relationship between Religious/Spiritual Well-Being (RSWB) and ‘dark triad’ personality traits found that “RSWB was confirmed to be negatively correlated with these negative aspects of personality, in particular with subclinical psychopathy.”
 +
 
 +
...moral concern is associated with a spiritual worldview.<ref>[http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0149989 Why Do You Believe in God? Relationships between Religious Belief, Analytic Thinking, Mentalizing and Moral Concern] by Anthony Ian Jack , Jared Parker Friedman, Richard Eleftherios Boyatzis, Scott Nolan Taylor, ''Plus One'', March 23, 2016</ref>}}
 +
 
 +
According to the 2014 journal article ''Correlates of psychopathic personality traits in everyday life: results from a large community survey'' published in the journal ''Frontiers of Psychology''  lack of belief in [[God]] is positively associated with [[psychopath]]y.<ref>[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4106400/ Correlates of psychopathic personality traits in everyday life: results from a large community survey] by Scott O. Lilienfeld, Robert D. Latzman, Ashley L. Watts, Sarah F. Smith, and Kevin Dutton, ''Frontiers of Psychology'', 2014</ref>
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and theft crimes ===
 +
 
 +
*[[Atheism and stealing|Atheism and theft crimes]]
 +
*[[Irreligion and car theft]]
 +
*[[Secular Europe and pickpocketing]]
 +
*[[Atheist organizations and scandals]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and infanticide ===
 +
[[Infanticide]] is the practice of killing very young children. An infant is a child too young to speak.<ref>MedicineNet.com http://www.medterms.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=3966.</ref>
 +
[[File:Chow chow.jpg|thumbnail|right|200px|Each year thousands of [[dog]]s are stolen in atheist, communist controlled mainland [[China]] and as many as 20 million dogs are killed in China to satisfy the dog meat industry.<ref>[https://www.unilad.co.uk/featured/stop-pet-dogs-stolen-for-meat/ The Chinese Government Must Stop Pet Dogs Being Stolen For Meat] by JERRY GADIANO, Unilad website</ref> For more information, please see: [[Atheists and dog meat eating]]
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
According to ''ABC News'', gruesome techniques are used in Chinese dog slaughterhouses.<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NjbWQAASPcs Chinese Dog Meat Festival | Undercover Cameras Reveal Brutality Chinese Dog Meat Festival | Undercover Cameras Reveal Brutality], ABC News, YouTube</ref>  Brutal beatings of dogs are occurring in the Chinese dog meat trade during the slaughtering process.<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NjbWQAASPcs Chinese Dog Meat Festival | Undercover Cameras Reveal Brutality Chinese Dog Meat Festival | Undercover Cameras Reveal Brutality], ABC News, YouTube</ref> See: [[Atheism and animal abuse]]
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
[[China]] has the world's largest atheist population.<ref>Double references:
 +
*[http://www.thechapmans.nl/news/Atheist.pdf "Top 20 Countries With Largest Numbers of Atheists / Agnostics (Zuckerman, 2005)"] (November 28, 2007). ''The Largest Atheist/Agnostic Populations''. Chris & Terri Chapman website (March 19, 2013 or bef.), first publication date at website from archive at Internet Archive.
 +
*[https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/05/23/a-surprising-map-of-where-the-worlds-atheists-live/ A surprising map of where the world’s atheists live], ''Washington Post'' By Max Fisher and Caitlin Dewey May 23, 2013</ref> It also has [[state atheism]] (See: [[China and atheism]]).
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
Most atheists in the world are [[East Asia]]n (see: [[Asian atheism]]).]]
 +
Below is an article on atheism and infanticide:
 +
 
 +
*[[Atheism and infanticide]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and bestiality ===
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism and bestiality]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and cannibalism ===
 +
 
 +
See: [[Atheism and cannibalism]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and animal abuse ===
 +
 
 +
See: [[Atheism and animal abuse]] (Brutal dog/cat meat trades, etc.)
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and veganism ===
 +
 
 +
See: [[Atheism and veganism]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and hypocrisy ===
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheist hypocrisy]]
 +
 
 +
In order to attempt to justify their atheism, atheists often engage in [[Hypocrisy|hypocritical]] argumentation.  In addition, atheists often engage in hypocritical behavior. Please see: [[Atheist hypocrisy]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and social justice ===
 +
See: [[Atheism and social justice]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and care of the environment ===
 +
 
 +
See: [[Atheism and the environment|Atheism and care of the environment]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and other moral issues ===
 +
For more information please see:  [[Atheism and morality]] and [[Atheism and hedonism]]
 +
 
 +
=== Earlier definitions of atheism ===
 +
Dictionaries point out that previous/archaic meanings of the word atheism are: ungodliness. wickedness, immorality<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20130509103942/http://www.positiveatheism.org/mail/eml9779.htm Dictionary Says 'Atheism' Means 'Immorality'!?]</ref><ref>[https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/atheism Definition of atheism - Merriam-Webster dictionary]</ref>
 +
 
 +
== Atheism and philosophy topics ==
 +
[[File:Cerebellum.jpg|right|thumb|240px|If [[Naturalism (philosophy)|philosophical naturalism]] were true, then we ought not to trust our capacity for reason for the human brain would be a byproduct of blind/unintelligent natural forces.
 +
<ref>
 +
*[http://creationevolutiondesign.blogspot.com/2006/09/cs-lewis-argument-from-reason.html C.S. Lewis' argument from reason]
 +
*[http://www.evolutionnews.org/2013/11/cs_lewis_and_th079541.html C.S. Lewis and the Argument from Reason] by Jay W. Richards, November 25, 2013
 +
*[http://www.acton.org/pub/religion-liberty/volume-6-number-6/cs-lewis-and-materialism C.S. Lewis and Materialism] by John G. West
 +
*[http://wmbriggs.com/blog/?p=8669 C.S. Lewis On The Validity of Reasoning]
 +
*[http://truthbomb.blogspot.com/2012/04/cs-lewis-on-rationality-and-materialism.html C.S. Lewis on Rationality and Materialism ]
 +
*[http://str.typepad.com/weblog/2008/08/naturalisms-hot.html Naturalism's Hot Water]
 +
</ref>
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
See: [[Atheism and reason]] and [[Atheism and the brain]] ]]
 +
=== Atheism and naturalism ===
 +
 
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism and naturalism]]
 +
 
 +
Scientific naturalism proposes that only explanations which can be scientifically tested are valid, yet this proposition cannot be scientifically tested. Therefore, scientific naturalism is self-refuting.<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DU_K_a7fW1A William Lane Craig on Scientific Naturalism] by Dr. [[William Lane Craig]]</ref> See also: [[Atheism and incoherency]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and issues relating to knowledge acquisition ===
 +
 
 +
*[[Atheism and knowledge]]
 +
 
 +
*[[Atheism and epistemology]]
 +
 
 +
*[[Atheism and reason]]
 +
 
 +
*[[Atheism and evidence]]
 +
 
 +
*[[Atheism and logic]]
 +
 
 +
*[[Atheism and logical fallacies]]
 +
 
 +
*[[Atheism and critical thinking]]
 +
 
 +
*[[Atheism and meaninglessness]]
 +
 
 +
=== Why atheism is irrational ===
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism and irrationality]] and [[Irreligion and superstition]]
 +
 
 +
A common and legitimate criticism of the atheist worldview is that [[Atheism and irrationality|atheism is irrational]].<ref name="athdef"/> In short, atheism is a fundamentally incoherent worldview with a number of inconsistencies.<ref name="inconsist"/>  For example, the atheistic worldview cannot account for the laws of [[logic]].<ref>Multiple references:
 +
*Lisle, Dr. Jason (October 10, 2007).  [https://answersingenesis.org/world-religions/atheism/atheism-an-irrational-worldview/ "Atheism: An irrational worldview"]. AnswersinGenesis. 
 +
*Slick, Matt (2010).  [http://carm.org/christian-worldview-atheist-worldview-and-logic "The Christian worldview, the atheist worldview, and logic"].  Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry.
 +
*Petersen, Jason (2013).  [https://web.archive.org/web/20160807221254/http://answersforhope.org/can-atheism-coherently-explain-the-laws-of-logic/ "Can atheism coherently explain the laws of logic?"] Answers for Hope. 
 +
*Audio of a formal 1985 debate between Christian Greg Bahnsen and skeptic Gordon Stein at the University of California, Irvine on the question "Does God exist?"  See Dr. [[Greg Bahnsen]]
 +
**[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1hSx2evTGM "Greg Bahnsen vs. Gordon Stein:  The Great Debate (FULL)"] (May 19, 2011).  YouTube video, 2:10:44, posted by Argin Gerigorian. 
 +
**Andy (December 5, 2006).  [http://veritasdomain.wordpress.com/2006/12/05/greg-bahnsen-vs-gordon-stein-the-great-debate/ "Greg Bahnsen vs Gordon Stein mp3"].  The Domain for Truth.</ref> See also: [[Atheism and critical thinking]]
 +
 
 +
The atheist worldview cannot explain the existence of [[consciousness]] either and the [[theism|theistic]] worldview can offer a reasonable explanation.<ref>Multiple references:
 +
*Piippo, John (March 20, 2012).  [http://www.johnpiippo.com/2012/03/argument-from-consciousness-for.html "The argument from consciousness for the existence of God"].  John Piippo.
 +
*Piippo, John (April 14, 2014).  [http://www.johnpiippo.com/2014/04/one-of-atheisms-irresolvable-problems.html "Consciousness:  One of atheism's irresolvable problems"].  John Piippo.</ref> 
 +
[[File:113320508 2b86fdb94a.jpg|thumb|201px|right|A common and legitimate criticism of the atheist worldview is that [[Atheism and irrationality|atheism is irrational]].<ref name="athdef">Multiple references:
 +
*Slick, Matt (2010).  [http://carm.org/cut-atheism "Atheism"].  Christian Apologetics & Research Ministry. 
 +
*Samples, Kenneth R. (Fall 1991 and Winter 1992). [http://www.iclnet.org/pub/resources/text/cri/cri-jrnl/web/crj0131a.html "Putting the atheist on the defensive"].  ''Christian Research Institute Journal'', p. 7. Internet Christian Library
 +
*Gilson, Tom (March 21, 2012).  [http://www.faithstreet.com/onfaith/2012/03/21/atheists-dont-own-reason/10924 "Atheists don’t own reason"].  FaithStreet/On Faith. 
 +
*McInerny, Professor Ralph (1985).  [http://www.leaderu.com/truth/1truth11.html "Why the burden of proof is on the atheist"].  ''Truth Journal'', vol. 1. LeadershipU
 +
*Platinga, Alvin (1991).  [http://www.leaderu.com/truth/3truth02.html "Theism, atheism, and rationality"]. ''Truth Journal'', vol. 3.  LeadershipU. See [[Alvin Plantinga]].
 +
*Day, Vox (2008). [http://www.voxday.net/mart/TIA_free.pdf ''The Irrational Atheist: Dissecting the Unholy Trinity of Dawkins, Harris, and Hitchens''](Dallas TX:  Benbella Books). ISBN 1933771364; ISBN 978-1933771366.</ref> In short, atheism is a fundamentally incoherent worldview with a number of inconsistencies.<ref name="inconsist">Multiple references:
 +
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J4K_WZpIkM4 "William Lane Craig on scientific naturalism"] (January 12, 2008).  YouTube video, 9:55, posted by Drcraigvideos
 +
*[http://vimeo.com/102663614 "The Summit lecture series: Scientific naturalism worldview with J.P. Moreland, part 1"] (August 5, 2014).  Vimeo video, 8:10, posted by Jefferson Drexler.
 +
*[http://vimeo.com/103277405 "The Summit lecture series: Scientific naturalism with J.P. Moreland, part 2"] (August 12, 2014).  Vimeo video, 7:43, posted by Jefferson Drexler. 
 +
*[http://vimeo.com/103865278 "The Summit lecture series: Scientific naturalism worldview with J.P. Moreland, part 3"] (August 19, 2014).  Vimeo video, 7:21, posted by Jefferson Drexler. 
 +
*[http://vimeo.com/105068126 "The Summit lecture series: Scientific naturalism worldview with J.P. Moreland, part 4"] (September 2, 2014).  Vimeo video, 6:40, posted by Jefferson Drexler.
 +
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6cTlDn4PiU "The incoherence of atheism - Ravi Zacharias"] (February 5, 2013).  YouTube video, 51:59, posted by Christianity Reason and Science. 
 +
*Cooper, Jordan (August 31, 2012).  [http://justandsinner.blogspot.com/2012/08/the-incoherence-of-atheism.html "The incoherence of atheism"].  Just and Sinner blog. 
 +
*Randy (November 12, 2012).  [http://ephesians4-15.blogspot.com/2012/11/more-on-inconsistent-atheists.html "More on inconsistent atheists"].  Speak the Truth in Love. 
 +
*Geisler, Norman and McCoy, Daniel J. (June 2014).  ''The Atheist's Fatal Flaw: Exposing Conflicting Beliefs'' (Ada, MI:  Baker Publishing Group).  See [[Norman Geisler]]</ref>]]
 +
 
 +
For more information, please see:
 +
 
 +
*[[Atheism and irrationality]]
 +
*[[Atheism and logic]]
 +
*[[Atheism and incoherency]]
 +
*[[Irreligion and superstition]]
 +
*[[Atheism and groupthink]]
 +
*[[Atheism and epistemology]]
 +
*[[Atheism and postmodernism]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and reason ===
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism and reason]] and [[Atheists and unreasonableness]]
 +
 
 +
If [[Naturalism (philosophy)|naturalism]] is true, then we ought not to trust our capacity for [[reason]] for the human [[brain]] would be a byproduct of blind/unintelligent natural forces.
 +
<ref name="C.S. Lewis' argument from reason">*[http://creationevolutiondesign.blogspot.com/2006/09/cs-lewis-argument-from-reason.html C.S. Lewis' argument from reason]
 +
*[http://www.evolutionnews.org/2013/11/cs_lewis_and_th079541.html C.S. Lewis and the Argument from Reason] by Jay W. Richards, November 25, 2013
 +
*[http://www.acton.org/pub/religion-liberty/volume-6-number-6/cs-lewis-and-materialism C.S. Lewis and Materialism] by John G. West
 +
*[http://wmbriggs.com/blog/?p=8669 C.S. Lewis On The Validity of Reasoning]
 +
*[http://str.typepad.com/weblog/2008/08/naturalisms-hot.html Naturalism's Hot Water]</ref>  Therefore, believing in naturalism is self-defeating.
 +
 
 +
In short, atheism/naturalism and reason are incompatible.<ref name="C.S. Lewis' argument from reason"/>
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and personhood ===
 +
 
 +
See: [[Atheism and personhood]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and the problem of consciousness ===
 +
 
 +
See: [[Atheism and consciousness]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and free will ===
 +
 
 +
See: [[Atheism and free will]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and human worth ===
 +
 
 +
See: [[Atheism and human worth]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and evidence ===
 +
See: [[Atheism and evidence]]
 +
 
 +
=== Logical fallacies that atheists commonly commit ===
 +
List of logical fallacies that atheists commonly commit: [[Atheism and logical fallacies]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and meaninglessness ===
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism and meaninglessness]] and [[Atheism and the meaning of life]] and [[Nihilism]] and [[Absurdism]] and [[Existentialism]]
 +
 
 +
Under an atheistic worldview, there is no objective meaning or purpose in life.<ref>Multiple references:
 +
*Anderson, James (July 16, 2013).  [http://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/can-life-have-meaning-without-god "Can life have meaning without God?"] The Gospel Coalition.  "Atheism’s universe is meaningless and valueless". J.W. Wartick—"Always Have a Reason" [blog
 +
*Galloway, Katie (December 23, 2013).  [http://www.bethinking.org/atheism/reclaiming-reason-from-atheism "Reclaiming reason from atheism".]  Bethinking.  ["Why atheism?"]
 +
*Sirrahc (April 19, 2012).  [http://aviewfromtheright.com/2012/04/19/heat-death-and-atheist-inconsistency-or-isnt-it-ironic/ "Heat death and atheist inconsistency (or, isn’t it ironic?)"].  A View from the Right
 +
*Shramek, Dustin (2009).  [http://www.oocities.org/athens/delphi/8449/atheism.html "Atheism and death: Why the atheist must face death with despair"].  Contend for the Faith [archive].  Archive
 +
*Brake, Aaron (2013).  [http://pleaseconvinceme.com/2013/apathy-atheism-and-the-absurdity-of-life-without-god/ "Apathy, atheism, and the absurdity of life without God"].  Pleaseconvinceme. 
 +
*Prayson, Daniel (December 16, 2010).  [http://withalliamgod.wordpress.com/2010/12/16/the-meaningless-life-of-atheism/ "The meaningless life of atheism"].  With All I Am.</ref>  Through [[Jesus Christ]], Christianity offers objective meaning and purpose to life.<ref>Multiple references:
 +
*Slick, Matt (2012).  [http://carm.org/meaning-of-life "What does the Bible say about the meaning/purpose of life?"].  Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry website
 +
*[Under a Christian worldview] [http://www.christianbiblereference.org/faq_MeaningLife.htm "What is the purpose and meaning of life?"] (2009).  Christian Bible Reference Site.</ref>
 +
 
 +
For more information, please see: [[Atheism and meaninglessness]] and [[Atheism and the meaning of life]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheists/agnostics and ultimate purpose ===
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism and purpose]] and [[Atheism, agnosticism and pessimism]] and [[Atheism and beliefs]]
 +
 
 +
One of the most popular arguments for God's existence is the [[teleological argument]]. Derived from the Greek word ''telos'', which refers to purpose or end, this argument hinges on the idea that the world gives evidence of being designed, and concludes that a divine designer must be posited to account for the orderly world we encounter.
 +
 
 +
Academic research and historical data indicate that a significant portion of atheists/agnostics often see their lives and the world as being the product of purposeful design (see: [[Atheism and purpose]]).<ref>Multiple references:
 +
*Banerjee, Konika and Bloom, Paul (October 17, 2014).  [https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/19/opinion/sunday/does-everything-happen-for-a-reason.html "Does everything happen for a reason?"]  The New York Times website
 +
*Catchpoole, David (July 16, 2009 [GMT+10]).  [https://creation.com/children-see-the-world-as-designed "Children see the world as designed"].  Creation.com.  See [[Creation Ministries International]].
 +
*Atheist [[Jean-Paul Sartre]] made the candid confession: "As for me, I don’t see myself as so much dust that has appeared in the world but as a being that was expected, prefigured, called forth. In short, as a being that could, it seems, come only from a creator; and this idea of a creating hand that created me refers me back to God. Naturally this is not a clear, exact idea that I set in motion every time I think of myself. It contradicts many of my other ideas; but it is there, floating vaguely. And when I think of myself I often think rather in this way, for want of being able to think otherwise." Source: Turner, Dean (1991). [https://books.google.com/books?id=BGU7LZ2bQ4cC&pg=PA109&lpg=PA109&dq=As+for+me,+I+don%E2%80%99t+see+myself+as+so+much+dust+that+has+appeared+in+the+world+but+as+a+being+that+was+expected,+prefigured,+called+forth.+In+short,+as+a+being+that+could,+it+seems,+come+only+from+a+creator;+and+this+idea+of+a+creating+hand+that+created+me+refers+me+back+to+God.&source=bl&ots=die9xMUdsB&sig=3dAJOK34aBalYieFKcJLdGpwFjY&hl=en&sa=X&ei=NXhqVMSmHMexyASUyYKIBw&ved=0CCwQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=As%20for%20me%2C%20I%20don%E2%80%99t%20see%20myself%20as%20so%20much%20dust%20that%20has%20appeared%20in%20the%20world%20but%20as%20a%20being%20that%20was%20expected%2C%20prefigured%2C%20called%20forth.%20In%20short%2C%20as%20a%20being%20that%20could%2C%20it%20seems%2C%20come%20only%20from%20a%20creator%3B%20and%20this%20idea%20of%20a%20creating%20hand%20that%20created%20me%20refers%20me%20back%20to%20God.&f=false ''Escape from God: The Use of Religion and Philosophy to Evade Responsibility''] (Pasadena, California:  Hope Publishing House), p. 109. GoogleBooks archive.
 +
*The ''Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy'' declares about the agnostic/[[weak atheism|weak atheist]] Charles Darwin: "In 1885, the Duke of Argyll recounted a conversation he had had with Charles Darwin the year before Darwin's death: 'In the course of that conversation I said to Mr. Darwin, with reference to some of his own remarkable works on the Fertilization of [[Orchid]]s, and upon The [[Earthworm]]s, and various other observations he made of the wonderful contrivances for certain purposes in nature — I said it was impossible to look at these without seeing that they were the effect and the expression of Mind. I shall never forget Mr. Darwin's answer. He looked at me very hard and said, "Well, that often comes over me with overwhelming force; but at other times," and he shook his head vaguely, adding, "it seems to go away."' (Argyll 1885, 244)"
 +
**[http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/teleological-arguments/notes.html "Notes to 'Teleological arguments for God's existence'"] [article revised removing reference in January 2015].
 +
**The Duke of Argyll (1885).  [https://books.google.com/books?id=CskhAQAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=%22good+words%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=fs24VKGOMpDnsATg_4HYDQ&ved=0CDkQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=%22it%20seems%20to%20go%20away%22&f=false "What is science?"]  ''Good Words'' [United Kingdom], vol. 26, p. 244. GoogleBooks archive
 +
</ref>
 +
 
 +
See also:
 +
 
 +
*[[Atheists doubting the validity of atheism]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and evil/suffering ===
 +
 
 +
*[[Atheism and the Problem of Evil|Atheism and the problem of evil]]
 +
 
 +
*[[Atheism and suffering]]
 +
=== Arrogance of atheism/atheists ===
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism and arrogance]] and [[Atheism and narcissism]] and [[Atheism and deception]]
 +
 
 +
One of the common and well-founded charges against atheists is their arrogance and presumptuousness.<ref>Multiple references:
 +
*Samples, Kenneth R. (Fall 1991 and Winter 1992). [http://www.iclnet.org/pub/resources/text/cri/cri-jrnl/web/crj0131a.html "Putting the atheist on the defensive"].  ''Christian Research Institute Journal'', p. 7.  Internet Christian Library
 +
*Copan, Paul (April 6, 2009).  [http://www.equip.org/articles/the-presumptuousness-of-atheism/ "The presumptuousness of atheism"].  Christian Research Institute.
 +
*Cupp, S. E. (December 29, 2010).  [http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/arrogance-atheists-batter-believers-religion-smug-certainty-article-1.469613 "The arrogance of the atheists: They batter believers in religion with smug certainty"].  ''New York Daily News''.  See atheist commentator [[S.E. Cupp]]
 +
*O'Neill, Brendan (August 14, 2013).  [http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/brendanoneill2/100230985/how-atheists-became-the-most-colossally-smug-and-annoying-people-on-the-planet/ "How atheists became the most colossally smug and annoying people on the planet"].  The Telegraph website/Brendan O'Neill [blog].  [atheist author] 
 +
*Delzell, Dan (October 17, 2011).  [http://www.christianpost.com/news/how-anger-fuels-atheistic-arrogance-58281/ "How anger fuels atheistic arrogance"].  Christian Post website.
 +
*[http://atheismexposed.tripod.com/atheist_arrogance.htm "Militant atheist arrogance and pride"] (2007).  Militant Atheism Exposed.</ref>
 +
 
 +
==== Why atheism is an arrogant ideology  ====
 +
''See also:'' [[Rebuttals to atheist arguments|Arguments against atheism]] and [[Atheism and arrogance]]
 +
[[File:Old Nietzsche, 1899.JPG|thumbnail|220px|right|[[Friedrich Nietzsche]] wrote: "But now God is dead. You superior men, this God was your greatest danger. Only since he is in the grave, have you risen again. Only now comes the great noontide; only now the superior man will be – Lord!".<ref>[http://atheismexposed.tripod.com/atheist_arrogance.htm Friedrich Nietzsche, Thus Spoke Zarathustra, In Michael Curtis (Ed.) The Great Political Theories, Vol. 2 (New York: Avon Books, 1962, PP. 261-262). Cited in, Christopher, J.R., G.G, Wittet, Modern Western Civilization. Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1991, Pages 232, 233]</ref>
 +
<br /><br />
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
The picture of Nietzsche above was taken in 1899. Nietzsche died in 1900. See: [[Atheism and arrogance]] ]]
 +
Atheists [[Attempts to dilute the definition of atheism|lack proof and evidence]] that God does not exist and ignore the [[Christian apologetics websites|clear and abundant proof and evidence]] that He does exist.  The philosopher [[Mortimer Adler]] pointed out that atheism asserts an unreasonable [[universal negative]] that is self-defeating.<ref name="defensive">Samples, Kenneth R. (Fall 1991 and Winter 1992). [http://www.iclnet.org/pub/resources/text/cri/cri-jrnl/web/crj0131a.html "Putting the atheist on the defensive"].  ''Christian Research Institute Journal'', p. 7. Internet Christian Library</ref> 
 +
 
 +
Contrary to the mistaken notion of individuals who are inexperienced in [[logic]]/philosophy, there are plenty of cases where universal negatives [[Universal negative|can be proven]].<ref>[https://www.reasonablefaith.org/writings/question-answer/must-the-atheist-be-omniscient/ Must the Atheist Be Omniscient?] by Dr. William Lane Craig</ref>  However, atheists' universal negative claim that God does not exist is not a reasonable universal negative claim.<ref name="defensive"/>
 +
 
 +
Atheists have also given themselves pretentious monikers such as [[freethinker]], rationalist and "bright". See also: [[Brights Movement]] and [[Atheism and intelligence]]
 +
 
 +
In addition, historically militant atheists have commonly endeavored to limit the religious freedom of others while imposing their errant, atheistic ideology on others. See also: [[Atheism and intolerance]]
 +
 
 +
==== Atheists and lack of open-mindedness ====
 +
 
 +
Research indicates that atheists are less open-minded (see: [[Atheism and open-mindedness]]).
 +
 
 +
See:
 +
 
 +
*[[Atheism and open-mindedness]]
 +
 
 +
*[[Atheism and dogmatism]]
 +
 
 +
*[[New Atheism, dogmatism and Jonathon Haidt's study]]
 +
 
 +
== Atheism and religion ==
 +
=== Atheism is a religion ===
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism is a religion]] and [[Atheist cults]] and [[Atheist hypocrisy]]
 +
[[File:Sanderson Jones.jpg|thumbnail|right|200px|The [[British atheism|British atheist]] Sanderson Jones is a founder of the [[Sunday Assembly]] "atheist church" movement.<ref>[https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/06/atheist-church-split_n_4550456.html Atheist Church Split: Sunday Assembly And Godless Revival's 'Denominational Chasm'], Huffington Post, 2014</ref>]]
 +
 
 +
See: [[Atheism is a religion]]
 +
 
 +
[[Atheism is a religion]].<ref name="Atheismisareligion">Multiple references:
 +
*[https://creation.com/atheism-a-religion Is Atheism a religion?] by Daniel Smartt, Published: 4 May 2010(GMT+10)
 +
*Hodge, Bodie; Patterson, Roger (2016). ''[https://assets.answersingenesis.org/doc/prod/etc/sample/10-2-476_sample.pdf ''World Religions and Cults Vol. 3'']. Master Books. 29–44. ISBN: 978-0-89051-970-7.
 +
*Hodge, Bodie; Ham, Ken (February 20, 2017). [https://answersingenesis.org/world-religions/atheism/atheism-is-religion/ Atheism Is Religion]. ''Answers in Genesis''. Retrieved March 27, 2018.</ref>  And many of the leaders of the atheist movement, such as the evolutionist and [[New Atheism|new atheist]]/agnostic Richard Dawkins, argue for agnosticism/atheism with a religious fervor.
 +
 +
In addition, although many atheists deny that atheism is a worldview, atheists commonly share a [[Atheism and beliefs|number of beliefs]] such as [[Naturalism (philosophy)|naturalism]], belief in evolution and [[Origin of life|abiogenesis]].<ref>Multiple references:
 +
*Slick, Matt (October 2011).  [http://carm.org/atheism-worldview "Is atheism a worldview?"]  Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry website.  See [[CARM]]
 +
*Hearn, Brian F. (December 31, 2009).  [http://www.apologetics.net/post/Atheism-a-worldview.aspx "Atheism a worldview?"]  Apologetics.net.
 +
*Hearn, Brian F. (May 2, 2012).  [http://www.apologetics.net/post/Atheism-is-a-worldview-%28II%29.aspx "Atheism is a worldview II"].  Apologetics.net.
 +
*Bannister, Andy (October 14, 2013).  [http://www.rzim.eu/the-scandanavian-sceptic-or-why-atheism-is-a-belief-system "The Scandanavian sceptic (or why atheism is a belief system)"].  Ravi Zacharias International Ministries website.  See [[Ravi Zacharias]]</ref> 
 +
 
 +
Roderick Ninian Smart, a Scottish writer and professor, defined a seven-part scheme of understanding both religious and secular worldviews<ref>Smart, Ninian (1996).  [https://books.google.com/books?id=14j2UrLCi64C&pg=PA130&lpg=PA130&dq=ninian+smart+narrative&source=bl&ots=Hq3WwG_mVT&sig=j-8FpwSdqohURYodSdcl46erSJY&hl=en&sa=X&ei=FgybT6zxIc-_gAe864X6Dg&ved=0CCoQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=ninian%20smart%20narrative&f=false ''Dimensions of the Sacred'' [preview&#93;] (Oakland, CA: University of California Press).  Preview: GoogleBooks</ref>  These can be understood as narrative, experiential, social, ethical, doctrinal, ritual and material.
 +
 
 +
English Pastor Daniel Smartt defines atheism as a religion, using Ninian Smart's seven dimensions of worldview as a list of criteria. It is not necessary in Smartt's model for every one of these to be present in order for something to be a religion.<ref>Smartt, Daniel (November 6, 2008).  [https://archive.is/L3cY5 "Atheism religion naturalism morally relative"].  Archive of SpiritualLiving360°.</ref> However, it can be argued that all seven are present in the case of atheism.<ref name="Atheismisareligion"/>
 +
<ref>*Ammi, Ken (June 11, 2009).  [https://creation.com/atheism "Atheism"].  Creation Ministries International.</ref>
 +
 
 +
In 2013, a trend of atheist services began and atheist services were reported in the ''[[New York Times]]'', ''[[The Blaze]]'' and other major news outlets.<ref>Multiple references:
 +
*Thier, Dave (June 23, 2013).  [https://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/24/us/in-the-bible-belt-offering-atheists-a-spiritual-home.html?_r=0 "In the Bible belt offering atheists a spiritual home"].  Nytimes.com
 +
*Hallowell, Billy (April 17, 2013).  [https://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/04/17/atheist-sunday-morning-worship-services-are-on-the-rise/ "Bizarre trend: atheist Sunday morning ‘worship’ services are on the rise (minus God, of course)"]  TheBlaze. 
 +
*Ortberg, Mallory (January 5, 2013).  [http://gawker.com/5973377/londons-first-atheist-church-opens-tomorrow "London's first atheist church opens tomorrow".]  Gawker.</ref>
 +
 
 +
See also:
 +
 
 +
*[[Atheism is a religion]]
 +
*[[Atheist indoctrination]]
 +
*[[Atheist cults]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheist cults ===
 +
See: [[Atheist cults]]
 +
 
 +
[[File:2384975035 230a0eac30.jpg|thumb|right|170px|The [[Wall Street Journal]] reported: "A comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows ...that the irreligious and the members of more liberal Protestant denominations, far from being resistant to [[superstition]], tend to be much more likely to believe in the paranormal and in [[pseudoscience]] than evangelical Christians."<ref name="online.wsj.com">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html</ref>]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and spirituality ===
 +
*[[Atheism and spirituality]]
 +
 
 +
=== Irreligion and superstition ===
 +
''See also:'' [[Irreligion and superstition]]
 +
 
 +
In September 2008, the [[Wall Street Journal]] reported:
 +
{{cquote|The reality is that the New Atheist campaign, by discouraging [[religion]], won't create a new group of intelligent, skeptical, enlightened beings. Far from it: It might actually encourage new levels of mass [[superstition]]. And that's not a conclusion to take on faith—it's what the empirical data tell us.
 +
 
 +
"What Americans Really Believe," a comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]]. It also shows that the irreligious and the members of more liberal Protestant denominations, far from being resistant to superstition, tend to be much more likely to believe in the paranormal and in [[pseudoscience]] than evangelical Christians...."<ref name="paranormal">Hemingway, Molly Ziegler (September 19, 2008). [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html "Look who's irrational now"].  The Wall Street Journal website.</ref>}}
 +
[[File:Loc of United States.png|thumbnail|175px|right|According to Pew Forum, [[Evangelicalism|evangelical Protestant]] churches in America grew by 2 million from 2007 to 2014.<ref>[https://www.wnd.com/2015/05/why-conservative-churches-are-still-growing/ Why conservative churches are still growing]</ref>  See: [[Atheism vs. Christianity]] ]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and the occult ===
 +
 
 +
See: [[Atheism and the occult]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism vs. Abrahamic religions and religion ===
 +
*[[Atheism vs. Christianity]]
 +
*[[Atheism vs. religion]]
 +
*[[Atheism vs. Judaism]]
 +
*[[Atheism vs. theism]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism vs. Islam ===
 +
:''See main article: [[Atheism vs. Islam]]''
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and miracles ===
 +
:''See main article: [[Atheism and Miracles]]''
 +
 
 +
In relation to [[Atheism and Miracles|atheism and miracles]], modern scholars are divided on the issue of whether or not [[David Hume]] was an atheist.<ref>Russell, Paul (February 11, 2013). [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hume-religion/#10 "Hume on religion"]. ''The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy'' (Spring 2013 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.).
 +
</ref> With that caveat in mind, Hume is well known for arguing that it is always more probable that the testimony of a miracle is false than that the miracle occurred.<ref>Multiple references:
 +
*Lennox, John (2009).  [http://www.bethinking.org/are-miracles-possible/the-question-of-miracles-the-contemporary-influence-of-hume "The question of miracles: the contemporary influence of Hume"].  BeThinking.
 +
*Craig, Dr. William Lane (1986).  [http://www.leaderu.com/offices/billcraig/docs/miracles.html "The problem of miracles: a historical and philosophical perspective"].  ''Gospel Perspectives'', vol 6, ed. by David Wenham and Craig Blomberg (Sheffield, England: JSOT Press), pp. 9-40.  LeadershipU</ref>  Christian apologists [[William Lane Craig]], [[Norman Geisler]], [[C.S. Lewis]], [[JP Holding]], and others have shown the inadequacy and unreasonableness of Hume's position regarding miracles.<ref>Multiple references:
 +
*Lennox, John (2009).  [http://www.bethinking.org/are-miracles-possible/the-question-of-miracles-the-contemporary-influence-of-hume "The question of miracles: the contemporary influence of Hume"].  BeThinking. 
 +
*Craig, Dr. William Lane (1986).  [http://www.leaderu.com/offices/billcraig/docs/miracles.html "The problem of miracles: a historical and philosophical perspective"].  ''Gospel Perspectives'', vol 6, ed. by David Wenham and Craig Blomberg (Sheffield, England: JSOT Press), pp. 9-40.  LeadershipU
 +
*Hoffman, Paul K. (Spring 1999).  [http://www.galaxie.com/article/caj02-1-03?highlight=hoffmanA "A jurisprudential analysis of Hume’s ‘in principal’ argument against miracles" [excerpt&#93;].  ''Christian Apologetics Journal'', 2:1, p. 2.  Galaxie Software.  Subscription required for full article.
 +
*Geisler, Professor Norman (1985).  [http://www.leaderu.com/truth/1truth19.html "Miracles and modern scientific thought"].  ''Truth Journal'', vol. 1.  LeadershipU
 +
*Lewis, C. S. (1960).  [https://books.google.com/books/about/Miracles.html?id=tH8di3qQDhEC ''Miracles''] (New York:  HarperCollins).  Abstract: Google Books
 +
*Holding, J. P. [http://www.tektonics.org/gk/hume01.html "David Hume: a critique"].  Tekton Apologetics.
 +
*Esposito, Lenny (2002).  [http://www.comereason.org/phil_qstn/phi060.asp "Are miracles logically impossible?"]  Come Reason Ministries.</ref>
 +
 
 +
The ''Christian Post'' reporter Stoyan Zaimov wrote: "Double-blind prayer experiments: where people pray for others with terminal illness. [[Gary Habermas|Habermas]] admitted that most such experiments have not worked, but the three that he knows of that have indeed worked were cases of orthodox-Christians praying for the sick."<ref>[http://www.christianpost.com/news/christian-apologist-10-reasons-for-the-fall-of-atheism-106531/ Christian Apologist: 10 Reasons for the Fall of Atheism] by Stoyan Zaimov,'' Christian Post'', October 14, 2013</ref>
 +
 
 +
==== Atheists who believe in life after death ====
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism and the supernatural]]
 +
 
 +
A survey involving 15,738 individuals found that 32 percent of Americans who identified themselves as agnostics and atheists believe in an afterlife of some kind.<ref>[http://www.theskepticsguide.org/one-third-of-atheists-agnostics-believe-in-an-afterlife Survey: 32% of Atheists & Agnostics Believe in an Afterlife], Skepticsguide.com</ref><ref>[http://relationshipsinamerica.com/religion/do-people-still-believe-in-life-after-death Do people still believe in life after death?], Austin Institute for the Study of Family and Culture Study</ref>
 +
 
 +
== Atheism and death ==
 +
[[File:Atheism and death.jpg|thumbnail|200px|right|According to a study performed in the United States by researchers Wink and Scott, very religious people fear death the least.<ref>Multiple references:
 +
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20140330091500/http://www.world-science.net/exclusives/050628_deathfearfrm.htm "Fear of death: Worst if you’re a little religious?"] (July 13, 2005).  World Science.
 +
*Wink, P. L. and Scott, J. A. (July 2005).  [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15980288 "Does religiousness buffer against the fear of death and dying in late adulthood? Findings from a longitudinal study" [abstract&#93;].  ''The Journals of Gerontology, series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences'', vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 207-14. PubMed.gov</ref>] See: [[Atheism and death]]
 +
 
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism and death]] and [[Atheist funerals]] and [[Atheism and Hell]]
 +
 
 +
''Science Daily'' reported that ''Death anxiety increases atheists' unconscious belief in God''.<ref name="Otago">University of Otago [New Zealand] (April 2, 2012).  [https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/04/120402094322.htm "Death anxiety increases atheists' unconscious belief in God"].  ScienceDaily.</ref> In a ''Psychology Today'' article, Dr. Nathan A. Heflick reported similar results in other studies.<ref name="Heflick">Heflick, Nathan A. (May 25, 2012).  [http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-big-questions/201205/atheists-death-and-belief-in-god "Atheists, death and belief in God: The effects of death reminders on atheists' supernatural beliefs"].  Psychology Today website.</ref> Under stress, the brain's processing works in a way that prefers unconscious thinking.<ref>Multiple references:
 +
*Ruhr University Bochum (August 9, 2012). [http://aktuell.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/pm2012/pm00263.html.en "Learn to forecast the weather after stress"].  aktuell.ruhr-uni-bochum.de. 
 +
*Gregoire, Carolyn (July 31, 2013).  [https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/31/learn-under-stress-brain_n_3678222.html "How the brain learns successfully, even under stress"].  The Huffington Post.</ref>
 +
 
 +
A United States study and a [[Taiwan]]ese study indicated that the irreligious fear death more than the very religious.<ref>Multiple references:
 +
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20140330091500/http://www.world-science.net/exclusives/050628_deathfearfrm.htm "Fear of death: Worst if you’re a little religious?"] (July 13, 2005).  World Science.
 +
*Wink, Paul. and Scott, Julia. (July 2005).  [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15980288 "Does religiousness buffer against the fear of death and dying in late adulthood? Findings from a longitudinal study"].  ''The Journals of Gerontology. Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences'', vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 207-14. PubMed.gov.
 +
*Wen, Ya-hui. (December 2010). [http://www.hraljournal.com/Page/4%20Ya-Hui%20Wen.pdf "Religiosity and death anxiety"]. ''The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning'', vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 31-37. The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning website.</ref>
 +
 
 +
==== Atheists and belief in life after death ====
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism and life after death]] and [[Atheists and supernatural beliefs]]
 +
 
 +
A significant percentage of atheists believe in life after death (see: [[Atheism and life after death]]).<ref>[http://www.theskepticsguide.org/one-third-of-atheists-agnostics-believe-in-an-afterlife Survey: 32% of Atheists & Agnostics Believe in an Afterlife]</ref>
 +
 
 +
For additional information, please see:
 +
 
 +
* [[Atheism and cryonics]]
 +
*[[Atheism and transhumanism]]
 +
 
 +
==== Atheism and Hell ====
 +
''See also:''  [[Atheism and Hell]]
 +
 
 +
The journalist and [[ex-atheists|ex-atheist]] [[Peter Hitchens]], who is the brother of the late atheist [[Christopher Hitchens]], said upon seeing an art exhibit of [[Michelangelo]]'s painting ''The Last Judgment'' he came to the realization that he might be judged which startled him.<ref name="PH">[http://vimeo.com/10354237 "Peter Hitchens author interview—The rage against God"] [interview of Peter Hitchens] (March 22, 2010).  Vimeo video, 8:38, posted by Gorilla Poet Productions.</ref> This started a train of thought within Peter Hitchens that eventually led him to become a [[Christian]].<ref name="PH"/>
 +
 
 +
== Atheism and science ==
 +
[[Image:Newton.jpg|alt=atheism quotes|right|thumbnail|200px|[[Isaac Newton]] wrote: "I have a fundamental belief in the [[Bible]] as the Word of [[God]], written by men who were inspired. I study the Bible daily. Opposition to godliness is atheism in profession and idolatry in practice. Atheism is so senseless and odious to mankind that it never had many professors." See also: [[Atheism Quotes|Atheism quotes]] ]]
 +
 
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism and science]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and the suppression of science ===
 +
See: [[Atheism and the suppression of science]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and the social sciences ===
 +
See: [[Atheism and the social sciences]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and the foundation of modern science ===
 +
''See also:'' [[Christianity and science]]
 +
 
 +
The birth of modern [[science]] occurred in Christianized Europe.<ref>Bumbulis, Michael, Ph. D. (November 24, 1996). [http://www.ldolphin.org/bumbulis/#anchor5343749 "Christianity and the birth of science; The evidence; Clue #1. The founders/fathers of modern science were shaped by a culture that was predominantly Christian."]  Lambert Dolphin's Library.  Archived at Internet Archive on July 20, 2014.</ref>
 +
 
 +
[[Sociology|Sociologist]] [[Rodney Stark]] investigated the individuals who made the most significant scientific contributions between 1543 and 1680 A.D., the time of the [[Scientific Revolution]].
 +
In Stark's list of 52 top scientific contributors,<ref name="Origins">Williams, Alex (August 2004).  [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1581/ "The biblical origins of science; a review of ''For The Glory of God: How Monotheism Led to Reformations, Science, Witch-hunts and the End of Slavery'' by Rodney Stark"], ''Journal of Creation'', vol. 18:2, pp. 49–52.</ref> only one ([[Edmund Halley]]) was a skeptic and another ([[Paracelsus]]) was a [[pantheism|pantheist]].
 +
The other 50 were Christians, 30 of whom could be characterized as being devout Christians.<ref name="Origins" />
 +
 
 +
Sir [[Francis Bacon]], sometimes referred to as "the Father of Modern Science", wrote in his essay entitled ''Of Atheism'': "I had rather believe all the fables in the Legend, and the [[Talmud]], and the [[Koran|Alcoran]], than that this universal frame is without a mind."<ref name="bacon">Bacon, Francis (1601).  [http://www.authorama.com/essays-of-francis-bacon-17.html ''The Essays or Counsels, Civil and Moral, of Francis Ld. Verulam Viscount St. Albans''; "Of atheism"].  Authorama.</ref>
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and environmental science ===
 +
 
 +
See: [[Atheism and the environment|Atheism and environmental science]]
 +
 
 +
===Atheism and questions of origins===
 +
:''See articles: [[Atheism and Evolution]]'' and [[Evolution as a secular origins myth]]
 +
[[Creationism|Creationist]] scientists state that the [[First Law of Thermodynamics|first law of thermodynamics]] and the [[Second Law of Thermodynamics|second law of thermodynamics]] argue against an eternal universe or a universe created by natural processes and argue for a universe created by [[God]].<ref>Multiple references:
 +
*Hergenrather, John (2004).  [http://www.creationencounter.com/space/lawsofscience.php "Evidences for God from space:  can laws of science explain the origin of the universe?"]  Creation Encounter.
 +
*Thompson, Bert (2003).  [http://www.apologeticspress.org/apcontent.aspx?category=12&article=310 "So long, eternal universe; 'Hello beginning, hello end!'"]  Apologetics Press. 
 +
*Brown, Dr. Walt (2008).  [http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/AstroPhysicalSciences14.html "Chapter 2: astronomical and physical sciences", p. 53.]  ''In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood'', 8th ed. The Center for Scientific Creation.</ref> See also: [[Atheism and the origin of the universe]]
 +
 
 +
A majority of the most prominent and vocal defenders of the evolutionary position which employs [[methodological naturalism]] since [[World War II]] have had the worldview of atheism/agnosticism.<ref>
 +
* Dr. Don Batten, [https://creation.com/a-whos-who-of-evolutionists A ''Who’s Who'' of evolutionists] ''Creation'' 20(1):32, December 1997.
 +
* [[Jonathan Sarfati]], Ph.D.,F.M., [http://www.creation.com/content/view/3830 ''Refuting Evolution'', Chapter 1, Facts and Bias]
 +
</ref>  [[Creation science|Creation scientists]] assert that the theory of evolution is an inadequate explanation for the variety of life forms on earth.<ref>Morris, Henry M., PhD. (January 2001). [https://www.icr.org/home/resources/resources_tracts_scientificcaseagainstevolution/ "The scientific case against evolution"].  Institute for Creation Research.</ref> The theory of evolution [[Social effects of the theory of evolution|has had a number of negative social effects]].
 +
 
 +
In addition, the current naturalistic explanations for the [[origin of life]] are inadequate.<ref>[https://creation.com/origin-of-life Origin of life] by Dr. Don Batten</ref>
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and scientific community ===
 +
*[[Atheism and science]]
 +
*[[Scientists and belief in the existence of God]]
 +
*[[Atheism and the origin of the universe|Atheist scientists and the origin of the universe]]
 +
*[[Atheists and the National Academy of Sciences]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and scientific fraud and speculation ===
 +
*[[Atheism and deception|Atheism and scientific fraud and speculation]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and food science ===
 +
 
 +
*[[Atheism and food science]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and culinary science ===
 +
 
 +
*[[Atheism and culinary science]]
 +
 
 +
=== RationalWiki's flouting of nutritional science ===
 +
 
 +
*[[Rational Media Board of Director and RationalWiki Moderater User: Spud and ultra-processed/unhealthy/junk food]]
 +
 
 +
==Atheism and mental and physical health==
 +
:''See also:'' [[Atheism and health]] and [[Atheism and life expectancy]] and [[Atheism and alcoholism]] and [[Atheism and negative emotions/thoughts]]
 +
 
 +
The is considerable amount of [[science|scientific]] evidence that suggest that theism is more conducive to mental and physical health than atheism and some of the more significant findings are given below <ref>Multiple references:
 +
*[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3671693/ Religion, Spirituality, and Health: The Research and Clinical Implications] by Harold G. Koenig, ISRN Psychiatry. 2012; 2012: 278730.
 +
*Mueller, Dr. Paul S. et al. (December 2001). [http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org/article/S0025-6196%2811%2962799-7/fulltext "Religious involvement, spirituality, and medicine: implications for clinical practice"]. ''Mayo Clinic Proceedings'' vol. 76:12, pp. 1225-1235.  Mayo Clinic Proceedings website
 +
*[http://www.spiritualityandhealth.duke.edu/index.php/research/research-library "Research library"].  Duke University Center for Spirituality, Theology and Health.
 +
*McCullough, Michael E. et al. (2000).  [http://www.psy.miami.edu/faculty/mmccullough/Papers/rel_mort_meta.pdf "Religious involvement and mortality: a meta-analytic review"].  ''Health Psychology''. vol. 19:3. pp. 211-222.  University of Miami, College of Arts and Sciences, Department of Psychology website
 +
*Casey, Professor Patricia (April 3, 2009).  [http://www.ionainstitute.ie/the-benefits-of-religious-practise/  "The psycho-social benefits of religious practise" [executive summary&#93;].  Iona Institute for Religion and Society [Ireland] website. 
 +
*McCullough, Michael E. and Willoughby, Brian L. B. (2009).  [http://www.psy.miami.edu/faculty/mmccullough/Papers/Relig_self_control_bulletin.pdf "Religion, self-regulation, and self-control: associations, explanations, and implications"]. ''Psychological Bulletin'', vol. 135: 1, pp. 69–93.  University of Miami, College of Arts and Sciences, Department of Psychology website
 +
*University of Colorado at Boulder (May 17, 1999).  [https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/05/990517064323.htm "Research shows religion plays a major role in health, longevity"].  ScienceDaily. 
 +
*Dervic, Kanita, et al. (December 2004).  [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15569904 "Religious affiliation and suicide attempt" [abstract&#93;]. ''The American Journal of Psychiatry'', vol. 161:12, pp. 2303-8.  Abstract: National Institutes of Health, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, Pub Med
 +
*University of Warwick (December 2003).  [http://www.scienceblog.com/community/older/2003/A/20037338.html "Psychology researcher [Dr. Stephen Joseph&#93; says spiritual meaning of Christmas brings more happiness than materialism"].  Scienceblog.
 +
</ref> For more information please see: [[Atheism and health]] and [[Atheism and life expectancy]]
 +
 
 +
=== Mayo Clinic and other studies ===
 +
[[Image:Mayo-clinic-gondaoverview.jpg|thumb|right|200px|The prestigious [[Mayo Clinic]] found that religious involvement and spirituality are associated with better physical health and mental health outcomes.<ref name="Mueller">Mueller, Dr. Paul S. et al. (December 2001). [https://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org/article/S0025-6196(11)62799-7/abstract "Religious involvement, spirituality, and medicine: implications for clinical practice"]. ''Mayo Clinic Proceedings'' vol. 76:12, pp. 1225-1235. Mayo Clinic Proceedings website</ref> See: [[Atheism and health]] ]]
 +
The prestigious [[Mayo Clinic]] reported the following on December 11, 2001:
 +
{{cquote|In an article also published in this issue of Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Mayo Clinic researchers reviewed published studies, meta-analyses, systematic reviews and subject reviews that examined the association between religious involvement and spirituality and physical health, mental health, health-related quality of life and other health outcomes.
 +
 
 +
The authors report a majority of the nearly 350 studies of physical health and 850 studies of mental health that have used religious and spiritual variables have found that religious involvement and spirituality are associated with better health outcomes.<ref name="Mueller"/>}}
 +
 
 +
The [[Iona Institute]] reported:
 +
{{cquote|A meta-analysis of all studies, both published and unpublished, relating to religious involvement and longevity was carried out in 2000. Forty-two studies were included, involving some 126,000 subjects. Active religious involvement increased the chance of living longer by some 29%, and participation in public religious practices, such as church attendance, increased the chance of living longer by 43%.<ref>Multiple references:
 +
*Casey, Professor Patricia (April 3, 2009).  [http://www.ionainstitute.ie/the-benefits-of-religious-practise/  "The psycho-social benefits of religious practise" [executive summary&#93;].  Iona Institute for Religion and Society [Ireland] website.
 +
*McCullough, Michael E. et al. (2000).  [http://www.psy.miami.edu/faculty/mmccullough/Papers/rel_mort_meta.pdf "Religious involvement and mortality: a meta-analytic review"].  ''Health Psychology''. vol. 19:3. pp. 211-222.  University of Miami, College of Arts and Sciences, Department of Psychology website</ref>}}
 +
 
 +
=== Atheists and negative emotions/thoughts ===
 +
 
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism and emotional problems]] and [[Atheism and social/interpersonal intelligence]] and  [[Atheism and negative emotions/thoughts]]
 +
 
 +
[[Emotional intelligence]] "refers to the ability to perceive, control and evaluate emotions."<ref>[http://psychology.about.com/od/personalitydevelopment/a/emotionalintell.htm Emotional intelligence]</ref> Research indicates that religiosity is positively associated with ability in emotional intelligence.<ref>[https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10943-016-0335-3 Divine Emotions: On the Link Between Emotional Intelligence and Religious Belief], ''Journal of Religion and Health'', December 2017, Volume 56, Issue 6, pp 1998–2009</ref><ref>[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4733549/ THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE WITH RELIGIOUS COPING AND GENERAL HEALTH OF STUDENTS] by Masoumeh Bagheri Nesami, Amir Hossein Goudarzian, Houman Zarei, Pedram Esameili, Milad Dehghan Pour, and Hesam Mirani, ''Materia Sociomedica''. 2015 Dec; 27(6): 412–416. doi: 10.5455/msm.2015.27.412-416</ref><ref>[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222857921_Religiosity_and_perceived_emotional_intelligence_among_Christians Religiosity and perceived emotional intelligence among Christians], Personality and Individual Differences 41(3):479-490 · August 2006, DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.01.016</ref> See also: [[Atheism and emotional problems]] and [[Atheism and social/interpersonal intelligence]] and [[Atheism and negative emotions/thoughts]]
 +
 
 +
===Atheism and suicide===
 +
:''See also:''  [[Atheism and suicide]] and [[Atheism and depression]] and [[Hopelessness of atheism]] and [[Atheism, agnosticism and pessimism]]
 +
 
 +
Although there are recent studies relating to [[Atheism and suicide|atheism being a causal factor for suicide for some individuals]], an early proponent of atheism being a causal factor for [[suicide]] was the Reverend Dr. [[Robert Stuart MacArthur]].<ref>Multiple references:
 +
*Dervic, Kanita, et al. (December 2004).  [http://www.adherents.com/misc/religion_suicide.html "Religious affiliation and suicide attempt" [summary&#93;]. ''The American Journal of Psychiatry'', vol. 161:12, pp. 2303-8.  Summary: Adherents.com. Website contains link to article at American Journal of Psychiatry website.
 +
*Dervic, Kanita, et al. (December 2004).  [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15569904 "Religious affiliation and suicide attempt" [abstract&#93;]. ''The American Journal of Psychiatry'', vol. 161:12, pp. 2303-8.  Abstract: National Institutes of Health, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, Pub Med
 +
*[http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9507E2DC1131E033A25754C1A96F9C94659ED7CF "Atheism a cause of suicide; Dr. MacArthur preaches on the sin and cowardice of self-destruction"] (September 17, 1894).  ''New York Times'', p. 2.</ref> In 1894, the [[NY Times|''New York Times'']] stated the following in relation to atheism and suicide:
 +
{{cquote|Dr. Martin urged that a great cause of suicide was atheism. It was, he said, a remarkable fact that where atheism prevailed most, there suicides were most numerous. In [[Paris]], a recent census showed one suicide to every 2,700 of the population. After the publication of Paine's "Age of Reason" suicides increased.<ref name="nytimes">[http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9507E2DC1131E033A25754C1A96F9C94659ED7CF "Atheism a cause of suicide; Dr. MacArthur preaches on the sin and cowardice of self-destruction"] (September 17, 1894).  ''New York Times'', p. 2.</ref>}}
 +
[[Image:Desperation man.jpg‎|thumb|left|200px|Atheists have higher suicide rates. See: [[Atheism and suicide]] ]]
 +
 
 +
The website Adherents.com reported the following in respect to atheism and suicide:
 +
{{cquote|Pitzer College sociologist Phil Zuckerman compiled country-by-country survey, polling and census numbers relating to atheism, agnosticism, disbelief in God and people who state they are non-religious or have no religious preference...In examining various indicators of societal health, Zuckerman concludes about suicide:
 +
 
 +
"...According to the 2003 World Health Organization's report on international male suicides rates (which compared 100 countries), of the top ten nations with the highest male suicide rates, all but one (Sri Lanka) are strongly irreligious nations with high levels of atheism."<ref>http://www.adherents.com/misc/religion_suicide.html</ref>}}
 +
 
 +
Concerning [[atheism and depression]], a University of Michigan study involving 19,775 individuals found that religious people are less likely than atheists to suffer [[depression]] when they are lonely.<ref>[https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-6136603/Lonely-religious-people-depressed-God-friend.html Lonely religious people are less depressed than atheists because they see God as a friend replacement, study finds], ''Daily Mail'', 2018</ref>
 +
 
 +
For more information please see:
 +
 
 +
*[[Atheism and suicide]]
 +
*[[Atheism and loneliness]]
 +
*[[Hopelessness of atheism]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and mental illness ===
 +
[[File:Angry atheist.jpg|thumbnail|right|240px|An angry atheist speaking to a woman with a Bible in her hand.
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
The Christian philosopher James S. Spiegel says the path from Christianity to atheism among several of his friends involved moral slippage such as resentment or unforgiveness.<ref>[http://www.christianpost.com/news/christian-philosopher-explores-causes-of-atheism-44353/ Christian Philosopher Explores Causes of Atheism]</ref>
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
See: [[Atheism and anger]] and [[Atheism and forgiveness|Atheism and unforgiveness]] ]]
 +
See also: [[Atheism and mental illness]]
 +
 
 +
The abstract for the journal article ''Health and Well-Being Among the Non-religious: Atheists, Agnostics, and No Preference Compared with Religious Group Members'' published in the ''Journal of Religion and Health'' indicates: "On dimensions related to psychological well-being, atheists and agnostics tended to have worse outcomes than either those with religious affiliation or those with no religious preference."<ref>[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26743877 ''Health and Well-Being Among the Non-religious: Atheists, Agnostics, and No Preference Compared with Religious Group Members''] by Hayward RD, Krause N, Ironson G, Hill PC, Emmons R., ''Journal of Religion and Health'', 2016 Jun;55(3):1024-1037. doi: 10.1007/s10943-015-0179-2.</ref>
 +
 
 +
''Global News'' reported:
 +
{{Cquote|Children who are raised with [[religion|religious]] or [[spirituality|spiritual]] beliefs tend to have better mental health into their adulthood, a new study from the [[Harvard]] T.H. Chan School of Public Health found.
 +
 
 +
According to the study’s findings, people who attended weekly religious services or [[Prayer|prayed]] or [[Meditation|meditated]] daily in their childhood reported greater life satisfaction in their 20s. People who grew up in a religious household also reported fewer symptoms of depression and lower rates of [[Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder|post-traumatic stress disorder]].<ref>[https://globalnews.ca/news/4468745/religion-children-mental-health/ Religion can help improve children’s mental health, new study finds], ''Global News'', 2018</ref>}}
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and negative emotions/thoughts ===
 +
 
 +
*[[Atheism and emotional problems]]
 +
 
 +
*[[Atheism and negative emotions/thoughts]]
 +
 
 +
*[[Atheism and anger]]
 +
 
 +
*[[Atheism and anxiety]]
 +
 
 +
*[[Atheism and death anxiety]]
 +
 
 +
=== Irreligion and recovery from illnesses ===
 +
 
 +
See: [[Irreligion and recovery from illnesses]]
 +
 
 +
[[File:Europe pol 2004.jpg|thumbnail|250px|right|According to the [[World Health Organization]]'s (WHO) regional office in Europe, "The WHO European Region has the highest proportion in the world of total ill health and premature death due to alcohol.<ref name=whoalc>[http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/disease-prevention/alcohol-use/data-and-statistics "Data and statistics"] (September 2014 or bef.).  Health topics/Disease prevention/Alcohol use.  World Health Organization (WHO)/Regional office for Europe</ref>]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and alcoholism ===
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism and alcoholism]]
 +
 
 +
At least 100 studies suggests religion has a positive effect on preventing alcohol-related problems, researchers Christopher Ellison, Jennifer Barrett and Benjamin Moulton noted in an article in the ''Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion'' on “Gender, Marital Status, and Alcohol Behavior: The Neglected Role of Religion.”<ref>[https://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-briggs/charlie-sheen-circus-and-_b_836934.html The Doubled-Edged Sword of Religion and Alcoholism]</ref>
 +
 
 +
Atheists and atheistic cultures often have significant problems with excess alcohol usage (For more information please see: [[Atheism and alcoholism]]).
 +
 
 +
For example, as far as secular Europe, according to the [[World Health Organization]]'s (WHO) regional office in Europe, "The WHO European Region has the highest proportion in the world of total ill health and premature death due to alcohol.<ref name=whoalc/>
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and illegal drug use and drug addition ===
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism and drug addiction]]
 +
 
 +
Studies indicate that religious individuals are less likely to engage in illegal drug use than atheists/nonreligious.<ref>[http://www.christianpost.com/news/believers-consume-fewer-drugs-than-atheists-106266/ Believers Consume Fewer Drugs Than Atheists], ''Christian Post'', By Jim Denison, Christian Post Columnist, October 9, 2013|9:47 am</ref><ref>[https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/10/131003093041.htm Believers consume fewer drugs than atheists], Science Daily, Date:October 3, 2013, Source: Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Foerderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung]</ref><ref>Multiple references:
 +
*McCullough, Michael E. and Willoughby, Brian L. B. (January 2009).  [http://www.psy.miami.edu/faculty/mmccullough/Papers/Relig_self_control_bulletin.pdf "Religion, self-regulation, and self-control: associations, explanations, and implications"] ''Psychological Bulletin'', vol. 135, no. 1, pp. 69-93.  Retrieved from University of Miami department of psychology website on September 10, 2014.
 +
*Alternate source of abstract: [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19210054 "Religion, self-regulation, and self-control: associations, explanations, and implications" [abstract&#93;].  Retrieved from PubMed.gov on September 10, 2014.</ref>
 +
 
 +
According to ''Science Daily'': "Young [[Switzerland|Swiss]] men who say that they believe in [[God]] are less likely to smoke cigarettes or pot or take ecstasy pills than Swiss men of the same age group who describe themselves as atheists. Belief is a protective factor against addictive behaviour. This is the conclusion reached by a study funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation.<ref>Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Foerderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung [Swiss National Science Foundation] (October 3, 2013).  [https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/10/131003093041.htm "Believers consume fewer drugs than atheists"].  Science Daily website/Science News.</ref>
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and loneliness ===
 +
 
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism and loneliness]]
 +
[[File:Depressed man.jpg|thumb|right|200px|Secular societies commonly have significant levels of loneliness.
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
See: [[Atheism and loneliness]] ]]
 +
Loneliness has been linked to many physical and mental health problems.<ref>Multiple references:
 +
*Gammon, Katherine (March 2, 2012).  [http://www.livescience.com/18800-loneliness-health-problems.html "Why loneliness can be deadly"].  Live Science website.
 +
*Booth, Robert (October 12, 2014).  "Number of severely lonely men over 50 set to rise to 1m in 15 years", ''The Guardian''.</ref>
 +
 
 +
Compared to deeply religious cultures where an extended family and a sense of community often exists, secular countries [[Secular countries and loneliness|are often lonelier societies]]. In addition, numerous studies and other data indicate that atheists often have lower [[emotional intelligence]] and lower social skills (see: [[Atheism and emotional/intrapersonal intelligence|Atheism and emotional intelligence]] and [[Atheism and interpersonal intelligence|Atheism and social skills]]).
 +
 
 +
For more information, please see:
 +
 
 +
*[[Atheism and loneliness]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and obesity ===
 +
 
 +
See: [[Atheism and obesity]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and cancer ===
 +
 
 +
See: [[Atheism and cancer]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheist and higher levels of harmful genetic mutations ===
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheists and genetic mutations]]
 +
 
 +
There is research which suggests that the atheist population has higher levels of harmful genetic [[mutations]] (see: [[Atheists and genetic mutations]]).<ref>[http://www.newsweek.com/religion-healthy-atheism-mutant-genes-756984 RELIGIOUS PEOPLE LIVE HEALTHIER, LONGER LIVES—WHILE ATHEISTS COLLECT MUTANT GENES], Newsweek, 2017</ref><ref>[Atheists are more likely to be left handed, study finds], ''The Telegraph'', 2017</ref>
 +
 
 +
=== Sports performance: Religious faith vs. atheism ===
 +
 
 +
''See also:'' [[Sports performance: Religious faith vs. atheism]] and [[Irreligion and unsportsmanlike conduct]] and [[Atheism and obesity]]
 +
[[File:Basketball.jpg|right|200px|thumbnail|Numerous studies report that athletes to be more religious than non-athletes.<ref>[http://www.thesportjournal.org/article/strength-religious-faith-athletes-and-nonathletes-two-ncaa-division-iii-institutions ''Strength of Religious Faith of Athletes and Nonathletes at Two NCAA Division III Institutions'']</ref>]]
 +
''The [[Sport]]s Journal'' is a monthly refereed journal published by the United States Sports Academy.
 +
A journal article appeared in the Sports Journal entitled ''Strength of Religious Faith of Athletes and Nonathletes at Two NCAA Division III Institutions''. The article was submitted by Nathan T. Bell, Scott R. Johnson, and Jeffrey C. Petersen from Ball State University.<ref name="thesportjournal.org">[http://thesportjournal.org/article/strength-of-religious-faith-of-athletes-and-nonathletes-at-two-ncaa-division-iii-institutions/ ''Strength of Religious Faith of Athletes and Nonathletes at Two NCAA Division III Institutions'']</ref>
 +
An excerpt from the abstract of the journal article ''Strength of Religious Faith of Athletes and Nonathletes at Two NCAA Division III Institutions'' declares:
 +
{{cquote|Numerous studies report athletes to be more religious than nonathletes (Fischer, 1997; Storch, Kolsky, Silvestri, & Storch, 2001; Storch et al., 2004). According to Storch, Kolsky, Silvestri, and Storch (2001), four reasons may explain why religion interacts with athletic performance.<ref name="thesportjournal.org">[http://thesportjournal.org/article/strength-of-religious-faith-of-athletes-and-nonathletes-at-two-ncaa-division-iii-institutions/ ''Strength of Religious Faith of Athletes and Nonathletes at Two NCAA Division III Institutions'']</ref>}}
 +
 
 +
{{See also|Atheism and bodily-kinesthetic intelligence}}
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and mental toughness ===
 +
 
 +
See: [[Atheism and mental toughness]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheists, aging populations and cancer/Alzheimer's disease ===
 +
 
 +
*[[Atheism and cancer]]
 +
 
 +
*[[Atheism and Alzheimer's disease]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and veganism ===
 +
 
 +
See: [[Atheism and veganism]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism in medicine ===
 +
 
 +
See: [[Atheism in medicine]]
 +
 
 +
== Atheism and intelligence ==
 +
[[File:Cerebellum.jpg|right|thumb|200px|Brain researchers have conducted a number of studies focusing on the differences between atheists and the religious. See: [[Atheism and the brain]] ]]
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism and intelligence]] and [[Atheism and the theory of multiple intelligences|Atheism and Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences]] and [[Causes of atheism]]
 +
 
 +
Within various countries, standardized [[intelligence testing|intelligence test]] (IQ) scores related to the issue of atheists/agnostics vs. theists intelligence scores yield conflicting results.<ref>
 +
*[http://www.doxa.ws/other/smarter.html "Who is smarter; are atheists smarter than Christians?  An examination of studies"] (2007).  Doxa: Christian Thought in the 21st Century.  Retrieved on October 29, 2014.
 +
*[http://www.randalolson.com/2014/08/24/the-myth-of-the-smarter-atheist/ The myth of the smarter Atheist] by Randy Olson, Posted on August 24, 2014</ref>  Part of the problem is that social scientists use variant definitions of atheism.<ref>Multiple references:
 +
*Briggs, Dr. William M. (2013).  [http://www.strangenotions.com/atheists-higher-iqs/ "Do atheists really have higher IQs than believers?"]  Strange Notions.  Retrieved on October 29, 2014.
 +
*Wright, Bradley (January 26, 2012).  [http://www.patheos.com/blogs/blackwhiteandgray/2012/01/how-many-americans-are-atheists-fewer-than-you-might-think/ "How many Americans are atheists? Fewer than you might think"].  Black, White and Gray.  Retrieved on October 29, 2014.</ref> See also: [[Atheism, intelligence and the General Social Survey]]
 +
 
 +
However, within individuals, families and societies irreligion/religion can have an effect on intelligence - especially over time (See: [[Atheism and intelligence]]).
 +
 
 +
For more information, please see:
 +
 
 +
*[[Intelligence trends in religious countries and secular countries]]
 +
*[[Atheism and the theory of multiple intelligences]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism, intelligence and open-mindedness ===
 +
 
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism and open-mindedness]] and [[Atheism and dogmatism]] and [[Atheism and intolerance]] and [[Atheism and groupthink]]
 +
 
 +
Highly intelligent people tend to be open-minded and have intellectual curiosity.<ref>[https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/eleven-common-traits-of-highly-intelligent-people-a7480246.html Eleven common traits of highly intelligent people] by Shana Lebowicz, The Independent, Friday 16 December 2016 18:24</ref>
 +
 
 +
Research indicates that atheists are less open-minded (see: [[Atheism and open-mindedness]]).
 +
 
 +
=== Study on emotional intelligence and religiosity ===
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism and emotional/intrapersonal intelligence|Atheism and emotional intelligence]] and [[Atheism and social/interpersonal intelligence|Atheism and social intelligence]]
 +
 
 +
A 2004 study by Ellen Paek examined the extent to which religious orientation/behavior and found significant positive correlations were found between level of religious commitment and an individual's perceived [[emotional intelligence]].<ref>''Journal of Organizational Behavior'', Paek, Ellen (2006). "[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886906000961 Religiosity and perceived emotional intelligence among Christians". Personality and Individual Differences] (International Society for the Study of Individual Differences) 41 (3): 479–490</ref> See also: [[Atheism and emotional/intrapersonal intelligence|Atheism and emotional intelligence]]
 +
 
 +
According to the prominent brain researcher Antonio Damasio and other brain researchers, emotions play a critical role in high-level cognition and allow individuals to make better decisions.<ref>
 +
*[http://intentionalworkplace.com/2012/03/15/how-emotion-shapes-decision-making/ How emotion affects decision making], The Intentional Workplace
 +
*[http://people.hss.caltech.edu/~steve/bechara.pdf The role of emotion in decision-making: Evidence from neurological patients with orbitofrontal damage], Antoine Becharam, Department of Neurology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
 +
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1wup_K2WN0I When Emotions Make Better Decisions - Antonio Damasio] - short video
 +
*[https://news.usc.edu/29569/Antonio-and-Hanna-Damasio-Receive-Honorary-Degrees/ News item about Professor Antonio Damasio], University of Southern California
 
</ref>
 
</ref>
  
−
===Positive vs. negative===
+
=== Brain studies of atheists ===
−
{{Main|Negative and positive atheism}}
+
''See also:'' [[Atheism and the brain]] and [[Religiosity and larger frontal lobes]]
−
Philosophers such as [[Antony Flew]]<ref name="presumption">{{harvnb|Flew|1976|pp=14ff}}: "In this interpretation an atheist becomes: not someone who positively asserts the non-existence of God; but someone who is simply not a theist. Let us, for future ready reference, introduce the labels 'positive atheist' for the former and 'negative atheist' for the latter."
+
 
−
</ref>
+
Brain researchers have conducted a number of studies focusing on the differences between atheists and the religious (see: [[Atheism and the brain]] and [[Religiosity and larger frontal lobes]]).
−
and [[Michael Martin (philosopher)|Michael Martin]]{{sfn|Martin|2006}} have contrasted positive (strong/hard) atheism with negative (weak/soft) atheism. Positive atheism is the explicit affirmation that gods do not exist. Negative atheism includes all other forms of non-theism. According to this categorization, anyone who is not a theist is either a negative or a positive atheist.
+
 
−
The terms ''weak'' and ''strong'' are relatively recent, while the terms ''negative'' and ''positive'' atheism are of older origin, having been used (in slightly different ways) in the philosophical literature<ref name="presumption"/> and in Catholic apologetics.<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://www.nd.edu/Departments/Maritain/jm3303.htm |title=On the Meaning of Contemporary Atheism |journal=The Review of Politics |first=Jacques |last=Maritain |date=July 1949 |volume=11 |issue=3 |pages=267–280 |doi=10.1017/S0034670500044168 |ref=harv}}
+
==== Atheists and dopamine levels in the brain ====
−
</ref>
+
 
−
Under this demarcation of atheism, most agnostics qualify as negative atheists.
+
''See also:'' [[Atheism and motivation]]
 +
 
 +
According to ''Scientific American'': "Research also suggests that a religious brain exhibits higher levels of [[dopamine]], a hormone associated with increased attention and motivation."<ref>[http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/askthebrains/ Ask the Brains, Scientific American, Dec 23, 2011]</ref> See: [[Atheism and motivation]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and the problem of consciousness ===
 +
 
 +
See: [[Atheism and consciousness]]
 +
 
 +
== Atheism and women  ==
 +
''see also:'' [[Atheism and women]] and [[Atheism and rape]] and [[Elevatorgate]] and [[Prominent atheists whose wives believe in the existence of God]]
 +
 
 +
[[File:women.jpg|thumbnail|right|205px|Studies indicate that women tend to be more religious than men (See: [[Atheism and women]]). ]]
 +
 
 +
=== Recent studies ===
 +
 
 +
=== Atheist Alliance International analysis ===
 +
 
 +
In 2016, Atheist Alliance International (AAI) conducted an annually recurring atheist census project and found: "At the time of writing, the Atheist Census Project recorded that on average worldwide 73.2% of respondents were male. The result is consistent with other research... As such, the focus of many scholarly papers has been on seeking to explain this persistent observation."<ref>[https://www.atheistalliance.org/about-aai/position-statements/1206-aai-position-statement-gender-balance.html AAI Position Statement - Gender Balance]</ref>
 +
 
 +
==== Surveys by country ====
 +
In November 2010, ''Discover'' magazine published survey results published by the World Values Survey which showed significant differences between the percentage of men and women who are atheists for various countries with men outnumbering women within the [[Atheist Population|atheist population]].<ref>Khan, Razib (November 18, 2010).  [http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/11/sex-differences-in-global-atheism-part-n/ "Gene expression; "Sex differences in global atheism, part N"].  Discover magazine website.</ref>
 +
 
 +
==== United States surveys ====
 +
In 2015, ''BloombergView'' reported concerning the [[United States]]: "According to a much-discussed 2012 report from the Pew Research Center on Religion and Public Life, ...women are 52 percent of the U.S. population but only 36 percent of atheists and agnostics.<ref name=agap>Carter, Stephen L. (March 27, 2015).  [http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2015-03-27/the-atheism-gap "The atheism gap"].  BloombergView website.</ref>
 +
 
 +
A 2009 article in LiveScience.com entitled ''Women More Religious Than Men'' reported: "A new analysis of survey data finds women pray more often then men, are more likely to believe in God, and are more religious than men in a variety of other ways...The latest findings, released Friday, are no surprise, only confirming what other studies have found for decades.<ref name=Britt>Britt, Robert Roy (February 28, 2009). [http://www.livescience.com/7689-women-religious-men.html "Women more religious than men"].  Livescience.</ref>  In 2007, the Pew Research Center found that American women were more religious than American men.<ref name=Britt/>
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and sexism ===
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism and sexism]]
 +
 
 +
Most atheists are politically on the [[leftist|left]] (see: [[Atheism and politics]] and [[Secular left]]).  Part of leftist ideology is [[feminism]]. However, there is a significant amount of [[misogyny]] among atheists (see: [[Atheism and women]]). 
 +
 
 +
For more information please see:
 +
 
 +
*[[Atheism and sexism]]
 +
*[[Atheism and rape]]
 +
*[[Sexual harassment at atheist conferences]]
 +
*[[Elevatorgate]]
 +
*[[Richard Dawkins and women]]
 +
*[[Atheism, polyamory and other immoral relationships|Atheist leaders and immoral relationships]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and women's rights ===
 +
 
 +
See: [[Atheism and women's rights]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheist feminism ===
 +
 
 +
See: [[Atheist feminism]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and Asian/white males ===
 +
 
 +
*[[Atheism and Asian males]]
 +
 
 +
*[[Atheism and white males]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheist websites appear to receive significantly less traffic from women ===
 +
 
 +
See: [[Atheist websites appear to receive significantly less traffic from women]]
 +
 
 +
== Atheism and marriage/relationships ==
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism and marriage]] and [[Atheism and illegitimate births]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and rates of marriage in the United States ===
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism and marriageability]] and [[Atheism and women]]
 +
 
 +
The Christian apologist Michael Caputo wrote: "Recently the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life has published its mammoth study on Religion in America based on 35,000 interviews... According to the Pew Forum a whopping 37% of atheists never marry as opposed to 19% of the American population, 17% of Protestants and 17% of Catholics."<ref name="marry"/>
 +
 
 +
Theodore Beale declared that according to the 2001 American Religious Identification Survey (ARIS) "more than half of all atheists and agnostics don’t get married."<ref name="marry"/>
 +
 
 +
For more information please see:  [[Atheism and marriageability]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheist marriages ===
 +
See: [[Atheist marriages]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and polyamory ===
 +
*[[Atheism, polyamory and other immoral relationships]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and divorce ===
 +
See: [[Atheism and divorce]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and interfaith marriages ===
 +
* [[Atheism and interfaith marriages]]
 +
* [[Prominent atheists whose wives believe in the existence of God]]
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and its inability to explain love ===
 +
See also: [[Atheism and love]] and [[Atheism and forgiveness]]
 +
 
 +
From a [[Metaphysics|metaphysical]], moral and spiritual perspective, atheists have an inability to satisfactorily explain the existence of [[love]].<ref name="How do atheists define love">[http://www.strangenotions.com/atheists-love/ How do atheists define love?] by Dr. Taylor Marshall</ref><ref name="atheistforum.wordpress.com">[https://atheistforum.wordpress.com/2014/07/09/what-is-love-how-materialist-atheism-fails-to-have-a-satisfactory-answer/ What is love? how materialist atheism fails to have a satisfactory answer], July 9, 2014</ref>]
 +
From a moral, [[Metaphysics|metaphysical]] and spiritual perspective, atheists have an inability to satisfactorily explain the existence of [[love]].<ref name="How do atheists define love"/><ref name="atheistforum.wordpress.com"/>
 +
 
 +
=== Atheism and sexuality ===
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism and sexuality]] and [[Atheism and romance]] and [[Atheism and fertility rates]]
 +
 
 +
Research shows that religious women (especially [[evangelicalism|evangelical]]/low-church [[Protestantism|Protestant]] women) are more sexually satisfied than irreligious women.<ref>The Social Organization of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States By Edward O. Laumann, John H. Gagnon, Robert T. Michael, Stuart Michaels, page 115</ref><ref>[https://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2008/11/25/the-christian-sexual-awakening.html Why Are Christians Having Better Sex Than the Rest of Us?] by Tucker Carlson, The Daily Beast, November 11, 25, 2008</ref><ref>[http://blog.getrelationshiphelp.com/2009/07/christian-women-have-more-sexual-fun.html Christian Women Have More Sexual Fun], Relationship Center in Springfield Missouri</ref>
 +
 
 +
A social science study also reports that Hispanic men are more sexually satisfied than other ethnic groups in the United States.<ref>The Social Organization of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States By Edward O. Laumann, John H. Gagnon, Robert T. Michael, Stuart Michaels, page 114</ref>
 +
Hispanics are known for their religiosity (See also: [[Western atheism and race]]).
 +
 
 +
In addition, the atheist and agnostic populations have sub-replacement levels of fertility (see: [[Atheism and sexuality]] and [[Atheism and romance]]).
 +
 
 +
===  Atheists and physical attractiveness ===
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheists and physical attractiveness]]
 +
 
 +
The English anthropologist Edward Dutton indicates that using [[right-wing]] politics as a proxy for religiosity, there is evidence that atheists are less attractive and he pointed out that right-wing politicians are more likely to have symmetrical faces according to a study.<ref>[https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/unique-everybody-else/201806/defending-atheist-mutational-load-theory-part-2 Defending Atheist Mutational Load Theory — Part 2] by
 +
Scott A. McGreal MSc., Psychology Today, June 22, 2018</ref>
 +
 
 +
== Atheism and race ==
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism, race and gender]] and [[Atheism and racism]]
 +
 
 +
=== Asian atheism ===
 +
''See also:'' [[Asian atheism]] and [[East Asia, China, atheism and racism]]
 +
 
 +
[[East Asia]], in particular what are often termed “Confucian societies.” It is likely therefore that the majority of the world's atheists are actually East Asian."<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20150905135558/http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/11/most-atheists-are-not-white/ Most atheists are not white & other non-fairy tales], Discover magazine</ref>
 +
 
 +
As noted above, the current [[Atheist Population|atheist population]] mostly resides in East [[Asia]] (particularly China) and in secular Europe/Australia among whites.<ref>[https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/05/23/a-surprising-map-of-where-the-worlds-atheists-live/ A surprising map of where the world’s atheists live], By Max Fisher and Caitlin Dewey, ''Washington Post'', May 23, 2013</ref> See: [[China and atheism]]
 +
 
 +
As noted above, China is experiencing an explosive growth of Christianity (see: [[Growth of Christianity in China]] and [[East Asia and global desecularization]]).
 +
 
 +
=== Western atheism and race ===
 +
[[File:Sikivu Hutchinson.JPG|thumbnail|200px|right|Atheist Sikivu Hutchinson says that white atheists organizations generally focus on church/state separation and [[creationism]] issues and not on the concerns the less affluent African-American population faces.<ref name="washingtonpost.com">[https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/06/16/blacks-are-even-discriminated-against-by-atheists/ Atheism has a big race problem that no one’s talking about] by Dr. Sikivu Hutchinson, Washington Post June 16, 2014</ref>
 +
 
 +
Hutchinson also mentioned that church organizations significantly help poor African-Americans.<ref name="washingtonpost.com"/> See also: [[Atheism and charity|Atheism and uncharitableness]] ]]
 +
''See also:'' [[Western atheism and race]] and [[Black atheism]] and [[Atheism and diversity]]
 +
 
 +
==== Atheism and race: United States and Europe ====
 +
In 2015, ''BloombergView'' reported:
 +
{{cquote|According to a much-discussed 2012 report from the Pew Research Center on Religion and Public Life, only 3 percent of U.S. atheists and agnostics are black, 6 percent are Hispanic, and 4 percent are Asian. Some 82 percent are white. (The relevant figures for the population at large at the time of the survey were 66 percent white, 11 percent black, 15 percent Hispanic, 5 percent Asian.)
 +
 
 +
...Craig Keener, in his huge review of claims of miracles in a wide variety of cultures, concludes that routine rejection of the possibility of the [[supernatural]] represents an impulse that is [[Secular Europe|deeply Eurocentric]].<ref name=agap/>}}
 +
 
 +
In the United States, blacks have the highest rate of religiosity.<ref>[https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/gallup-blacks-most-religious-group-us Gallup: Blacks Most Religious Group in U.S.]</ref> Among Hispanics, religion has traditionally played a significant role in daily activity.<ref>[http://www.diocesephoenix.org/old_site/fc/CatecheticalLeadership/ChurchDocs/UnderstandingtheHispanicCulture.pdf Understanding Hispanic culture]</ref>
 +
 
 +
In 2011, Beliefnetnews reported concerning the race and gender of American atheists:
 +
{{cquote|From the smallest local meetings to the largest conferences, the vast majority of speakers and attendees are almost always white men. Leading figures of the atheist movement — [[Richard Dawkins]], [[Sam Harris]], [[Christopher Hitchens]] and [[Daniel Dennett]] — are all white men.
 +
 
 +
But making atheism more diverse is proving to be no easy task.
 +
 
 +
Surveys suggest most atheists are white men. A recent survey of 4,000 members of the [[Freedom From Religion Foundation|Freedom from Religion Foundation]] found that 95 percent were white, and men comprised a majority.<ref>http://blog.beliefnet.com/news/2011/01/atheists-diversity-woes-have-n.php</ref>}}
 +
 
 +
=== RationalWiki/RationalMedia Foundation board of trustees and the lack of Black representation ===
 +
 
 +
See: [[RationalMedia Foundation board of trustees and the lack of Black representation]]
 +
 
 +
== Atheism and education ==
 +
*[[Religion and education]]
 +
*[[Atheist indoctrination|Atheistic indoctrination and education]]
 +
*[[Atheism and academia]]
 +
*[[Atheism and academic performance]]
 +
== Atheism and culture: Art, architecture, music, language, poetry, dance and humor ==
 +
[[File:Destroy the old world Cultural Revolution poster.jpg|thumb|200px|right|A [[People's Republic of China]] propaganda poster stating "Destroy the Old World & Forge the New World," with a worker smashing a [[crucifix]], a [[Buddha]] murti, and a classical Chinese sacred text; 1967.]]
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism and culture]]
  
−
While [[Michael Martin (philosopher)|Martin]], for example, asserts that agnosticism [[logical consequence|entails]] negative atheism,<ref name=martin-agnosticism-entails/> many agnostics see their view as distinct from atheism,<ref name=Kenny2006 /><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/omar-baddar/why-im-not-an-atheist-the-case-for-agnosticism_b_3345544.html | title=Why I'm Not an Atheist: The Case for Agnosticism |date=28 May 2013 |publisher=Huffington Post |accessdate=2013-11-26}}
+
[[Culture]] consists of the "language, habits, ideas, beliefs, customs, social organization, inherited artifacts, technical processes, and values."<ref>[http://www.eng.auburn.edu/~sjreeves/cm/culture.html Christianity and culture]</ref>
−
</ref>
 
−
which they may consider no more justified than theism or requiring an equal conviction.<ref name=Kenny2006>{{cite book |first=Anthony |last=Kenny |authorlink=Anthony Kenny |title=What I believe |chapter=Why I Am Not an Atheist |publisher=Continuum |isbn=0-8264-8971-0 |quote=The true default position is neither theism nor atheism, but agnosticism&nbsp;... a claim to knowledge needs to be substantiated; ignorance need only be confessed. |year=2006}}
 
−
</ref>
 
−
The assertion of unattainability of knowledge for or against the existence of gods is sometimes seen as indication that atheism requires a [[leap of faith]].<ref>{{cite news |title=Many atheists I know would be certain of a high place in heaven |url=http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/opinion/2009/0725/1224251303564.html|last=O'Brien|first=Breda |authorlink=Breda O'Brien|publisher=Irish Times| accessdate=2011-04-09 |date=7 July 2009
 
−
| archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110520132651/http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/opinion/2009/0725/1224251303564.html
 
−
| archivedate=2011-05-20 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}
 
−
</ref><ref>
 
−
{{cite web | url=http://www.ncregister.com/blog/matthew-warner/more-faith-to-be-an-atheist-than-a-christian | title=More faith to be an atheist than a Christian | author=Matthew Warner | date= 8 June 2012 | accessdate=2013-11-26}}
 
−
</ref>
 
−
Common atheist responses to this argument include that unproven ''[[faith#Faith in world religions|religious]]'' propositions deserve as much disbelief as all ''other'' unproven propositions,<ref>{{harvnb|Baggini|2003|pp=30–34}}. "Who seriously claims we should say 'I neither believe nor disbelieve that the Pope is a robot', or 'As to whether or not eating this piece of chocolate will turn me into an elephant I am completely agnostic'. In the absence of any good reasons to believe these outlandish claims, we rightly disbelieve them, we don't just suspend judgement."
 
−
</ref>
 
−
and that the unprovability of a god's existence does not imply equal probability of either possibility.<ref>{{harvnb|Baggini|2003|p=22}}. "A lack of proof is no grounds for the suspension of belief. This is because when we have a lack of absolute proof we can still have overwhelming evidence or one explanation which is far superior to the alternatives."
 
−
</ref>
 
−
Scottish philosopher [[J. J. C. Smart]] even argues that "sometimes a person who is really an atheist may describe herself, even passionately, as an agnostic because of unreasonable generalised [[philosophical skepticism]] which would preclude us from saying that we know anything whatever, except perhaps the truths of mathematics and formal logic."<ref name="stanford">{{cite web |url=http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/atheism-agnosticism/ |title=Atheism and Agnosticism |first=J.C.C. |last=Smart |date=9 March 2004 |publisher=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy | accessdate=2011-04-09}}
 
−
</ref>
 
−
Consequently, some atheist authors such as [[Richard Dawkins]] prefer distinguishing theist, agnostic, and atheist positions along a [[spectrum of theistic probability]]—the likelihood that each assigns to the statement "God exists".{{sfn|Dawkins|2006|p=50}}
 
  
−
===Definition as impossible or impermanent===
+
Atheism has not produced any outstanding cultural achievements and it has had a negative effect on cultures (see: [[Atheism and culture]] and [[Atheism and its anti-civilizational effects]] and [[Atheism statistics]]).
−
Before the 18th century, the existence of God was so universally accepted in the western world that even the possibility of true atheism was questioned. This is called ''theistic [[innatism]]''—the notion that all people believe in God from birth; within this view was the connotation that atheists are simply in denial.<ref>{{cite book |last=Cudworth |first=Ralph |authorlink=Ralph Cudworth |title=The True Intellectual System of the Universe: the first part, wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted and its impossibility demonstrated |year=1678}}
 
−
</ref>
 
  
−
There is also a position claiming that atheists are quick to believe in God in times of crisis, that atheists make [[deathbed conversion]]s, or that "there are no [[atheists in foxholes]]".<ref>See, for example: {{Cite news|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/features/ohair090896.htm|title=Atheist Group Moves Ahead Without O'Hair|first=Sue Anne|last=Pressley|newspaper=The Washington Post|date=September 8, 1996|accessdate=2014-10-22}}</ref>
+
For example, relative to [[Christianity]], which has a large collection of art, music and poetry associated it, atheism has a very small collection of art, music and poetry associated with it (see: [[Atheist art]] and [[Atheist music]] and [[Atheist poetry]]).
−
There have however been examples to the contrary, among them examples of literal "atheists in foxholes".<ref>{{cite web |last=Lowder |first=Jeffery Jay |year=1997 |title=Atheism and Society |url=http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/jeff_lowder/society.html | accessdate=2011-04-09| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20110522025011/http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/jeff_lowder/society.html| archivedate=2011-05-22 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}
 
−
</ref>
 
  
−
Some atheists have doubted the very need for the term "atheism". In his book ''[[Letter to a Christian Nation]]'', [[Sam Harris (author)|Sam Harris]] wrote:
+
It is often said that atheism is boring, stale and difficult to believe (see: [[Atheism and inspiration]]). As noted above, research indicates that atheists are less open-minded (see: [[Atheism and open-mindedness]]).  
−
<blockquote>In fact, "atheism" is a term that should not even exist. No one ever needs to identify himself as a "non-[[Astrology|astrologer]]" or a "non-[[Alchemy|alchemist]]". We do not have words for people who doubt that Elvis is still alive or that aliens have traversed the galaxy only to molest ranchers and their cattle. Atheism is nothing more than the noises reasonable people make in the presence of unjustified religious beliefs.{{sfn|Harris|2006|p=[http://books.google.com/?id=ypyMZlkgHGIC&pg=PA51&dq=No+one+ever+needs+to+identify+himself+as+a+%22non-astrologer%22+or+a+%22non-alchemist&f=false 51]}}</blockquote>
 
  
−
==Concepts==
+
For additional information, please see:
−
[[File:D'Holbach.jpg|thumb|[[Baron d'Holbach|Paul Henri Thiry, Baron d'Holbach]], an 18th-century advocate of atheism.
 
  
−
{{quote|The source of man's unhappiness is his ignorance of Nature. The pertinacity with which he clings to blind opinions imbibed in his infancy, which interweave themselves with his existence, the consequent prejudice that warps his mind, that prevents its expansion, that renders him the slave of fiction, appears to doom him to continual error.|d'Holbach|[[The System of Nature]]<ref>Paul Henri Thiry, Baron d'Holbach, ''System of Nature; or, the Laws of the Moral and Physical World'' (London, 1797), Vol. 1, p. 25</ref>}}]]
+
*[[Atheist art]]
 +
*[[Atheism and architecture]]
 +
*[[Atheist music]]
 +
*[[Atheist population and verbal–linguistic intelligence|Atheism and linguistic/oratory skills]]
 +
*[[Atheist poetry]]
 +
*[[Atheism and dance]]
 +
*[[Atheism and humor]]
  
−
The broadest demarcation of atheistic rationale is between practical and theoretical atheism.
+
== Global atheism ==
 +
=== Global decline of atheism  ===
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism and diversity]] and [[Atheism and culture]]
 +
[[File:Blue Marble.jpg|thumbnail|right|200px|Atheism is in decline worldwide in terms of number of atheists and the percentage of atheists in world.<ref>
 +
*[https://www.gordonconwell.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2025/01/Status-of-Global-Christianity-2025.pdf Status of Global Atheism/Christianity, 2025, in the Context of 1900–2050] (831,000 less atheists in the world than a year ago.
 +
*[https://gordonconwell.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2019/04/StatusofGlobalChristianity20191.pdf Status of Global Atheism/Christianity/other religions, 2019, in the Context of 1900–2050]</ref>
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
See: [[Global atheism statistics]] ]]
  
−
===Practical atheism===
+
Atheists as a percentage of the world's population have declined since 1970 and global atheism is expected to face long-term decline.<ref>
−
{{Main|Apatheism}}
+
*[http://www.christianpost.com/news/study-world-is-turning-more-religious-atheism-declining-100518/ Study: World is becoming more religious]
−
In ''practical'' or ''[[pragmatism|pragmatic]]'' atheism, also known as ''[[apatheism]]'', individuals live as if there are no gods and explain natural phenomena without reference to any deities. The existence of gods is not rejected, but may be designated unnecessary or useless; gods neither provide purpose to life, nor influence everyday life, according to this view.<ref name="Zdybicka-p20">{{harvnb|Zdybicka|2005|p=20}}.
+
*[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/05/globally-worldviews-of-atheism-and-non.html Globally the worldviews of atheism and non-religious (agnostic) are declining while global Christianity is exploding in adherents]
−
</ref>
+
*[http://www.sneps.net/RD/uploads/1-Shall%20the%20Religious%20Inherit%20the%20Earth.pdf Shall the Religious Inherit the Earth?: Demography and Politics in the Twenty-First Century by Eric Kaufmann, Belfer Center, Harvard University/Birkbeck College, University of London]
−
A form of practical atheism with implications for the [[scientific community]] is [[methodological naturalism]]—the "tacit adoption or assumption of philosophical naturalism within [[scientific method]] with or without fully accepting or believing it."<ref name="neps">{{cite web |last=Schafersman |first=Steven D. |url=http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:NSuw6hjn_w0J:www.tcnj.edu/~scholars/111%2520Evolution%2520FSP/NATURALISM%2520IS%2520AN%2520ESSENTIAL%2520PART%2520OF%2520SCIENCE%2520AND%2520CRITICAL%2520INQUIRY.doc+Naturalism+is+an+Essential+Part+of+Science+and+Critical+Inquiry&hl=en&gl=ca&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESiOoQ0c8zeA-NUM5qRN7EZqXoJs8b3hGUyuOedNRD9OheY2WLJHpdgNCsxwDJ0iJVdxIhSyytGXR-RXodM3cV8JYd6mEmBRuSQhAsvgFyIDPrw2HT3KXZTEoujo4lXsMckPLn-U&sig=AHIEtbS7vrl9TTdgC7ZY94opxblINuXYMw&pli=1 |title=Naturalism is an Essential Part of Science and Critical Inquiry |date = February 1997|publisher=Conference on Naturalism, Theism and the Scientific Enterprise. Department of Philosophy, The University of Texas |accessdate=2011-04-07}} Revised May 2007
+
*[http://www.gordonconwell.edu/resources/documents/StatusOfGlobalMission.pdf Gordon-Conwell Seminary - Status of Global Mission, 2014, in the Context of AD 1800–2025]</ref> See: [[Desecularization]] and [[Global atheism statistics]]
−
</ref>
 
  
−
Practical atheism can take various forms:
+
In 2024, Frontier Partners International reported concerning [[global atheism]]: "Simultaneously, atheism, which once saw a peak around 1970 with 165 million adherents, is on the decline. The current growth trend for atheism is -0.12 percent, with their number falling from 147 million in 2020 to 146 million in 2024."<ref>[https://www.frontierpartners.org/global-christianity-surges Global Christianity surges beyond projections in 2024], LiCAS.news • Mar 15, 2024, Frontiers Patners Intertnational, 2024</ref> See also: [[Desecularization]] and [[Global atheism statistics]]
−
* Absence of religious motivation—belief in gods does not motivate moral action, religious action, or any other form of action;
 
−
* Active exclusion of the problem of gods and religion from intellectual pursuit and practical action;
 
−
* Indifference—the absence of any interest in the problems of gods and religion; or
 
−
* Unawareness of the concept of a deity.<ref>{{harvnb|Zdybicka|2005|p=21}}.
 
−
</ref>
 
  
−
===Theoretical atheism===
+
According to the ''[[Encyclopædia Britannica]]'', 2% of the world's population self-identifies as atheist and the average annual global change for atheism from 2000 to 2010 was −0.17%.<ref name="eb-2010">{{cite web|title=Religion: Year in Review 2010: Worldwide Adherents of All Religions|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150310135559/https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/1731588/Religion-Year-In-Review-2010/298437/Worldwide-Adherents-of-All-Religions|work=Encyclopædia Britannica Online|publisher=Encyclopædia Britannica Inc.|accessdate=2013-11-21}}</ref>
  
−
====Ontological arguments====
+
=== Decline of the number of atheists in the world ===
−
{{Further|Agnostic atheism|Theological noncognitivism}}
 
−
Theoretical (or theoric) atheism explicitly posits arguments against the existence of gods, responding to common [[Arguments for the existence of God|theistic arguments]] such as the [[argument from design]] or [[Pascal's Wager]]. Theoretical atheism is mainly an ontology, precisely a [[physical ontology]].
 
  
−
====Epistemological arguments====
+
''See also:'' [[Decline of the number of atheists in the world]]
−
{{Further|Agnostic atheism|Theological noncognitivism}}
 
−
[[Epistemology|Epistemological]] atheism argues that people cannot know a God or determine the existence of a God. The foundation of epistemological atheism is agnosticism, which takes a variety of forms. In the philosophy of [[immanence]], divinity is inseparable from the world itself, including a person's mind, and each person's [[consciousness]] is locked in the [[Subject (philosophy)|subject]]. According to this form of agnosticism, this limitation in perspective prevents any objective inference from belief in a god to assertions of its existence. The [[Rationalism|rationalistic]] agnosticism of [[Immanuel Kant|Kant]] and the [[Age of Enlightenment|Enlightenment]] only accepts knowledge deduced with human rationality; this form of atheism holds that gods are not discernible as a matter of principle, and therefore cannot be known to exist. [[Skepticism]], based on the ideas of [[David Hume|Hume]], asserts that certainty about anything is impossible, so one can never know for sure whether or not a god exists. Hume, however, held that such unobservable metaphysical concepts should be rejected as "sophistry and illusion".<ref name=hume-metaphysics/> The allocation of agnosticism to atheism is disputed; it can also be regarded as an independent, basic worldview.<ref name="Zdybicka-p20"/>
 
  
−
Other arguments for atheism that can be classified as epistemological or [[ontology|ontological]], including [[logical positivism]] and [[ignosticism]], assert the meaninglessness or unintelligibility of basic terms such as "God" and statements such as "God is all-powerful." [[Theological noncognitivism]] holds that the statement "God exists" does not express a proposition, but is nonsensical or cognitively meaningless. It has been argued both ways as to whether such individuals can be classified into some form of atheism or agnosticism. Philosophers [[Alfred Ayer|A. J. Ayer]] and [[Theodore M. Drange]] reject both categories, stating that both camps accept "God exists" as a proposition; they instead place noncognitivism in its own category.<ref>[[Theodore Drange|Drange, Theodore M.]] (1998). "[http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/theodore_drange/definition.html Atheism, Agnosticism, Noncognitivism]". [[Internet Infidels]], ''Secular Web Library''. Retrieved 2007-APR-07.
+
According to the [[Center for the Study of Global Christianity]], the number of atheists in the world is now shrinking and will continue to do so.<ref name="gordonconwell.edu">[https://www.gordonconwell.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2024/01/Status-of-Global-Christianity-2024.pdf Status of Global Atheism/Christianity, 2024, in the Context of 1900–2050]</ref><ref>[https://www.gordonconwell.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2023/01/Status-of-Global-Christianity-2023.pdf Status of Global Atheism/Christianity/other religions, 2023, in the Context of 1900–2050]</ref> See also: [[Decline of the number of atheists in the world]] and [[Future of atheism in China]] and [[European desecularization in the 21st century]] and [[Decline of Europe]]
−
</ref><ref>
 
−
[[Alfred Ayer|Ayer, A. J.]] (1946). ''Language, Truth and Logic''. Dover. pp. 115–116. In a footnote, Ayer attributes this view to "Professor H. H. Price".
 
−
</ref>
 
  
−
====Metaphysical arguments====
+
=== Demographics of atheism ===
−
{{Further|Monism|Physicalism}}
+
[[Demography]] is the study of human populations, and is a major specialty in the disciplines of sociology, economics, history, geography, statistics and epidemiology.
−
One author writes:
 
−
{{quote|"Metaphysical atheism&nbsp;... includes all doctrines that hold to metaphysical monism (the homogeneity of reality). Metaphysical atheism may be either: a) absolute — an explicit denial of God's existence associated with materialistic monism (all materialistic trends, both in ancient and modern times); b) relative — the implicit denial of God in all philosophies that, while they accept the existence of an absolute, conceive of the absolute as not possessing any of the attributes proper to God: transcendence, a personal character or unity. Relative atheism is associated with idealistic monism (pantheism, panentheism, deism)."<ref>{{harvnb|Zdybicka|2005|p=19}}.</ref>}}
 
  
−
[[File:Epikouros BM 1843.jpg|thumb|left|[[Epicurus]] is credited with first expounding the [[problem of evil]]. [[David Hume]] in his ''[[Dialogues concerning Natural Religion]]'' (1779) cited Epicurus in stating the argument as a series of questions:{{sfn|Hume|1779}}
+
*[[Demographics of atheism]]
−
"Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is impotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?"]]
 
  
−
====Logical arguments====
+
==== Atheism and specific countries/areas ====
−
{{Further2|[[Existence of God#Arguments against the existence of God|Arguments against the existence of God]], [[Problem of evil]], [[Argument from nonbelief|Divine hiddenness]]}}
+
*[[China and atheism]]
−
Logical atheism holds that the various [[conceptions of God|conceptions of gods]], such as the [[personal god]] of Christianity, are ascribed logically inconsistent qualities. Such atheists present [[existence of God#Deductive arguments|deductive arguments]] against the existence of God, which assert the incompatibility between certain traits, such as perfection, creator-status, [[immutability (theology)|immutability]], [[omniscience]], [[omnipresence]], [[omnipotence]], [[omnibenevolence]], [[transcendence (philosophy)|transcendence]], personhood (a personal being), nonphysicality, [[justice]], and [[mercy]].<ref name=logical>{{cite web | url=http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/nontheism/atheism/logical.html | author=Various authors | title=Logical Arguments for Atheism | publisher=[[Internet Infidels]] | work=The Secular Web Library | accessdate=2012-10-02}}</ref>
+
*[[French atheism]]
 +
*[[British atheism]]
 +
*[[Secular Europe]]
 +
*[[American atheism]]
 +
[[File:Europe map.png|thumbnail|right|226px|[[Europe]], which is less religious than the United States has a subreplacement level of births, is projected to have a population that is 30% less small by the end of the century (see: [[Atheism and fertility rates]]).<ref>[https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/total-population-outlook-from-unstat-3/assessment-1#:~:text=The%20greatest%20declines%20occur%20under,30%20%25%20of%20its%20current%20size. Population trends 1950 – 2100: globally and within Europe]</ref>
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
In 2014, the Pew Research Forum indicated that [[Europe]] will go from 11% of the world's population to 7% of the world's population by 2050.<ref>[https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/02/03/10-projections-for-the-global-population-in-2050/ 10 projections for the global population in 2050] By Rakesh Kochhar, Pew Research Forum, February 3, 2014</ref>]]
 +
*[[European desecularization in the 21st century]]
 +
*[[Irreligion in Australia]]
 +
*[[Irreligion in New Zealand]]
 +
*[[Atheism in the Anglosphere]]
  
−
[[Theodicy|Theodicean]] atheists believe that the world as they experience it cannot be reconciled with the qualities commonly ascribed to God and gods by theologians. They argue that an [[omniscience|omniscient]], [[omnipotence|omnipotent]], and [[omnibenevolence|omnibenevolent]] God is not compatible with a world where there is [[problem of evil|evil]] and [[suffering]], and where divine love is [[Divine hiddenness|hidden]] from many people.<ref name=Drange-1996>{{cite web | first=Theodore M. | last=Drange | authorlink=Theodore Drange | year=1996 | url=http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/theodore_drange/aeanb.html | title=The Arguments From Evil and Nonbelief | publisher=[[Internet Infidels]] |work=Secular Web Library | accessdate=2012-10-02}}
+
==== Religious people moving to irreligious regions ====
−
</ref>
 
−
A similar argument is attributed to [[Siddhartha Gautama]], the founder of [[Buddhism]].<ref>V.A. Gunasekara, {{cite web |url=http://www.buddhistinformation.com/buddhist_attitude_to_god.htm |title=The Buddhist Attitude to God |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080102053643/http://www.buddhistinformation.com/buddhist_attitude_to_god.htm |archivedate=2008-01-02}} In the Bhuridatta Jataka, "The Buddha argues that the three most commonly given attributes of God, viz. omnipotence, omniscience and benevolence towards humanity cannot all be mutually compatible with the existential fact of dukkha."
 
−
</ref>
 
  
−
===Reductionary accounts of religion===
+
*[[Religion and migration]]
−
{{Further|Evolutionary origin of religions|Evolutionary psychology of religion|Psychology of religion}}
+
*[[Growth of evangelical Christianity in irreligious regions]]
−
Philosopher [[Ludwig Andreas Feuerbach|Ludwig Feuerbach]]<ref>Feuerbach, Ludwig (1841) ''[[The Essence of Christianity]]''</ref>
 
−
and psychoanalyst [[Sigmund Freud]] have argued that God and other religious beliefs are human inventions, created to fulfill various psychological and emotional wants or needs. This is also a view of many [[Buddhism|Buddhists]].<ref>Walpola Rahula, ''What the Buddha Taught.'' Grove Press, 1974. Pages 51–52.</ref>
 
−
[[Karl Marx]] and [[Friedrich Engels]], influenced by the work of Feuerbach, argued that belief in God and religion are social functions, used by those in power to oppress the working class. According to [[Mikhail Bakunin]], "the idea of God implies the abdication of human reason and justice; it is the most decisive negation of human liberty, and necessarily ends in the enslavement of mankind, in theory and practice." He reversed [[Voltaire]]'s famous aphorism that if God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him, writing instead that "if God really existed, it would be necessary to abolish him."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/anarchist_archives/bakunin/godandstate/godandstate_ch1.html |title=God and the State |last=Bakunin |first=Michael |authorlink=Michael Bakunin |year=1916 |work= |publisher=New York: Mother Earth Publishing Association | accessdate=2011-04-09| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20110521195435/http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/Anarchist_Archives/bakunin/godandstate/godandstate_ch1.html| archivedate=2011-05-21 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}
 
−
</ref>
 
  
−
===Atheism within religions===
+
=== Atheism statistics ===
−
{{further|Nontheistic religions}}
 
−
Atheism is acceptable within some religious and spiritual belief systems, including [[Hinduism]], [[Jainism]], [[Buddhism]], [[Syntheism]], [[Raelism]],<ref>{{cite book|title=Intelligent Design|url=http://www.rael.org/request.php?1|year=2005|author=The Raelian Foundation|page=312}}</ref> and [[Paganism (contemporary religions)|Neopagan]] [[New religious movement|movements]]<ref name="Neopaganism">{{cite book |editor1-last=Claydon |editor1-first=David |editor2-last=Harper |editor2-first=Anne C. |editor3-last=Morehead |editor3-first=John W. |display-editors=1 |last1=Johnson |first1=Philip |last2=Clifford |first2=Ross |last3=Lewis |first3=Mark |last4=Madsen |first4=Ole Skjerbaek |last5=Morehead |first5=John W. |last6=Mulholland |first6=Ken |last7=Payne |first7=Simeon |last8=Riecke |first8=Christina |last9=Smulo |first9=John |display-authors=1 |date=2005
 
−
|title=Religious and Non-Religious Spirituality in the Western World ("New Age") |work=A New Vision, A New Heart, A Renewed Call |volume=2 |publisher=William Carey Library |isbn=978-0-87808-364-0 |page=194
 
−
|url=http://books.google.com/?id=RfGhUW8RdUIC&pg=PA194&dq=neopaganism+atheism#v=onepage&q&f=false |quote=Although Neo-Pagans share common commitments to nature and spirit there is a diversity of beliefs and practices&nbsp;... Some are atheists, others are polytheists (several gods exist), some are pantheists (all is God) and others are panentheists (all is in God).}}</ref>
 
−
such as [[Wicca]].<ref name="Wicca">{{cite book|last=Matthews|first=Carol S.
 
−
|url=http://books.google.com/?id=stQQJlV9FT8C&pg=PA115&dq=neopaganism+atheism#v=onepage&q&f=false
 
−
|title=New Religions|publisher=Chelsea House Publishers|quote=There is no universal worldview that all Neo-Pagans/Wiccans hold. One online information source indicates that depending on how the term ''God'' is defined, Neo-Pagans might be classified as monotheists, duotheists (two gods), polytheists, pantheists, or atheists.|year=2009|isbn=978-0-7910-8096-2}}
 
−
</ref>
 
−
[[Āstika]] schools in [[Atheism in Hinduism|Hinduism]] hold atheism to be a valid path to [[moksha]], but extremely difficult, for the atheist can not expect any help from [[Gods in Hinduism|the divine]] on their journey.<ref>{{Cite book | last = Chakravarti| first = Sitansu| title = Hinduism, a way of life| publisher = Motilal Banarsidass Publ.| year = 1991| page = 65| url = http://books.google.com/books?id=J_-rASTgw8wC&pg=PA71&hl=en#v=onepage&q=atheist&f=false| isbn = 978-81-208-0899-7|quote = For the thoroughgoing atheist, the path is extremely difficult, if not lonely, for he can not develop any relationship of love with God, nor can he expect any divine help on the long and arduous journey. |accessdate=2014-07-15}}
 
−
</ref>
 
−
Jainism believes the universe is eternal and has no need for a creator deity, however [[Tirthankaras]] are revered that can transcend space and time
 
−
<ref name=devdutt>{{cite web  | last =Pattanaik  | first =Devdutt  | title =63 worthy beings  | publisher =Mid-day  | date = 2009-08-18  | url =http://web.archive.org/web/20120927173952/http://www.mid-day.com/specials/2009/aug/180809-Vardhamana-Mahavir-Jainism-Devlok-Play-24th-Tirthankara.htm| accessdate =2014-07-15 }}
 
−
</ref>
 
−
and have more power than the god [[Indra]].<ref>{{cite book | last =Muni Nagraj | first = | editor = | title =Āgama and Tripiṭaka: A Comparative Study : a Critical Study of the Jaina and the Buddhist Canonical Literature, Volume 1| publisher =Today & Tomorrow's Printers and Publishers| location = | isbn =978-81-7022-730-4 | oclc = |page=203}}
 
−
</ref>
 
−
[[Secular Buddhism]] does not advocate belief in gods. Early Buddhism was atheistic as [[Gautama Buddha]]'s path involved no mention of gods. [[God in Buddhism|Later conceptions]] of Buddhism consider Buddha himself a god, suggest adherents can attain godhood, and revere [[Bodhisattvas]]<ref>{{cite book |url=http://books.google.com.vc/books?id=Jb0rCQD9NcoC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q=atheism&f=false |last=Kedar |first=Nath Tiwari |year=1997 |title=Comparative Religion |publisher=[[Motilal Banarsidass]] |isbn=81-208-0293-4 |page=50}}
 
−
</ref>
 
−
and [[Eternal Buddha]].
 
  
−
==Atheist philosophies==
+
*[[Atheism statistics]]
−
{{Further|Atheist existentialism|Secular humanism}}
+
*[[Christianity vs. atheism statistics]]
−
[[Axiological]], or constructive, atheism rejects the existence of gods in favor of a "higher absolute", such as [[Human nature|humanity]].<!-- The previous wikilink is a disambiguation page. Someone redirect it to human race, human nature, etc., etc. --> This form of atheism favors humanity as the absolute source of ethics and values, and permits individuals to resolve moral problems without resorting to God. Marx and Freud used this argument to convey messages of liberation, full-development, and unfettered happiness.<ref name="Zdybicka-p20"/> One of the most common [[criticism of atheism|criticisms of atheism]] has been to the contrary—that denying the existence of a god leads to [[moral relativism]], leaving one with no moral or ethical foundation,<ref name="misconceptions">{{cite web |url=http://articles.exchristian.net/2006/12/common-misconceptions-about-atheists.html |title=Common Misconceptions About Atheists and Atheism |last=Gleeson |first=David |date=10 August 2006 | accessdate=2013-11-21}}</ref> or renders life [[meaning of life (religious)|meaningless]] and miserable.<ref>{{harvnb|Smith|1979|p=275}}. "Perhaps the most common criticism of atheism is the claim that it leads inevitably to [[moral bankruptcy]]."
+
*[[Atheist women statistics]]
−
</ref> [[Blaise Pascal]] argued this view in his [[Pensées]].<ref>[[Blaise Pascal|Pascal, Blaise]] (1669). ''[[Pensées]]'', II: "The Misery of Man Without God".
+
*[[Research on atheism]]
−
</ref>
 
  
−
French philosopher [[Jean-Paul Sartre]] identified himself as a representative of an "[[atheist existentialism]]"{{sfn|Sartre|2004|p=127}}
+
=== Atheist movement and leadership ===
−
concerned less with denying the existence of God than with establishing that "man needs&nbsp;... to find himself again and to understand that nothing can save him from himself, not even a valid proof of the existence of God."{{sfn|Sartre|2001|p=45}}
+
* [[Atheist movement]]
−
Sartre said a corollary of his atheism was that "if God does not exist, there is at least one being in whom existence precedes essence, a being who exists before he can be defined by any concept, and&nbsp;... this being is man."{{sfn|Sartre|2004|p=127}}
+
* [[Atheism and leadership]]
−
The practical consequence of this atheism was described by Sartre as meaning that there are no ''a priori rules'' or absolute values that can be invoked to govern human conduct, and that humans are "condemned" to invent these for themselves, making "man" absolutely "responsible for everything he does".{{sfn|Sartre|2001|p=32}}
 
  
−
==Atheism, religion, and morality==
+
=== Poor international cooperation among atheists ===
−
{{See also|Atheism and religion|Criticism of atheism|Secular ethics|Secular morality}}
 
  
−
===Association with world views and social behaviors===
+
''See also:'' [[Atheism and international cooperation among atheists]]
−
Sociologist [[Phil Zuckerman]] analyzed previous social science research on secularity and non-belief, and concluded that societal well-being is positively correlated with irreligion. He found that there are much lower concentrations of atheism and secularity in poorer, less developed nations (particularly in Africa and South America) than in the richer industrialized democracies.<ref>{{cite book |author=Norris, Pippa and Ronald Inglehart |year=2004 |title=Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide |publisher=Cambridge University Press}}
 
−
</ref><ref>
 
−
{{cite book |author=Bruce, Steve |year=2003 |title=Religion and Politics location=Cambridge, UK}}
 
−
</ref>
 
−
His findings relating specifically to atheism in the US were that compared to religious people in the US, "atheists and secular people" are less [[Nationalism|nationalistic]], prejudiced, [[Antisemitism|antisemitic]], [[Racism|racist]], dogmatic, [[Ethnocentrism|ethnocentric]], closed-minded, and authoritarian, and in US states with the highest percentages of atheists, the murder rate is lower than average. In the most religious states, the murder rate is higher than average.<ref name="Zuckerman">{{cite journal| first1=Phil |last1=Zuckerman| year=2009 |title= Atheism, Secularity, and Well-Being: How the Findings of Social Science Counter Negative Stereotypes and Assumptions| url=http://pitweb.pitzer.edu/academics/wp-content/uploads/sites/38/2014/12/FAC-Zuckerman-Sociology-Compass.pdf | journal=Sociology Compass |volume=3|issue=6 | pages= 949–971 |doi = 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2009.00247.x| ref=harv}}
 
−
</ref><ref name=Guardian>
 
−
{{cite web |url=http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2010/sep/12/pope-benedict-atheism-secularism |title=Societies without God are more benevolent |publisher=[[The Guardian]] |date=2 September 2010 |accessdate=2013-11-21}}</ref>
 
  
−
===Atheism and irreligion===
+
In recent years, international cooperation among atheists has been low (see: [[Atheism and international cooperation among atheists]]).
−
[[File:Lightmatter buddha3.jpg|thumb|left|upright|[[Buddhism]] is sometimes described as nontheistic because of [[God in Buddhism|the absence]] of a [[creator god]], but that can be too simplistic a view.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.alanwallace.org/Is%20Buddhism%20Really%20Nontheistic_.pdf|author=Wallace, B. Alan Ph.D.|title=Is Buddhism Really Non-Theistic?|series=National Conference of the American Academy of Religion lectures|location=Boston, MA|date=November 1999|accessdate=2014-07-22|page=8}}"Thus, in light of the theoretical progression from the bhavaºga to the tath›gatagarbha to the primordial wisdom of the absolute space of reality, Buddhism is not so simply non-theistic as it may appear at first
 
−
glance."</ref>]]
 
−
People who self-identify as atheists are often assumed to be [[irreligion|irreligious]], but some sects within major religions reject the existence of a personal, [[creator deity]].<ref name="winston2">{{cite book |last=Winston |first=Robert (Ed.) |title=Human |publisher=New York: DK Publishing, Inc |year=2004 |isbn=0-7566-1901-7 |page=299 |quote=Nonbelief has existed for centuries. For example, Buddhism and Jainism have been called atheistic religions because they do not advocate belief in gods.}}
 
−
</ref>
 
−
In recent years, certain religious denominations have accumulated a number of openly atheistic followers, such as [[atheist Jew|atheistic]] or [[humanistic Judaism]]<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/judaism/subdivisions/humanistic.shtml |title=Humanistic Judaism |date=20 July 2006 |publisher=BBC | accessdate=2011-04-09| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20110416143510/http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/judaism/subdivisions/humanistic.shtml| archivedate=2011-04-16 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}
 
−
</ref><ref>
 
−
{{cite journal |last=Levin |first=S. |date=May 1995 |title=[[Jewish atheism|Jewish Atheism]] |journal=New Humanist |volume=110 |issue=2 |pages=13–15 |ref=harv}}
 
−
</ref>
 
−
and [[Christian atheism|Christian atheists]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/atheism/types/christianatheism.shtml |title=Christian Atheism |date=17 May 2006 |publisher=BBC | accessdate=2011-04-09}}
 
−
</ref><ref>
 
−
{{cite book |last=Altizer |first=Thomas J. J. |authorlink=Thomas J. J. Altizer |title=The Gospel of Christian Atheism |url=http://www.religion-online.org/showbook.asp?title=523 |year=1967 |publisher=London: Collins |pages=102–103 | accessdate=2011-04-09}}
 
−
</ref><ref>
 
−
{{cite journal |last=Lyas |first=Colin |date=January 1970 |title=On the Coherence of Christian Atheism |journal=Philosophy: the Journal of the Royal Institute of Philosophy |volume=45 |issue=171 |pages=1–19 |ref=harv | doi=10.1017/S0031819100009578}}
 
−
</ref>
 
  
−
The strictest sense of positive atheism does not entail any specific beliefs outside of disbelief in any deity; as such, atheists can hold any number of spiritual beliefs. For the same reason, atheists can hold a wide variety of ethical beliefs, ranging from the [[moral universalism]] of [[humanism]], which holds that a moral code should be applied consistently to all humans, to [[moral nihilism]], which holds that morality is meaningless.<ref>{{harvnb|Smith|1979|pp=21–22}}
+
== Views on atheists ==
−
</ref>
+
''See also:'' [[Views on atheists]] and [[Distrust of atheists]] and [[Atheism and social outcasts]] and [[Atheism and public relations]] and [[Atheophobia]]
 +
[[File:Sam Harris-2010.jpg|thumbnail|250px|right|[[Sam Harris]] ]]
  
−
Philosophers such as [[Slavoj Žižek]],<ref>Slavoj Žižek: Less Than Nothing (2012)</ref> [[Alain de Botton]],<ref>Alain de Botton: [[Religion for Atheists]] (2012)</ref> and [[Alexander Bard]] and [[Jan Söderqvist]],<ref>Alexander Bard and Jan Söderqvist: The Global Empire (2012)</ref> have all argued that atheists should reclaim religion as an act of defiance against theism, precisely not to leave religion as an unwarranted monopoly to theists.
+
Sociological research indicates that atheists are widely distrusted in both religious cultures and nonreligious cultures.<ref name="USATodayviewsonatheists">[http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/religion/story/2011-12-10/religion-atheism/51777612/1 Study: Atheists distrusted as much as rapists]</ref><ref name="CPviewsonatheists">[http://www.christianpost.com/news/atheists-widely-distrusted-even-among-themselves-culturally-ingrained-uk-study-finds-160480/ Atheists Widely Distrusted, Even Among Themselves, UK Study Finds], Christian Post, 2015</ref><ref name="Independentviewsonatheists">[http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/anti-atheist-distrust-deeply-and-culturally-ingrained-study-finds-a6952276.html Anti-atheist distrust ‘deeply and culturally ingrained’, study finds], ''The Independent'', 2015</ref><ref>Edgell, Gerteis & Hartmann 2006</ref>
  
−
===Divine command vs. ethics===
+
According to a study published in the ''International Journal for The Psychology of Religion'': "anti-atheist prejudice is not confined either to dominantly religious countries or to religious individuals, but rather appears to be a robust judgment about atheists."<ref name="Independentviewsonatheists"/> The study found that many atheists do not trust other atheists as well.<ref name="Independentviewsonatheists"/>
−
According to Plato's [[Euthyphro dilemma]], the role of the gods in determining right from wrong is either unnecessary or arbitrary. [[Divine command theory|The argument that morality must be derived from God]], and cannot exist without a wise creator, has been a persistent feature of political if not so much philosophical debate.<ref>{{harvnb|Smith|1979|p=275}}. "Among the many myths associated with religion, none is more widespread -{{sic}}or more disastrous in its effects—than the myth that moral values cannot be divorced from the belief in a god."
 
−
</ref><ref>
 
−
In [[Dostoevsky]]'s ''[[The Brothers Karamazov]]'' (Book Eleven: ''Brother Ivan Fyodorovich'', Chapter 4) there is the famous argument that ''If there is no God, all things are permitted.'': "'But what will become of men then?' I asked him, 'without God and immortal life? All things are lawful then, they can do what they like?'"
 
−
</ref><ref name="Kant CPR A811">
 
−
For [[Immanuel Kant|Kant]], the presupposition of God, soul, and freedom was a practical concern, for "Morality, by itself, constitutes a system, but happiness does not, unless it is distributed in exact proportion to morality. This, however, is possible in an intelligible world only under a wise author and ruler. Reason compels us to admit such a ruler, together with life in such a world, which we must consider as future life, or else all moral laws are to be considered as idle dreams&nbsp;..." (''Critique of Pure Reason'', A811).
 
−
</ref>
 
−
Moral precepts such as "murder is wrong" are seen as [[divine law]]s, requiring a divine lawmaker and judge. However, many atheists argue that treating morality legalistically involves a [[false analogy]], and that morality does not depend on a lawmaker in the same way that laws do.<ref>{{harvnb|Baggini|2003|p=38}}
 
−
</ref>
 
−
[[Friedrich Nietzsche]] believed in a morality independent of theistic belief, and stated that morality based upon God "has truth only if God is truth—it stands or falls with faith in God."<ref name="Fortin & Benestad">{{cite book|url = http://books.google.com/?id=19ccmx1W58IC&pg=PA16|title =Human Rights, Virtue, and the Common Good|publisher = [[Rowman & Littlefield]]|quote=That problem was brought home to us with dazzling clarity by Nietzsche, who had reflected more deeply than any of his contemporaries on the implications of godlessness and come to the conclusion that a fatal contradiction lay at the heart of modern theological enterprise: it thought that Christian morality, which it wished to preserve, was independent of Christian dogma, which it rejected. This, in Nietzsche's mind, was an absurdity. It amounted to nothing less than dismissing the architect while trying to keep the building or getting rid of the lawgiver while claiming the protection of the law. | accessdate=2011-04-09|isbn = 978-0-8476-8279-9|year = 1996}}
 
−
</ref><ref name="Craig & Moreland">
 
−
{{cite book|url = http://books.google.com/?id=g8bHRrVu3SsC&pg=PA392|title =The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology|publisher = [[Wiley-Blackwell]]|quote=Morality "has truth only if God is truth–it stands or falls with faith in God" (Nietzche 1968, p. 70). The moral argument for the existence of God essentially takes Nietzche's assertion as one of its premises: if there is no God, then "there are altogether no moral facts". | accessdate=2011-04-09|isbn = 978-1-4051-7657-6|date = 11 May 2009}}
 
−
</ref><ref name="Miller">
 
−
{{cite book|url = http://books.google.com/?id=VgMB9-tMSMoC&pg=PA85|title =Victorian Subjects|publisher = [[Duke University Press]]|quote=Like other mid-nineteenth-century writers, George Eliot was not fully aware of the implications of her humanism, and, as Nietzsche saw, attempted the difficult task of upholding the Christian morality of altruism without faith in the Christian God.| accessdate=2011-04-09|isbn = 978-0-8223-1110-2|year = 1991}}</ref>
 
  
−
There exist [[Normative ethics|normative ethical systems]] that do not require principles and rules to be given by a deity. Some include [[virtue ethics]], [[social contract]], [[Kantian ethics]], [[utilitarianism]], and [[Objectivism (Ayn Rand)|Objectivism]]. [[Sam Harris (author)|Sam Harris]] has proposed that moral prescription (ethical rule making) is not just an issue to be explored by philosophy, but that we can meaningfully practice a [[science of morality]]. Any such scientific system must, nevertheless, respond to the criticism embodied in the [[naturalistic fallacy]].<ref>{{cite book |title=Principia Ethica |url=http://fair-use.org/g-e-moore/principia-ethica/s.13 |year=1903 |first=G. E. |last=Moore |authorlink=G. E. Moore | accessdate=2011-04-09| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20110514054112/http://fair-use.org/g-e-moore/principia-ethica/s.13| archivedate=2011-05-14 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}
+
Various atheists have attempted to change the public's perception of atheism and atheists, but their efforts were largely unsuccessful (see: [[Attempts to positively rebrand atheism]]).  
−
</ref>
 
  
−
Philosophers [[Susan Neiman]]<ref>{{cite video |people=[[Susan Neiman]] |title=Beyond Belief Session 6 |medium=Conference |publisher=The Science Network |location=[[Salk Institute]], La Jolla, CA |date=6 November 2006}}
+
=== Other topics related to views on atheists ===
−
</ref>
+
*[[Persecution of atheists]]
−
and [[Julian Baggini]]<ref>{{harvnb|Baggini|2003|p=40}}
+
*[[Atheophobia]] is a fear and/or hatred of atheism/atheists.
−
</ref>
 
−
(among others) assert that behaving ethically only because of divine mandate is not true ethical behavior but merely blind obedience. Baggini argues that atheism is a superior basis for ethics, claiming that a moral basis external to religious imperatives is necessary to evaluate the morality of the imperatives themselves—to be able to discern, for example, that "thou shalt steal" is immoral even if one's religion instructs it—and that atheists, therefore, have the advantage of being more inclined to make such evaluations.<ref>{{harvnb|Baggini|2003|p=43}}
 
−
</ref>
 
−
The contemporary British political philosopher [[Martin Cohen (philosopher)|Martin Cohen]] has offered the more historically telling example of Biblical injunctions in favour of torture and slavery as evidence of how religious injunctions follow political and social customs, rather than vice versa, but also noted that the same tendency seems to be true of supposedly dispassionate and objective philosophers.<ref>101 Ethical Dilemmas, 2nd edition, by Cohen, M., Routledge 2007, pp&nbsp;184–5. (Cohen notes particularly that Plato and Aristotle produced arguments in favour of slavery.)
 
−
</ref> Cohen extends this argument in more detail in ''Political Philosophy from Plato to Mao'', where he argues that the [[Qur'an]] played a role in perpetuating social codes from the early 7th century despite changes in secular society.<ref>Political Philosophy from Plato to Mao, by Cohen, M, Second edition 2008
 
−
</ref>
 
  
−
===Criticism of religion===
+
== Desecularization and its causes ==
−
{{See also|Criticism of religion}}
+
''See also:'' [[Desecularization]] and [[Causes of desecularization]]
−
Some prominent atheists—most recently [[Christopher Hitchens]], [[Daniel Dennett]], [[Sam Harris (author)|Sam Harris]] and [[Richard Dawkins]], and following such thinkers as [[Bertrand Russell]], [[Robert G. Ingersoll]], [[Voltaire]], and novelist [[José Saramago]]—have criticized religions, citing harmful aspects of religious practices and doctrines.<ref>{{harvnb|Harris|2005}}, {{harvnb|Harris|2006}}, {{harvnb|Dawkins|2006}}, {{harvnb|Hitchens|2007}}, {{harvnb|Russell|1957}}</ref>
 
  
−
[[File:Karl Marx.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Karl Marx]]]]
+
[[Desecularization]] is the process by which [[religion]] reasserts its societal influence though religious values, institutions, sectors of society and symbols in reaction to previous and/or co-occurring [[secularization]] processes.<ref>''Religion and the State in Russia and China: Suppression, Survival and Revival'' by Christopher Marsh, 2011, page 11 (Christopher Marsh cites the definitions of desecularization given by Peter L. Berger and Vyacheslav Karpov)</ref>
  
−
The 19th-century German political theorist and sociologist Karl Marx called religion "the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the [[opium of the people]]". He goes on to say, "The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is the demand for their real happiness. To call on them to give up their illusions about their condition is to call on them to give up a condition that requires illusions. The criticism of religion is, therefore, in embryo, the criticism of that vale of tears of which religion is the halo.<ref>Marx, K. 1976. Introduction to A Contribution to the Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right. Collected Works, v. 3. New York.</ref> [[Vladimir Lenin|Lenin]] said that "every religious idea and every idea of God "is unutterable vileness&nbsp;... of the most dangerous kind, 'contagion' of the most abominable kind. Millions of sins, filthy deeds, acts of violence and physical contagions&nbsp;... are far less dangerous than the subtle, spiritual idea of God decked out in the smartest ideological constumes&nbsp;..."<ref name="MartinAmis">Martin Amis; Koba the Dread; Vintage Books; London; 2003; ISBN 978-0-09-943802-1; p.&nbsp;30–31</ref>
+
As noted above, from 2024 to 2025, the number of atheists in the world dropped by 831,000 atheists according to the [[Center for the Study of Global Christianity]] at [[Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary]].<ref>[https://www.gordonconwell.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2025/01/Status-of-Global-Christianity-2025.pdf Status of Global Atheism/Christianity, 2025, in the Context of 1900–2050]</ref><ref>[https://www.gordonconwell.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2024/01/Status-of-Global-Christianity-2024.pdf Status of Global Atheism/Christianity, 2024, in the Context of 1900–2050]</ref>
  
−
Sam Harris criticises Western religion's reliance on divine authority as lending itself to [[authoritarianism]] and [[dogma]]tism.{{sfn|Harris|2006a}}
+
The [[theology|theologian]] and [[Harvard University]] academic Harvey Cox asserted that [[grassroots]] movements such as [[fundamentalism]] and the [[Charismatic movement]]/[[pentecostalism]] are significant religious forces that are resistant to secularization forces.<ref>[http://www.publishersweekly.com/978-0-8028-4691-4 Publisher's Weekly Review of'' The Desecularization of the World: Resurgent Religion and World Politics'' by Peter L. Berger]</ref><ref>[https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/harvey-cox/fire-from-heaven/ Kirkus Reviews- ''FIRE FROM HEAVEN: Pentecostalism, Spirituality, and the Reshaping of Religion in the Twenty-First Century'' by Harvey Cox]</ref> In her book ''The Battle for God'', Karen Armstrong wrote: "One of the most startling developments of the late 20th century has been the emergence within every major religious tradition of a militant piety known as 'fundamentalism'… this religious resurgence has taken many observers by surprise."<ref>Karen Armstrong, The Battle for God, p. 9</ref>  
−
There is a correlation between [[religious fundamentalism]] and [[Extrinsic religious orientation|extrinsic religion]] (when religion is held because it serves ulterior interests)<ref name=Moreira-almeida2006>{{cite journal |doi=10.1590/S1516-44462006005000006 |last1=Moreira-almeida |first1=A. |last2=Neto |first2=F. |last3=Koenig |first3=H. G. |year=2006 |title=Religiousness and mental health: a review |journal=Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria |volume=28 |pages=242–250 |pmid=16924349 |issue=3 |ref=harv}}
+
Today, even the highly [[secular]]ized public and political sphere of [[France]] is showing a new and more open attitude towards religion.<ref>[https://edoc.unibas.ch/50856/3/20170119190142_5880ff06238b8.pdf How religious is the public sphere? – A critical stance on the debate about public religion and post-secularity], Draft Version, Jens Koehrsen (Köhrsen). Bielefeld Graduate School in History and Sociology, Germany. École des hautes études en sciences socials, France. Published in: Acta Sociologica 55 (3), S. 273-288.</ref>
−
</ref> and authoritarianism, dogmatism, and prejudice.<ref>See for example: {{cite journal | last1=Kahoe |first1= R.D.|date=June 1977 |title=Intrinsic Religion and Authoritarianism: A Differentiated Relationship|journal=Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion|volume=16|issue=2 |pages= 179–182 |jstor=1385749 | doi=10.2307/1385749 | ref=harv}} Also see: {{cite journal | last1=Altemeyer |first1= Bob |first2= Bruce|last2= Hunsberger |year=1992 |title=Authoritarianism, Religious Fundamentalism, Quest, and Prejudice| journal = [[International Journal for the Psychology of Religion]]| volume=2|issue=2| pages= 113–133 | doi = 10.1207/s15327582ijpr0202_5 | ref=harv}}
 
−
</ref>
 
−
These arguments—combined with historical events that are argued to demonstrate the dangers of religion, such as the [[Crusade]]s, [[inquisition]]s, [[Witch-hunt|witch trials]], and terrorist attacks—have been used in response to claims of beneficial effects of belief in religion.<ref>{{cite web |last=Harris |first=Sam |authorlink=Sam Harris (author) |title=An Atheist Manifesto |url=http://www.truthdig.com/dig/print/200512_an_atheist_manifesto | accessdate=2011-04-09 |publisher=[[Truthdig]] |year=2005 |quote=In a world riven by ignorance, only the atheist refuses to deny the obvious: Religious faith promotes human violence to an astonishing degree.| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20110516191405/http://www.truthdig.com/dig/print/200512_an_atheist_manifesto| archivedate=2011-05-16 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}
 
−
</ref>
 
−
Believers counter-argue that some [[state atheism|regimes that espouse atheism]], such as in Soviet Russia, have also been guilty of mass murder.<ref name="John S. Feinberg, Paul D. Feinberg">{{cite book|url = http://books.google.com/?id=Nl-f5SKq9mgC&pg=PA697 |last1=Feinberg |first1=John S. |authorlink1=John S. Feinberg |last2=Feinberg |first2=Paul D. |authorlink2=Paul D. Feinberg |title =Ethics for a Brave New World|publisher =[[Greg Koukl|Stand To Reason]]|quote=Over a half century ago, while I was still a child, I recall hearing a number of old people offer the following explanation for the great disasters that had befallen Russia: 'Men have forgotten God; that's why all this has happened.' Since then I have spent well-nigh 50 years working on the history of our revolution; in the process I have read hundreds of books, collected hundreds of personal testimonies, and have already contributed eight volumes of my own toward the effort of clearing away the rubble left by that upheaval. But if I were asked today to formulate as concisely as possible the main cause of the ruinous revolution that swallowed up some 60 million of our people, I could not put it more accurately than to repeat: 'Men have forgotten God; that's why all this has happened.'|accessdate = 2007-10-18|isbn = 978-1-58134-712-8|date = 4 November 2010}}
 
−
</ref><ref name="Totalitarianism and Atheism">
 
−
{{cite web|url = http://catholiceducation.org/articles/apologetics/ap0214.htm|title =Answering Atheist's Arguments|publisher = Catholic Education Resource Center |last=D'Souza |first=Dinesh |authorlink=Dinesh D'Souza | accessdate=2011-04-09}}
 
−
</ref> In response to those claims, atheists such as Sam Harris and Richard Dawkins have stated that Stalin's atrocities were influenced not by atheism but by dogmatic [[Marxism]], and that while Stalin and Mao happened to be atheists, they did not do their deeds in the name of atheism.{{sfn|Dawkins|2006|p=291}}<ref>[http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/harris06/harris06_index.html 10 myths and 10 truths about Atheism] Sam Harris</ref>
 
  
−
==Etymology==
+
=== Atheism and sub-replacement levels of fertility ===
−
[[File:Ephesians 2,12 - Greek atheos.jpg|thumb|left|The Greek word {{lang|grc|αθεοι}} (''atheoi''), as it appears in the [[Epistle to the Ephesians]] ({{bibleverse-nb||Ephesians|2:12}}) on the early 3rd-century [[Papyrus 46]]. It is usually translated into English as "[those who are] without God".<ref>The word {{lang|grc|αθεοι}}—in any of its forms—appears nowhere else in the [[Septuagint]] or the [[New Testament]]. {{cite book |last=Robertson |first=A.T. |title=Word Pictures in the New Testament |origyear=1932 |year=1960 |publisher=Broadman Press |chapter=Ephesians: Chapter 2 |chapterurl=http://www.ccel.org/r/robertson_at/wordpictures/htm/EPH2.RWP.html |quote=Old Greek word, not in LXX, only here in N.T. Atheists in the original sense of being without God and also in the sense of hostility to God from failure to worship him. See Paul's words in Ro 1:18–32. | accessdate=2011-04-09}}
+
''See also:'' [[Atheism and fertility rates]]
−
</ref>]]
+
[[File:Jacques Berlinerblau.jpg|thumbnail|250px|left|In 2011, atheist [[Jacques Berlinerblau]] declared: "The Golden Age of [[Secularism]] has passed."<ref name="chronicle.com"/>]]
 +
Michael Blume, a researcher at the University of Jena in Germany, wrote about the sub-replacement level of fertility among [[Atheist Population|atheistic populations]]: "Most societies or communities that have espoused atheistic beliefs have not survived more than a century."<ref name="scilogs.eu">[http://www.scilogs.eu/en/blog/biology-of-religion/2011-01-06/atheists-a-dying-breed-as-nature-favours-faithful-sunday-times-jan-02-2011-jonathan-leake-full-draft-version Atheist: A dying breed as nature favours faithful]</ref> Blume also indicated concerning concerning his research on this matter: "What I found was the complete lack of a single case of a secular population, community or movement that would just manage to retain replacement level."<ref name="scilogs.eu"/> See also: [[Atheism and sexuality]]
  
−
In early [[ancient Greek]], the adjective ''{{Transl|grc|átheos}}'' ({{lang|grc|[[:wikt:ἄθεος|ἄθεος]]}}, from the [[privative a|privative ἀ-]] + {{lang|grc|[[:wikt:θεός|θεός]]}} "god") meant "godless". It was first used as a term of censure roughly meaning "ungodly" or "impious". In the 5th century BCE, the word began to indicate more deliberate and active godlessness in the sense of "severing relations with the gods" or "denying the gods". The term [[:wikt:ἀσεβής|ἀσεβής]] (''{{Transl|grc|asebēs}}'') then came to be applied against those who impiously denied or disrespected the local gods, even if they believed in other gods. Modern translations of classical texts sometimes render ''{{Transl|grc|átheos}}'' as "atheistic". As an abstract noun, there was also {{lang|grc|[[:wikt:ἀθεότης|ἀθεότης]]}} (''{{Transl|grc|atheotēs}}''), "atheism". [[Cicero]] transliterated the Greek word into the [[Latin]] ''{{lang|la|[[:wikt:atheos#Latin|átheos]]}}''. The term found frequent use in the debate between [[early Christianity|early Christians]] and [[Ancient Greek religion|Hellenists]], with each side attributing it, in the pejorative sense, to the other.<ref name=drachmann>{{cite book |last=Drachmann |first=A. B. |title=Atheism in Pagan Antiquity |url=http://books.google.com/?id=cguq-yNii_QC&dq=Atheism+in+Pagan+Antiquity&printsec=frontcover&q= |publisher=Chicago: Ares Publishers |year=1977 |origyear=1922 |isbn=0-89005-201-8 |quote=Atheism and atheist are words formed from Greek roots and with Greek derivative endings. Nevertheless they are not Greek; their formation is not consonant with Greek usage. In Greek they said ''{{Transl |grc |átheos}}'' and ''{{Transl |grc |atheotēs}}''; to these the English words ungodly and ungodliness correspond rather closely. In exactly the same way as ungodly, ''{{Transl |grc |átheos}}'' was used as an expression of severe censure and moral condemnation; this use is an old one, and the oldest that can be traced. Not till later do we find it employed to denote a certain philosophical creed.}}
+
On December 23, 2012, Professor [[Eric Kaufmann]] who teaches at Birbeck College, University of London wrote:
−
</ref>
+
{{cquote|I argue that 97% of the world's population growth is taking place in the developing world, where 95% of people are religious.
  
−
The term ''atheist'' (from Fr. ''{{lang|fr|[[wikt:athée|athée]]}}''), in the sense of "one who&nbsp;... denies the existence of God or gods",<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.thefreedictionary.com/atheist |title=atheist |publisher=American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language |year=2009 |accessdate=2013-11-21}}
+
On the other hand, the secular West and East Asia has very low fertility and a rapidly aging population... In the coming decades, the developed world's demand for workers to pay its pensions and work in its service sector will soar alongside the booming supply of young people in the third world. Ergo, we can expect significant immigration to the secular West which will import religious revival on the back of ethnic change. In addition, those with religious beliefs tend to have higher birth rates than the secular population, with fundamentalists having far larger families. The epicentre of these trends will be in immigration gateway cities like New York (a third white), Amsterdam (half Dutch), Los Angeles (28% white), and London, 45% white British.
−
</ref>
+
<ref>[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2013/04/97-of-worlds-population-growth-is.html 97% of the world's population growth is taking place in the developing world, where 95% of people are religious], Tuesday, April 30, 2013</ref>}}
−
predates ''atheism'' in English, being first found as early as 1566,<ref>{{cite book |series=English recusant literature, 1558–1640 |volume=203 |title=A Replie to Mr Calfhills Blasphemous Answer Made Against the Treatise of the Cross |page=51 |first=John |last=Martiall |authorlink=John Marshall (priest) |location=Louvain |year=1566 |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=20snAQAAIAAJ&q=%22to%20entre#v=snippet&q=atheist&f=false | accessdate=2011-04-09}}
 
−
</ref>
 
−
and again in 1571.<ref>Rendered as ''Atheistes'': {{cite book |last=Golding |first=Arthur |authorlink=Arthur Golding |title=The Psalmes of David and others, with [[John Calvin|J. Calvin]]'s commentaries |year=1571 |pages=Ep. Ded. 3 |quote=The Atheistes which say..there is no God.}} Translated from Latin.
 
−
</ref>
 
−
''Atheist'' as a label of practical godlessness was used at least as early as 1577.<ref>{{cite book |last=Hanmer |first=Meredith |authorlink=Meredith Hanmer|title=The auncient ecclesiasticall histories of the first six hundred years after Christ, written by Eusebius, Socrates, and Evagrius |publisher=London |year=1577 |page=63 |oclc=55193813 |quote=The opinion which they conceaue of you, to be Atheists, or godlesse men.}}
 
−
</ref>
 
−
The term ''atheism'' was derived from the [[French language|French]] ''{{lang|fr|[[wikt:athéisme|athéisme]]}}'',<ref name=mw-online/> and appears in English about 1587.<ref name=Golding>Rendered as ''Athisme'': {{cite book |others=Translated from French to English by [[Arthur Golding]] & [[Philip Sidney]] and published in London, 1587 |authorlink=Philippe de Mornay |first=Philippe |last=de Mornay |title=A Woorke Concerning the Trewnesse of the Christian Religion: Against Atheists, Epicures, Paynims, Iewes, Mahumetists, and other infidels | year=1581 | trans_title=De la vérite de la religion chréstienne (1581, Paris) |quote=Athisme, that is to say, vtter godlesnes.}}
 
−
</ref>
 
−
An earlier work, from about 1534, used the term ''atheonism''.<ref>{{cite book |url=http://books.google.com/?id=gW-gAAAAMAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=vergil+english+history#v=onepage&q=Godd%20would%20not&f=false |year=c. 1534 |first=Polydore |last=Vergil |title=English history |quote=Godd would not longe suffer this impietie, or rather atheonisme. | accessdate=2011-04-09}}
 
−
</ref><ref>
 
−
The ''[[Oxford English Dictionary]]'' also records an earlier, irregular formation, ''atheonism'', dated from about 1534. The later and now obsolete words ''athean'' and ''atheal'' are dated to 1611 and 1612 respectively. {{cite book |title=[[Oxford English Dictionary|The Oxford English Dictionary]] |edition=Second |year=1989 |publisher=Oxford University Press, USA |isbn=0-19-861186-2 |author=prep. by J. A. Simpson&nbsp;...}}
 
−
</ref>
 
−
Related words emerged later: ''deist'' in 1621,<ref name=1621Deist>
 
−
{{Cite book |last=Burton |first=Robert |authorlink=Robert Burton (scholar)
 
−
|work=[[The Anatomy of Melancholy]] |year=1621 |at=Part III, section IV. II. i |quote=Cousin-germans to these men are many of our great Philosophers and Deists |url=http://books.google.com/?id=cPgveWnCdRcC&printsec=frontcover&dq=anatomy+of+melancholy#v=onepage&q=deists&f=false |title=deist | accessdate=2011-04-09 |ref=harv}}
 
−
</ref>
 
−
''theist'' in 1662,<ref>
 
−
{{cite book |last=Martin |first=Edward |authorlink= |title=His opinion concerning the difference between the Church of England and Geneva [etc.] |publisher=London |year=1662 |chapter=Five Letters |page=45 |quote=To have said my office..twice a day..among Rebels, Theists, Atheists, Philologers, Wits, Masters of Reason, Puritanes [etc.].}}
 
−
</ref>
 
−
''[[deism]]'' in 1675,<ref name=1675Deism>{{cite book |url=http://books.google.com/?id=CFBGAAAAYAAJ&pg=PT255&dq=deism#v=onepage&q=deism&f=false
 
−
|title=An universal etymological English dictionary |first=Nathan |last=Bailey |year=1675 | accessdate=2011-04-09}}
 
−
</ref>
 
−
and ''[[theism]]'' in 1678.<ref>"Secondly, that nothing out of nothing, in the sense of the atheistic objectors, viz. that nothing, which once was not, could by any power whatsoever be brought into being, is absolutely false; and that, if it were true, it would make no more against theism than it does against atheism&nbsp;..." Cudworth, Ralph. The true intellectual system of the universe. 1678. Chapter V Section II p.73
 
−
</ref>
 
−
At that time "deist" and "deism" already carried their modern meaning. The term ''theism'' came to be contrasted with deism.
 
  
−
[[Karen Armstrong]] writes that "During the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, the word 'atheist' was still reserved exclusively for [[polemic]]&nbsp;... The term 'atheist' was an insult. Nobody would have dreamed of calling ''himself'' an atheist."{{sfn|Armstrong|1999}}
+
At a conference, Kaufmann said of religious demographic projections concerning the 21st century:
 +
{{cquote|Part of the reason I think [[demography]] is very important, at least if we are going to speak about the future, is that it is the most predictable of the [[social sciences]].
  
−
''Atheism'' was first used to describe a self-avowed belief in late 18th-century Europe, specifically denoting disbelief in the [[monotheism|monotheistic]] [[Abrahamic god]].<ref name="adevism">In part because of its wide use in monotheistic Western society, ''atheism'' is usually described as "disbelief in God", rather than more generally as "disbelief in deities". A clear distinction is rarely drawn in modern writings between these two definitions, but some archaic uses of ''atheism'' encompassed only disbelief in the singular God, not in [[polytheism|polytheistic]] deities. It is on this basis that the obsolete term ''[[adevism]]'' was coined in the late 19th century to describe an absence of belief in plural deities.</ref>
+
...if you look at a population and its age structure now. You can tell a lot about the future. ...So by looking at the relative age structure of different populations you can already say a lot about the future...
−
In the 20th century, [[globalization]] contributed to the expansion of the term to refer to disbelief in all deities, though it remains common in Western society to describe atheism as simply "disbelief in God".{{sfn|Martin|2006}}
 
  
−
==History==
+
...Religious [[fundamentalism]] is going to be on the increase in the future and not just out there in the developing world..., but in the developed world as well.<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7vCDeKPRSo Eric Kaufmann - Religion, Demography and Politics in the 21st Century]</ref>}}
−
{{Main|History of atheism}}
 
−
While the earliest-found usage of the term ''atheism'' is in 16th-century [[France]],<ref name=mw-online>{{citation | url=http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/atheism | title=Merriam-Webster Online:Atheism | quote=First Known Use: 1546 | accessdate=2013-11-21}}</ref><ref name=Golding/> ideas that would be recognized today as atheistic are documented from the [[Vedic period]] and the [[classical antiquity]].
 
  
−
===Early Indic religion===
+
=== Secularism is exhausted and unconfident ===
−
{{Main|Atheism in Hinduism}}
+
''See also:'' [[Decline of the atheist movement]]
−
Atheistic schools are found in early Indian thought and have existed from the times of the [[historical Vedic religion]].<ref>{{Cite book | last = Pandian| title = India, that is, sidd| publisher = Allied Publishers| year = 1996| page = 64| url = http://books.google.com/?id=B90uj14NHjMC&pg=PA64| isbn = 978-81-7023-561-3| accessdate=2011-04-09}}
 
−
</ref>
 
−
Among the six [[Astika and Nastika|orthodox]] schools of Hindu philosophy, [[Samkhya]], the oldest philosophical school of thought, does not accept God, and the early [[Mimamsa]] also rejected the notion of God.<ref>{{Cite book | last = Dasgupta| first = Surendranath| title = A history of Indian philosophy, Volume 1| publisher = Motilal Banarsidass Publ.| year = 1992| page = 258| url = http://books.google.com/?id=PoaMFmS1_lEC&pg=PA258| isbn = 978-81-208-0412-8| accessdate=2011-04-09}}
 
−
</ref>
 
−
The thoroughly materialistic and anti-theistic philosophical [[Cārvāka]] (also called ''Nastika'' or ''Lokaiata'') school that originated in [[India]] around the 6th century BCE is probably the most explicitly atheistic school of philosophy in India, similar to the Greek [[Cyrenaic school]]. This branch of Indian philosophy is classified as [[nastika|heterodox]] due to its rejection of the authority of [[Vedas]] and hence is not considered part of the six orthodox schools of Hinduism, but it is noteworthy as evidence of a materialistic movement within Hinduism.<ref>Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan and Charles A. Moore. ''A Sourcebook in Indian Philosophy''. (Princeton University Press: 1957, Twelfth Princeton Paperback printing 1989) pp. 227–249. ISBN 0-691-01958-4.
 
−
</ref>
 
−
Chatterjee and Datta explain that our understanding of Cārvāka philosophy is fragmentary, based largely on criticism of the ideas by other schools, and that it is not a living tradition:
 
  
−
<blockquote>
+
[[Eric Kaufmann]], an [[agnosticism|agnostic]] professor whose academic research specialty is how demographic changes affect religion/irreligion and politics, wrote in 2010:
−
"Though [[materialism]] in some form or other has always been present in India, and occasional references are found in the Vedas, the Buddhistic literature, the Epics, as well as in the later philosophical works we do not find any systematic work on materialism, nor any organized school of followers as the other philosophical schools possess. But almost every work of the other schools states, for refutation, the materialistic views. Our knowledge of Indian materialism is chiefly based on these."<ref>Satischandra Chatterjee and Dhirendramohan Datta. ''An Introduction to Indian Philosophy''. Eighth Reprint Edition. (University of Calcutta: 1984). p. 55.
+
{{cquote|Worldwide, the march of religion can probably only be reversed by a renewed, self-aware secularism. Today, it appears exhausted and lacking in confidence... Secularism's greatest triumphs owe less to science than to popular social movements like nationalism, [[socialism]] and 1960s anarchist-[[liberalism]]. Ironically, secularism's demographic deficit means that it will probably only succeed in the twenty-first century if it can create a secular form of 'religious' enthusiasm.<ref>[http://www.sneps.net/uploadsepk/JQR%20Demography.pdf Shall the religious inherit the earth? - Eric Kaufmann]</ref>}}
−
</ref>
 
−
</blockquote>
 
  
−
Other Indian philosophies generally regarded as atheistic include [[Samkhya|Classical Samkhya]] and [[Mimamsa|Purva Mimamsa]]. The rejection of a personal creator God is also seen in [[Jainism]] and [[Buddhism]] in India.<ref name="Joshi">{{cite journal |last=Joshi |first=L.R. |year=1966 |title=A New Interpretation of Indian Atheism |journal=Philosophy East and West |volume=16 |issue=3/4 |pages=189–206|doi=10.2307/1397540 |ref=harv |jstor=1397540}}
+
[[File:Edward Tabash 2013.jpg|thumbnail|right|190px|[[Eddie Tabash]] ]]
−
</ref>
+
The American atheist activist [[Eddie Tabash]] said at the 2010 Michigan Atheists State Convention:
 +
{{Cquote|In every generation there has been a promising beginning of a true vanguard movement that will finally achieve widespread public acceptance for nonbelief. Yet, in each generation there has been an ultimately disappointing failure to actually register the [[Naturalism (philosophy)|naturalistic alternative]] to supernatural claims in the public consciousness...<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iix6OjLH6aM Atheists Speak Up - Eddie Tabash]</ref>}}
  
−
===Classical antiquity===
+
In recent years, a number of notable atheists have expressed pessimism about the future of the [[atheist movement]] (see: [[Decline of the atheist movement]]).
−
[[File:Socrates Louvre.jpg|thumb|upright|In [[Plato]]'s ''[[Apology (Plato)|Apology]]'', [[Socrates]] (pictured) was accused by [[Meletus]] of not believing in the gods.]]
 
−
Western atheism has its roots in [[Pre-Socratic philosophy|pre-Socratic]] [[Greek philosophy]], but did not emerge as a distinct world-view until the late [[Age of Enlightenment|Enlightenment]].<ref>{{harvnb|Baggini|2003|pp=73–74}}. "Atheism had its origins in Ancient Greece but did not emerge as an overt and avowed belief system until late in the Enlightenment."
 
−
</ref>
 
−
The 5th-century BCE Greek philosopher [[Diagoras of Melos|Diagoras]] is known as the "first atheist",<ref>[[Friedrich Solmsen|Solmsen, Friedrich]] (1942). ''[http://books.google.com/books?vid=0blEqYn0npw5h4r_qPHc_fk&id=rLASAAAAIAAJ&pgis=1 Plato's Theology]''. Cornell University Press. p 25.
 
−
</ref>
 
−
and is cited as such by [[Cicero]] in his ''[[De Natura Deorum]]''.<ref name=CIC>''...&nbsp;nullos esse omnino Diagoras et Theodorus Cyrenaicus&nbsp;...'' Cicero, Marcus Tullius: ''De natura deorum.'' Comments and English text by Richard D. McKirahan. Thomas Library, Bryn Mawr College, 1997, page 3. ISBN 0-929524-89-6
 
−
</ref> [[Atomism|Atomists]] such as [[Democritus]] attempted to explain the world in a purely [[materialism|materialistic]] way, without reference to the spiritual or mystical. [[Critias]] viewed religion as a human invention used to frighten people into following moral order<ref name=eb2007-study-of-religion/> and [[Prodicus]] also appears to have made clear atheistic statements in his work. [[Philodemus]] reports that Prodicus believed that "the gods of popular belief do not exist nor do they know, but primitive man, [out of admiration, deified] the fruits of the earth and virtually everything that contributed to his existence". Protagoras has sometimes been taken to be an atheist but rather espoused agnostic views, commenting that "Concerning the gods I am unable to discover whether they exist or not, or what they are like in form; for there are many hindrances to knowledge, the obscurity of the subject and the brevity of human life."<ref>{{cite book|last=Bremmer|first=Jan|title=Atheism in Antiquity|postscript=,}} in {{harvnb|Martin|2006|pp=12–13}}</ref> In the 3rd-century BCE the Greek philosophers [[Theodorus the Atheist|Theodorus Cyrenaicus]]<ref name=CIC/><ref>Diogenes Laërtius, The Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers, ii
 
−
</ref>
 
−
and [[Strato of Lampsacus]]<ref>Cicero, ''Lucullus'', 121. in Reale, G., ''A History of Ancient Philosophy''. SUNY Press. (1985).
 
−
</ref> did not believe gods exist.
 
  
−
Socrates (c. 470–399 BCE) was associated in the Athenian public mind with the trends in pre-Socratic philosophy towards naturalistic inquiry and the rejection of divine explanations for phenomena. Although such an interpretation misrepresents his thought he was portrayed in such a way in [[Aristophanes]]' comic play ''Clouds'' and was later to be tried and executed for impiety and corrupting the young. At his trial Socrates is reported as vehemently denying that he was an atheist and contemporary scholarship provides little reason to doubt this claim.<ref>{{cite book|last=Bremmer|first=Jan|title=Atheism in Antiquity|postscript=,}} in {{harvnb|Martin|2006|pp=14–19}}</ref><ref>
+
=== Causes of desecularization ===
−
{{cite book |first1=Thomas C. |last1=Brickhouse |last2=Smith |first2=Nicholas D. |title=Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Plato and the Trial of Socrates |year=2004 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=0-415-15681-5 |page=112}} In particular, he argues that the claim he is a complete atheist contradicts the other part of the indictment, that he introduced "new divinities".</ref>
+
*[[Causes of desecularization]]
 +
*[[Decline of the secular left]]
  
−
[[Euhemerus]] (c. 300 BCE) published his view that the gods were only the deified rulers, conquerors and founders of the past, and that their cults and religions were in essence the continuation of vanished kingdoms and earlier political structures.<ref>Fragments of Euhemerus' work in Ennius' Latin translation have been preserved in [[Church Fathers|Patristic]] writings (e.g. by [[Lactantius]] and [[Eusebius of Caesarea]]), which all rely on earlier fragments in [[Diodorus Siculus|Diodorus]] 5,41–46 & 6.1. Testimonies, especially in the context of polemical criticism, are found e.g. in [[Callimachus]], ''Hymn to Zeus'' 8.
+
=== Zero secularization rates in France and Protestant Europe ===
−
</ref>
+
''See also:'' [[British atheism]]
−
Although not strictly an atheist, Euhemerus was later criticized for having "spread atheism over the whole inhabited earth by obliterating the gods".<ref>[[Plutarch]], ''Moralia—Isis and Osiris'' [http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Plutarch/Moralia/Isis_and_Osiris*/B.html#23 23]
 
−
</ref>
 
  
−
Also important in the history of atheism was Epicurus (c. 300 BCE). Drawing on the ideas of Democritus and the Atomists, he espoused a materialistic philosophy according to which the universe was governed by the laws of chance without the need for divine intervention (see [[scientific determinism]]). Although he stated that deities existed, he believed that they were uninterested in human existence. The aim of the Epicureans was to attain peace of mind and one important way of doing this was by exposing fear of divine wrath as irrational. The Epicureans also denied the existence of an afterlife and the need to fear divine punishment after death.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epicurus/ |title=Epicurus (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) |work=Plato.stanford.edu |date= |accessdate=2013-11-10}}</ref>
+
In April 2010, Eric Kaufmann declared "the rate of secularisation has flattened to zero in most of [[Protestantism|Protestant]] [[Europe]] and [[France]]."<ref>[https://www.mercatornet.com/articles/view/shall_the_religious_inherit_the_earth/ Shall the Religious Inherit the earth] by Eric Kaufmann</ref>
  
−
The Roman philosopher [[Sextus Empiricus]] held that one should suspend judgment about virtually all beliefs—a form of skepticism known as [[Pyrrhonism]]—that nothing was inherently evil, and that [[ataraxia]] ("peace of mind") is attainable by withholding one's judgment. His relatively large volume of surviving works had a lasting influence on later philosophers.<ref name="gordonstein">Stein, Gordon (Ed.) (1980). "[http://www.positiveatheism.org/india/s1990c25.htm The History of Freethought and Atheism]". ''An Anthology of Atheism and Rationalism''. New York: Prometheus. Retrieved 2007-APR-03.
+
''The Guardian'' published an article in 2017 entitled ''Nearly 50% are of [[Nones|no religion]] – but has [[UK]] hit ‘peak secular’?'' which declared:
−
</ref>
+
{{Cquote|But, Bullivant told the ''Observer'' that the “growth of no religion may have stalled”. After consistent decline, in the past few years the proportion of [[nones]] appears to have stabilised. “Younger people tend to be more non-religious, so you’d expect it to keep going – but it hasn’t. The steady growth of non-Christian religions is a contributing factor, but I wonder if everyone who is going to give up their Anglican affiliation has done so by now? We’ve seen a vast shedding of nominal Christianity, and perhaps it’s now down to its hardcore.<ref>[https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/may/13/uk-losing-faith-religion-young-reject-parents-beliefs ''Nearly 50% are of no religion – but has UK hit ‘peak secular’?''], ''The Guardian'', 2017</ref>}}
  
−
The meaning of "atheist" changed over the course of classical antiquity. The early Christians were labeled atheists by non-Christians because of their disbelief in pagan gods.<ref name="cathencyc-atheism">{{ws|"[[s:Catholic Encyclopedia (1913)/Atheism|Atheism]]" in the 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia}}
+
=== Growth of evangelical Christianity in secular regions ===
−
</ref>
+
*[[Growth of Christianity in China|Growth of evangelical Christianity in China]]
−
During the [[Roman Empire]], Christians were executed for their rejection of the [[List of Roman deities|Roman gods]] in general and Emperor-worship in particular. When Christianity became the state religion of Rome under [[Theodosius I]] in 381, [[Christian heresy|heresy]] became a punishable offense.<ref>Maycock, A. L. and Ronald Knox (2003). ''[http://books.google.com/books?id=DmL8CljbqDwC Inquisition from Its Establishment to the Great Schism: An Introductory Study]''. ISBN 0-7661-7290-2.
+
*[[East Asia and global desecularization]]
−
</ref>
+
*[[Growth of evangelical Christianity#Evangelical Christianity and the developed world|Growth of evangelical Christianity in the developed world]]
 +
*[[Collapse of atheism in the former Soviet Union]]
 +
*[[Growth of Protestantism in Russia]]
 +
*[[Growth of evangelical Christianity in New Zealand]]
  
−
===Early Middle Ages to the Renaissance===
+
=== Future of desecularization via the continued global resurgence of religion ===
−
During the [[Early Middle Ages]], the [[Islamic world]] underwent a [[Islamic Golden Age|Golden Age]]. With the associated advances in science and philosophy, Arab and Persian lands produced outspoken rationalists and atheists, including [[Muhammad al Warraq]] (fl. 7th century), [[Ibn al-Rawandi]] (827–911), [[Muhammad ibn Zakariya al-Razi|Al-Razi]] (854–925), and [[Al-Maʿarri]] (973–1058). Al-Ma'arri wrote and taught that religion itself was a "fable invented by the ancients"<ref name="Nicholson318">Reynold Alleyne Nicholson, 1962, ''A Literary History of the Arabs'', page 318. Routledge</ref> and that humans were "of two sorts: those with brains, but no religion, and those with religion, but no brains."<ref>[http://www.sdsmt.edu/student-orgs/tfs/reading/freethought/islam.html Freethought Traditions in the Islamic World] by Fred Whitehead; also quoted in Cyril Glasse, (2001), ''The New Encyclopedia of Islam'', p. 278. Rowman Altamira.</ref> Despite being relatively prolific writers, nearly none of their writing survives to the modern day, most of what little remains being preserved through quotations and excerpts in later works by Muslim [[Apologetics|apologists]] attempting to refute them.<ref>''Al-Zandaqa Wal Zanadiqa'', by Mohammad Abd-El Hamid Al-Hamad, first edition 1999, Dar Al-Taliaa Al-Jadida, Syria (Arabic)</ref> Other prominent Golden Age scholars have been associated with rationalist thought and atheism as well, although the current intellectual atmosphere in the Islamic world, and the scant evidence that survives from the era, make this point a contentious one today.
+
''See also:'' [[Growth of global desecularization]] and [[Atheism vs. Christianity]]
 +
[[File:Birkbeck College, University of London.jpg|right|thumbnail|200px|[[Eric Kaufmann]] using a wealth of demographic studies, argues that there will be a significant decline of global atheism in the 21st century which will impact the [[Western World]].<ref>
 +
*[http://www.sneps.net/RD/uploads/1-Shall%20the%20Religious%20Inherit%20the%20Earth.pdf Shall the Religious Inherit the Earth?: Demography and Politics in the Twenty-First Century by Eric Kaufmann, Belfer Center, Harvard University/Birkbeck College, University of London]
 +
*[http://kitmantv.blogspot.com/2011/05/eric-kaufmann-shall-religious-inherit.html Eric Kaufmann: Shall The Religious Inherit The Earth?]
 +
*[http://kitmantv.blogspot.com/search/label/atheist%20demographics Eric Kaufmann's Atheist Demographic series]
 +
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6NtvDErEmBY Eric Kaufmann: Shall the Religious Inherit the Earth?, Australian Broadcasting Corporation]</ref>]]  
 +
Eric Kaufmann using a wealth of demographic studies, argues that there will be a significant decline of global atheism in the 21st century which will impact the [[Western World]].<ref>
 +
*[http://www.sneps.net/RD/uploads/1-Shall%20the%20Religious%20Inherit%20the%20Earth.pdf Shall the Religious Inherit the Earth?: Demography and Politics in the Twenty-First Century by Eric Kaufmann, Belfer Center, Harvard University/Birkbeck College, University of London]
 +
*[http://kitmantv.blogspot.com/2011/05/eric-kaufmann-shall-religious-inherit.html Eric Kaufmann: Shall The Religious Inherit The Earth?]
 +
*[http://kitmantv.blogspot.com/search/label/atheist%20demographics Eric Kaufmann's Atheist Demographic series]</ref><ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6NtvDErEmBY Eric Kaufmann: Shall the Religious Inherit the Earth?, Australian Broadcasting Corporation]</ref> In addition, Kaufmann argues that religious conservatism has a long-term trend of rising and that their influence in the world will significantly increase.<ref>[http://www.sneps.net/RD/uploads/1-Shall%20the%20Religious%20Inherit%20the%20Earth.pdf Shall the Religious Inherit the Earth?: Demography and Politics in the Twenty-First Century by Eric Kaufmann, Belfer Center, Harvard University/Birkbeck College, University of London]</ref> Kaufmann is author of the book ''Shall the Religious Inherit the Earth?''.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books/about/Shall_the_Religious_Inherit_the_Earth.html?id=nXVylycU2gQC Shall the religious inherit the earth by David Kaufmann]</ref><ref name="sneps.net">[http://www.sneps.net/RD/uploads/1-Shall%20the%20Religious%20Inherit%20the%20Earth.pdf Early paper - Shall the Religious Inherit the Earth?: Demography and Politics in the Twenty-First Century by Eric Kaufmann, Belfer Center, Harvard University/Birkbeck College, University of London]</ref> In the [[Western World]] due to immigration and the higher birth rates of religious people, Kaufman writes: "Committed religious populations are growing in the West, and will reverse the march of secularism before 2050."<ref name="sneps.net"/>
  
−
In Europe, the espousal of atheistic views was rare during the Early Middle Ages and [[Middle Ages]] (see [[Medieval Inquisition]]); [[metaphysics]] and theology were the dominant interests pertaining to religion.<ref name="Zdybicka 2005 4">{{harvnb|Zdybicka|2005|p=4}}</ref> There were, however, movements within this period that furthered heterodox conceptions of the Christian god, including differing views of the nature, transcendence, and knowability of God. Individuals and groups such as [[Johannes Scotus Eriugena]], [[David of Dinant]], [[Amalric of Bena]], and the [[Brethren of the Free Spirit]] maintained Christian viewpoints with [[pantheism|pantheistic]] tendencies.  [[Nicholas of Cusa]] held to a form of [[fideism]] he called ''[[De Docta Ignorantia|docta ignorantia]]'' ("learned ignorance"), asserting that God is beyond human categorization, and thus our knowledge of him is limited to conjecture. [[William of Ockham]] inspired anti-metaphysical tendencies with his [[nominalism|nominalistic]] limitation of human knowledge to singular objects, and asserted that the divine [[essence]] could not be intuitively or rationally apprehended by human intellect. Followers of Ockham, such as [[John of Mirecourt]] and [[Nicholas of Autrecourt]] furthered this view. The resulting division between [[Faith and rationality|faith and reason]] influenced later radical and reformist theologians such as [[John Wycliffe]], [[Jan Hus]], and [[Martin Luther]].<ref name="Zdybicka 2005 4"/>
+
Kaufmann told a secular audience in Australia: "The trends that are happening worldwide inevitably in an age of globalization are going to affect us."<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6NtvDErEmBY Shall the religious inherit the earth]</ref> Furthermore, Kaufmann also argues that secularization may reverse itself significantly earlier than 2050 in the West due to religious immigration and a religious population which is increasingly resistant to secularization in Europe.<ref>*[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/08/european-christian-immigration-will.html European immigration will pour Christian creationists into Europe]
 +
*[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/08/the-future-of-european-darwinism-and_16.html The future of European Darwinism and atheism is bleak]</ref>
  
−
The [[Renaissance]] did much to expand the scope of free thought and skeptical inquiry. Individuals such as [[Leonardo da Vinci]] sought experimentation as a means of explanation, and opposed [[Appeal to authority|arguments from religious authority]].  Other critics of religion and the Church during this time included [[Niccolò Machiavelli]], [[Bonaventure des Périers]], [[Michel de Montaigne]], and [[François Rabelais]].<ref name="gordonstein"/>
+
In addition, in the latter portion of the 20th century and continuing into the 21st century, the atheist movement has had lower confidence/morale due to various historical events/trends (see: [[Atheists and the endurance of religion]]).
  
−
===Early modern period===
+
==== Growth of desecularization in the 21st century ====
−
Historian [[Geoffrey Blainey]] wrote that the [[Protestant Reformation|Reformation]] had paved the way for atheists by attacking the authority of the Catholic Church, which in turn "quietly inspired other thinkers to attack the authority of the new Protestant churches".<ref>Geoffrey Blainey; A Short History of Christianity; Viking; 2011; p.388</ref> [[Deism]] gained influence in France, Prussia, and England. The philosopher [[Baruch Spinoza]] was "probably the first well known 'semi-atheist' to announce himself in a Christian land in the modern era", according to Blainey. Spinoza believed that natural laws explained the workings of the universe. In 1661 he published his ''Short Treatise on God''.<ref>Geoffrey Blainey; A Short History of Christianity; Viking; 2011; p.343</ref>
 
  
−
[[Criticism of Christianity]] became increasingly frequent in the 17th and 18th centuries, especially in France and England, where there appears to have been a religious [[malaise]], according to contemporary sources. Some Protestant thinkers, such as [[Thomas Hobbes]], espoused a materialist philosophy and skepticism toward supernatural occurrences, while Spinoza rejected [[divine providence]] in favour of a [[panentheistic]] naturalism. By the late 17th century, deism came to be openly espoused by intellectuals such as [[John Toland (Irish Philosopher)|John Toland]] who coined the term "pantheist".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=pantheism |title=Online Etymology Dictionary |accessdate=2013-11-26}}</ref>
+
*[[Growth of global desecularization]]
  
−
The first known explicit atheist was the German critic of religion [[Matthias Knutzen]] in his three writings of 1674.<ref>Winfried Schröder, in: Matthias Knutzen: Schriften und Materialien (2010), p. 8. See also Rececca Moore, ''The Heritage of Western Humanism, Scepticism and Freethought'' (2011), calling Knutzen "the first open advocate of a modern atheist perspective" [http://reason.sdsu.edu/germany.html online here]</ref> He was followed by two other explicit atheist writers, the Polish ex-Jesuit philosopher [[Kazimierz Łyszczyński]] and in the 1720s by the French priest [[Jean Meslier]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://nova.wpunj.edu/newpolitics/issue40/Onfray40.htm |title=Michel Onfray on Jean Meslier |publisher=William Paterson University |accessdate=2011-11-04}}</ref> In the course of the 18th century, other openly atheistic thinkers followed, such as [[Baron d'Holbach]], [[Jacques-André Naigeon]], and other [[French materialism|French materialists]].<ref name=Holbach-SoN>{{cite book |last=d'Holbach |first=P. H. T. |authorlink=Baron d'Holbach |title=The System of Nature |url=http://fulltextarchive.com/page/The-System-of-Nature-Vol-21/ |accessdate=2011-04-07 |year=1770 |volume=2}}</ref> [[John Locke]] in contrast, though an advocate of tolerance, urged authorities not to tolerate atheism, believing that the denial of God's existence would undermine the social order and lead to chaos.<ref>[[Jeremy Waldron]]; ''God, Locke, and Equality: Christian Foundations in Locke's Political Thought''; Cambridge, UK; 2002; p.217</ref>
+
*[[Acceleration of 21st century desecularization]]
  
−
The philosopher [[David Hume]] developed a skeptical epistemology grounded in empiricism, and [[Immanuel Kant]]'s philosophy has strongly questioned the very possibility of a metaphysical knowledge. Both philosophers undermined the metaphysical basis of natural theology and criticized classical [[arguments for the existence of God]].
+
*[[Future of atheism in China]]
  
−
[[File:Ludwig Andreas Feuerbach.jpg|thumb|left|upright|[[Ludwig Andreas Feuerbach|Ludwig Feuerbach]]'s ''[[The Essence of Christianity]]'' (1841) would greatly influence philosophers such as [[Friedrich Engels|Engels]], [[Karl Marx|Marx]], [[David Strauss]], [[Friedrich Nietzsche|Nietzsche]], and [[Max Stirner]]. He considered God to be a human invention and religious activities to be wish-fulfillment. For this he is considered the founding father of modern [[anthropology of religion]].]]
+
== Notable atheists who became ex-atheists ==
−
Blainey notes that, although [[Voltaire]] is widely considered to have strongly contributed to atheistic thinking during the Revolution, he also considered fear of God to have discouraged further disorder, having said "If God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him."<ref>Geoffrey Blainey; A Short History of Christianity; Viking; 2011; pp.&nbsp;390–391</ref> In ''[[Reflections on the Revolution in France]]'' (1790), the philosopher [[Edmund Burke]] denounced atheism, writing of a "literary cabal" who had "some years ago formed something like a regular plan for the destruction of the Christian religion. This object they pursued with a degree of zeal which hitherto had been discovered only in the propagators of some system of piety&nbsp;... These atheistical fathers have a bigotry of their own&nbsp;...".  But, Burke asserted, "man is by his constitution a religious animal" and "atheism is against, not only our reason, but our instincts; and&nbsp;... it cannot prevail long".<ref>[http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/b/burke/edmund/reflections-on-the-revolution-in-france/ Reflections on the Revolution in France]; (1790) by [[Edmund Burke]]</ref>
+
''See:'' [[Ex-atheists]]
  
−
[[Baron d'Holbach]] was a prominent figure in the [[French Enlightenment]] who is best known for his atheism and for his voluminous writings against religion, the most famous of them being ''[[The System of Nature]]'' (1770) but also ''[[Christianity Unveiled]]''. One goal of the [[French Revolution]] was a restructuring and subordination of the clergy with respect to the state through the [[Civil Constitution of the Clergy]]. Attempts to enforce it led to [[anticlericalism|anti-clerical]] violence and the expulsion of many clergy from France, lasting until the [[Thermidorian Reaction]]. The radical [[Jacobin Club|Jacobins]] seized power in 1793, ushering in the [[Reign of Terror]]. The Jacobins were deists and introduced the [[Cult of the Supreme Being]] as a new French state religion. Some atheists surrounding [[Jacques Hébert]] instead sought to establish a [[Cult of Reason]], a form of atheistic pseudo-religion with a goddess personifying reason. The [[Napoleonic era]] further institutionalized the secularization of French society, and exported the revolution to northern Italy, in the hopes of creating pliable republics.{{cn|date=June 2015}}
+
== Claims about the conditionality and existence of atheism ==
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheists doubting the validity of atheism]] and [[There Are No Atheists In Foxholes|There are no atheists in foxholes]]
  
−
In the latter half of the 19th century, atheism rose to prominence under the influence of [[rationalism|rationalistic]] and [[freethought|freethinking]] philosophers. Many prominent German philosophers of this era denied the existence of deities and were critical of religion, including [[Ludwig Andreas Feuerbach|Ludwig Feuerbach]], [[Arthur Schopenhauer]], [[Max Stirner]], [[Karl Marx]], and [[Friedrich Nietzsche]].<ref>{{cite book |url=http://books.google.com/?id=BKz2FcDrFy0C&pg=PA1 |title=Subjectivity and Irreligion: Atheism and Agnosticism in Kant, Schopenhauer, and Nietzsche |publisher=Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. |last=Ray |first=Matthew Alun |year=2003 |isbn=978-0-7546-3456-0 | accessdate=2011-04-09}}
+
Hannah More wrote: "[T]he mind, which knows not where to fly, flies to God.  In agony, nature is no Atheist.  The soul is drawn to God by a sort of natural impulse; not always, perhaps by an emotion of piety; but from a feeling conviction, that every other refuge is 'a refuge of lies'."<ref>More, Hannah (1815).  [https://archive.org/details/anessayoncharac00moregoog ''An Essay on the Character and Practical Writings of St. Paul''], 5th ed., vol. 2 (London:  T. Cadell and W. Davies), p. 234.</ref>
−
</ref>
 
  
−
G.J. Holyoake was the last person (1842) imprisoned in Great Britain due to atheist beliefs.<ref>{{cite book |title= Humanism: A Very Short Introduction|edition= |last= Law|first= Stephen|year= 2011|publisher= Oxford University Press|location= Oxford|isbn= 978-0-19-955364-8|page= 23}} Law notes that he may have also been the first imprisoned on such a charge.</ref> [[Stephen Law]] states that Holyoake "first coined the term 'secularism'".<ref>{{cite book |title= Humanism: A Very Short Introduction|edition= |last= Law|first= Stephen|year= 2011|publisher= Oxford University Press|location= Oxford|isbn= 978-0-19-955364-8|page= 23}}</ref>
+
=== There are no atheists in foxholes ===
 +
''See also:'' [[There Are No Atheists In Foxholes|There are no atheists in foxholes]] and [[Atheists doubting the validity of atheism]] and [[There are no atheists on a sinking ship]] and [[There are no atheists on turbulent airplanes]]
 +
[[File:Foxhole.jpg|thumb|right|250px|Reverend William T. Cummings is famous for declaring ''[[There Are No Atheists In Foxholes|There are no atheists in foxholes]]''.<ref>Multiple references:
 +
* Taylor-Blake, Bonnie (September 24, 2006). [https://web.archive.org/web/20080617035633/http://listserv.linguistlist.org/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0609D&L=ads-l&P=15696 "'There are no atheists in [the&#93; foxholes'"]. Message posted to The American Dialect Society [Electronic] Mailing List, archived at ListServ 16.0. Archive at Internet Archive.
 +
*Osborn, Neale (December 15, 2012).  [http://nealebooks.newsvine.com/_news/2012/12/15/15931810-there-are-no-atheists-in-foxholes "There are no atheists in foxholes..."]. Newsvine website/Neal Osborn.</ref>] ]]
 +
Reverend William T. Cummings is famous for declaring "[[There Are No Atheists In Foxholes|There are no atheists in foxholes]]."<ref>[http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,792459,00.html "Milestones [excerpt&#93;"] (October 15, 1945).  ''Time''.  magazine website</ref> Chaplain F. W. Lawson of the 302d Machine Gun Battalion, who was wounded twice in wartime, stated "I doubt if there is such a thing as an atheist. At least there isn't in a front line trench."<ref>[http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9905EFD91239E13ABC4D51DFB7678383609EDE "Tells of religion in army.  Chaplain Lawson says there are no atheists in front line"] (November 25, 1918).  ''New York Times'', p. 13.</ref> On the other hand, the news organization NBC featured a story in which atheist veterans claimed that there are atheists in foxholes.<ref>Breen, Tom (April 2, 2011).[https://www.nbcnews.com/id/42391558/ns/us_news-military/t/army-group-coming-out-atheist-closet/#.UbgMndihjSg "Army group 'coming out of the atheist closet'"] from NBCNews.com</ref>
  
−
===Since 1900===
+
Research indicates that heavy combat has a positive correlation to the strength of the religious faith in soldiers during the battles and subsequent to the war if they indicated their experience was a negative experience (for more information please see: [[There Are No Atheists In Foxholes|There are no atheists in foxholes]]).
−
{{Further|Marxism and religion}}
 
−
[[File:Lenin CL.jpg|thumb|upright|[[Vladimir Lenin]], the first leader of the [[Soviet Union]]. [[Marxist‒Leninist atheism]] was influential in the 20th century.]]
 
  
−
Atheism in the 20th century, particularly in the form of practical atheism, advanced in many societies. Atheistic thought found recognition in a wide variety of other, broader philosophies, such as [[existentialism]], [[Objectivism (Ayn Rand)|objectivism]], [[secular humanism]], [[nihilism]], [[anarchism]], [[logical positivism]], [[Marxism]], [[feminism]],<ref name=feminism>{{cite book |url=http://books.google.com/?id=tAeFipOVx4MC&pg=PA233&lpg=PA233&dq=%22Feminism+and+Atheism%22&q=%22Feminism%20and%20Atheism%22 |last=Overall |first=Christine |chapter=Feminism and Atheism |year=2006 |accessdate=2011-04-09 |title=The Cambridge Companion to Atheism |isbn=978-1-139-82739-3}} in {{harvnb|Martin|2006|pp=233–246}}
+
Also, due to research showing that death anxiety increases atheists' unconscious belief in God, Dr. Nathan Heflick declared in a ''Psychology Today'' article, "But, at a less conscious (or pre-conscious) level, this research suggests that there might be less atheism in foxholes than atheists in foxholes report."<ref name="Heflick"/> Please see: [[Atheism and death]]
−
</ref> and the general scientific and [[rationalist movement]].
 
  
−
In addition, [[state atheism]] emerged in Eastern Europe and Asia during that period, particularly in the [[Soviet Union]] under [[Vladimir Lenin]] and [[Joseph Stalin]], and in [[China#Communist Party|Communist China]] under [[Mao Zedong]]. Atheist and anti-religious policies in the Soviet Union included [[Soviet anti-religious legislation|numerous legislative acts]], the outlawing of religious instruction in the schools, and the emergence of the [[League of Militant Atheists]].<ref>[[Richard Pipes]]; ''Russia under the Bolshevik Regime''; The Harvill Press; 1994; pp. 339–340</ref><ref name="Viking p.494">[[Geoffrey Blainey]]; ''[[A Short History of Christianity]]''; Viking; 2011; p. 494</ref> After Mao, the [[Communist Party of China#Stance on religion|Chinese Communist Party]] remains an atheist organization, and regulates, but does not completely forbid, the practice of religion in mainland China.<ref>Rowan Callick; Party Time - Who Runs China and How; Black Inc; 2013; p.112</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.china-embassy.org/eng/zt/zjxy/t36492.htm|title= White Paper—Freedom of Religious Belief in China|publisher=Embassy of the People's Republic of China in the United States of America|date=October 1997|accessdate=2007-09-05}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2007/90133.htm|title=International Religious Freedom Report 2007 — China (includes Tibet, Hong Kong, and Macau)|year=2007|publisher=U.S.Department of State|accessdate=2007-10-02}}</ref>
+
=== Denials that atheists exist ===
 +
* [[Denials that atheists exist]]
  
−
[[File:Bezbozhnik u stanka 22-1929.jpg|thumb|left|upright|1929 cover of the USSR [[League of Militant Atheists]] [[Bezbozhnik (magazine)|magazine]], showing the gods of the [[Abrahamic religions]] being crushed by the [[First Five-Year Plan (Soviet Union)|Communist 5-year plan]]]]
+
== Causes of atheism ==
−
While Geoffrey Blainey has written that "the most ruthless leaders in the Second World War were atheists and secularists who were intensely hostile to both Judaism and Christianity",<ref>[[Geoffrey Blainey]]; ''[[A Short History of Christianity]]''; Viking; 2011; p.543</ref> Richard Madsen has pointed out that Hitler and Stalin each opened and closed churches as a matter of political expedience, and Stalin softened his opposition to Christianity in order to improve public acceptance of his regime during the war.<ref>{{cite book | editor-last = Smith | editor-first = S. A. | title = The Oxford Handbook of the History of Communism | publisher = Oxford University Press | year = 2014 | isbn = 9780199602056 | chapter = Religion Under Communism | last = Madsen | first = Richard | page = 588 | chapterurl = http://books.google.com/books?id=ZMd7AgAAQBAJ&lpg=PA172&pg=PA586 | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=ZMd7AgAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover}}</ref> Blackford and Schüklenk have written that "the Soviet Union was undeniably an atheist state, and the same applies to Maoist China and Pol Pot's fanatical Khmer Rouge regime in Cambodia in the 1970s. That does not, however, show that the atrocities committed by these totalitarian dictatorships were the result of atheist beliefs, carried out in the name of atheism, or caused primarily by the atheistic aspects of the relevant forms of communism."<ref>{{cite book | last1 = Blackford | first1 = R. | last2 = Schüklenk | first2 = U. | title = 50 great myths about atheism | publisher = John Wiley & Sons | year = 2013 | isbn = 9780470674048 | chapterurl = http://books.google.com/books?id=fR1rAAAAQBAJ&lpg=PA79&pg=PA85 | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=fR1rAAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover | chapter = Myth 27 Many Atrocities Have Been Committed in the Name of Atheism | page = 88}}</ref>
+
:''See main article: [[Causes of atheism]]'' and [[Atheism and hedonism]] and [[Resources for leaving atheism and becoming a Christian]]
  
−
Logical positivism and [[scientism]] paved the way for [[neopositivism]], [[analytical philosophy]], [[structuralism]], and [[naturalism (philosophy)|naturalism]]. Neopositivism and analytical philosophy discarded classical rationalism and metaphysics in favor of strict empiricism and epistemological [[nominalism]]. Proponents such as [[Bertrand Russell]] emphatically rejected belief in God. In his early work, [[Ludwig Wittgenstein]] attempted to separate metaphysical and supernatural language from rational discourse. [[A. J. Ayer]] asserted the unverifiability and meaninglessness of religious statements, citing his adherence to the empirical sciences. Relatedly the [[Structural anthropology|applied structuralism]] of [[Claude Lévi-Strauss|Lévi-Strauss]] sourced religious language to the human subconscious in denying its transcendental meaning. [[John Niemeyer Findlay|J. N. Findlay]] and [[J. J. C. Smart]] argued that the existence of God is not logically necessary. Naturalists and materialistic monists such as [[John Dewey]] considered the natural world to be the basis of everything, denying the existence of God or immortality.<ref name="stanford"/><ref>{{harvnb|Zdybicka|2005|p=16}}</ref>
+
There are a number of psychological, societal, familial, economic and spiritual factors which cause atheism which have been proposed over the centuries. Please see: [[Causes of atheism]] and [[Atheism and hedonism]].
  
−
===Other developments===
+
== Christian websites and other resources with a large focus on the topic of atheism  ==
 +
[[File:TFT.JPG|thumb|right|275px|[[True Freethinker]] is a [[Christian apologetics]] Facebook page run by Ken Ammi which offers many [[Rebuttals to atheist arguments|refutations of atheism]].]]
 +
''See also:'' [[Atheism vs. Christianity]] and [[Internet atheism]]
  
−
[[File:Honourable Bertrand Russell.jpg|thumb|upright|The British philosopher [[Bertrand Russell]]]]
+
Five of the more notable Christian apologetics websites/blogs which have a large focus on the topic of atheism are: the [[Atheism is dead (website)|Atheism is dead]] website; the [[Shadow To Light blog]]; the [[True Freethinker]] website; the [[Creation Ministries International and atheism|Creation Ministries International resources on atheism]] and the [[Fixed Point Foundation]] website.
  
−
Other leaders like [[E. V. Ramasami Naicker]] (Periyar), a prominent atheist leader of [[India]], fought against [[Hinduism]] and [[Brahmins]] for discriminating and dividing people in the name of [[caste]] and religion.<ref>{{cite book |last=Michael |first=S. M. |year=1999 |chapter=Dalit Visions of a Just Society |editor=S. M. Michael (ed.) |publisher=Lynne Rienner Publishers |title=Untouchable: Dalits in Modern India |isbn=1-55587-697-8 |pages=31–33}}
+
=== Freedom from Atheism Foundation (FFAF) ===
−
</ref>
+
In 2012, the [[Freedom From Atheism Foundation]] (FFAF) was formed as an online interfaith civil rights group to provide support for victims of militant atheism, protect the rights of religious believers, and address the increasing amount of atheist intolerance around the world. The groups' many admins are all anonymous due to the large amount of hate mail, threats, and stalking the site receives from militant atheists.
−
This was highlighted in 1956 when he arranged for the erection of a statue depicting a Hindu god in a humble representation and made [[antitheism|antitheistic]] statements.<ref>"He who created god was a fool, he who spreads his name is a scoundrel, and he who worships him is a barbarian." Hiorth, Finngeir (1996). "[http://iheu.org/content/atheism-south-india-2 Atheism in South India]". [[International Humanist and Ethical Union]], ''International Humanist News''. Retrieved 2013-11-21</ref>
 
  
−
Atheist [[Vashti McCollum]] was the plaintiff in a landmark 1948 [[Supreme Court of the United States|Supreme Court]] case that struck down religious education in US public schools.<ref>{{cite web|last=Martin |first=Douglas |url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9805E1DB103EF935A1575BC0A9609C8B63 |title=Vashti McCollum, 93, Plaintiff In a Landmark Religion Suit - Obituary (Obit); Biography |publisher=New York Times |date=26 Aug 2006 |accessdate=2013-11-10}}</ref> [[Madalyn Murray O'Hair]] was perhaps one of the most influential American atheists; she brought forth the 1963 Supreme Court case ''[[Murray v. Curlett]]'' which banned compulsory prayer in public schools.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Religion on Trial|last=Jurinski|first=James|year=2004|publisher=AltraMira Press|location=Walnut Creek, California|isbn=0-7591-0601-0|page=48|url=http://books.google.com/?id=0Yq_z5LaCjsC&pg=PA48&lpg=PA48|accessdate=2009-07-23}}</ref> In 1966, ''[[Time (magazine)|''Time'']]'' magazine asked "Is God Dead?"<ref>[http://content.time.com/time/covers/0,16641,19660408,00.html ''TIME Magazine'' cover] online. Apr 8, 1966. Retrieved 2013-11-21.
+
As of October 2017 the group has [https://www.facebook.com/FFAF.International over 750,000 followers] and makes an average of 80 posts a week.  Along with tens of thousands of religious supporters, the group also found support from atheist author and biologist PZ Myers.<ref>http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2014/05/09/i-support-the-freedom-from-atheism-foundation/</ref> A May 2014 article in the ''Christian Post'' titled "Freedom From Religion? How About Freedom From Atheism?" profiled the Freedom From Atheism Foundation in greater detail.<ref>http://www.christianpost.com/news/freedom-from-religion-how-about-freedom-from-atheism-119389/</ref>
−
</ref>
 
−
in response to the [[God is dead#Death of God theological movement|Death of God theological movement]], citing the estimation that nearly half of all people in the world lived under an anti-religious power, and millions more in Africa, Asia, and South America seemed to lack knowledge of the Christian view of theology.<ref>"[http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,835309,00.html Toward a Hidden God]". ''Time Magazine'' online. Apr 8, 1966. Retrieved 2007-04-17.
 
−
</ref> The [[Freedom From Religion Foundation]] was co-founded by Anne Nicol Gaylor and her daughter, [[Annie Laurie Gaylor]], in 1976 in the United States, and incorporated nationally in 1978. It promotes the [[separation of church and state]].<ref name="aboutCalling">{{cite news |title= The atheists' calling the Madison-based Freedom From Religion Foundation is taking its latest battle to the U.S. Supreme court. It's a milestone for the often-vilified but financially strong group, which has seen its membership grow to an all-time high |url= http://host.madison.com/news/the-atheists-calling-the-madison-based-freedom-from-religion-foundation/article_85a849c9-f26a-50e8-8a04-cf8bc889d8a0.html |date= 25 February 2010 |last= Erickson |first= Doug |newspaper= [[Wisconsin State Journal]] |accessdate= 2013-06-30 }}
 
−
</ref><ref>
 
−
{{cite web|url=http://host.madison.com/news/the-atheists-calling-the-madison-based-freedom-from-religion-foundation/article_85a849c9-f26a-50e8-8a04-cf8bc889d8a0.html|title=The Atheists' Calling|publisher=[[Wisconsin State Journal]]|first=Doug|last=Erickson|date=25 February 2007|accessdate=2013-11-21}}</ref>
 
  
−
Since the fall of the [[Berlin Wall]], the number of actively anti-religious regimes has reduced considerably. In 2006, Timothy Shah of the [[Pew Research Center|Pew Forum]] noted "a worldwide trend across all major religious groups, in which God-based and faith-based movements in general are experiencing increasing confidence and influence vis-à-vis secular movements and ideologies."<ref>"[http://www.pewforum.org/2006/07/18/timothy-samuel-shah-explains-why-god-is-winning/ Timothy Samuel Shah Explains 'Why God is Winning']." 2006-07-18. The Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life. Retrieved 2013-11-21.
+
=== Online videos related to atheism  ===
−
</ref>
+
*[[Atheism videos]]
−
However, [[Gregory S. Paul]] and Phil Zuckerman consider this a myth and suggest that the actual situation is much more complex and nuanced.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Paul |first1=Gregory |authorlink1=Gregory S. Paul |last2=Zuckerman |first2=Phil |title=Why the Gods Are Not Winning |journal=Edge |volume=209 |year=2007 |url=http://www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge209.html#gp |ref=harv | accessdate=2011-04-09}}
+
*[[Creation vs. Evolution Videos]]
−
</ref>
 
  
−
A 2010 survey found that those identifying themselves as atheists or agnostics are on average more knowledgeable about religion than followers of major faiths. Nonbelievers scored better on questions about tenets central to Protestant and Catholic faiths. Only Mormon and Jewish faithful scored as well as atheists and agnostics.<ref name="religion knowledge">{{harvnb|Landsberg|2010}}</ref>
+
The [[Militant atheism YouTube channel]] has a collection of videos on militant atheism.
  
−
In 2012, the first "Women in Secularism" conference was held in Arlington, Virginia.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.womeninsecularism.org/2012/ |title=Women in Secularism |accessdate=2013-11-21}}</ref> Secular Woman was organized in 2012 as a national organization focused on nonreligious women.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.secularwoman.org/about |title=Secular Woman:About |accessdate=2013-11-21}}</ref> The [[Atheist feminism|atheist feminist movement]] has also become increasingly focused on fighting sexism and [[sexual harassment]] within the atheist movement itself.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://freethoughtblogs.com/greta/2013/08/13/a-timeline-of-the-sexual-harassment-accusations/ |title=A Timeline of the Sexual Harassment Accusations |accessdate=2013-11-21}}
+
== Atheism and the media ==
−
</ref>
+
''See also:'' [[Atheism and the media]] and [[Atheism and public relations]] and [[Atheism news]]
−
In August 2012, Jennifer McCreight (the organizer of [[Boobquake]]) founded a movement within atheism known as Atheism Plus, or A+, that "applies skepticism to everything, including social issues like sexism, racism, politics, poverty, and crime".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://freethoughtblogs.com/blaghag/2012/08/atheism/ |title=Blaghag: Atheism+ |accessdate=2013-11-21}}
 
−
</ref><ref>
 
−
{{cite web  |url=http://freethoughtblogs.com/blaghag/2012/08/how-i-unwittingly-infiltrated-the-boys-club-why-its-time-for-a-new-wave-of-atheism/ |title=How I unwittingly infiltrated the boys club, why it's time for a new wave of atheism |accessdate=2013-11-21}}
 
−
</ref><ref>
 
−
{{cite web |url=http://atheismplus.com/faq.php |title=About Atheism+ |accessdate=2013-11-21}}
 
−
</ref>
 
  
−
In 2013 the first atheist monument on American government property was unveiled at the [[Bradford County, Florida|Bradford County]] Courthouse in Florida: a 1,500-pound granite bench and plinth inscribed with quotes by [[Thomas Jefferson]], [[Benjamin Franklin]], and [[Madalyn Murray O'Hair]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.alligator.org/news/local/article_f9a8713c-e2cf-11e2-b9d8-001a4bcf887a.html |title=Alligator News |accessdate=2013-11-21}}
+
The Media Research Center released a study in 2008 reporting pro-atheism bias by major press outlets in the [[United States]].<ref name=mrc>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTxORumTarg "Smoking gun proof that there is an atheist media bias"] (July 17, 2008). YouTube video, 2:56, posted by Atheism Sucks!</ref>   The study found that 80% of mainstream media coverage of atheism was positive and that 71% of Christian-themed stories had an atheist counterpoint or were written from an atheist perspective.<ref name=mrc/>  The study is not surprising given the liberal bias [[Liberal bias|that commonly exists in the major media outlets]].
−
</ref><ref>
 
−
{{cite web |url=http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/06/29/atheists-unveil-monument-in-florida-and-promise-to-build-50-more |title=Atheists unveil monument in Florida and promise to build 50 more |accessdate=2013-11-21}}</ref>
 
  
−
==New Atheism==
+
See also:  
−
[[File:Four Horsemen.jpg|thumb|right|The "[[Four Horsemen of the Non-Apocalypse]]" (clockwise from top left): [[Richard Dawkins]], [[Christopher Hitchens]], [[Daniel Dennett]], and [[Sam Harris (author)|Sam Harris]].]]
 
−
{{main|New Atheism}}
 
−
New Atheism is the name given to a movement among some early-21st-century atheist writers who have advocated the view that "religion should not simply be tolerated but should be countered, criticized, and exposed by rational argument wherever its influence arises."<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe/11/08/atheism.feature/index.html|title=The rise of the New Atheists|publisher=CNN|first=Simon|last=Hooper|accessdate=2010-03-16| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20100408094135/http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe/11/08/atheism.feature/index.html| archivedate=2010-04-08 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}
 
−
</ref><!--- NB: they may also advocate other views--->
 
−
The movement is commonly associated with [[Sam Harris (author)|Sam Harris]], [[Daniel C. Dennett]], [[Richard Dawkins]], [[Victor J. Stenger]], and [[Christopher Hitchens]].<ref>{{cite journal |title=Preview: The Four Horsemen of New Atheism reunited |first=Alice |last=Gribbin |url=http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2011/12/richard-dawkins-issue-hitchens |journal=[[New Statesman]] |date=22 December 2011 |accessdate=2012-02-13}}</ref>{{sfn|Stenger|2009}} Several best-selling books by these authors, published between 2004 and 2007, form the basis for much of the discussion of New Atheism.{{sfn|Stenger|2009}}
 
  
−
These atheists generally seek to disassociate themselves from the mass political atheism that gained ascendency in various nations in the 20th century. In best selling books, the religiously motivated terrorist [[September 11 attacks|events of 9/11]] and the partially successful attempts of the [[Discovery Institute]] to change the American science curriculum to include [[creationist]] ideas, together with support for those ideas from [[George W. Bush]] in 2005, have been cited by authors such as Harris, Dennett, Dawkins, Stenger, and Hitchens as evidence of a need to move society towards atheism.<ref name="sharedvalues">{{cite journal |url=http://lawreview.vermontlaw.edu/files/2012/02/13-Garfield-Book-2-Vol-33.pdf |journal=Vermont Law Review |volume= 33 Book 2 |author=Alan E Garfield |title=Finding Shared Values in a Diverse Society: Lessons From the Intelligent Design Controversy |publisher=Vermont Law Review |accessdate=2013-11-21}}
+
*[[Atheism and the media#Post 2010 drop in volume of atheism news stories|Drop in news stories about atheism]]
−
</ref>
+
*[[Atheism and the media#Post 2010 the percentage of negative news stories about atheism has increased|Negative news stories about atheism]].
 +
*[[Attempts to positively rebrand atheism]]
  
−
==Demographics==
+
=== Celebrity atheists ===
−
{{Main|Demographics of atheism}}
 
−
{{Further|Religiosity and education}}
 
−
[[File:Europe No Belief enhanced.svg|thumb|Percentage of people in various European countries who said: "I don't believe there is any sort of spirit, God or life force." (2005)<ref>{{cite web|url=http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_225_report_en.pdf |title=Social values, Science and Technology |format=PDF | accessdate=2011-04-09| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20110430163128/http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_225_report_en.pdf| archivedate=2011-04-30 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}</ref>]]
 
  
−
It is difficult to quantify the number of atheists in the world. Respondents to religious-belief polls may define "atheism" differently or draw different distinctions between ''atheism'', non-religious beliefs, and non-theistic religious and spiritual beliefs.<ref>{{cite web
+
See: [[Celebrity atheists]]
−
|url=http://www.adherents.com/Religions_By_Adherents.html#Nonreligious
 
−
|title=Major Religions of the World Ranked by Number of Adherents, Section on accuracy of non-Religious Demographic Data
 
−
| accessdate=2011-04-09| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20110422093857/http://www.adherents.com/Religions_By_Adherents.html| archivedate=2011-04-22 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}
 
−
</ref> A Hindu atheist would declare oneself as a Hindu, although also being an atheist at the same time.<ref>{{Cite book | last = Huxley| first = Andrew| title = Religion, Law and Tradition: Comparative Studies in Religious Law | publisher = Routledge | year = 2002 | page = 120 | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=YsUMTA4MebwC&pg=PA120 | isbn = 978-0-7007-1689-0 | ol = 7763963M | accessdate=2011-04-09}}</ref> A 2010 survey published in ''[[Encyclopædia Britannica]]'' found that the non-religious made up about 9.6% of the world's population, and atheists about 2.0%, with a very large majority based in Asia. This figure did not include those who follow atheistic religions, such as some Buddhists.<ref name=eb-2010>{{cite web|title=Religion: Year in Review 2010: Worldwide Adherents of All Religions|url=http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/1731588/Religion-Year-In-Review-2010/298437/Worldwide-Adherents-of-All-Religions|work=Encyclopædia Britannica Online|publisher=Encyclopædia Britannica Inc.|accessdate=2013-11-21}}
 
−
</ref> The average annual change for atheism from 2000 to 2010 was −0.17%.<ref name=eb-2010 /> A broad figure estimates the number of atheists and agnostics on Earth at 1.1 billion.<ref>{{cite book | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=rQTdki1xyK0C&pg=PA122 | title = Secularization and the World Religions | year = 2010 | editor1-first = Hans | editor1-last = Joas | editor2-first = Klaus | editor2-last = Wiegandt | publisher = Liverpool University Press | isbn = 978-1-84631-187-1 | ol = 25285702M | page = 122 (footnote 1) | accessdate =2012-04-18}}</ref>
 
  
−
The 2012 Gallup ''Global Index of Religiosity and Atheism'', measured the percentage of people who viewed themselves as "a religious person, not a religious person or a convinced atheist?" 13% reported to be "convinced atheists".<ref name="Gallup2012">{{cite web|url=http://www.wingia.com/en/news/win_gallup_international_ae_religiosity_and_atheism_index_ao_reveals_atheists_are_a_small_minority_in_the_early_years_of_21st_century/14/|title=WIN-Gallup International "Religiosity and Atheism Index" reveals atheists are a small minority in the early years of 21st century|date=6 August 2012|accessdate=2012-08-28}}</ref> The top ten countries with people who viewed themselves as "convinced atheists" were [[China]] (47%), [[Japan]] (31%), the [[Czech Republic]] (30%), [[France]] (29%), [[South Korea]] (15%), [[Germany]] (15%), [[Netherlands]] (14%), [[Austria]] (10%), [[Iceland]] (10%), [[Australia]] (10%), and the [[Republic of Ireland]] (10%). The top ten countries with people who described themselves as "a religious person" were [[Ghana]] (96%), [[Nigeria]] (93%), [[Armenia]] (92%), [[Fiji]] (92%), [[Republic of Macedonia|Macedonia]] (90%), [[Romania]] (89%), [[Iraq]] (88%), [[Kenya]] (88%), [[Peru]] (86%), and [[Brazil]] (85%).<ref>{{cite web|title=GLOBAL INDEX OF RELIGION AND ATHEISM - Press Release|url=http://redcresearch.ie/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/RED-C-press-release-Religion-and-Atheism-25-7-12.pdf|publisher=[[Gallup (company)|Gallup]] - [[Red C]]|ref=REDC}}</ref>
+
== Atheism and homosexuality ==
 +
See:  
  
−
'''Europe'''. According to the 2010 Eurobarometer Poll, the percentage of those polled who agreed with the statement "you don't believe there is any sort of spirit, God or life force" varied from: France (40%), Czech Republic (37%), Sweden (34%), Netherlands (30%), and Estonia (29%), down to Poland (5%), Greece (4%), Cyprus (3%), Malta (2%), and Romania (1%), with the European Union as a whole at 20%.<ref name=EU /> In a 2012 Eurobarometer poll on discrimination in the European Union, 16% of those polled considered themselves non believers/agnostics and 7% considered themselves atheists.<ref>{{citation|title=Discrimination in the EU in 2012|work=[[Eurobarometer|Special Eurobarometer]] |year=2012 |series=383 |page=233 |url=http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_393_en.pdf |accessdate=14 August 2013 |publisher=[[European Commission]] |location=[[European Union]]}} The question asked was "Do you consider yourself to be...?", with a card showing: Catholic, Orthodox, Protestant, Other Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Sikh, Buddhist, Hindu, Atheist, and non-believer/agnostic. Space was given for Other (SPONTANEOUS) and DK. Jewish, Sikh, Buddhist, Hindu did not reach the 1% threshold.</ref> According to the [[Australian Bureau of Statistics]], 22% of Australians have "no religion", a category that includes atheists.<ref name="abs">
+
*[[Atheist actions against homosexuals]]
−
{{cite web|url=http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/2071.0main+features902012-2013
+
*[[Atheism and homosexuality]]
−
|title=Cultural Diversity In Australia
 
−
|publisher=Australian Bureau of Statistics
 
−
|year=2012
 
−
| accessdate=2012-06-21}}
 
−
</ref>
 
  
−
According to a [[Pew Research Center]] survey in 2012 [[Irreligion|religiously unaffiliated]] (including agnostics and atheists) make up about 18.2% of Europeans.<ref name="Religiously Unaffiliated">[http://www.pewforum.org/global-religious-landscape-unaffiliated.aspx Religiously Unaffiliated]</ref> According to the same survey, the religiously unaffiliated are the majority of the population only in two European countries: Czech Republic (75%) and Estonia (60%).<ref name="Religiously Unaffiliated"/> There are another four countries where the unaffiliated make up a majority of the population: North Korea (71%), Japan (57%), Hong Kong (56%), and China (52%).<ref name="Religiously Unaffiliated"/>
+
== Other well-known proponents of atheism ==
 +
''See:'' [[Famous atheists]] and [[Famous agnostics]]
 +
[[Image:nietzsche2.jpg|right|200px|thumb|[[Friedrich Nietzsche]] ]]
 +
*[[Diagoras of Melos]]
 +
*[[Friedrich Nietzsche]]
 +
*[[A. J. Ayer]]
 +
*[[Ludwig Feuerbach]]
 +
*[[Friedrich Engels]]
 +
*[[Sigmund Freud]]
 +
*[[Adolf Hitler]]<ref name="Today's atheists"/>
 +
*[[Albert Camus]]
 +
*[[Ayn Rand]]
 +
*[[Madalyn Murray O'Hair]]
 +
*[[Paul Kurtz]]
 +
*[[John Gray (philosopher)|John Gray]]
  
−
In the '''United States''', there was a 1% to 5% increase in self-reported atheism from 2005 to 2012, and a larger drop in those who self-identified as "religious", down by 13%, from 73% to 60%.<ref name="BBCViewpoints">{{cite news|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19262884|title=BBC News – Viewpoints: Why is faith falling in the US?|date=22 August 2012|work=[[BBC Online]]|accessdate=2012-08-28}}</ref> According to a 2015 report by the Pew Research Center, 3.1% of the US adult population identify as atheist, up from 1.6% in 2007, and within the religiously unaffiliated (or "no religion") demographic, atheists made up 13.6%.<ref>[http://www.pewforum.org/2015/05/12/americas-changing-religious-landscape/ America’s Changing Religious Landscape], Pew Research Center, 12 May 2015.</ref>
+
=== Well-known proponents of skepticism/atheism/agnosticism ===
 +
*[[David Hume]]
 +
*[[Bertrand Russell]]
  
−
[[File:Atheists Agnostics Zuckerman en.svg|thumb|400px|left|Proportion of atheists and agnostics around the world.]]
+
== Atheist organizations ==
 +
See: [[Atheist organizations]]
  
−
'''Socio-economics'''. A study noted positive correlations between levels of education and secularity, including atheism, in America.<ref name="Zuckerman"/>
+
=== Atheist organizations and fundraising ===
 +
*[[Atheist organizations and fundraising]]
  
−
According to evolutionary psychologist Nigel Barber, atheism blossoms in places where most people feel economically secure, particularly in the [[Social democracy|social democracies]] of Europe, as there is less uncertainty about the future with extensive social safety nets and better health care resulting in a greater quality of life and higher life expectancy. By contrast, in underdeveloped countries, there are virtually no atheists.<ref>Nigel Barber (2010). [http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-human-beast/201005/why-atheism-will-replace-religion Why Atheism Will Replace Religion]. [[Psychology Today]]. Retrieved 2013-05-22.</ref>
+
==Atheism quotes==
  
−
'''Atheism and education'''. A letter published in ''[[Nature (journal)|Nature]]'' in 1998 reported a survey suggesting that belief in a personal god or [[afterlife]] was at an all-time low among the members of the U.S. [[National Academy of Science]], 7.0% of whom believed in a personal god as compared with more than 85% of the general U.S. population,<ref>{{cite journal |title=Correspondence: Leading scientists still reject God |last1=Larson |first1=Edward J. |last2=Zheng |first2=Larry |year=1998 |journal=Nature |volume=394 |issue=6691 |pages=313–4 |doi=10.1038/28478 |pmid=9690462 |ref=harv |last3=Li |first3=CC}} Available at [http://www.stephenjaygould.org/ctrl/news/file002.html StephenJayGould.org], Stephen Jay Gould archive. Retrieved 2006-12-17</ref> although this study has been criticized by [[Rodney Stark]] and [[Roger Finke]] for its definition of belief in God. The definition was "I believe in a God to whom one may pray in the expectation of receiving an answer".<ref name="Standard1">{{cite book|url = http://books.google.com/?id=2P_RJqdUYBAC&pg=PA57|title =The Secularization Debate (chapter by Rodney Stark)|publisher = [[Rowman & Littlefield]]|editor=William H. Swatos; Daniel V. A. Olson|quote=Recently, quite amazing time series data on the beliefs of scientists were published in ''Nature''. Leuba's standard for belief in God is so stringent it would exclude a substantial portion of "mainline" clergy. It obviously was an intentional ploy on his part. He wanted to show that men of science were irreligious. |accessdate=2011-08-19|isbn = 978-0-7425-0761-6|year = 2000}}
+
See articles: [[Atheism Quotes]]
−
* {{cite book|url = http://books.google.com/?id=N4p9eiXV6dMC&pg=PA73|last1=Stark |first1=Rodney |last2=Finke |first2=Roger |title =Acts of Faith: Explaining the Human Side of Religion |publisher = [[University of California Press]]|quote=Recently, quite amazing time series data on the beliefs of scientists were published in ''Nature''. Leuba's standard for belief in God is so stringent it would exclude a substantial portion of "mainline" clergy. It obviously was an intentional ploy on his part. He wanted to show that men of science were irreligious. |accessdate=2011-08-19}}
 
−
</ref>
 
  
−
An article published by ''[[The University of Chicago|The University of Chicago Chronicle]]'' that discussed the above study, stated that 76% of [[physician]]s in the United States believe in God, more than the 7% of scientists above, but still less than the 85% of the general population.<ref name="Physicians">{{cite web|url = http://chronicle.uchicago.edu/050714/doctorsfaith.shtml|title =Survey on physicians' religious beliefs shows majority faithful|publisher = [[The University of Chicago]]|quote=The first study of physician religious beliefs has found that 76 percent of doctors believe in God and 59 percent believe in some sort of afterlife. The survey, performed by researchers at the University and published in the July issue of the Journal of General Internal Medicine, found that 90 percent of doctors in the United States attend religious services at least occasionally compared to 81 percent of all adults.|accessdate=2011-04-08}}
+
== Atheism news ==
−
</ref> Another study assessing religiosity among scientists who are members of the [[American Association for the Advancement of Science]] found that "just over half of scientists (51%) believe in some form of deity or higher power; specifically, 33% of scientists say they believe in God, while 18% believe in a universal spirit or higher power."<ref name="American Academy">{{cite web|url = http://www.pewforum.org/2009/11/05/scientists-and-belief/|title =Scientists and Belief|publisher = [[Pew Research Center]]|quote=A survey of scientists who are members of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, conducted by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press in May and June 2009, finds that members of this group are, on the whole, much less religious than the general public.1 Indeed, the survey shows that scientists are roughly half as likely as the general public to believe in God or a higher power. According to the poll, just over half of scientists (51%) believe in some form of deity or higher power; specifically, 33% of scientists say they believe in God, while 18% believe in a universal spirit or higher power.| accessdate=2013-11-21}}
+
See: [[Atheism news]]
−
</ref>
 
  
−
[[Frank Sulloway]] of the [[Massachusetts Institute of Technology]] and [[Michael Shermer]] of [[California State University]] conducted a study which found in their polling sample of "credentialed" U.S. adults (12% had Ph.Ds and 62% were college graduates) 64% believed in God, and there was a [[correlation]] indicating that religious conviction diminished with education level.{{sfn|Shermer|1999|pp=76–79}}
+
== Recommended reading ==
 +
*[[Christian apologetics books on atheism]]
  
−
In 1958, Professor [[Michael Argyle (psychologist)|Michael Argyle]] of the [[University of Oxford]] analyzed seven research studies that had investigated correlation between attitude to religion and [[Intelligence quotient|measured intelligence]] among school and college students from the U.S. Although a clear negative correlation was found, the analysis did not identify causality but noted that factors such as authoritarian family background and social class may also have played a part.<ref>{{cite book
+
== Resources for leaving atheism and becoming a Christian ==
−
|last=Argyle
+
*[[Resources for leaving atheism and becoming a Christian]]
−
|first=Michael
+
*[https://creation.com/good-news Some good news]
−
|authorlink=Michael Argyle (psychologist)
+
*[https://rightsmarts.com/atheism-is-dead Atheism Is Dead]
−
|title=Religious Behaviour
 
−
|publisher=Routledge and Kegan Paul
 
−
|year=1958
 
−
|location=London
 
−
|pages=93–96
 
−
|isbn=0-415-17589-5}}
 
−
</ref> Sociologist Philip Schwadel found that higher levels of education are associated with increased religious participation and religious practice in daily life, but also correlate with greater tolerance for atheists' public opposition to religion and greater skepticism of "exclusivist religious viewpoints and biblical literalism".<ref>{{cite journal |title=The Effects of Education on Americans' Religious Practices, Beliefs, and Affiliations|last=Schwadel|first=Philip|year=2011|journal=Review of Religious Research|volume=53|issue=2|doi=10.1007/s13644-011-0007-4 |page=161}}</ref> Other studies have also examined the relationship between [[religiosity and intelligence]]; in a [[meta-analysis]], 53 of 63 studies found that [[Theory of multiple intelligences|analytical intelligence]] correlated negatively with religiosity, with 35 of the 53 reaching [[statistical significance]], while 10 studies found a positive correlation, 2 of which reached significance.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://arstechnica.com/science/2013/08/new-meta-analysis-checks-the-correlation-between-intelligence-and-faith/|title=New meta-analysis checks the correlation between intelligence and faith|first=Akshat|last=Rathi|publisher=Ars Technica|date=August 11, 2013|accessdate=2014-05-29}}</ref>
 
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
−
{{div col|colwidth=18em}}
 
−
* [[A Brief History of Disbelief]]
 
−
* [[Adevism]]
 
−
* [[Antitheism]]
 
−
* [[Apostasy]]
 
−
* [[Atheist existentialism]]
 
−
* [[Atheist feminism]]
 
−
* [[Brights movement]]
 
−
* [[Christian atheism]]
 
−
* [[Criticism of atheism]]
 
−
* [[Discrimination against atheists]]
 
−
* [[Dysteleology]]
 
−
* [[Empiricism]]
 
−
* [[Irreligion by country]]
 
−
* [[Jewish atheism]]
 
−
* [[List of atheists]]
 
−
* [[List of secularist organizations]]
 
−
* [[Out Campaign]]
 
−
* [[Secular religion]]
 
−
* [[Tabula rasa]]
 
−
* [[Wealth and religion]]
 
−
* Wikiversity course [[v:Beyond Theism|Beyond Theism]]
 
−
{{Div col end}}
 
−
{{Wikipedia books|Atheism}}
 
−
{{Portal bar|Atheism|Philosophy|Religion}}
 
  
−
==Notes==
+
*[[Doubt]]
−
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em
+
*[[Atheism articles]]
−
|refs=
+
*[[Atheism symbols]]
−
<ref name=encyc-unbelief-def-issues>{{cite book|last=Harvey|first=Van A.|title=Agnosticism and Atheism|postscript=,}} in {{harvnb|Flynn|2007|p=35}}: "The terms ''ATHEISM'' and ''AGNOSTICISM'' lend themselves to two different definitions. The first takes the privative ''a'' both before the Greek ''theos'' (divinity) and ''gnosis'' (to know) to mean that atheism is simply the absence of belief in the gods and agnosticism is simply lack of knowledge of some specified subject matter. The second definition takes atheism to mean the explicit denial of the existence of gods and agnosticism as the position of someone who, because the existence of gods is unknowable, suspends judgment regarding them&nbsp;... The first is the more inclusive and recognizes only two alternatives: Either one believes in the gods or one does not. Consequently, there is no third alternative, as those who call themselves agnostics sometimes claim. Insofar as they lack belief, they are really atheists. Moreover, since absence of belief is the cognitive position in which everyone is born, the burden of proof falls on those who advocate religious belief. The proponents of the second definition, by contrast, regard the first definition as too broad because it includes uninformed children along with aggressive and explicit atheists. Consequently, it is unlikely that the public will adopt it."</ref>
+
*[[Essay: Atheism and evolution essays]]
−
<ref name=eb2011-atheism>{{harvnb|Nielsen|2013}}: "Instead of saying that an atheist is someone who believes that it is false or probably false that there is a God, a more adequate characterization of atheism consists in the more complex claim that to be an atheist is to be someone who rejects belief in God for the following reasons&nbsp;... : for an anthropomorphic God, the atheist rejects belief in God because it is false or probably false that there is a God; for a nonanthropomorphic God&nbsp;... because the concept of such a God is either meaningless, unintelligible, contradictory, incomprehensible, or incoherent; for the God portrayed by some modern or contemporary theologians or philosophers&nbsp;... because the concept of God in question is such that it merely masks an atheistic substance—e.g., "God" is just another name for love, or&nbsp;... a symbolic term for moral ideals."</ref>
+
*[[Atheism and satanic deception]]
−
<ref name=eb2011-atheism-critique>{{harvnb|Nielsen|2013}}: "atheism, in general, the critique and denial of metaphysical beliefs in God or spiritual beings. As such, it is usually distinguished from theism, which affirms the reality of the divine and often seeks to demonstrate its existence. Atheism is also distinguished from agnosticism, which leaves open the question whether there is a god or not, professing to find the questions unanswered or unanswerable."</ref>
+
*[[Second generation atheist]]
−
<ref name=eb2011concise-atheism>{{cite encyclopedia|title = Atheism | url=http://www.merriam-webster.com/concise/atheism?show=0&t=1323944845 |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica Concise |publisher=Merriam Webster |accessdate=2011-12-15 | quote = Critique and denial of metaphysical beliefs in God or divine beings. Unlike agnosticism, which leaves open the question of whether there is a God, atheism is a positive denial. It is rooted in an array of philosophical systems.}}</ref>
 
−
<ref name="eb2011-Rejection-of-all-religious-beliefs">
 
−
{{cite encyclopedia |title=Atheism as rejection of religious beliefs |url=http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/40634/atheism |encyclopedia=[[Encyclopædia Britannica]] |edition=15th |volume=1 |page=666 |year=2011 |id=0852294735 |ref=harv | accessdate=2011-04-09| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20110512015453/http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/40634/atheism| archivedate=2011-05-12 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}</ref>
 
−
<ref name=eb2007-study-of-religion>{{cite encyclopedia | title = religion, study of |encyclopedia=[[Encyclopædia Britannica]] | year = 2007 | url = http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/497151/study-of-religion | accessdate =2007-04-02 }}</ref>
 
  
−
<ref name=eb2007-demographics>{{cite web
+
'''Humor:'''
−
|url=http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/1360391/Religion-Year-In-Review-2007
 
−
|title=Worldwide Adherents of All Religions by Six Continental Areas, Mid-2007
 
−
|publisher=Encyclopædia Britannica
 
−
|year=2007
 
−
|accessdate=2013-11-21}}
 
−
* 2.3% Atheists: Persons professing atheism, skepticism, disbelief, or irreligion, including the militantly antireligious (opposed to all religion).
 
−
* 11.9% Nonreligious: Persons professing no religion, nonbelievers, agnostics, freethinkers, uninterested, or dereligionized secularists indifferent to all religion but not militantly so.</ref>
 
  
−
<ref name=eb1911-atheism>{{cite encyclopedia |year=1911 |url=http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Atheism |title=Atheism |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica | accessdate=2011-04-09 | quote = The term as generally used, however, is highly ambiguous. Its meaning varies (a) according to the various definitions of deity, and especially (b) according as it is (i.) deliberately adopted by a thinker as a description of his own theological standpoint, or (ii.) applied by one set of thinkers to their opponents. As to (a), it is obvious that atheism from the standpoint of the Christian is a very different conception as compared with atheism as understood by a Deist, a Positivist, a follower of Euhemerus or Herbert Spencer, or a Buddhist.| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20110512015453/http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Atheism| archivedate=2011-05-12 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}</ref>
+
*[[Essay:Comedy and satires concerning atheism and evolution|Comedies and satires of atheism and evolution]]
−
<ref name=eb1911-atheism-sceptical>{{cite encyclopedia |year=1911 |url=http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Atheism |title=Atheism |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica | accessdate=2011-04-09 | quote = But dogmatic atheism is rare compared with the sceptical type, which is identical with agnosticism in so far as it denies the capacity of the mind of man to form any conception of God, but is different from it in so far as the agnostic merely holds his judgment in suspense, though, in practice, agnosticism is apt to result in an attitude towards religion which is hardly distinguishable from a passive and unaggressive atheism.| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20110512015453/http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Atheism| archivedate=2011-05-12 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}</ref>
+
 
−
<ref name=encyc-philosophy>{{harvnb|Edwards|2005}}: "On our definition, an 'atheist' is a person who rejects belief in God, regardless of whether or not his reason for the rejection is the claim that 'God exists' expresses a false proposition. People frequently adopt an attitude of rejection toward a position for reasons other than that it is a false proposition. It is common among contemporary philosophers, and indeed it was not uncommon in earlier centuries, to reject positions on the ground that they are meaningless. Sometimes, too, a theory is rejected on such grounds as that it is sterile or redundant or capricious, and there are many other considerations which in certain contexts are generally agreed to constitute good grounds for rejecting an assertion."</ref>
+
'''Conservapedia statistics about its atheism articles:'''
−
<ref name=encyc-unbelief-compatible>{{cite book|last=Holland|first=Aaron|title=Agnosticism|postscript=,}} in {{harvnb|Flynn|2007|p=[http://books.google.com/books?ei=xvzhT-_WFIaQ8wSivd2GCA&id=YR4RAQAAIAAJ&dq=agnosticism+compatible+with+atheism&q=%22It+is+important+to+note+that+this+interpretation+of+agnosticism%22 34]}}: "It is important to note that this interpretation of agnosticism is compatible with theism or atheism, since it is only asserted that ''knowledge'' of God's existence is unattainable."</ref>
+
 
−
<ref name=RoweRoutledge>{{harvnb|Rowe|1998}}: "As commonly understood, atheism is the position that affirms the nonexistence of God. So an atheist is someone who disbelieves in God, whereas a theist is someone who believes in God. Another meaning of 'atheism' is simply nonbelief in the existence of God, rather than positive belief in the nonexistence of God.&nbsp;... an atheist, in the broader sense of the term, is someone who disbelieves in every form of deity, not just the God of traditional Western theology."</ref>
+
*[[Conservapedia:Atheism articles statistics]]
−
<!--ref name=extreme-secularism>{{harvnb|Zuckerman|2010}}: "A major source of these biases is the lack of clear definitions. Atheism and secularity are defined in opposition to religion, with atheism (the rejection of theism) often perceived as an extreme form of secularism (the decline of religious influence over society). But atheism is a narrow term referring to a specific belief (that there is no god), whereas secularism has various meanings, including a range of attitudes (such as religious indifference, doubt, agnosticism, and atheism) as as behaviors (such as lack of regular church attendance or disregard for traditional religious morality)."</ref-->
+
 
−
<ref name=martin-agnosticism-entails>{{harvnb|Martin|2006|p=2}}: "But agnosticism is compatible with negative atheism in that agnosticism ''entails'' negative atheism. Since agnostics do not believe in God, they are by definition negative atheists. This is not to say that negative atheism entails agnosticism. A negative atheist ''might'' disbelieve in God but need not."</ref>
+
*[[Conservapedia:Atheism Project|Conservapedia Atheism Project]]
−
<ref name=BBC-2004-demographics>{{cite news
+
 
−
|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/wtwtgod/3518375.stm
+
==External links==
−
|title=UK among most secular nations
+
''see also:'' [[Atheism website resources]]
−
|publisher=BBC News
+
 
−
|accessdate=2015-01-14
+
'''General articles on atheism:'''
−
| date=2004-02-26}}</ref>
+
 
−
<ref name=agnosticism-compatible>{{harvnb|Martin|1990|pp=[http://books.google.com/books?id=MNZqCoor4eoC&pg=PA466&dq=%22compatible+with+negative+atheism%22 467–468]}}: "In the popular sense an agnostic neither believes nor disbelieves that God exists, while an atheist disbelieves that God exists. However, this common contrast of agnosticism with atheism will hold only if one assumes that atheism means positive atheism. In the popular sense, agnosticism is compatible with negative atheism. Since negative atheism by definition simply means not holding any concept of God, it is compatible with neither believing nor disbelieving in God."</ref>
+
*[https://creation.com/atheism Atheism] by [[Creation Ministries International]]
−
<ref name=flint-agnostic-atheism>{{harvnb|Flint|1903|pp=[http://books.google.com/books?id=DWMtAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA49&dq=%22The+atheist+may+however+be%22 49–51]}}: "The atheist may however be, and not unfrequently is, an agnostic. There is an agnostic atheism or atheistic agnosticism, and the combination of atheism with agnosticism which may be so named is not an uncommon one."</ref>
+
*[https://www.wnd.com/2013/03/horrific-human-toll-of-militant-atheism-exposed/ Horrific Human Toll of 'Militant Atheism' Exposed: USSR's genocide against Christians largely ignored - World Net Daily]
−
<ref name=barker-agnostic-atheism>{{harvnb|Barker|2008|p=[http://books.google.com/books?id=fAjPWYgIfCoC&pg=PA96&dq=%22both+an+atheist+and+an+agnostic%22 96]}}: "People are invariably surprised to hear me say I am both an atheist and an agnostic, as if this somehow weakens my certainty. I usually reply with a question like, "Well, are you a Republican or an American?" The two words serve different concepts and are not mutually exclusive. Agnosticism addresses knowledge; atheism addresses belief. The agnostic says, "I don't have a knowledge that God exists." The atheist says, "I don't have a belief that God exists." You can say both things at the same time. Some agnostics are atheistic and some are theistic."</ref>
+
*[https://creation.com/atheism-agnosticism-and-humanism-godless-religions-questions-and-answers Atheism, agnosticism and humanism: godless religions] by [[Creation Ministries International]]
−
<ref name=besant-open-to-new-truth>{{cite book | title = Why Should Atheists Be Persecuted? | first = Annie | last = Besant | authorlink = Annie Wood Besant }} in {{harvnb|Bradlaugh|Besant|Bradlaugh|Moss|1884|pp =[http://books.google.com/books?id=jh8HAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA185&dq=%22The+Atheist+waits+for+proof+of+God%22 185–186]}}: "The Atheist waits for proof of God. Till that proof comes he remains, as his name implies, without God. His mind is open to every new truth, after it has passed the warder Reason at the gate."</ref>
+
*[https://www.bethinking.org/tag/atheism/page/all Atheism articles - Bethinking.org]
−
<ref name=holyoake-question-of-probability>{{cite journal | title = Mr. Mackintosh's New God | first = George Jacob | last = Holyoake | authorlink = George Holyoake | magazine = [[w:The Oracle of Reason|The Oracle of Reason, Or, Philosophy Vindicated]] | volume = 1 | issue = 23 | year = 1842 | page = 186 | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=BFY9AAAAYAAJ&pg=PA186 | quote = On the contrary, I, as an Atheist, simply profess that I do not see sufficient reason to ''believe'' that there is a god. I do not pretend to ''know'' that there is no god. The whole question of god's existence, ''belief'' or ''disbelief'', a question of probability or of improbability, not knowledge.}}</ref>
+
*[http://www.truefreethinker.com/atheism True Free Thinker - atheism section]
−
<ref name=honderich>
+
*[http://www.carm.org/atheism.htm Atheism] by [[Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry]]
−
Honderich, Ted (Ed.) (1995). "Humanism". ''The Oxford Companion to Philosophy''. Oxford University Press. p 376. ISBN 0-19-866132-0.
+
*[https://www.wnd.com/2017/04/former-atheists-case-for-christ-hits-big-screen/ Former Atheist's 'Case For Christ Hits Big Screen], 2017
−
</ref>
+
 
−
<ref name=religioustolerance>Most dictionaries (see the OneLook query for [http://www.onelook.com/?w=atheism&ls=a "atheism"]) first list one of the more narrow definitions.
+
'''Prominent atheists:'''
−
* {{Cite book |url=http://www.ditext.com/runes/a.html |title=Dictionary of Philosophy |first=Dagobert D.(editor) |last=Runes |authorlink=Dagobert D. Runes |year=1942 |publisher=Littlefield, Adams & Co. Philosophical Library |location=New Jersey |isbn=0-06-463461-2 |quote=(a) the belief that there is no God; (b) Some philosophers have been called "atheistic" because they have not held to a belief in a personal God. Atheism in this sense means "not theistic". The former meaning of the term is a literal rendering. The latter meaning is a less rigorous use of the term though widely current in the history of thought |accessdate=2011-04-09| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20110513234916/http://www.ditext.com/runes/a.html| archivedate=2011-05-13 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}} – entry by [[Vergilius Ferm]]
 
−
</ref><ref name=oxdicphil>
 
−
{{cite dictionary |editor=Simon Blackburn |encyclopedia=The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy |title=atheism |url=http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199541430.001.0001/acref-9780199541430-e-278?rskey=GC0Coc&result=279 |accessdate=2013-11-21 |edition=2008 |year=2008 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford |quote= Either the lack of belief that there exists a god, or the belief that there exists none. Sometimes thought itself to be more dogmatic than mere agnosticism, although atheists retort that everyone is an atheist about most gods, so they merely advance one step further.}}<!--Same in 2005 edition: http://books.google.com/books?id=WHILCw0hDA4C&pg=PA27&dq=%22atheism%22#v=onepage&q=%22atheism%22&f=false -->
 
−
</ref><ref name=reldef>
 
−
{{cite web |url=http://www.as.ua.edu/rel/aboutreldefinitions.html |title=Definitions: Atheism|publisher=Department of Religious Studies, University of Alabama |accessdate=2012-12-01}}
 
−
</ref>
 
−
<ref name=hume-metaphysics>{{harvnb|Hume|1748|loc=Part III}}: "If we take in our hand any volume; of divinity or school metaphysics, for instance; let us ask, Does it contain any abstract reasoning concerning quantity or number? No. Does it contain any experimental reasoning concerning matter of fact and existence? No. Commit it then to the flames: for it can contain nothing but sophistry and illusion."</ref>
 
−
}}
 
  
−
==References==
+
*[[Atheism and leadership]]
−
{{refbegin|30em}}
+
*[http://www.thebestschools.org/blog/2011/12/01/50-top-atheists-in-the-world-today/ 50 most prominent atheists in the world today]
−
* {{cite book
 
−
|last=Armstrong
 
−
|first=Karen
 
−
|authorlink=Karen Armstrong
 
−
|title=A History of God
 
−
|year=1999
 
−
|location=London
 
−
|publisher=Vintage
 
−
|isbn=0-09-927367-5
 
−
|ref=harv}}
 
−
* {{Cite book
 
−
|last=Baggini
 
−
|first=Julian
 
−
|authorlink=Julian Baggini
 
−
|title=Atheism: A Very Short Introduction
 
−
|year=2003
 
−
|publisher=Oxford: Oxford University Press
 
−
|isbn=0-19-280424-3
 
−
|ref=harv}}
 
−
* {{cite book
 
−
|last=Barker
 
−
|first=Dan
 
−
|authorlink=Dan Barker
 
−
|title=Godless: How an Evangelical Preacher Became One of America's Leading Atheists
 
−
|year=2008
 
−
|location=New York
 
−
|publisher=Ulysses Press
 
−
|isbn=978-1-56975-677-5
 
−
|ol=24313839M
 
−
|ref=harv}}
 
−
* {{cite book
 
−
|last1 = Bradlaugh |first1 = Charles |authorlink = Charles Bradlaugh
 
−
|last2=Besant |first2=Annie
 
−
|last3=Bradlaugh |first3=Alice
 
−
|last4=Moss |first4=A. B.
 
−
|last5=Cattell |first5=C. C.
 
−
|last6=Standring |first6=G.
 
−
|last7=Aveling |first7=E.
 
−
|title = The Atheistic Platform
 
−
|year = 1884
 
−
|location = London
 
−
|publisher = Freethought Publishing
 
−
|ref=harv}}
 
−
* {{Cite book
 
−
|last=Dawkins
 
−
|first=Richard
 
−
|authorlink=Richard Dawkins
 
−
|title=The God Delusion
 
−
|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=yq1xDpicghkC&lpg=PP1&dq=The%20God%20Delusion&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=true
 
−
|year=2006
 
−
|publisher=Bantam Press
 
−
|isbn=0-593-05548-9
 
−
|ref=harv}}
 
−
* {{cite encyclopedia
 
−
|last=Edwards
 
−
|first=Paul
 
−
|authorlink=Paul Edwards (philosopher)
 
−
|title=Atheism
 
−
|publisher=MacMillan Reference USA (Gale)
 
−
|editor=Donald M. Borchert
 
−
|origyear=1967
 
−
|year=2005
 
−
|edition=2nd
 
−
|encyclopedia=[[Encyclopedia of Philosophy|The Encyclopedia of Philosophy]]
 
−
|volume=Vol. 1
 
−
|page=359
 
−
|isbn=978-0-02-865780-6
 
−
|ref=harv}}<!-- (page 175 in 1967 edition) -->
 
−
* {{cite book
 
−
|last=Flew
 
−
|first=Antony
 
−
|authorlink=Antony Flew
 
−
|title=The Presumption of Atheism, and other Philosophical Essays on God, Freedom, and Immortality
 
−
|location=New York
 
−
|publisher=Barnes and Noble
 
−
|year=1976
 
−
|ref=harv}}
 
−
* {{cite book
 
−
|last=Flint
 
−
|first=Robert
 
−
|authorlink=Robert Flint
 
−
|title=Agnosticism: The Croall Lecture for 1887–88
 
−
|year=1903
 
−
|publisher=William Blackwood and Sons
 
−
|ol=7193167M
 
−
|ref=harv}}
 
−
* {{cite encyclopedia
 
−
|encyclopedia=The New Encyclopedia of Unbelief
 
−
|editor-last=Flynn
 
−
|editor-first=Tom
 
−
|editor-link=Tom Flynn (author)
 
−
|publisher=Prometheus Books
 
−
|date=25 October 2007
 
−
|isbn=978-1-59102-391-3
 
−
|ol=8851140M
 
−
|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=YR4RAQAAIAAJ
 
−
|ref=harv
 
−
|title=The new encyclopedia of unbelief}}
 
−
* {{cite book
 
−
|last=Harris
 
−
|first=Sam
 
−
|authorlink=Sam Harris (author)
 
−
|title=The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason
 
−
|publisher=W. W. Norton & Company
 
−
|year=2005
 
−
|ref=harv}}
 
−
* {{cite book
 
−
|last=Harris
 
−
|first=Sam
 
−
|authorlink=Sam Harris (author)
 
−
|title=Letter to a Christian Nation
 
−
|date=19 September 2006
 
−
|publisher=Knopf
 
−
|isbn=978-0-307-27877-7
 
−
|ol=25353925M
 
−
|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=RlZATs3xD0gC&lpg=PP1&pg=PP1
 
−
|ref=harv}}
 
−
* {{cite journal
 
−
|last=Harris
 
−
|first=Sam
 
−
|authorlink=Sam Harris (author)
 
−
|title=The Myth of Secular Moral Chaos
 
−
|journal=[[Free Inquiry]]
 
−
|issn=0272-0701
 
−
|date=April 2006
 
−
|volume=26
 
−
|issue=3
 
−
|url=https://www.secularhumanism.org/index.php/articles/2863 <!--- requires subscription -->
 
−
| accessdate=2013-11-21
 
−
|ref=harv}} [http://www.samharris.org/site/full_text/the-myth-of-secular-moral-chaos alternate URL]
 
−
* {{cite book
 
−
|last=Hitchens
 
−
|first=Christopher
 
−
|authorlink=Christopher Hitchens
 
−
|title=god Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything
 
−
|publisher=Random House
 
−
|year=2007
 
−
|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=sGgoYfGyqSMC&lpg=PP1&pg=PP1
 
−
|ref=harv
 
−
|isbn=978-0-7710-4143-3}}
 
−
* {{cite book
 
−
|last=Hume
 
−
|first=David
 
−
|authorlink=David Hume
 
−
|title=[[s:Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion|Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion]]
 
−
|year=1779
 
−
|ol=7145748M
 
−
|location=London
 
−
|ref=harv}}
 
−
* {{cite book
 
−
|last=Hume
 
−
|first=David
 
−
|authorlink=David Hume
 
−
|title=[[s:An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding|An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding]]
 
−
|year=1748
 
−
|location=London
 
−
|ref=harv}}
 
−
* {{cite news
 
−
|last=Landsberg
 
−
|first=Mitchell
 
−
|title=Atheists, agnostics most knowledgeable about religion, survey says |url=http://articles.latimes.com/2010/sep/28/nation/la-na-religion-survey-20100928
 
−
|newspaper=[[Los Angeles Times]]
 
−
|date=28 September 2010
 
−
|accessdate=2011-04-08
 
−
| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20110511180716/http://articles.latimes.com/2010/sep/28/nation/la-na-religion-survey-20100928
 
−
| archivedate=2011-05-11 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no
 
−
|ref=harv}}
 
−
* {{Cite book
 
−
|last=Martin
 
−
|first=Michael
 
−
|authorlink=Michael Martin (philosopher)
 
−
|title=Atheism: A Philosophical Justification
 
−
|url=http://books.google.ca/books?id=MNZqCoor4eoC&lpg=PP1&dq=Atheism%3A%20A%20Philosophical%20Justification&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=true
 
−
|location=Philadelphia
 
−
|publisher=Temple University Press
 
−
|year=1990
 
−
|isbn=978-0-87722-642-0
 
−
|ol=8110936M
 
−
| accessdate=2011-04-09| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20110519174319/http://books.google.ca/books?id=MNZqCoor4eoC&lpg=PP1&dq=Atheism%3A%20A%20Philosophical%20Justification&pg=PP1| archivedate=2011-05-19 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no
 
−
|ref=harv}}
 
−
* {{Cite book
 
−
|editor-last=Martin
 
−
|editor-first=Michael
 
−
|editor-link=Michael Martin (philosopher)
 
−
|title=The Cambridge Companion to Atheism
 
−
|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=tAeFipOVx4MC&pg=PA8#v=onepage&q&f=true
 
−
|location=Cambridge
 
−
|publisher=Cambridge University Press
 
−
|year=2006
 
−
|isbn=0-521-84270-0
 
−
|ol=22379448M
 
−
| accessdate=2013-11-25
 
−
|ref=harv}}
 
−
* {{cite encyclopedia
 
−
|last=Nielsen
 
−
|first=Kai
 
−
|authorlink=Kai Nielsen (philosopher)
 
−
|title=Atheism
 
−
|encyclopedia=[[Encyclopædia Britannica]]
 
−
|year=2013
 
−
|url=http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/40634/atheism
 
−
|accessdate=2013-11-25
 
−
|ref=harv}}
 
−
* {{cite encyclopedia
 
−
|url=http://books.google.com/?id=lnuwFH_M5o0C&pg=PA530 |first=William L. |last=Rowe |authorlink=William L. Rowe |encyclopedia=[[Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy]] |title=Atheism |year=1998 |editor=Edward Craig |isbn=978-0-415-07310-3 |publisher=Taylor & Francis
 
−
|accessdate=2011-04-09
 
−
|ref=harv}}
 
−
* {{cite book
 
−
|last=Russell
 
−
|first=Bertrand
 
−
|authorlink=Bertrand Russell
 
−
|title=Why I am not a Christian, and other essays on religion and related subjects
 
−
|publisher=Simon and Schuster
 
−
|year=1957
 
−
|ref=harv}}
 
−
* {{Cite book
 
−
|last=Sartre
 
−
|first=Jean-Paul
 
−
|author-link=Jean-Paul Sartre
 
−
|origyear=1946
 
−
|contribution=Existentialism and Humanism
 
−
|editor-last=Priest
 
−
|editor-first=Stephen
 
−
|title=Jean-Paul Sartre: Basic Writings
 
−
|year=2001
 
−
|publisher=Routledge
 
−
|location=London
 
−
|page=45
 
−
|isbn=0-415-21367-3
 
−
|ref=harv}}
 
−
* {{Cite book
 
−
|last=Sartre
 
−
|first=Jean-Paul
 
−
|author-link=Jean-Paul Sartre
 
−
|origyear=1946
 
−
|contribution=An existentialist ethics
 
−
|year=2004
 
−
|editor-last=Gensler
 
−
|editor-first=Harry J.
 
−
|editor2-last=Spurgin
 
−
|editor2-first=Earl W.
 
−
|editor3-last=Swindal
 
−
|editor3-first=James C.
 
−
|title=Ethics: Contemporary Readings
 
−
|place=London
 
−
|publisher=Routledge
 
−
|page=127
 
−
|isbn=0-415-25680-1
 
−
|ref=harv}}
 
−
* {{cite book
 
−
|last=Shermer
 
−
|first=Michael
 
−
|authorlink=Michael Shermer
 
−
|title=How We Believe: Science, Skepticism, and the Search for God
 
−
|publisher=William H Freeman
 
−
|year=1999
 
−
|location=New York
 
−
|isbn=0-7167-3561-X
 
−
|ref=harv}}
 
−
* {{Cite book
 
−
|last=Smith
 
−
|first=George H.
 
−
|authorlink=George H. Smith
 
−
|title=Atheism: The Case Against God
 
−
|year=1979
 
−
|location = Buffalo, New York
 
−
|publisher=Prometheus Books
 
−
|isbn=0-87975-124-X
 
−
|lccn=79002726
 
−
|ol=4401616M
 
−
|ref=harv
 
−
}}
 
−
* {{cite book
 
−
|last=Stenger
 
−
|first=Victor J.
 
−
|authorlink=Victor J. Stenger
 
−
|title=God: The Failed Hypothesis—How Science Shows That God Does Not Exist
 
−
|year=2007
 
−
|publisher=Prometheus Books
 
−
|location=Amherst, New York
 
−
|isbn=978-1-59102-652-5
 
−
|ref=harv}}
 
−
* {{cite book
 
−
|last=Stenger
 
−
|first=Victor J.
 
−
|authorlink=Victor J. Stenger
 
−
|title=The New Atheism: Taking a Stand for Science and Reason
 
−
|date=22 September 2009
 
−
|publisher=Prometheus
 
−
|isbn=1-59102-751-9
 
−
|url=http://www.colorado.edu/philosophy/vstenger/battle.html
 
−
|accessdate=2009-07-23
 
−
|ref=harv}}
 
−
* {{Cite book
 
−
|last= Zdybicka
 
−
|first= Zofia J.
 
−
|year=2005
 
−
|contribution = Atheism
 
−
|url=http://ptta.pl/pef
 
−
|contribution-url=http://ptta.pl/pef/haslaen/a/atheism.pdf
 
−
|editor-first = Andrzej
 
−
|editor-last = Maryniarczyk
 
−
|title=Universal Encyclopedia of Philosophy
 
−
|volume = 1
 
−
|publisher=Polish Thomas Aquinas Association
 
−
|ref= harv
 
−
|postscript= <!--None-->
 
−
| accessdate=2011-04-09}}
 
−
{{refend}}
 
  
−
==Further reading==
+
'''Other articles on atheism:'''
−
{{refbegin|30em}}
 
−
* {{Cite book
 
−
|last=Berman
 
−
|first=David
 
−
|title=A History of Atheism in Britain: From Hobbes to Russell
 
−
|year=1990
 
−
|url=http://books.google.ca/books?id=Li4OAAAAQAAJ&lpg=PP1&dq=A%20History%20of%20Atheism%20in%20Britain%3A%20From%20Hobbes%20to%20Russell&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=true
 
−
|publisher=London: Routledge
 
−
|isbn=0-415-04727-7}}
 
−
* [[Charles Bradlaugh|Bradlaugh, Charles]], [[Annie Besant]] and others. (1884) ''The Atheistic Platform: 12 Lectures''. London: Freethought Publishing. [https://books.google.com/books?id=jh8HAAAAQAAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false]
 
−
* {{Cite book
 
−
|last=Buckley
 
−
|first=M. J.
 
−
|title=At the Origins of Modern Atheism
 
−
|year=1990
 
−
|isbn=0-300-04897-1
 
−
|publisher=New Haven, CT: Yale University Press}}
 
−
* {{Cite book
 
−
|last=Flew
 
−
|first=Antony
 
−
|authorlink=Antony Flew
 
−
|title=God and Philosophy
 
−
|publisher=Prometheus Books
 
−
|isbn=1-59102-330-0
 
−
|year=2005}}
 
−
* {{Cite book|editor=Tom Flynn|title=The New Encyclopedia of Unbelief|year=2007|publisher=Prometheus Books|location=Buffalo, NY|isbn=1-59102-391-2}}
 
−
* {{Cite book
 
−
|editor=Gaskin, J.C.A.
 
−
|title=Varieties of Unbelief: From Epicurus to Sartre
 
−
|publisher=•New York: Macmillan
 
−
|year=1989
 
−
|isbn=0-02-340681-X}}
 
−
* {{Cite journal
 
−
|last=Germani
 
−
|first=Alan
 
−
|title=The Mystical Ethics of the New Atheists
 
−
|journal=The Objective Standard
 
−
|volume=3
 
−
|issue=3
 
−
|publisher=Glen Allen Press
 
−
|date=15 September 2008
 
−
|url=http://www.theobjectivestandard.com/issues/2008-fall/mystical-ethics-new-atheists.asp
 
−
| accessdate=2011-04-09| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20110428193621/http://www.theobjectivestandard.com/issues/2008-fall/mystical-ethics-new-atheists.asp| archivedate=2011-04-28 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}
 
−
* {{Cite book
 
−
|last=Harbour
 
−
|first=Daniel
 
−
|title=[[An Intelligent Person's Guide to Atheism]]
 
−
|publisher=London: Duckworth
 
−
|isbn=0-7156-3229-9
 
−
|year=2003}}
 
−
* {{Cite news|url=http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/panelists/sam_harris/2007/10/the_problem_with_atheism.html|title=The Problem with Atheism|last=Harris|first=Sam|date=2 October 2007|work=[[The Washington Post]]| accessdate=2011-04-09| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20110524071308/http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/panelists/sam_harris/2007/10/the_problem_with_atheism.html| archivedate=2011-05-24 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}
 
−
* Howson, Colin (2011). ''Objecting to God.'' Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-18665-0
 
−
* {{Cite book
 
−
|last=Jacoby
 
−
|first=Susan
 
−
|authorlink=Susan Jacoby
 
−
|title=Freethinkers: A History of American Secularism
 
−
|year=2004
 
−
|publisher=Metropolitan Books
 
−
|isbn=978-0-8050-7442-0}}
 
−
* {{Cite book
 
−
|last=Krueger
 
−
|first=D. E.
 
−
|title=What is Atheism?: A Short Introduction
 
−
|publisher=New York: Prometheus
 
−
|year=1998
 
−
|isbn=1-57392-214-5}}
 
−
* {{Cite journal|doi=10.1177/0952695112441301|title=The evolution of atheism: Scientific and humanistic approaches|year=2012|last1=Ledrew|first1=S.|journal=History of the Human Sciences|volume=25|issue=3|page=70}}
 
−
* {{Cite book
 
−
|last=Le Poidevin
 
−
|first=R.
 
−
|title=Arguing for Atheism: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion
 
−
|publisher=London: Routledge
 
−
|url=http://books.google.ca/books?id=M4YlYZi_cMUC&lpg=PP1&dq=Arguing%20for%20Atheism%3A%20An%20Introduction%20to%20the%20Philosophy%20of%20Religion&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=true
 
−
|year=1996
 
−
|isbn=0-415-09338-4}}
 
−
* {{Cite book|last=Mackie|first=J. L.|authorlink=J. L. Mackie|title=The Miracle of Theism: Arguments For and Against the Existence of God|year=1982|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=Oxford|isbn=0-19-824682-X}}
 
−
* {{Cite book
 
−
|last=Maritain
 
−
|first=Jacques
 
−
|title=The Range of Reason
 
−
|publisher=London: Geoffrey Bles
 
−
|year=1952
 
−
|url=http://www.nd.edu/Departments/Maritain/etext/range.htm
 
−
|accessdate=2013-04-15}}
 
−
* {{Cite book
 
−
|last=Martin
 
−
|first=Michael
 
−
|authorlink=Michael Martin (philosopher)
 
−
|title=Atheism: A Philosophical Justification
 
−
|url=http://books.google.ca/books?id=MNZqCoor4eoC&lpg=PP1&dq=Atheism%3A%20A%20Philosophical%20Justification&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=true
 
−
|location=Philadelphia
 
−
|publisher=Temple University Press
 
−
|year=1990
 
−
|isbn=0-87722-943-0
 
−
| accessdate=2011-04-09| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20110519174319/http://books.google.ca/books?id=MNZqCoor4eoC&lpg=PP1&dq=Atheism%3A%20A%20Philosophical%20Justification&pg=PP1| archivedate=2011-05-19 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}
 
−
* {{Cite book|editor=Michael Martin & Ricki Monnier|title=The Impossibility of God|year=2003|publisher=Prometheus Books|location=Buffalo, NY|isbn=1-59102-120-0}}
 
−
* {{Cite book|editor=Michael Martin & Ricki Monnier|title=The Improbability of God|year=2006|publisher=Prometheus Books|location=Buffalo, NY|isbn=1-59102-381-5}}
 
−
* {{Cite book|last1=McTaggart|first1=John|last2=McTaggart|first2=Ellis|title=Some Dogmas of Religion|edition =New|year=1930|publisher=Edward Arnold & Co.|location=London|isbn=0-548-14955-0|origyear=1906}}
 
−
* {{Cite book|last=Nielsen|first=Kai|authorlink=Kai Nielsen (philosopher)|title=Philosophy and Atheism
 
−
|year=1985|publisher=New York: Prometheus|isbn=0-87975-289-0}}
 
−
* {{Cite book
 
−
|last=Nielsen
 
−
|first=Kai
 
−
|title=Naturalism and Religion
 
−
|year=2001
 
−
|isbn=1-57392-853-4
 
−
|publisher=New York: Prometheus}}
 
−
* {{cite book | last=Onfray |first= Michel |year=2007 |title=Atheist Manifesto|url=http://books.google.ca/books?id=QpEAYMo7pFkC&lpg=PP1&dq=Atheist%20Manifesto&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=true| publisher= Arcade Publishing |location= New York | isbn = 978-1-55970-820-3 | accessdate=2011-04-09| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20110519174449/http://books.google.ca/books?id=QpEAYMo7pFkC&lpg=PP1&dq=Atheist%20Manifesto&pg=PP1| archivedate=2011-05-19 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no }}
 
−
* {{Cite book
 
−
|last=Oppy
 
−
|first=Graham
 
−
|authorlink=Graham Oppy
 
−
|year=2006
 
−
|title=Arguing about Gods
 
−
|url=http://books.google.ca/books?id=DlVtfUxPD14C&lpg=PP1&dq=Arguing%20about%20Gods&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=true
 
−
|publisher=Cambridge University Press
 
−
|isbn=0-521-86386-4
 
−
| accessdate=2011-04-09| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20110519174846/http://books.google.ca/books?id=DlVtfUxPD14C&lpg=PP1&dq=Arguing%20about%20Gods&pg=PP1| archivedate=2011-05-19 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}
 
−
* {{cite journal
 
−
|last=Rafford
 
−
|first=R. L.
 
−
|year=1987
 
−
|title=Atheophobia—an introduction
 
−
|journal=Religious Humanism
 
−
|volume=21
 
−
|issue=1
 
−
|pages=32–37 }}
 
−
* {{Cite book
 
−
|last=Robinson
 
−
|first=Richard
 
−
|title=An Atheist's Values
 
−
|url=http://www.positiveatheism.org/hist/athval0.htm
 
−
|isbn=0-19-824191-7
 
−
|publisher=Oxford: Clarendon Press
 
−
|year=1964
 
−
| accessdate=2011-04-09| archiveurl= https://web.archive.org/web/20110425091126/http://www.positiveatheism.org/hist/athval0.htm| archivedate=2011-04-25 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}
 
−
* Rosenberg, Alex (2011). ''The Atheist's Guide to Reality: Enjoying Life Without Illusions.'' New York: W. W. Norton & Co. ISBN 978-0-393-08023-0
 
−
* {{Cite encyclopedia |last=Russell |first=Paul |editor=Edward N. Zalta |encyclopedia=Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy |title=Hume on Religion |url=http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hume-religion/ |edition=2013 |date=11 February 2013 |publisher=Metaphysics Research Lab | accessdate=2013-11-24 }}
 
−
* {{Cite book
 
−
|last=Sharpe
 
−
|first=R.A.
 
−
|title=The Moral Case Against Religious Belief
 
−
|publisher=London: SCM Press
 
−
|year=1997
 
−
|isbn=0-334-02680-6}}
 
−
* {{Cite book
 
−
|last=Thrower
 
−
|first=James
 
−
|title=A Short History of Western Atheism
 
−
|publisher=London: Pemberton
 
−
|year=1971
 
−
|isbn=0-301-71101-1}}
 
−
* Walters, Kerry (2010). ''Atheism: A Guide for the Perplexed.'' New York: Continuum. ISBN 978-0-8264-2493-8
 
−
* {{Cite book
 
−
|last=Zuckerman
 
−
|first=Phil
 
−
|title=Society without God: What the Least Religious Nations Can Tell Us About Contentment
 
−
|publisher=NYU Press
 
−
|year=2010
 
−
|isbn=0-8147-9723-7}}
 
−
* {{cite book
 
−
|editor-last=Zuckerman
 
−
|editor-first=Phil
 
−
|title=Atheism and secularity
 
−
|year=2010
 
−
|publisher=Praeger
 
−
|location=Santa Barbara, Calif. [u.a.]
 
−
|isbn=978-0-313-35183-9 }}
 
−
{{refend}}
 
  
−
== External links ==
+
*[[Atheism articles|Atheism articles on various topical areas - External websites]]
−
<!--Per Wikipedia conventions, there should be no more than 10–15 external links in this section. External links that don't merit inclusion here should either be removed altogether, moved to daughter articles, or incorporated into the article text as references.-->{{Sister project links}}
+
*[[Conservapedia atheism articles]]
−
* {{PhilPapers|category|atheism}}
 
−
* {{InPho|idea|1006}}
 
−
* {{SEP|atheism-agnosticism/}}
 
−
* {{IEP|atheism}}
 
−
* [http://www.iep.utm.edu/n-atheis The New Atheists in ''The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy'']
 
−
* {{dmoz|Society/Religion_and_Spirituality/Atheism/|Atheism}} – Includes links to organizations and websites.
 
−
* [http://www.positiveatheism.org/tochist.htm Positive atheism: Great Historical Writings] Historical writing sorted by authors.
 
−
* [http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/atheism/ Religion & Ethics—Atheism] at [[bbc.co.uk]].
 
−
* [http://www.infidels.org/library/ Secular Web library] – Library of both historical and modern writings, a comprehensive online resource for freely available material on atheism.
 
−
* [http://www.agreeley.com/articles/hardcore.html The Demand for Religion] – A study on the demographics of Atheism by Wolfgang Jagodzinski (University of Cologne) and Andrew Greeley (University of Chicago and University of Arizona).
 
  
−
{{Navboxes
+
== References ==
−
| list =
+
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}}
−
{{Irreligion}}
 
−
{{Belief systems}}
 
−
{{Philosophy of religion}}
 
−
{{Religion topics}}
 
−
{{Philosophy topics}}
 
−
}}
 
  
−
<!--Eponymous categories:-->
+
[[Category:Atheism]]
−
{{Authority control}}
+
[[Category:Religion]]
−
[[Category:Atheism| ]]
+
[[Category:Philosophy]]
−
<!--Other categories:-->
 
−
[[Category:Criticism of religion]]
 
−
[[Category:Philosophical movements]]
 
−
[[Category:Philosophy of religion]]
 
−
[[Category:Secularism]]
 
−
[[Category:Skepticism]]
 

Latest revision as of 21:46, October 22, 2026

atheism
Portrait of Paul-Henri Thiry, Baron d'Holbach (1723 - 1789) was an early advocate of atheism in Europe.

In terms of contemporary definitions of atheism, the Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary defines atheism in two ways: "1) a lack of belief or a strong disbelief in the existence of a god or any gods 2) a philosophical or religious position characterized by disbelief in the existence of a god or any gods."[1] Lexico.com (Oxford University Press) defines atheism as "Disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God or gods."[2] See: Definition of atheism

Atheism, as defined by the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, the Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, and other philosophy reference works, is the denial of the existence of God.[3] Paul Edwards, who was a prominent atheist and editor of the Encyclopedia of Philosophy, defined an atheist as "a person who maintains that there is no God."[4] See also: Strong atheism

Beginning in the latter portion of the 20th century and continuing beyond, many agnostics and atheists have argued that the definition of atheism should be a lack of belief in God or gods.[4][5][6][7] See: Purpose of redefining atheism and Weak atheism

Atheism has been examined by many disciplines in terms of its effects on individuals and on societies and these effects will be covered below.

As far as individuals adopting an atheistic worldview, atheism has a number of causal factors and these will be elaborated on below as well.

As of March 2025, data compiled by the Center for the Study of Global Christianity at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary indicates that there are 831,000 fewer atheists in the world than a year ago.[8] On March 15, 2024, Frontier Partners International reported concerning global atheism: "Simultaneously, atheism, which once saw a peak around 1970 with 165 million adherents, is on the decline. The current growth trend for atheism is -0.12 percent, with their number falling from 147 million in 2020 to 146 million in 2024."[9] The world's atheists have a below replacement level of births (See: Atheism and fertility rates). See also: Global atheism statistics and Desecularization

Types of atheism

See also: Schools of atheist thought and Atheist factions

Diagoras of Melos was an ancient Greek atheist, poet and Sophist of the 5th century BC. See: History of atheism

The history of atheism can be dated as early as the 5th century B.C. Diagoras of Melos was a 5th-century B.C. Greek atheist, poet and Sophist. Since then many schools of atheist thought have developed.

Atheism and why do atheists state they disbelieve?

See also: Weak atheism and Strong atheism

Atheists claim there are two main reasons for their denial of the existence of God and/or disbelief in God: the conviction that there is positive evidence or argument that God does not exist (strong atheism, which is also sometimes called positive atheism), and their claim that theists bear the burden of proof to show that God exists, that they have failed to do so, and that belief is therefore unwarranted (weak atheism).

As alluded to above, theists and others have posited a number of causes of atheism and this matter will be further addressed in this article.

Attempts to broaden the definition of atheism

In 1876, Charles Bradlaugh proposed that atheism does not assert "there is no God," and by doing so he endeavored to dilute the traditional definition of atheism.[5][10] As noted above, in the latter portion of the 20th century, the proposition that the definition of atheism be defined as a mere lack of belief in God or gods began to be commonly advanced by agnostics/atheists.[5][11] It is now common for atheists/agnostics and theists to debate the meaning of the word atheism.[5][12]

Critics of a broader definition of atheism as a mere lack of belief often point out that such a definition is contrary to the traditional/historical meaning of the word and that such a definition makes atheism indistinguishable from agnosticism.[4][5][13]

For more information, please see:

Some common types of atheism

Joseph Stalin's atheistic regime killed tens of millions of people.

See: Atheism and mass murder

Below are a few common ways that atheism manifests itself:

1. Militant atheism, which continues to suppress and oppress religious believers today.

Topics related to militant atheism:

2. Philosophical atheism - Atheist philosophers assert that God does not exist. (See also: Naturalism and Materialism)

Secular humanism is a philosophy that holds that human beings are the most important figures, and that social problems are best solved without the involvement of religious doctrine.

The philosophy of postmodernism is atheistic (see: Atheism and postmodernism).

3. Atheistic Buddhism (some schools of Buddhism are theistic)

4. Practical atheism: atheism of the life - that is, living as though God does not exist.[14]

5. Other schools of atheist thought: Schools of atheist thought

Atheist factions

See also: Atheist factions and Western atheism, schisms and political polarization and Atheist organizations

On July 24, 2020, the atheist PZ Myers wrote about atheism: "Deep rifts, ongoing fragmentation, and crumbling reputations seems to be the order of the day in atheism."[15] See also: Atheist factions and Atheist organizations and scandals and Atheist scandals

Richard Dawkins
Richard Dawkins was a central figure in the Elevatorgate controversy.

Jacques Rousseau wrote in the Daily Maverick: "Elevatorgate..has resulted in three weeks of infighting in the secular community. Some might observe that we indulge in these squabbles fairly frequently."[16] An ex-atheist wrote: "As an Atheist for 40 years, I noticed that there is not just a wide variety of Atheist positions, but there exists an actual battle between certain Atheist factions."[17]

Atheist infighting

See also: Atheist movement and Atheism and anger and Atheists and conflict resolution

Blair Scott served on the American Atheists board of directors.[18] Mr. Scott formerly served as a State Director for the American Atheists organization in the state of Alabama. On December 1, 2012, he quit his post as a director of outreach for the American Atheists due to infighting within the American atheist movement.[19]

Mr. Blair wrote: "I have spent the last week mulling over what I want to do at this point in the movement. I’m tired of the in-fighting: at every level. I am especially tired of allowing myself to get sucked into it and engaging in the very behavior that is irritating...me."[19]

The atheist Neil Carter wrote: "Friends of mine have noted lately how biting and critical the atheist community can be, not only toward outsiders, but even toward its own members. Has there ever been a subculture more prone to eating its own than this one? I really don’t know."[20]

The atheist David Smalley said about the atheist movement: "We're eating our own... We’re disintegrating."[21]

See also: Antitheism and antisocial behavior

Atheist infighting causing fundraising difficulties

The atheist Hemant Mehta said about raising money from fellow nonbelievers: "Meanwhile, I’ve had one hell of a time convincing people to give to the Foundation Beyond Belief — and I help lead that organization." [22]

See also: Atheist organizations and fundraising and Atheism and charity

See also: Atheist organizations and fundraising and Atheist fundraising vs. religious fundraising and Atheism and charity

In 2017, the atheist activist Lee Moore declared about American atheist organizations:

“ If you look at the major atheist groups right now, like the national groups, the ones that are doing the real activist work... They are not bringing in the kind of donations they used to. Most of them are starved for cash. They're downsizing left and right. Because people aren't just giving like they used to. And I talked to a lot of the major donors out there and they said, "Well, we're kind of tired of seeing the atheist community just fight amongst itself and not really get anything done. We'd rather not give money if we don't think it's going to go somewhere."[23] ”

Eddie Tabash on atheist argumentativeness

See also: Atheism and social intelligence and Atheism and emotional intelligence

The American atheist activist Eddie Tabash said in a speech to the Michigan Atheists State Convention, "Since we are a bit of a cantankerous, opinionated lot...".[24]

Angry and bitter demeanor of militant atheists

See also: Atheism and anger and Atheism and unforgiveness

On January 1, 2011, CNN reported:

“ People unaffiliated with organized religion, atheists and agnostics also report anger toward God either in the past, or anger focused on a hypothetical image - that is, what they imagined God might be like - said lead study author Julie Exline, Case Western Reserve University psychologist.

In studies on college students, atheists and agnostics reported more anger at God during their lifetimes than believers.[25]

”
An angry atheist speaking to a woman with a Bible in her hand.

The Christian philosopher James S. Spiegel says that the path from Christianity to atheism among several of his friends involved moral slippages such as resentment or unforgiveness.[26] See: Atheism and unforgiveness

According to Anthony DeStefano:

“ But are (atheists) really dangerous, too?

You bet they are. The truth is, the atheist position is incapable of supporting any coherent system of morality other than ruthless social Darwinism. That’s why it has caused more deaths, murders and bloodshed than any other belief system in the history of the world.

Atheists, of course, are always claiming hysterically that Christianity has been responsible for most of the world’s wars, but that’s just another example of atheistic ignorance. The main reasons for war have always been economic gain, territorial gain, civil and revolutionary conflicts. According to Philip Axelrod’s monumental "Encyclopedia of Wars," only 6.98 percent or all wars from 8000 BC to the present were religious in nature. If you subtract Islamic wars from the equation, only 3.2 percent of wars were due to specifically Christian causes. That means that over 96 percent of all the wars on this planet were due to worldly reasons.[27]

”

Various studies found that traumatic events in people's lives have a positive correlation with "emotional atheism".[28]

The atheist and lesbian Greta Christina told the journalist Chris Mooney on the Point of Inquiry podcast, "there isn't one emotion" that affects atheists "but anger is one of the emotions that many of us have ...[it] drives others to participate in the movement."[29]

Social science research indicates that antitheists score the highest among atheists when it comes to personality traits such as narcissism, dogmatism, and anger.[30] Furthermore, they scored lowest when it comes to agreeableness and positive relations with others.[31]

For additional information, please see: Atheism and social intelligence and Atheism and emotional intelligence and Atheism and unforgiveness and Atheism and bitterness

Atheism and its retention rate in individuals

See also: Atheism and its retention rate in individuals and Conversion from atheism to Christianity and Atheism and children and Desecularization and Atheism and apathy

In 2012, a Georgetown University study was published indicating that about 30 percent of those who grow up in an atheist household in the United States remain atheists as adults.[32] See: Atheism and its retention rate in individuals

In 2012, a Georgetown University study was published indicating that only about 30 percent of those who grow up in an atheist household remain atheists as adults.[32] See also: Atheism and children

A 2012 study by the General Social Survey of the social science research organization NORC at the University of Chicago found that belief in God rises with age, even in atheistic nations.[33] The Pew Forum reports about American atheists: "Among self-identified atheists and agnostics, the median age is 34, and roughly four-in-ten adults in these categories are between the ages of 18 and 29."[34] See also: Atheism and immaturity.

In addition, in atheistic Communist China, Christianity is experiencing rapid growth (see: Growth of Christianity in China). Also, there was a collapse of atheism in the former Soviet Union (see: Collapse of atheism in the former Soviet Union).

See also:

Difficulty in participating in atheist community

See also: Atheism and loneliness and Atheism and apathy and Atheism and motivation and Internet atheism

According to an international study done by William Bainbridge, atheism is frequent among people whose interpersonal social obligations are weak and is also linked to lower fertility rates in advanced industrial nations (See also: Atheism and fertility rates).[35] See also: Atheism and loneliness and Atheism and social skills

In comparison to many religious groups, which have many meetings/conferences in numerous places in a given day or week that are convenient to attend, atheist meetings and atheist conferences are sparse. One of the causes of this situation is the apathy of many atheists (see: Atheism and apathy and Atheism and motivation).

Most atheist organizations are relatively small in terms of active participants as most atheists are apathetic about organized atheism (see: Atheism and apathy). An exception is the Communist Party of China, which requires its members be atheists (see: Atheism and China and Atheism and communism). At the same time, due to the explosive growth of Christianity in China, there are now more Christians in China than Chinese who belong to the Communist Party of China (see also: East Asia and global desecularization).[36]

In recent times, the number of people attending atheist conferences has grown smaller.[37] Atheist David Smalley wrote: "And we wonder why we’re losing elections, losing funding, and our conferences are getting smaller."[21] In 2017, the atheist activist Lee Moore said about atheist conferences, "Most conferences are gone now. They're either gone or in some kind of life support form."[38]

Jerry Coyne speaking at a 2013 atheist meeting entitled The Amazing Meeting (TAM). TAM is an annual meeting.

Atheist Francois Tremblay wrote about the difficulty of motivating atheists to engage in activities related to atheism: "One last problem that undermines any propagation of atheism is inspiration. Let's be honest here, "there is no god!" is not a very motivating call for most people." (see also: Atheism and inspiration).[39] The atheist Jerry Coyne said about atheist meetings/conferences, "But to me the speakers and talks have often seemed repetitive: the same crew of jet-set skeptics giving the same talks."[40]

In an essay entitled How the Atheist Movement Failed Me, an atheist woman noted that participation in the atheist community is often expensive due to the cost of attending atheist conferences and even local atheist meetings in restaurants and bars challenged her modest budget.[41] As a result of the challenges that atheists commonly have in terms of socializing in person, many atheists turn to the internet in terms of communicating with other atheists.[42] Often internet communication between atheists turns contentious (see: Atheist factions).

Christian organizations have been significantly more successful than atheist organizations as far as evangelizing via the internet (see: Internet evangelism: Christians vs. atheists and Internet atheism). Beginning sometime between 2008 and 2012, there has been a big decline in internet atheism in terms of web traffic (See: Internet atheism web traffic volume).[43]

For more information, please see: Atheism and loneliness

Abandonment of atheism and communist regimes

Decline of the atheist movement

See also: Decline of the atheist movement and Morale of the atheist movement and Desecularization and Atheist movement

In 2011, atheist Jacques Berlinerblau declared: "The Golden Age of Secularism has passed."[44]

Numerous atheists have declared that the "atheist movement is dead" or that it is dying.[45] See: Decline of the atheist movement

Before the atheist movement died/declined, various atheists attempted to change the public's perception concerning atheism and atheists, but they were largely unsuccessful (see: Attempts to positively rebrand atheism).

At the 2018 American Atheists convention, the ex-president of the American Atheists organization David Silverman declared regarding the atheist movement being in a demoralized state:

“ It is a hard time to be an atheist activist. This has affected us. And it has affected our community...

...it has really affected us. We are suffering a level of defeatism that I have never seen before...

We feel the loss. And we feel like we have lost. We feel like we lost the election... We see this cascade of attack coming down at us over and over from all different directions and we feel like it's over. I have heard so many times it makes me sick. It makes me sad. It feels like we lost.

The apathy that follows. It doesn't matter. We can't win anyways. It's useless to fight. This apathy is infecting us. It's hurting us.

And people are reacting to each other now. And so that is causing a division. Lots and lots of division in our movement. Hard, bad division... And that has resulted in a splintering and factioning of the movement that I have never seen before and none of us have.

In other words, we're in a bad situation and it's getting worse.[46]

”

In 2017, atheist David Smalley has indicated that leftist/progressive atheists were "killing the atheist movement" through being contentious and divisive (see also: Atheist factions).[21] Former new atheist PZ Myers, who subscribes to progressive politics, says he is no longer a member of the atheist movement.[47]

The atheist movement saw a number of setbacks during the latter portion of the 20th century and beyond in terms of historical events/trends (See: Causes of desecularization). As a result, it has lost a considerable amount of confidence (see also: Decline of the atheist movement and Atheists and the endurance of religion).

Globally, the atheist population is declining in terms of the percentage of the world's population that are atheists (see: Global atheism statistics).

Atheism and Communism

see also: Atheism and communism and Militant atheism and Atheism and economics and Atheism and mass murder and Atheist cults and Atheism and Karl Marx

Atheists Karl Marx, Vladmir Lenin and Chou En-lai

Karl Marx said "[Religion] is the opium of the people." Marx also stated: "Communism begins from the outset (Owen) with atheism; but atheism is at first far from being communism; indeed, that atheism is still mostly an abstraction."[48]

Vladimir Lenin similarly wrote regarding atheism and Communism: "A Marxist must be a materialist, i.e., an enemy of religion, but a dialectical materialist, i.e., one who treats the struggle against religion not in an abstract way, not on the basis of remote, purely theoretical, never varying preaching, but in a concrete way, on the basis of the class struggle which is going on in practice and is educating the masses more and better than anything else could."[49]

In 1955, the Chinese Communist leader Chou En-lai declared, "We Communists are atheists".[50]

In 2014, the Communist Party of China reaffirmed that members of their party must be atheists.[51]

In 2016, the International Business Times reported:

“ A senior Chinese advisor on religious affairs has said the country should promote atheism throughout society, in remarks that appear to reflect a deepening campaign to reinforce traditional Marxist values in China — and could add to concern about official attitudes among believers in the country’s five officially recognized religions.[52] ”

Russian Revolution caused the most notable spread of atheism

According to the University of Cambridge, historically, the "most notable spread of atheism was achieved through the success of the 1917 Russian Revolution, which brought the Marxist-Leninists to power."[53]

Vitalij Lazarʹevič Ginzburg, a Soviet physicist, wrote that the "Bolshevik communists were not merely atheists but, according to Lenin's terminology, militant atheists."[54] However, prior to this, the Reign of Terror of the French Revolution established a state which was anti-Roman Catholicism/Christian in nature [55] (anti-clerical deism and anti-religious atheism and played a significant role in the French Revolution[56]), with the official ideology being the Cult of Reason; during this time thousands of believers were suppressed and executed by the guillotine.[57]

Atheistic Communism and mass murder

See also: Atheism and mass murder and Atheist atrocities

The militant atheistic regime of Joseph Stalin killed tens of millions of people.

Joseph Stalin is the figure on the right and Vladimir Lenin is the figure on the left,

See: Atheism and mass murder

It has been estimated that in less than the past 100 years, governments under the banner of Communism have caused the death of somewhere between 40,472,000 and 259,432,000 human lives.[58] Dr. R. J. Rummel, professor emeritus of political science at the University of Hawaii, is the scholar who first coined the term democide (death by government). Dr. R. J. Rummel's mid estimate regarding the loss of life due to communism is that communism caused the death of approximately 110,286,000 people between 1917 and 1987.[59] Richard Dawkins has attempted to engage in historical revisionism concerning atheist atrocities and Dawkins was shown to be in gross error. See also: Atheism and historical revisionism

Christian apologist Gregory Koukl wrote relative to atheism and mass murder that "the assertion is that religion has caused most of the killing and bloodshed in the world. There are people who make accusations and assertions that are empirically false. This is one of them."[60] Koukl details the number of people killed in various events involving theism and compares them to the much higher tens of millions of people killed under regimes that advocated atheism.[60] As noted earlier, Richard Dawkins has attempted to engage in historical revisionism concerning atheist atrocities and Dawkins was shown to be in gross error.

Koukl summarized by stating:

“ It is true that it's possible that religion can produce evil, and generally when we look closer at the detail it produces evil because the individual people are actually living in a rejection of the tenets of Christianity and a rejection of the God that they are supposed to be following. So it can produce it, but the historical fact is that outright rejection of God and institutionalizing of atheism actually does produce evil on incredible levels. We're talking about tens of millions of people as a result of the rejection of God.[60] ”

Theodore Beale notes concerning atheism and mass murder:

“ Apparently it was just an amazing coincidence that every Communist of historical note publicly declared his atheism … .there have been twenty-eight countries in world history that can be confirmed to have been ruled by regimes with avowed atheists at the helm … These twenty-eight historical regimes have been ruled by eighty-nine atheists, of whom more than half have engaged in democidal acts of the sort committed by Stalin and Mao …

The total body count for the ninety years between 1917 and 2007 is approximately 148 million dead at the bloody hands of fifty-two atheists, three times more than all the human beings killed by war, civil war, and individual crime in the entire twentieth century combined.

The historical record of collective atheism is thus 182,716 times worse on an annual basis than Christianity’s worst and most infamous misdeed, the Spanish Inquisition. It is not only Stalin and Mao who were so murderously inclined, they were merely the worst of the whole Hell-bound lot. For every Pol Pot whose infamous name is still spoken with horror today, there was a Mengistu, a Bierut, and a Choibalsan, godless men whose names are now forgotten everywhere but in the lands they once ruled with a red hand.

Is a 58 percent chance that an atheist leader will murder a noticeable percentage of the population over which he rules sufficient evidence that atheism does, in fact, provide a systematic influence to do bad things? If that is not deemed to be conclusive, how about the fact that the average atheist crime against humanity is 18.3 million percent worse than the very worst depredation committed by Christians, even though atheists have had less than one-twentieth the number of opportunities with which to commit them. If one considers the statistically significant size of the historical atheist set and contrasts it with the fact that not one in a thousand religious leaders have committed similarly large-scale atrocities, it is impossible to conclude otherwise, even if we do not yet understand exactly why this should be the case. Once might be an accident, even twice could be coincidence, but fifty-two incidents in ninety years reeks of causation![61]

”
Xi Jinping is the current General Secretary of the Communist Party of China which requires that all their members be atheists.[62]

See: China and atheism and Atheism and communism

See also:

Communism and religious oppression

See also: Communism and religious persecution and Atheistic communism and torture and Atheism and forced labor and China and involuntary organ harvesting

The atheism in Communist regimes has been and continues to be militant atheism and various acts of repression including the razing of thousands of religious buildings and the killing, imprisoning, and oppression of religious leaders and believers.[63]

Religious persecution in the Soviet Union

See also: Soviet atheism

The persecution of Christians in the Soviet Union was the result of the violently atheist Soviet government. In the first five years after the October Revolution, 28 bishops and 1,200 priests were murdered, many on the orders of Leon Trotsky. When Joseph Stalin came to power in 1927, he ordered his secret police, under Genrikh Yagoda to intensify persecution of Christians. In the next few years, 50,000 clergy were murdered, many were tortured, including crucifixion. "Russia turned red with the blood of martyrs", said Father Gleb Yakunin of the Russian Orthodox Church.[64] According to Orthodox Church sources, as many as fifty million Orthodox believers may have died in the twentieth century, mainly from persecution by Communists.[65]

With its large population, China has the largest population of atheists.[66]

The religious landscape of China is quickly changing, however, due to the rapid growth of Christianity. See also: China and atheism and Global atheism

In addition, in the atheistic and Communist Soviet Union, 44 anti-religious museums were opened and the largest was the 'The Museum of the History of Religion and Atheism' in Leningrad’s Kazan Cathedral.[67] Despite intense effort by the atheistic leaders of the Soviet Union, their efforts were not effective in converting the masses to atheism.[68]

Religious persecution in Communist China

See also: China and atheism

China has the world's largest atheist population (see: China and atheism).[69] China is a Communist country. In 1999, the publication Christian Century reported that "China has persecuted religious believers by means of harassment, prolonged detention, and incarceration in prison or 'reform-through-labor' camps and police closure of places of worship." In 2003, owners of Bibles in China were sent to prison camps and 125 Chinese churches were closed.[70] China continues to practice religious oppression today.[71]

The efforts of China's atheist leaders in promoting atheism, however, are increasingly losing their effectiveness and the number of Christians in China is rapidly growing (see: Growth of Christianity in China). China's state-sponsored atheism and atheistic indoctrination have been a failure and a 2007 religious survey in China indicated that only 15% of Chinese identified themselves as atheists.[72]

The above photograph shows the Russian Nikolai Khmara, a new Baptist convert in the Soviet Union, after his arrest by the KGB. He was tortured to death and his tongue was cut out.[73][74]

Researchers estimate that tens of thousands of Falun Gong prisoners in Communist China have been killed to supply a financially lucrative trade in human organs and cadavers, and that these human rights abuses may be an ongoing concern.[75]

Religious persecution in North Korea

North Korea is a repressive Communist state and is officially atheistic.[76] The North Korean government practices brutal repression and atrocities against North Korean Christians.[77] Open Doors, an organization based in the United States, has put North Korea at the very top of its list of countries where Christians face significant persecution - for 12 years in a row.[78]

Atheistic Communism and torture

See: Atheistic communism and torture

Atheistic Communist regimes and forced labor

See also: Atheism and forced labor and Atheism and slavery

In atheistic Communist regimes forced labor has often played a significant role in their economies and this practice continues to this day (see: Atheism and forced labor).[79]

Atheism and the internet

See also: Internet atheism

As noted above, sometime between 2008 and 2012, there has been a big drop in internet atheism in terms of web traffic (See: Internet atheism web traffic volume).[43][80]

In addition, in terms of reach and its ability to influence, internet atheism is ineffectual (See: Internet atheism has a small audience and an insignificant influence on the world).[81]

Google Trends: From 2004 to June 2025, the number of worldwide Google searches for the term atheist is significantly down

See also: Google trends - Global searches for atheism and agnosticism terms

According to Google Trends, as of June 2025, worldwide Google searches for the term atheist is significantly below its levels in January 2024.

Atheism and politics

See also: Atheism and politics and Atheism and political science

Historically, atheists have favored the left side of the political aisle (see: Atheism and politics).

According to the Pew Forum, in the United States: "About two-thirds of atheists (69%) identify as Democrats (or lean in that direction), and a majority (56%) call themselves political liberals (compared with just one-in-ten who say they are conservatives)."[82]

In some regions where the secular left has considerable influence, they are losing an increasing amount of their power. For example, in secular Europe right-wing, nationalist parties are growing and in China conservative Protestantism is growing rapidly (see: Growth of Christianity in China).[83]

For more information please see:

Atheism and history

Voroshilov, Molotov, Stalin, with Nikolai Yezhov.jpg
Nikolai Yezhov walking with Joseph Stalin in the top photo taken in the mid-1930s. Subsequent to his execution in 1940, Yezhov was edited out of the photo by Soviet Union censors.[84]

See also: History of atheism and Atheists and historical illiteracy and Atheism and historical revisionism and Atheist indoctrination

The history of atheism: History of atheism

Atheists and historical illiteracy

A common complaint concerning many atheists is their lack of depth when it comes to knowledge of history and historiography - particularly in areas such as historicity of Jesus Christ and atheist mass murders in history.[85]

For more information, please see:

Atheists and historical revisionism

Atheists commonly engage in historical revisionism in order to illegitimately distort the historical record (see: Atheism and historical revisionism).

Religion/irreligion and war

See also: Irreligion/religion and war and Atheism and world peace

Louise Ridley (assistant news editor at the Huffington Post UK), Theodore Beale and others point out that academic studies and other research consistently challenge the link between religion and war.[86]

Atheism and economics

Analysis of atheism and common objections to atheism

Commonly Cited Arguments Against Atheism and For Theism

See: Arguments for theism and against atheism

Anselm of Canterbury's version of the ontological argument appeared in his work Proslogium.

The majority of philosophers of religion, or those who have extensively studied the issue of the existence of God, are theists (72 percent).[87]

In relation to the debate between theism and atheism, theists often criticize atheism as being contrary to persuasive argument and have a number of arguments against atheism (See: Arguments for theism and against atheism).

Within Christendom, the discipline of Christian apologetics has been developed. Christian apologetics is the defense of the Christian faith through logic/evidence based arguments. The word apologetics comes from the Greek word apologia (from Greek ἀπολογία), which means "speaking in defense".

Arguments for the existence of God include:

  • Evidential apologetics is an approach in Christian apologetics which emphasizes the use of evidence to demonstrate that God exists and that there is compelling evidence to support Christianity and the Bible. In addition, there are various arguments that atheists or other unbelievers weigh evidence improperly (see: Atheism and evidence).
  • Cosmological argument: Every event in our universe necessarily has a cause. However, it is impossible that there should be an unending chain of causes going back. Therefore, there necessarily must be a cause distinct from the universe as we know it which is capable of causing all things and is itself uncaused. Atheism denies that that first cause is God. Christians point out that the question "Who created God" is an illogical question.[89] See also: Atheism and the origin of the universe
The argument from beauty is a commonly used argument for the existence of God.
  • Historical arguments for the existence of God (subset of evidential apologetics). For example, arguments stemming from historical accounts such as Christian historical apologetics, Christian legal apologetics and archaeological evidence such as Bible archaeology

See also:

Biblical statements concerning atheism

See also: Bible verses relating to atheism

The writers of the Bible considered the existence of God to be self-evident and Moses simply wrote: "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." (Genesis 1:1).[90]

Accordingly, the psalmist David declared:

"The fool has said in his heart, 'There is no God.' They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good." — Psalms 14:1 (KJV)

Atheism and debate

See also: Atheism debates and Atheism vs. theism

Dr. Greg Bahnsen became known as "the man atheists fear most" due to Michael Martin's cancellation of their scheduled debate.[91][92]

As far as atheism debates, the majority of the public debates are Atheism vs. Christianity debates (although there have been a few Atheism vs. Islam debates).

Beginning in the latter part of the 20th century, there were a number of notable instances of prominent atheists being reluctant to debate (see: Notable cases of prominent atheists being reluctant to debate).

On May 14, 2011, the British newspaper The Daily Telegraph published a news story entitled Richard Dawkins accused of cowardice for refusing to debate existence of God.[93] In The Daily Telegraph article Dr. Daniel Came, a member of the Faculty of Philosophy at Oxford University was quoted as writing to fellow atheist Richard Dawkins concerning his refusal to debate Dr. William Lane Craig, "The absence of a debate with the foremost apologist for Christian theism is a glaring omission on your CV and is of course apt to be interpreted as cowardice on your part."[93]

Greg Bahnsen became known as the "man atheists fear most".[91][94] This is because Harvard-educated Michael Martin was scheduled to debate Bahnsen but pulled out of the debate at the "eleventh hour". A press release at the time said that Dr. Martin offered ruses on why he pulled out and didn't want the scheduled debate recorded but the real reason was that "...Michael Martin is afraid that he will be publicly humiliated just as his friend and fellow atheist, Dr. Gordon Stein, was...".

In 1990, Michael Martin indicated there was a general absence of an atheistic response to contemporary work in the philosophy of religion and in jest he indicated that it was his "cross to bear" to respond to theistic arguments.[95] See also: Atheology and Atheist apologetics

A majority of the most prominent and vocal defenders of the naturalistic evolutionary position since World War II have been atheists.[96] After doing poorly in a series of debates in the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s, evolutionists are generally reluctant to debate (see: Creation vs. evolution debates).

Atheism and morality/ethics

The atheist PZ Myers declared: "I am so, so tired of hearing about atheist scandals and scumbaggery."[97]

See also: Atheism and morality

See also: Atheism and morality and Atheist population and immorality and Atheist hypocrisy and Religion and morality

Objective morality incompatible with atheism

Under an atheist worldview, there is no logical basis for objective morality or ultimate meaning and purpose.[98] See also: Atheism and morality and Atheism and moral relativism and Atheism and meaninglessness

Atheism and moral relativism

See also: Atheism and moral relativism and Atheism and morality

Dr. Phil Fernandes states the following regarding atheism and moral relativism:

“ Nietzsche preached that a group of "supermen" must arise with the courage to create their own values through their "will to power." Nietzsche rejected the "soft" values of Christianity (brotherly love, turning the other cheek, charity, compassion, etc.); he felt they hindered man's creativity and potential....

Many other atheists agree with Nietzsche concerning moral relativism. British philosopher Bertrand Russell (1872-1970) once wrote, "Outside human desires there is no moral standard." A. J. Ayer believed that moral commands did not result from any objective standard above man. Instead, Ayer stated that moral commands merely express one's subjective feelings. When one says that murder is wrong, one is merely saying that he or she feels that murder is wrong. Jean-Paul Sartre, a French existentialist, believed that there is no objective meaning to life. Therefore, according to Sartre, man must create his own values.

There are many different ways that moral relativists attempt to determine what action should be taken. Hedonism is probably the most extreme. It declares that whatever brings the most pleasure is right. In other words, if it feels good, do it. If this position is true, then there is no basis from which to judge the actions of Adolph Hitler as being evil.[99]

”

Atheism and various types of immorality

The perverse and cruel atheist Marquis de Sade in prison, 18th century line engraving. See: Atheism and sadism

Atheism and sociopathy

See: Atheism and sociopathy

Atheist mass shooters and serial killers

Study: U.S. public perception of atheist morality

In 2014, a University of Kentucky study was published by Will M. Gervais, which was entitled "Everything is permitted? People intuitively judge immorality as representative of atheists", and the study indicated that "even atheist participants viewed immorality as significantly more representative of atheists than of other people."[100]

Barna Group studies: Atheism and morality

Barna Group study on the behavior of atheists vs. evangelical Christians:

Richard Deem wrote:

“ A random sample of 1003 adults were surveyed in May, 2008 by The Barna Group for their participation in a number of negative behaviors within the previous week. The results showed that there were vast differences in the behaviors of evangelicals compared to agnostics/atheists.

These results show that atheists/agnostics participate in morally questionable behaviors to a much greater degree than evangelical Christians - an average of nearly five times the frequency![101]

”

Barna Group study related to atheist beliefs about behaviors:

The Barna Group found that atheists and agnostics in America were more likely, than theists in America, to look upon the following behaviors as morally acceptable: illegal drug use; excessive drinking; sexual relationships outside of marriage; abortion; cohabitating with someone of opposite sex outside of marriage; obscene language; gambling; pornography and obscene sexual behavior; and engaging in homosexuality/bisexuality.[102]

Given the many diseases associated with homosexuality, the biblical prohibition against homosexuality is quite arguably one of the many example where the Bible exhibited knowledge that was ahead of its time. See also: Atheism and sexual immorality

Atheism and uncharitableness

See also: Atheism and charity and Atheist organizations and scandals and Atheism, uncharitableness and depression
Most atheists likely live in East Asia (see: Asian atheism).

A beggar in Cambodia. In Cambodia, the vast majority of the population adheres to a nontheistic form of Buddhism called the Theravada school of Buddhism.

A comprehensive study by Harvard University professor Robert Putnam found that religious people are more charitable than their irreligious counterparts.[103]

Concerning the issue of atheism and uncharitableness, the evidence indicates that per capita charitable giving by atheists and agnostics in America is significantly less than by theists, according to a study by the Barna Group:

“ The typical no-faith American donated just $200 in 2006, which is more than seven times less than the amount contributed by the prototypical active-faith adult ($1500). Even when church-based giving is subtracted from the equation, active-faith adults donated twice as many dollars last year as did atheists and agnostics. In fact, while just 7% of active-faith adults failed to contribute any personal funds in 2006, that compares with 22% among the no-faith adults.[104] ”

A comprehensive study by Harvard University professor Robert Putnam found that religious people are more charitable than their irreligious counterparts.[103]

See also: Atheism, social justice and hypocrisy

Church-state issues emphasis. Charity low priority

See also: Atheism and uncharitableness and Western atheism and race and Atheism and love

In June 2014, the African-American atheist woman Sikivu Hutchinson wrote in the Washington Post that atheist organizations generally focus on church-state separation and creationism issues and not the concerns the less affluent African American population faces.[105] Hutchinson also mentioned that church organizations do focus on helping poor African Americans.[105]

Atheist nonprofit scandals

See also: Atheist organizations and scandals and Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science - Embezzlement allegation

In a 2018 YouTube video entitled David Silverman Ousted as President of American Atheists, the atheist YouTube channel Utah Outcasts said in a video about David Silverman and atheist organizations: "Many other people were also like maybe he was embezzling funds because we know people in atheist activist communities where that kind of sh*t happens. Yes, it was kind of common."[106]

Two atheist nonprofit scandals that recently received some publicity were the organizations Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science and the We Are Atheism organization.[107]

In addition, David Gorski at Scienceblogs indicated that many atheist/skeptic organizations are poorly run from a financial standpoint.[108]

For more information, please see: Atheist organizations and scandals

Irreligion and domestic violence

See also: Irreligion and domestic violence and Atheism and women and Atheism and rape

Research suggests that irreligiousity is a causal factor for domestic violence.[109]

The abstract for the 2007 article in the journal Violence Against Women entitled Race/Ethnicity, Religious Involvement, and Domestic Violence indicated:

“ The authors explored the relationship between religious involvement and intimate partner violence by analyzing data from the first wave of the National Survey of Families and Households. They found that: (a) religious involvement is correlated with reduced levels of domestic violence; (b) levels of domestic violence vary by race/ethnicity; (c) the effects of religious involvement on domestic violence vary by race/ethnicity; and (d) religious involvement, specifically church attendance, protects against domestic violence, and this protective effect is stronger for African American men and women and for Hispanic men, groups that, for a variety of reasons, experience elevated risk for this type of violence.[109] ”
Secular Europe and domestic violence

See also: Secular Europe and domestic violence

Atheism and racism

See also: Atheism and racism and East Asia, China, atheism and racism and Western atheism and race

The atheist population has a significant amount of racism within its midst (see: Atheism and racism).

Atheism and empathy

See: Atheism and empathy

Atheism and pornography

[[File:Larry Flynt Wheelchair.jpg|thumbnail|200px|right|The pornographer Larry Flynt is an atheist.[110]] See also: Atheism and pornography

One of the causes of atheism is a hedonistic lifestyle. See: Atheism and hedonism.

The infamous pornographers Hugh Hefner and Larry Flynt was and is (taken separately in the order indicated) both atheists (taken together).[111]

In 2003, Arena magazine magazine listed Flynt as #1 on the "50 Powerful People in Porn" list.[112] Flynt is paralyzed from the waist down due to injuries sustained from a 1978 assassination attempt by the serial killer Joseph Paul Franklin.[113]

RationalWiki and web visitor interest in pornography

See: RationalWiki and web visitor interest in pornography

Atheism and child pornography

See also: Atheism and child pornography

In 2005 Denmark was ranked the third most atheistic country in the world and the website adherents.com reported that in 2005 43 - 80% of Danes are agnostics/atheists/non-believers in God.[114]

The 2003 book entitled Overcoming Violence Against Women and Girls: The International Campaign to Eradicate a Worldwide Problem written by authors Rahel Nardos; Mary K. Radpour; William S. Hatcher and Michael L. Penn, declared:

“ The largest source of commercial child pornography is Denmark. Denmark became the world's leading producer of child pornography when, in 1969, it removed all restrictions on the production and sale of any type of pornographic material. "The result," notes Tim Tate, "was a short-lived explosion in adult pornography, and the birth of commercial child pornography. ....by 1979 when Denmark finally banned the production and sale of child pornography it had already become such a financial success on the international market that it has proven to be nearly impossible to bring its spread under control.[115] ”

Suzanne Ost, in her 2009 book Child Pornography and Sexual Grooming: Legal and Societal Responses published by Cambridge University Press, wrote about the child pornography created by Denmark/Holland during this period: "Taylor and Quayle note that the material produced during this period still constitutes the largest part of child pornography that is currently available, having been transferred into digital format and uploaded onto the internet."[116]

Atheism, pedophilia and NAMBLA

[[Image:Harry Hay.jpg|thumb|150px|Many consider atheist Harry Hay to be the founder of the American homosexual movement.]]

see also: Atheism, pedophilia and NAMBLA and Teenage homosexuality

The North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) was founded in December 1978 and is an activist homosexuality and pedophilia/pederasty coalition group.

Some of the well known atheist advocates of the North American Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) are:

1. The atheist and homosexual David Thorstad was a founding member of the North American Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA).[117]

2. Harry Hay (1912 - 2002) was an liberal advocate of statutory rape and the widely acknowledged founder and progenitor of the activist homosexual agenda in the United States. Hay joined the Communist Party of the United States (CPUSA) in 1934.[118] Harry Hay was an atheist.[119] He was a vociferous advocate of man/boy love.[120] In 1986, Hay marched in a gay parade wearing a shirt emblazoned with the words "NAMBLA walks with me."[121]

3. The writer Samuel R. Delany is an atheist and a homosexual.[122] Delaney said he was a supporter of NAMBLA.[123]

See also: Richard Dawkins on child molestation and so called "gentle pedophiles" and John Maynard Keynes and pederasty

Atheism and slavery/forced labor

Dietary practices of atheists. Eating of dogs, cats, horses and babies/children

See: Dietary practices of atheists (Dietary habits of various irreligious regions)

Atheists and the eating of babies/children

Major news organizations reporting on China baby flesh powder scandal

Immorality of prominent atheists

See also: Atheism, polyamory and other immoral relationships

James Randi is a leader within the atheist community. Brian Thompson, former James Randi Educational Foundation (JREF) Outreach Coordinator, wrote:

“ But I no longer identify with this community of benevolent know-it-alls, because not all of them are the best folks in the world. In fact, a good percentage of the top ten worst humans I’ve ever met are prominent members of the skeptics’ club. They’re dishonest, mean-spirited, narcissistic, misogynistic. Pick a personality flaw, and I can probably point you to someone who epitomizes it. And that person has probably had a speaking slot at a major skeptical conference.

I grew particularly disgusted with the boys’ club attitude I saw among skeptical leaders and luminaries. The kind of attitude that’s dismissive of women, sexually predatory, and downright gross. When I first started going to skeptical conferences as a fresh-faced know-it-all, I started hearing things about people I once admired. Then I started seeing things myself. Then I got a job with the JREF, and the pattern continued.[124]

”

See also:

Atheism and rape

Atheism and abortion

The Journal of Medical Ethics wrote this about the atheist and sadist Marquis de Sade:

“ In 1795 the Marquis de Sade published his La Philosophie dans le boudoir, in which he proposed the use of induced abortion for social reasons and as a means of population control. It is from this time that medical and social acceptance of abortion can be dated, although previously the subject had not been discussed in public in modern times. It is suggested that it was largely due to de Sade's writing that induced abortion received the impetus which resulted in its subsequent spread in western society.[125] ”

Population control is based on pseudoscience and ill founded economic assumptions.[126] CBS News reported: "According to a mail-in survey of nearly 4,000 British doctors, those who were atheist or agnostic were almost twice as willing to take actions designed to hasten the end of life."[127]

Atheism and profanity

See also: Atheism and profanity and Atheism and culture

Studies indicate that atheists engage in more profanity than Christians/theists and are more likely to believe that obscene language is acceptable to engage in.[128] Use of profanity by individuals is negatively correlated with conscientiousness and agreeableness.[129]

For more information, please see: Atheism and profanity

Irreligion and crime/prison population

Atheism and psychopathy

See also: Atheism and psychopathy

The serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer engaged in cannibalism. He was an atheist while he committed these acts.[130] See: Atheism and cannibalism

A psychopath is someone with an anti-social personality disorder characterized by violent, perverted or immoral behavior often leading to criminality. Psychopaths have little or no concern for other people. Some psychopaths equate love with sexual arousal.[131]

A 2016 study relating to atheism and psychopathy published in Plus One indicates:

“ Similarly, a survey of 312 college students examining the relationship between Religious/Spiritual Well-Being (RSWB) and ‘dark triad’ personality traits found that “RSWB was confirmed to be negatively correlated with these negative aspects of personality, in particular with subclinical psychopathy.”

...moral concern is associated with a spiritual worldview.[132]

”

According to the 2014 journal article Correlates of psychopathic personality traits in everyday life: results from a large community survey published in the journal Frontiers of Psychology lack of belief in God is positively associated with psychopathy.[133]

Atheism and theft crimes

Atheism and infanticide

Infanticide is the practice of killing very young children. An infant is a child too young to speak.[134]

Each year thousands of dogs are stolen in atheist, communist controlled mainland China and as many as 20 million dogs are killed in China to satisfy the dog meat industry.[135] For more information, please see: Atheists and dog meat eating

According to ABC News, gruesome techniques are used in Chinese dog slaughterhouses.[136] Brutal beatings of dogs are occurring in the Chinese dog meat trade during the slaughtering process.[137] See: Atheism and animal abuse

China has the world's largest atheist population.[138] It also has state atheism (See: China and atheism).

Most atheists in the world are East Asian (see: Asian atheism).

Below is an article on atheism and infanticide:

Atheism and bestiality

See also: Atheism and bestiality

Atheism and cannibalism

See: Atheism and cannibalism

Atheism and animal abuse

See: Atheism and animal abuse (Brutal dog/cat meat trades, etc.)

Atheism and veganism

See: Atheism and veganism

Atheism and hypocrisy

See also: Atheist hypocrisy

In order to attempt to justify their atheism, atheists often engage in hypocritical argumentation. In addition, atheists often engage in hypocritical behavior. Please see: Atheist hypocrisy

Atheism and social justice

See: Atheism and social justice

Atheism and care of the environment

See: Atheism and care of the environment

Atheism and other moral issues

For more information please see: Atheism and morality and Atheism and hedonism

Earlier definitions of atheism

Dictionaries point out that previous/archaic meanings of the word atheism are: ungodliness. wickedness, immorality[139][140]

Atheism and philosophy topics

If philosophical naturalism were true, then we ought not to trust our capacity for reason for the human brain would be a byproduct of blind/unintelligent natural forces. [141]

See: Atheism and reason and Atheism and the brain

Atheism and naturalism

See also: Atheism and naturalism

Scientific naturalism proposes that only explanations which can be scientifically tested are valid, yet this proposition cannot be scientifically tested. Therefore, scientific naturalism is self-refuting.[142] See also: Atheism and incoherency

Atheism and issues relating to knowledge acquisition

Why atheism is irrational

See also: Atheism and irrationality and Irreligion and superstition

A common and legitimate criticism of the atheist worldview is that atheism is irrational.[143] In short, atheism is a fundamentally incoherent worldview with a number of inconsistencies.[144] For example, the atheistic worldview cannot account for the laws of logic.[145] See also: Atheism and critical thinking

The atheist worldview cannot explain the existence of consciousness either and the theistic worldview can offer a reasonable explanation.[146]

A common and legitimate criticism of the atheist worldview is that atheism is irrational.[143] In short, atheism is a fundamentally incoherent worldview with a number of inconsistencies.[144]

For more information, please see:

Atheism and reason

See also: Atheism and reason and Atheists and unreasonableness

If naturalism is true, then we ought not to trust our capacity for reason for the human brain would be a byproduct of blind/unintelligent natural forces. [147] Therefore, believing in naturalism is self-defeating.

In short, atheism/naturalism and reason are incompatible.[147]

Atheism and personhood

See: Atheism and personhood

Atheism and the problem of consciousness

See: Atheism and consciousness

Atheism and free will

See: Atheism and free will

Atheism and human worth

See: Atheism and human worth

Atheism and evidence

See: Atheism and evidence

Logical fallacies that atheists commonly commit

List of logical fallacies that atheists commonly commit: Atheism and logical fallacies

Atheism and meaninglessness

See also: Atheism and meaninglessness and Atheism and the meaning of life and Nihilism and Absurdism and Existentialism

Under an atheistic worldview, there is no objective meaning or purpose in life.[148] Through Jesus Christ, Christianity offers objective meaning and purpose to life.[149]

For more information, please see: Atheism and meaninglessness and Atheism and the meaning of life

Atheists/agnostics and ultimate purpose

See also: Atheism and purpose and Atheism, agnosticism and pessimism and Atheism and beliefs

One of the most popular arguments for God's existence is the teleological argument. Derived from the Greek word telos, which refers to purpose or end, this argument hinges on the idea that the world gives evidence of being designed, and concludes that a divine designer must be posited to account for the orderly world we encounter.

Academic research and historical data indicate that a significant portion of atheists/agnostics often see their lives and the world as being the product of purposeful design (see: Atheism and purpose).[150]

See also:

Atheism and evil/suffering

Arrogance of atheism/atheists

See also: Atheism and arrogance and Atheism and narcissism and Atheism and deception

One of the common and well-founded charges against atheists is their arrogance and presumptuousness.[151]

Why atheism is an arrogant ideology

See also: Arguments against atheism and Atheism and arrogance

Friedrich Nietzsche wrote: "But now God is dead. You superior men, this God was your greatest danger. Only since he is in the grave, have you risen again. Only now comes the great noontide; only now the superior man will be – Lord!".[152]

The picture of Nietzsche above was taken in 1899. Nietzsche died in 1900. See: Atheism and arrogance

Atheists lack proof and evidence that God does not exist and ignore the clear and abundant proof and evidence that He does exist. The philosopher Mortimer Adler pointed out that atheism asserts an unreasonable universal negative that is self-defeating.[153]

Contrary to the mistaken notion of individuals who are inexperienced in logic/philosophy, there are plenty of cases where universal negatives can be proven.[154] However, atheists' universal negative claim that God does not exist is not a reasonable universal negative claim.[153]

Atheists have also given themselves pretentious monikers such as freethinker, rationalist and "bright". See also: Brights Movement and Atheism and intelligence

In addition, historically militant atheists have commonly endeavored to limit the religious freedom of others while imposing their errant, atheistic ideology on others. See also: Atheism and intolerance

Atheists and lack of open-mindedness

Research indicates that atheists are less open-minded (see: Atheism and open-mindedness).

See:

Atheism and religion

Atheism is a religion

See also: Atheism is a religion and Atheist cults and Atheist hypocrisy

The British atheist Sanderson Jones is a founder of the Sunday Assembly "atheist church" movement.[155]

See: Atheism is a religion

Atheism is a religion.[156] And many of the leaders of the atheist movement, such as the evolutionist and new atheist/agnostic Richard Dawkins, argue for agnosticism/atheism with a religious fervor.

In addition, although many atheists deny that atheism is a worldview, atheists commonly share a number of beliefs such as naturalism, belief in evolution and abiogenesis.[157]

Roderick Ninian Smart, a Scottish writer and professor, defined a seven-part scheme of understanding both religious and secular worldviews[158] These can be understood as narrative, experiential, social, ethical, doctrinal, ritual and material.

English Pastor Daniel Smartt defines atheism as a religion, using Ninian Smart's seven dimensions of worldview as a list of criteria. It is not necessary in Smartt's model for every one of these to be present in order for something to be a religion.[159] However, it can be argued that all seven are present in the case of atheism.[156] [160]

In 2013, a trend of atheist services began and atheist services were reported in the New York Times, The Blaze and other major news outlets.[161]

See also:

Atheist cults

See: Atheist cults

The Wall Street Journal reported: "A comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows ...that the irreligious and the members of more liberal Protestant denominations, far from being resistant to superstition, tend to be much more likely to believe in the paranormal and in pseudoscience than evangelical Christians."[162]

Atheism and spirituality

Irreligion and superstition

See also: Irreligion and superstition

In September 2008, the Wall Street Journal reported:

“ The reality is that the New Atheist campaign, by discouraging religion, won't create a new group of intelligent, skeptical, enlightened beings. Far from it: It might actually encourage new levels of mass superstition. And that's not a conclusion to take on faith—it's what the empirical data tell us.

"What Americans Really Believe," a comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows that traditional Christian religion greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of astrology. It also shows that the irreligious and the members of more liberal Protestant denominations, far from being resistant to superstition, tend to be much more likely to believe in the paranormal and in pseudoscience than evangelical Christians...."[163]

”
According to Pew Forum, evangelical Protestant churches in America grew by 2 million from 2007 to 2014.[164] See: Atheism vs. Christianity

Atheism and the occult

See: Atheism and the occult

Atheism vs. Abrahamic religions and religion

Atheism vs. Islam

See main article: Atheism vs. Islam

Atheism and miracles

See main article: Atheism and Miracles

In relation to atheism and miracles, modern scholars are divided on the issue of whether or not David Hume was an atheist.[165] With that caveat in mind, Hume is well known for arguing that it is always more probable that the testimony of a miracle is false than that the miracle occurred.[166] Christian apologists William Lane Craig, Norman Geisler, C.S. Lewis, JP Holding, and others have shown the inadequacy and unreasonableness of Hume's position regarding miracles.[167]

The Christian Post reporter Stoyan Zaimov wrote: "Double-blind prayer experiments: where people pray for others with terminal illness. Habermas admitted that most such experiments have not worked, but the three that he knows of that have indeed worked were cases of orthodox-Christians praying for the sick."[168]

Atheists who believe in life after death

See also: Atheism and the supernatural

A survey involving 15,738 individuals found that 32 percent of Americans who identified themselves as agnostics and atheists believe in an afterlife of some kind.[169][170]

Atheism and death

[[File:Atheism and death.jpg|thumbnail|200px|right|According to a study performed in the United States by researchers Wink and Scott, very religious people fear death the least.[171]] See: Atheism and death

See also: Atheism and death and Atheist funerals and Atheism and Hell

Science Daily reported that Death anxiety increases atheists' unconscious belief in God.[172] In a Psychology Today article, Dr. Nathan A. Heflick reported similar results in other studies.[173] Under stress, the brain's processing works in a way that prefers unconscious thinking.[174]

A United States study and a Taiwanese study indicated that the irreligious fear death more than the very religious.[175]

Atheists and belief in life after death

See also: Atheism and life after death and Atheists and supernatural beliefs

A significant percentage of atheists believe in life after death (see: Atheism and life after death).[176]

For additional information, please see:

Atheism and Hell

See also: Atheism and Hell

The journalist and ex-atheist Peter Hitchens, who is the brother of the late atheist Christopher Hitchens, said upon seeing an art exhibit of Michelangelo's painting The Last Judgment he came to the realization that he might be judged which startled him.[177] This started a train of thought within Peter Hitchens that eventually led him to become a Christian.[177]

Atheism and science

[[Image:Newton.jpg|alt=atheism quotes|right|thumbnail|200px|Isaac Newton wrote: "I have a fundamental belief in the Bible as the Word of God, written by men who were inspired. I study the Bible daily. Opposition to godliness is atheism in profession and idolatry in practice. Atheism is so senseless and odious to mankind that it never had many professors." See also: Atheism quotes ]]

See also: Atheism and science

Atheism and the suppression of science

See: Atheism and the suppression of science

Atheism and the social sciences

See: Atheism and the social sciences

Atheism and the foundation of modern science

See also: Christianity and science

The birth of modern science occurred in Christianized Europe.[178]

Sociologist Rodney Stark investigated the individuals who made the most significant scientific contributions between 1543 and 1680 A.D., the time of the Scientific Revolution. In Stark's list of 52 top scientific contributors,[179] only one (Edmund Halley) was a skeptic and another (Paracelsus) was a pantheist. The other 50 were Christians, 30 of whom could be characterized as being devout Christians.[179]

Sir Francis Bacon, sometimes referred to as "the Father of Modern Science", wrote in his essay entitled Of Atheism: "I had rather believe all the fables in the Legend, and the Talmud, and the Alcoran, than that this universal frame is without a mind."[180]

Atheism and environmental science

See: Atheism and environmental science

Atheism and questions of origins

See articles: Atheism and Evolution and Evolution as a secular origins myth

Creationist scientists state that the first law of thermodynamics and the second law of thermodynamics argue against an eternal universe or a universe created by natural processes and argue for a universe created by God.[181] See also: Atheism and the origin of the universe

A majority of the most prominent and vocal defenders of the evolutionary position which employs methodological naturalism since World War II have had the worldview of atheism/agnosticism.[182] Creation scientists assert that the theory of evolution is an inadequate explanation for the variety of life forms on earth.[183] The theory of evolution has had a number of negative social effects.

In addition, the current naturalistic explanations for the origin of life are inadequate.[184]

Atheism and scientific community

Atheism and scientific fraud and speculation

Atheism and food science

Atheism and culinary science

RationalWiki's flouting of nutritional science

Atheism and mental and physical health

See also: Atheism and health and Atheism and life expectancy and Atheism and alcoholism and Atheism and negative emotions/thoughts

The is considerable amount of scientific evidence that suggest that theism is more conducive to mental and physical health than atheism and some of the more significant findings are given below [185] For more information please see: Atheism and health and Atheism and life expectancy

Mayo Clinic and other studies