Difference between revisions of "Eugenics"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Etymology and history: Completed reference.)
 
(147 intermediate revisions by 23 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
[[Image:Gtr766.png|right|thumb|300px|Logo of the Second International Congress of Eugenics, 1921.]]
+
[[File:Gtr766.png|right|thumb|300px|Logo of the Second International Congress of Eugenics, 1921.]]
−
'''Eugenics''' (from the Greek. eugenes "well-born, of good stock," from eu- "good" + genos "birth") is the general name for a series of ostensibly [[Science|scientific]] claims about inheritance among humans, which sought to eliminate traits, such as "imbecility" or criminal behavior, by selective [[Eugenics and sterilization|sterilization]], regulation of family size, and restrictions on who could marry whom.  It was based upon a number of premises since shown to be demonstrably false (not all eugenecists held to all of these uniformly):
+
[[File:Allen William Thurman.jpg|thumb|right|230px|[[Ohio]] Democrat and eugenicist [[Allen W. Thurman]],<ref>September 26, 1912. [https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1912/09/26/100549905.pdf Predicting Ohio's Bankruptcy]. ''The New York Times''. Retrieved October 8, 2021.</ref> the son of segregationist and [[white supremacist]] U.S. senator [[Allen G. Thurman]].]]
 +
'''Eugenics''' was a [[progressive]] movement which tried to eliminate "dangerous human pests" and "the rising tide of imbeciles" through what has been euphemistically called "[[selective breeding]]." What this meant, in actual practice, was [[forced sterilization]] of American immigrants and minorities (particularly in California),<ref>Crichton, Michael (2004).  [https://web.archive.org/web/20070315005147/http://www.michaelcrichton.net/fear/index.html "Why politicized science is dangerous"].  Excerpt from ''State of Fear'' (New York: Harper).  Retrieved from March 15, 2007 archive of MichaelCrichton.com at Internet Archive on September 17, 2014.</ref> and then the promotion of abortion by [[liberal]] whites in black and Hispanic communities.
  
−
* That "imbecility" -- a catch-all phrase used to label many persons without anything that today would be recognized as mental illness or deficiency -- was necessarily the result of inheritance, and heritable.
+
The Progressive Movement promoted [[birth control]] for eugenic purposes, and [[Birth control and racism|its association with the racist legacy of eugenics]] continues to this day.
  
−
* That human "races" as a category were substantial and determinative, and that certain races, such as the "Anglo Saxon," were innately superior to others.
+
==Connection with the theory of evolution==
  
−
* That "nervous exhaustion", "moral looseness" and other socially-acquired traits were inherited and heritable.
+
The [[theory of evolution]] suggests that humans are merely evolving animals.  The claimed biological struggle for survival that brought humans here is continuing.  Man's long-term survival is, according to evolution, a biological [[survival of the fittest]].  Evolution theory teaches that there must be a biological struggle for survival among various human races and groups.
  
−
* That families with more children dispersed and diluted the "moral force" of each offspring.
+
[[Charles Darwin]] declared in ''[[The Descent of Man]]'':<ref>Darwin, Charles (1901).  [http://www.literature.org/authors/darwin-charles/the-descent-of-man/chapter-06.html "Chapter 1"].  ''The Descent of Man'' (London: John Murray), pp. 241-42 (footnote * is a reference to ''Anthropological Review'', April, 1867, p. 236).</ref>
  
−
* That immigrant children were less desirable, and that the "white race" or native-born Americans generally were endangered due to their lower fertility rate in comparison to recent immigrants (see leaflet at right).
+
:At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world.  At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked,* will no doubt be exterminated.  The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilized state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.
  
−
* That "genius" was readily identified, inherited, and heritable.
+
Darwin was not the first to claim racial superiority.  But he was the first to teach that some races of man "will almost certainly exterminate, and replace" other races of man.  His followers developed a new intellectual field called "eugenics" for this mythical biological struggle.
  
−
The banner of eugenics was taken up by a variety of groups in the United States and around the world, each of which believed that it would lead to the creation of healthier, more intelligent people, conserve society's limited resources, and reduce human suffering.  Of course, one of the unspoken aspects of this "reduction" in suffering was that it worked, not by reducing suffering ''per se'', but by reducing the number of people through forced sterilization -- fewer people, ergo, less suffering.  Many women were sterilized involuntarily and without their knowledge under Eugenics laws which were passed in many states of the [[United States]] throughout the nineteen-teens and twenties.
+
In fact, the term "eugenics" was coined by Darwin's cousin, [[Francis Galton]].<ref>Multiple references:
 +
*Cavanaugh-O'Keefe (2000).  [https://web.archive.org/web/20120204002402/http://www.eugenics-watch.com/roots/chap02.html "Chapter two: Francis Galton and the Eugenics Society"]. ''Roots of Racism and Abortion: An Exploration of Eugenics.'' Retrieved from February 4, 2012 archive of Eugenics Watch at Internet Archive on September 17, 2014.
 +
*Francis Galton (1883). [http://eugenics.us/francis-galton-coins-the-word-eugenics-as-the-science-of-better-breeding-men-brutes-and-plants-quote-of-the-day/344.htm ''Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development''] (London: Macmillan and Co., 1883), 24-25."  Retrieved August 11, 2015  from http://www.eugenics.us.</ref>
  
−
===Eugenics and the state, 1890s–1945===
+
Defenders of Darwin, and Darwinism, often try to argue that Darwin, and Darwinism, have no logical connection to eugenics at all. However, in a 1914 speech, Charles Darwin's son, Francis Darwin, wrote:  "In the first edition of ''The Descent of Man'', 1874, [my father] distinctly gives his adherence to the eugenic idea by his assertion that many might by selection do something for the moral and physical qualities of the race."<ref>Francis Darwin (1914). [http://eugenics.us/eugenics-is-darwinism-and-evolution-applied/144.htm "The Galton Lecture, as found in ''The Eugenics Review''."]  Retrieved August 11, 2015 from http://www.eugenics.us.</ref> He based his ideas on his cousin's work.
−
One of the earliest modern advocates of eugenic ideas (before they were labeled as such) was [[Alexander Graham Bell]]. In 1881 Bell investigated the rate of [[deaf]]ness on [[Martha's Vineyard]], Massachusetts. From this he concluded that deafness was hereditary in nature and recommended a marriage prohibition against the deaf ("Memoir upon the formation of a deaf variety of the human Race") even though he was married to a deaf woman. Like many other early eugenicists, he proposed controlling immigration for the purpose of eugenics and warned that boarding schools for the deaf could possibly be considered as breeding places of a deaf human race.
 
  
−
In [[1907]], [[Indiana]] became the first of more than thirty states to adopt legislation aimed at compulsory sterilization of certain
+
Francis Darwin's clear statement that his father endorsed Galton's conception of eugenics is important because many people try to distance Darwin from the taint of eugenics by pointing out that Darwin himself never advocated for it by name. But Galton coined the word after Darwin's death, so naturally, he wouldn't have used the word 'eugenics.' Darwin's son can be expected to have understood his father's theory well enough to know whether or not his father's book, "The Descent of Man", 'gave adherence to the eugenic idea.'
−
individuals.<ref>Indiana Supreme Court Legal History Lecture Series,  
 
−
"Three Generations of Imbeciles are Enough:"
 
−
Reflections on 100 Years of Eugenics in Indiana, at [http://www.in.gov/judiciary/citc/special/eugenics/index.html]</ref> Although the law was overturned by the [[Indiana Supreme Court]] in [[1921]],<ref>''Williams v. Smith'', 131 NE 2 (Ind.), 1921, text at [http://www.bioethics.iupui.edu/Eugenics/SMith%20vs%20Williams.pdf] </ref> the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] upheld the constitutionality of a Virginia Law allowing for the [[Buck v. Bell|compulsory sterilization]] of patients of state mental institutions in [[1927]]; it was in writing this opinion that Justice [[Oliver Wendell Holmes]] Jr. coined the phrase "three generations of imbeciles are enough."<ref>{{harvnb|Larson|2004|p=194-195}} Citing [[Buck v. Bell]] 274 U.S. 200, 205 (1927).</ref>
 
  
−
[[Nazi Germany]] under [[Adolf Hitler]] was infamous for eugenics programs which attempted to maintain a "pure" German race through a series of programs that ran under the banner of "[[racial hygiene]]". Among other activities, the Nazis performed extensive experimentation on live human beings to test their genetic theories, ranging from simple measurement of physical characteristics to the horrific experiments carried out by [[Josef Mengele]] for [[Otmar von Verschuer]] on twins in the concentration camps. During the 1930s and 1940s, the Nazi regime forcibly sterilized hundreds of thousands of people whom they viewed as mentally and physically "unfit", an estimated 400,000 between 1934 and 1937. The scale of the Nazi program prompted American eugenics advocates to seek an expansion of their program, with one complaining that "the Germans are beating us at our own game".<ref>Quoted in Selgelid, Michael J. 2000. Neugenics? ''Monash Bioethics Review'' 19 (4):9-33</ref> The Nazis went further, however, killing tens of thousands of the institutionalized disabled through compulsory "[[euthanasia]]" programs.<ref>The Nazi eugenics policies are discussed in a number of sources. A few of the more definitive ones are Robert Proctor, ''Racial hygiene: Medicine under the Nazis'' (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988) and Dieter Kuntz, ed., ''Deadly medicine: creating the master race'' (Washington, DC: United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, 2004) ([http://www.ushmm.org/museum/exhibit/online/deadlymedicine/ online exhibit]). On the development of the [[racial hygiene]] movement before National Socialism, see Paul Weindling, ''Health, race and German politics between national unification and Nazism, 1870-1945'' (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989).</ref>
+
==Etymology and history==
  
−
They also implemented a number of "positive" eugenics policies, giving awards to "[[Aryan race|Aryan]]" women who had large numbers of children and encouraged a service in which "racially pure" single women could deliver illegitimate children. Allegations that such women were also impregnated by [[Schutzstaffel|SS]] officers in the ''[[Lebensborn]]'' are common, but unproven. Also, "racially valuable" children from occupied countries were forcibly removed from their parents and adopted by German people. Many of their concerns for eugenics and racial hygiene were also explicitly present in their systematic killing of millions of "undesirable" people including [[Jew]]s, [[Gypsies]], [[Jehovah's Witness]]es and [[homosexuality|homosexuals]] during [[the Holocaust]] (much of the killing equipment and methods employed in the death camps were first developed in the euthanasia program). The scope and coercion involved in the German eugenics programs along with a strong use of the rhetoric of eugenics and so-called "racial science" throughout the regime created an indelible cultural association between eugenics and the [[Third Reich]] in the postwar years.<ref>See Proctor, ''Racial hygiene'', and Kuntz, ed., ''Deadly medicine.''</ref>
+
The word "eugenics" is based on Greek roots meaning "well-born." The Merriam-Webster dictionary provides 1883 as the date of origin for the term. Later, [[Leonard Darwin|Darwin's son, Leonard]], served as the president of the First Congress of Eugenics in 1912 in London.
  
−
The second largest eugenics movement was in the [[United States]]. Beginning with [[Connecticut]] in 1896, many states enacted marriage laws with eugenic criteria, prohibiting anyone who was "epileptic, imbecile or [[feeble-minded]]" from marrying. In 1898 [[Charles Benedict Davenport|Charles B. Davenport]], a prominent American [[biology|biologist]], began as director of a biological research station based in [[Cold Spring Harbor]] where he experimented with evolution in plants and animals. In 1904 Davenport received funds from the [[Carnegie Institution]] to found the Station for Experimental Evolution. The [[Eugenics Record Office]] opened in 1910 while Davenport and [[Harry H. Laughlin]] began to promote eugenics.<ref>The history of eugenics in the United States is discussed at length in Mark Haller, ''Eugenics: Hereditarian attitudes in American thought'' (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1963) and [[Daniel Kevles]], ''In the name of eugenics: Genetics and the uses of human heredity'' (New York: Knopf, 1985) ISBN 0-520-05763, the latter being the standard survey work on the subject.</ref>
+
The encyclopedia describes eugenics as now being "in disrepute,"<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20010224015950/www.fwkc.com/encyclopedia/low/articles/e/e007001431f.html "Eugenics"] (Oct. 2001 or bef.). Retrieved from Funk and Wagnall's website at Internet Archive.</ref> although Professor [[Peter Singer]] of Princeton University has sought to remove the stigma from it. Evolutionist and atheist [[Richard Dawkins]] has stated in one letter his wish that it no longer be banned from polite discussion.<ref>Dawkins, Richard (November 19, 2006).  [https://web.archive.org/web/20090113170158/http://www.sundayherald.com/life/people/display.var.1031440.0.eugenics_may_not_be_bad.php "Eugenics may not be bad"].  ''Sunday Herald'' [Scotland].  Retrieved from January 13, 2009 archive at Internet Archive on September 24, 2014.</ref>
  
−
During the 20th century, researchers became interested in the idea that mental illness could run in families and conducted a number of studies to document the heritability of such illnesses as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and depression.  Their findings were used by the eugenics movement as proof for its cause.  State laws were written in the late 1800s and early 1900s to prohibit marriage and force sterilization of the mentally ill in order to prevent the "passing on" of mental illness to the next generation.  These laws were upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1927 and were not abolished until the mid-20th century.  By 1945 over 45,000 mentally ill individuals in the United States had been forcibly sterilized.
+
The [[Spartans]] in ancient Greece practiced a primitive form of eugenics, wherein babies which were judged to be too "weak" or "sickly" would be left to die.
  
−
In years to come, the ERO collected a mass of family pedigrees and concluded that those who were unfit came from economically and socially poor backgrounds. Eugenicists such as Davenport, the [[psychology|psychologist]] [[Henry H. Goddard]] and the conservationist [[Madison Grant]] (all well respected in their time) began to lobby for various solutions to the problem of the "unfit". (Davenport favored immigration restriction and sterilization as primary methods; Goddard favored segregation in his ''[[The Kallikak Family]]''; Grant favored all of the above and more, even entertaining the idea of extermination.)<ref>See Kevles, ''In the name of eugenics.''</ref> Though their methodology and research methods are now understood as highly flawed, at the time this was seen as legitimate scientific research.<ref>See Pg. 23 " 'Human Progress’ through Eugenics" from Psychology of Mental Fossils, toward an Archeo-psychology by Douglas Keith Candland at [http://www.douglascandland.com/images/chapter7.pdf] </ref> It did, however, have scientific detractors (notably, [[Thomas Hunt Morgan]], one of the few [[Mendel]]ians to explicitly criticize eugenics), though most of these focused more on what they considered the crude methodology of eugenicists, and the characterization of almost every human characteristic as being hereditary, rather than the idea of eugenics itself.<ref>Hamilton Cravens, ''The triumph of evolution: American scientists and the heredity-environment controversy, 1900-1941'' (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1978): 179.</ref>
+
In the early 1900s, many influential officials advocated Darwinism and eugenics. Supreme Court Justice [[Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.|Oliver Wendell Holmes]] became a strong proponent. So did many others in prominent government and academic positions.  Members of the British Eugenics Society, including the [[Planned Parenthood|International Planned Parenthood Federation]], are listed.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/19970801030506/http://homepages.enterprise.net/eugenics/briteugen/index.html "British Eugenics Society"] (1997).  Eugenics Watch.  Retrieved from August 1, 1997 archive at Internet Archive on September 24, 2014.</ref>
  
−
The idea of "genius" and "talent" is also considered by William Graham Sumner, a founder of the American Sociological Society (now called the American Sociological Association).  He maintained that if the government did not meddle with the social policy of ''laissez-faire'', a class of genius would rise to the top of the system of social stratification, followed by a class of talent.  Most of the rest of society would fit into the class of mediocrity. Those who were considered to be defective (mentally retarded, handicapped, etc.) had a negative effect on social progress by draining off necessary resources.  They should be left on their own to sink or swim. But those in the class of delinquent (criminals, deviants, etc.) should be eliminated from society ("Folkways", 1907).
+
===Eugenics in America===
 +
[[Image:Eugenic categories.jpg|thumb|right|220px|Categories]]
 +
Between 1907 and 1937, 32 American states passed eugenics laws requiring sterilization of citizens deemed to be misfits, such as the mentally infirm.  Oliver Wendell Holmes and all but one conservative Democratic Justice upheld such laws in a Supreme Court decision that included Holmes' offensive statement that "three generations of imbeciles are enough." [[Buck v. Bell]], 274 U.S. 200, 207 (1927).<ref>United States Supreme Court (May 2, 1927).  [http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=274&invol=200 "Buck v. Bell"], 274 U.S. 200, 207. Retrieved from ''FindLaw'' on September 24, 2014.</ref>  In fact, the third generation "imbecile" was very bright but was declared by a eugenics "expert" as "supposed to be a mental defective," apparently without an examination.
  
−
With the passage of the [[Immigration Act of 1924]], eugenicists for the first time played a central role in the Congressional debate as expert advisers on the threat of "inferior stock" from eastern and southern Europe. This reduced the number of immigrants from abroad to 15 percent from previous years, to control the number of "unfit" individuals entering the country. The new act strengthened existing laws prohibiting race mixing in an attempt to maintain the gene pool.<ref>Paul Lombardo, "Eugenics Laws Restricting Immigration," essay in the Eugenics Archive, available online at http://www.eugenicsarchive.org/html/eugenics/essay9text.html.</ref> Eugenic considerations also lay behind the adoption of [[incest]] laws in much of the U.S. and were used to justify many [[miscegenation|antimiscegenation]] laws.<ref>Paul Lombardo, "Eugenic Laws Against Race-Mixing," essay in the Eugenics Archive, available online at http://www.eugenicsarchive.org/html/eugenics/essay7text.html.</ref>
+
Eugenics was taught as part of the evolution curriculum of many science classes in America in the early 1900s. For example, it was featured in the textbook used in the famous [[Scopes Trial|Scopes trial]] in 1925.
  
−
Some states sterilized "imbeciles" for much of the 20th century. The [[Supreme Court of the United States|U.S. Supreme Court]] ruled in the [[1927]] ''[[Buck v. Bell]]'' case that the state of [[Virginia]] could sterilize those it thought unfit. The most significant era of [[Eugenics and sterilization|eugenic sterilization]] was between 1907 and 1963, when over 64,000 individuals were forcibly sterilized under eugenic legislation in the United States.<ref>Paul Lombardo, "Eugenic Sterilization Laws," essay in the Eugenics Archive, available online at http://www.eugenicsarchive.org/html/eugenics/essay8text.html.</ref> A favorable report on the results of sterilization in [[California]], by far the state with the most sterilizations, was published in book form by the biologist [[Paul Popenoe]] and was widely cited by the Nazi government as evidence that wide-reaching sterilization programs were feasible and humane. When Nazi administrators went on trial for [[war crimes]] in [[Nuremberg]] after [[World War II]], they justified the mass sterilizations (over 450,000 in less than a decade) by citing the United States as their inspiration.<ref>The connections between U.S. and Nazi eugenicists is discussed in Edwin Black, "[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2003/11/09/ING9C2QSKB1.DTL Eugenics and the Nazis -- the California connection]", ''San Francisco Chronicle'' ([[9 November]] [[2003]]), as well as Black's ''War Against the Weak'' (New York: Four Wars Eight Windows, 2003). Stefan Kühl's work, ''The Nazi connection: Eugenics, American racism, and German National Socialism'' (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994), is considered the standard scholarly work on the subject.</ref>
+
"By 1928, the American Genetics Association boasted that there were 376 college courses devoted exclusively to eugenics. High-school biology textbooks followed suit by the mid-1930s, with most containing material favorable to the idea of eugenic control of reproduction. It would thus have been difficult to be an even moderately educated reader in the 1920s or 1930s and not have known, at least in general terms, about the claims of eugenics."<ref name="sm">''See'' Allen, Garland E. (August–September 1996).  "Science misapplied: the eugenics age revisited".  ''Technology Review'', vol. 99, no. 6, at p. 22(10).</ref>
  
−
==Eugenics in fiction==
+
Important remnants of the evolution-eugenics approach exist today, in part because many of Justice Holmes' opinions are still controlling law.  The very first quote in the infamous [[Roe v. Wade]] abortion decision is an unprincipled statement of Justice Holmes in a 1905 opinion.  Indeed, Holmes once wrote favorably in a letter to a future Supreme Court Justice about "restricting propagation by the undesirables and putting to death infants that didn't pass the examination.<ref>Holmes, Oliver Wendell, Jr. (September 3, 1921).  "Letter to Felix Frankfurter".  For a detailed criticism of Justice Holmes' judicial Darwinism, see Professor Albert W. Alschuler's ''Law Without Values:  The Life, Work, and Legacy of Justice Holmes'' (Univ. of Chicago Press 2000).</ref>
  
−
In [[Aldous Huxley]]'s novel ''[[Brave New World]]'', the world government employs massive eugenics through mechanical, automatic breeding and elimination of the unfit.  The 1997 film [[Gattaca]] is based on the premise of such as "new eugenics," complete with biometrics, "designer babies," and "in-valids."
+
Existing laws requiring students to receive controversial vaccines are based on a eugenics-era decision granting the State the power to forcibly vaccinate residents.<ref>United States Supreme Court (February 20, 1905).  [http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=197&invol=11 "Jacobson v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts"], 197 U.S. 11. Retrieved from ''FindLaw'' on September 25, 2014.</ref> That decision, in fact, was the cited precedent for Justice Holmes' offensive "imbeciles" holding quoted above.
  
−
== References ==
+
For the same reason that evolution teaching led to eugenics, evolution teaching today encourages acceptance of abortion and euthanasia.  Under evolution theory, after all, we are merely animals fighting for biological survival.
 +
 
 +
===Eugenics in Europe===
 +
 
 +
German Darwinist [[Ernst Haeckel]] promoted evolution by drawing fraudulent pictures of humans embryos, to pretend that their developmental stages imitate a historical evolution of humans from other species.<ref group = note>''See'' [[Haeckel diagrams]].  These fraudulent drawings remain a part of American textbooks and were only exposed a century later as false by the ''New York Times''.</ref>
 +
 
 +
In 1904, Haeckel reiterated the view of Darwin quoted above:  "These lower races … are psychologically nearer to the mammals (apes or dogs) than to civilized Europeans; we must, therefore, assign a totally different value to their lives." <ref>Haeckel, Ernst (1904). ''The Wonders of Life'' (New York: Harper), pp. 56-57.</ref>
 +
 
 +
It wasn't long before intellectuals viewed war as an essential evolutionary process.  ''Vom Heutigen Kriege'', a popular book by Geberal Bernhardi, "expounded the thesis that war was a biological necessity and a convenient means of ridding the world of the unfit.  These views were not confined to a lunatic fringe, but won wide acceptance especially among journalists, academics and politicians."<ref>Carr, William (October 1991). ''A History of Germany 1815-1990'' (London:  Bloomsbury), 4th ed., p. 205.</ref>  In America, Justice Holmes similarly wrote that "I always say that society is founded on the death of men - if you don't kill the weakest one way you kill them another."<ref>Holmes, Oliver Wendell, Jr. (February 26, 1922).  "Letter to Sir Frederick Pollock".</ref>
 +
 
 +
World War I entailed a brutality unknown in the history of mankind.  Gregg Easterbrook, a senior editor of the liberal ''[[New Republic]]'' magazine, observed that "prior to the Scopes trial in 1925, [[William Jennings Bryan]] had been on a revival tour of Germany and had been horrified by the signs of incipient Nazism. Before this point, Bryan had been moderate in the evolution debate; for instance, he had lobbied the Florida legislature not to ban the teaching of Darwin, only to specify that evolution must be taught as a theory rather than a fact. But after hearing the National Socialists talk about the elimination of genetic inferiority, [historian Gary] Wills wrote, Bryan came to feel that evolutionary ideas had become dangerous; he began both to oppose and to lampoon them."
 +
 +
The march of evolution/eugenics continued unabated in Germany.  By the 1920s, German textbooks were teaching evolution concepts of heredity and racial hygiene.  The Kaiser Wilhelm Institute of Anthropology, Human Heredity, and Eugenics was founded in 1927.
 +
 
 +
In 1933, Germany passed the Law for the Protection of Heredity Health. Next was the Nazi sterilization law entitled "Eugenics in the service of public welfare."  It required compulsory sterilization for the prevention of progeny with hereditary defects in cases including congenital mental defects, schizophrenia, manic-depressive psychosis, and hereditary epilepsy.
 +
 +
The German schools indoctrinated their students.  In 1935, a German high-school math textbook included the following problem:<ref name="sm"/> "… how much does it cost the state if:
 +
 
 +
:a. 868 [mentally infirm] patients stay longer than 10 years?
 +
:b. 260 [mentally infirm] patients stay longer than 20 years?
 +
:c. 112 [mentally infirm] patients stay longer than 2 years?"
 +
 
 +
One German student was [[Josef Mengele]], who studied anthropology and paleontology and received his Ph.D. for his thesis entitled "Racial Morphological Research on the Lower Jaw Section of Four Racial Groups." In 1937, Mengele was recommended for and received a position as a research assistant with the Third Reich Institute for Hereditary, Biology and Racial Purity at the University of Frankfort.  He became the "Angel of Death" for directing the operation of gas chambers of [[the Holocaust]] and for conducting horrific medical experiments on inmates in pursuit of eugenics.
 +
 
 +
===Genocide===
 +
 
 +
The [[liberal]] American Medical Society provided this summary:<ref>Barondess, Jeremiah A. (November 27, 1996).  "Medicine against society: lessons from the Third Reich".  ''The Journal of the American Medical Association'', vol. 276, no. 20, p. 1657(5).</ref>
 +
 +
:"The publication of Darwin's ''[[Origin of Species]]'' in 1859 led to the rise of the eugenics movement in Europe.  Eugenics supporters believed that [[race]]s could be improved by [[selective breeding]].  The [[Nazi Party]] adopted this belief and began a campaign against the Jews. Many physicians joined the Nazi Party because they needed jobs."
 +
 
 +
Many [[genocide]]s have been committed in the name of Eugenics, most notably the Holocaust.  [[Adolf Hitler]] was a strong believer in eugenics and evolution and believed that Jewish people were closest to apes, followed by Africans, Asians, non-Aryan Europeans, and finally, Aryans, who he believed were most evolved.
 +
 
 +
Pat Milmoe McCarrick and Mary Carrington Coutts, reference librarians for the National Reference Center for Bioethics Literature at [[Georgetown University]], were more succinct:  "The Nazi racial hygiene program began with involuntary sterilizations and ended with genocide." <ref>McCarrick, Pat Milmoe and Coutts, Mary Carrington et al. (June 1995). [https://web.archive.org/web/20041013060122/http://www.georgetown.edu/research/nrcbl/scopenotes/sn28.htm "Introduction"].  ''Eugenics'', Scope Note series, no. 28.  Georgetown University/The Joseph and Rose Kennedy Institute of Ethics/National Reference Center for Bioethics Literature website.  Retrieved from October 13, 2004 archive at Internet Archive on September 18, 2014.</ref>
 +
 
 +
===American scientists and Nazi Germany===
 +
 
 +
From ''The Nazi Connection'':<ref>Kühl, Stefan (2002).  [https://books.google.com/books?id=UGYfRv3DWuQC&dq=nazi+socialism&source=gbs_summary_s&cad=0 ''The Nazi Connection:  Eugenics, American Racism, and German National Socialism'' [preview&#93;] (Oxford: Oxford University Press).  Preview retrieved from GoogleBooks on September 25, 2014.</ref>{{cquote|When Hitler published ''Mein Kampf'' in 1924, he held up a foreign law as a model for his program of racial purification: The U.S. Immigration Restriction Act of 1924, which prohibited the immigration of those with hereditary illnesses and entire ethnic groups. When the Nazis took power in 1933, they installed a program of eugenics—the attempted "improvement" of the population through forced sterilization and marriage controls—that consciously drew on the U.S. example. By then, many American states had long had compulsory sterilization laws for "defectives," upheld by the Supreme Court in 1927. Small wonder that the Nazi laws led one eugenics activist in Virginia to complain, "The Germans are beating us at our own game."
 +
 
 +
In ''The Nazi Connection'', Stefan Kuhl uncovers the ties between the American eugenics movement and the Nazi program of racial hygiene, showing that many American scientists actively supported Hitler's policies. After introducing us to the recently resurgent problem of [[scientific racism]], Kuhl carefully recounts the history of the eugenics movement, both in the United States and internationally, demonstrating how widely the idea of sterilization as a genetic control had become accepted by the early twentieth century. From the first, the American eugenicists led the way with radical ideas. Their influence led to sterilization laws in dozens of states—laws which were studied, and praised, by the German racial hygienists. With the rise of Hitler, the Germans enacted compulsory sterilization laws partly based on the U.S. experience, and American eugenists took pride in their influence on Nazi policies. Kuhl recreates astonishing scenes of American eugenicists traveling to Germany to study the new laws, publishing scholarly articles lionizing the Nazi eugenics program, and proudly comparing personal notes from Hitler thanking them for their books. Even after the outbreak of war, he writes, the American eugenicists frowned upon Hitler's totalitarian government, but not his sterilization laws. So deep was the failure to recognize the connection between eugenics and Hitler's genocidal policies, that a prominent liberal Jewish eugenicist who had been forced to flee Germany found it fit to grumble that the Nazis "took over our entire plan of eugenic measures."
  
−
<references/>
+
By 1945, when the murderous nature of the Nazi government was made perfectly clear, the American eugenicists sought to downplay the close connections between themselves and the German program. Some of them, in fact, had sought to distance themselves from Hitler even before the war. But Stefan Kuhl's deeply documented book provides a devastating indictment of the influence—and aid—provided by American scientists for the most comprehensive attempt to enforce racial purity in world history.}}
  
−
== External References ==
+
==Liberal eugenics==
 +
Some argue that parents who abort infants with a genetic mutation or other disabilities are practicing a form of eugenics.<ref>Kristof, Nicholas D. (July 4, 2003).  [https://edition.cnn.com/2003/US/07/04/nyt.kristof/index.html "The new eugenics"].  ''The New York Times''.  Reprinted at CNN.com International/U. S. webpage.  Retrieved on September 18, 2014.</ref>  Some doctors and scientists have defended this practice and named it "liberal eugenics" in order to differentiate it from traditional forms of eugenics such as Nazi eugenics.<ref>Hauskeller, Michael (November 2, 2005).  [http://ndpr.nd.edu/review.cfm?id=4541 "Review of ''Liberal Eugenics: In Defence of Human Enhancement''"], Agar, Nicholas (2004, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing).  Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews.  Retrieved on September 25, 2014.</ref>  Eugenicists in the United States and elsewhere have been known to employ or advocate [[abortion]] as a method of eugenics.
  
−
Stephen Jay Gould, "The Mismeasure of Man", W.W. Norton and Co., 1981, 1996.
+
==Eugenics in film==
  
−
[[Category:philosophy]]
+
In the 2006 satirical comedy ''Idiocracy,'' the entire movie is premised on the idea that the out-breeding of the stupid over the intelligent will lead to a uniformly stupid world run by advertisers, marketers, and anti-intellectualism.
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
 +
* [[Genetic engineering]]
 +
* [[Planned Parenthood]]
 +
* [[Margaret Sanger]]
 +
* [[Liberalism]]
 +
* [[Abortion]]
 +
* [[Daniel Kevles]]
 +
*[[Biotechnology]]
 +
*[[Secular Europe and eugenics]]
 +
 +
== Note ==
 +
{{reflist1904|group=note}}
 +
 +
== References ==
 +
{{reflist|2}}
 +
 +
{{evolution}}
 +
{{Liberalism}}
  
−
*[[Genetic engineering]]
+
[[Category:Eugenics]]
 +
[[Category:Genetics]]
 +
[[Category:Racism]]
 +
[[Category:Pseudoscience]]
 +
[[Category:Philosophy]]
 +
[[Category:Liberalism]]
 +
[[Category:Progressivism]]

Latest revision as of 15:39, March 4, 2025

Logo of the Second International Congress of Eugenics, 1921.
Ohio Democrat and eugenicist Allen W. Thurman,[1] the son of segregationist and white supremacist U.S. senator Allen G. Thurman.

Eugenics was a progressive movement which tried to eliminate "dangerous human pests" and "the rising tide of imbeciles" through what has been euphemistically called "selective breeding." What this meant, in actual practice, was forced sterilization of American immigrants and minorities (particularly in California),[2] and then the promotion of abortion by liberal whites in black and Hispanic communities.

The Progressive Movement promoted birth control for eugenic purposes, and its association with the racist legacy of eugenics continues to this day.

Connection with the theory of evolution

The theory of evolution suggests that humans are merely evolving animals. The claimed biological struggle for survival that brought humans here is continuing. Man's long-term survival is, according to evolution, a biological survival of the fittest. Evolution theory teaches that there must be a biological struggle for survival among various human races and groups.

Charles Darwin declared in The Descent of Man:[3]

At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked,* will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilized state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.

Darwin was not the first to claim racial superiority. But he was the first to teach that some races of man "will almost certainly exterminate, and replace" other races of man. His followers developed a new intellectual field called "eugenics" for this mythical biological struggle.

In fact, the term "eugenics" was coined by Darwin's cousin, Francis Galton.[4]

Defenders of Darwin, and Darwinism, often try to argue that Darwin, and Darwinism, have no logical connection to eugenics at all. However, in a 1914 speech, Charles Darwin's son, Francis Darwin, wrote: "In the first edition of The Descent of Man, 1874, [my father] distinctly gives his adherence to the eugenic idea by his assertion that many might by selection do something for the moral and physical qualities of the race."[5] He based his ideas on his cousin's work.

Francis Darwin's clear statement that his father endorsed Galton's conception of eugenics is important because many people try to distance Darwin from the taint of eugenics by pointing out that Darwin himself never advocated for it by name. But Galton coined the word after Darwin's death, so naturally, he wouldn't have used the word 'eugenics.' Darwin's son can be expected to have understood his father's theory well enough to know whether or not his father's book, "The Descent of Man", 'gave adherence to the eugenic idea.'

Etymology and history

The word "eugenics" is based on Greek roots meaning "well-born." The Merriam-Webster dictionary provides 1883 as the date of origin for the term. Later, Darwin's son, Leonard, served as the president of the First Congress of Eugenics in 1912 in London.

The encyclopedia describes eugenics as now being "in disrepute,"[6] although Professor Peter Singer of Princeton University has sought to remove the stigma from it. Evolutionist and atheist Richard Dawkins has stated in one letter his wish that it no longer be banned from polite discussion.[7]

The Spartans in ancient Greece practiced a primitive form of eugenics, wherein babies which were judged to be too "weak" or "sickly" would be left to die.

In the early 1900s, many influential officials advocated Darwinism and eugenics. Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes became a strong proponent. So did many others in prominent government and academic positions. Members of the British Eugenics Society, including the International Planned Parenthood Federation, are listed.[8]

Eugenics in America

Categories

Between 1907 and 1937, 32 American states passed eugenics laws requiring sterilization of citizens deemed to be misfits, such as the mentally infirm. Oliver Wendell Holmes and all but one conservative Democratic Justice upheld such laws in a Supreme Court decision that included Holmes' offensive statement that "three generations of imbeciles are enough." Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200, 207 (1927).[9] In fact, the third generation "imbecile" was very bright but was declared by a eugenics "expert" as "supposed to be a mental defective," apparently without an examination.

Eugenics was taught as part of the evolution curriculum of many science classes in America in the early 1900s. For example, it was featured in the textbook used in the famous Scopes trial in 1925.

"By 1928, the American Genetics Association boasted that there were 376 college courses devoted exclusively to eugenics. High-school biology textbooks followed suit by the mid-1930s, with most containing material favorable to the idea of eugenic control of reproduction. It would thus have been difficult to be an even moderately educated reader in the 1920s or 1930s and not have known, at least in general terms, about the claims of eugenics."[10]

Important remnants of the evolution-eugenics approach exist today, in part because many of Justice Holmes' opinions are still controlling law. The very first quote in the infamous Roe v. Wade abortion decision is an unprincipled statement of Justice Holmes in a 1905 opinion. Indeed, Holmes once wrote favorably in a letter to a future Supreme Court Justice about "restricting propagation by the undesirables and putting to death infants that didn't pass the examination.[11]

Existing laws requiring students to receive controversial vaccines are based on a eugenics-era decision granting the State the power to forcibly vaccinate residents.[12] That decision, in fact, was the cited precedent for Justice Holmes' offensive "imbeciles" holding quoted above.

For the same reason that evolution teaching led to eugenics, evolution teaching today encourages acceptance of abortion and euthanasia. Under evolution theory, after all, we are merely animals fighting for biological survival.

Eugenics in Europe

German Darwinist Ernst Haeckel promoted evolution by drawing fraudulent pictures of humans embryos, to pretend that their developmental stages imitate a historical evolution of humans from other species.[note 1]

In 1904, Haeckel reiterated the view of Darwin quoted above: "These lower races … are psychologically nearer to the mammals (apes or dogs) than to civilized Europeans; we must, therefore, assign a totally different value to their lives." [13]

It wasn't long before intellectuals viewed war as an essential evolutionary process. Vom Heutigen Kriege, a popular book by Geberal Bernhardi, "expounded the thesis that war was a biological necessity and a convenient means of ridding the world of the unfit. These views were not confined to a lunatic fringe, but won wide acceptance especially among journalists, academics and politicians."[14] In America, Justice Holmes similarly wrote that "I always say that society is founded on the death of men - if you don't kill the weakest one way you kill them another."[15]

World War I entailed a brutality unknown in the history of mankind. Gregg Easterbrook, a senior editor of the liberal New Republic magazine, observed that "prior to the Scopes trial in 1925, William Jennings Bryan had been on a revival tour of Germany and had been horrified by the signs of incipient Nazism. Before this point, Bryan had been moderate in the evolution debate; for instance, he had lobbied the Florida legislature not to ban the teaching of Darwin, only to specify that evolution must be taught as a theory rather than a fact. But after hearing the National Socialists talk about the elimination of genetic inferiority, [historian Gary] Wills wrote, Bryan came to feel that evolutionary ideas had become dangerous; he began both to oppose and to lampoon them."

The march of evolution/eugenics continued unabated in Germany. By the 1920s, German textbooks were teaching evolution concepts of heredity and racial hygiene. The Kaiser Wilhelm Institute of Anthropology, Human Heredity, and Eugenics was founded in 1927.

In 1933, Germany passed the Law for the Protection of Heredity Health. Next was the Nazi sterilization law entitled "Eugenics in the service of public welfare." It required compulsory sterilization for the prevention of progeny with hereditary defects in cases including congenital mental defects, schizophrenia, manic-depressive psychosis, and hereditary epilepsy.

The German schools indoctrinated their students. In 1935, a German high-school math textbook included the following problem:[10] "… how much does it cost the state if:

a. 868 [mentally infirm] patients stay longer than 10 years?
b. 260 [mentally infirm] patients stay longer than 20 years?
c. 112 [mentally infirm] patients stay longer than 2 years?"

One German student was Josef Mengele, who studied anthropology and paleontology and received his Ph.D. for his thesis entitled "Racial Morphological Research on the Lower Jaw Section of Four Racial Groups." In 1937, Mengele was recommended for and received a position as a research assistant with the Third Reich Institute for Hereditary, Biology and Racial Purity at the University of Frankfort. He became the "Angel of Death" for directing the operation of gas chambers of the Holocaust and for conducting horrific medical experiments on inmates in pursuit of eugenics.

Genocide

The liberal American Medical Society provided this summary:[16]

"The publication of Darwin's Origin of Species in 1859 led to the rise of the eugenics movement in Europe. Eugenics supporters believed that races could be improved by selective breeding. The Nazi Party adopted this belief and began a campaign against the Jews. Many physicians joined the Nazi Party because they needed jobs."

Many genocides have been committed in the name of Eugenics, most notably the Holocaust. Adolf Hitler was a strong believer in eugenics and evolution and believed that Jewish people were closest to apes, followed by Africans, Asians, non-Aryan Europeans, and finally, Aryans, who he believed were most evolved.

Pat Milmoe McCarrick and Mary Carrington Coutts, reference librarians for the National Reference Center for Bioethics Literature at Georgetown University, were more succinct: "The Nazi racial hygiene program began with involuntary sterilizations and ended with genocide." [17]

American scientists and Nazi Germany

From The Nazi Connection:[18]

“ When Hitler published Mein Kampf in 1924, he held up a foreign law as a model for his program of racial purification: The U.S. Immigration Restriction Act of 1924, which prohibited the immigration of those with hereditary illnesses and entire ethnic groups. When the Nazis took power in 1933, they installed a program of eugenics—the attempted "improvement" of the population through forced sterilization and marriage controls—that consciously drew on the U.S. example. By then, many American states had long had compulsory sterilization laws for "defectives," upheld by the Supreme Court in 1927. Small wonder that the Nazi laws led one eugenics activist in Virginia to complain, "The Germans are beating us at our own game."

In The Nazi Connection, Stefan Kuhl uncovers the ties between the American eugenics movement and the Nazi program of racial hygiene, showing that many American scientists actively supported Hitler's policies. After introducing us to the recently resurgent problem of scientific racism, Kuhl carefully recounts the history of the eugenics movement, both in the United States and internationally, demonstrating how widely the idea of sterilization as a genetic control had become accepted by the early twentieth century. From the first, the American eugenicists led the way with radical ideas. Their influence led to sterilization laws in dozens of states—laws which were studied, and praised, by the German racial hygienists. With the rise of Hitler, the Germans enacted compulsory sterilization laws partly based on the U.S. experience, and American eugenists took pride in their influence on Nazi policies. Kuhl recreates astonishing scenes of American eugenicists traveling to Germany to study the new laws, publishing scholarly articles lionizing the Nazi eugenics program, and proudly comparing personal notes from Hitler thanking them for their books. Even after the outbreak of war, he writes, the American eugenicists frowned upon Hitler's totalitarian government, but not his sterilization laws. So deep was the failure to recognize the connection between eugenics and Hitler's genocidal policies, that a prominent liberal Jewish eugenicist who had been forced to flee Germany found it fit to grumble that the Nazis "took over our entire plan of eugenic measures."

By 1945, when the murderous nature of the Nazi government was made perfectly clear, the American eugenicists sought to downplay the close connections between themselves and the German program. Some of them, in fact, had sought to distance themselves from Hitler even before the war. But Stefan Kuhl's deeply documented book provides a devastating indictment of the influence—and aid—provided by American scientists for the most comprehensive attempt to enforce racial purity in world history.

”

Liberal eugenics

Some argue that parents who abort infants with a genetic mutation or other disabilities are practicing a form of eugenics.[19] Some doctors and scientists have defended this practice and named it "liberal eugenics" in order to differentiate it from traditional forms of eugenics such as Nazi eugenics.[20] Eugenicists in the United States and elsewhere have been known to employ or advocate abortion as a method of eugenics.

Eugenics in film

In the 2006 satirical comedy Idiocracy, the entire movie is premised on the idea that the out-breeding of the stupid over the intelligent will lead to a uniformly stupid world run by advertisers, marketers, and anti-intellectualism.

See also

Note

  1. ↑ See Haeckel diagrams. These fraudulent drawings remain a part of American textbooks and were only exposed a century later as false by the New York Times.

References

  1. ↑ September 26, 1912. Predicting Ohio's Bankruptcy. The New York Times. Retrieved October 8, 2021.
  2. ↑ Crichton, Michael (2004). "Why politicized science is dangerous". Excerpt from State of Fear (New York: Harper). Retrieved from March 15, 2007 archive of MichaelCrichton.com at Internet Archive on September 17, 2014.
  3. ↑ Darwin, Charles (1901). "Chapter 1". The Descent of Man (London: John Murray), pp. 241-42 (footnote * is a reference to Anthropological Review, April, 1867, p. 236).
  4. ↑ Multiple references:
  5. ↑ Francis Darwin (1914). "The Galton Lecture, as found in The Eugenics Review." Retrieved August 11, 2015 from http://www.eugenics.us.
  6. ↑ "Eugenics" (Oct. 2001 or bef.). Retrieved from Funk and Wagnall's website at Internet Archive.
  7. ↑ Dawkins, Richard (November 19, 2006). "Eugenics may not be bad". Sunday Herald [Scotland]. Retrieved from January 13, 2009 archive at Internet Archive on September 24, 2014.
  8. ↑ "British Eugenics Society" (1997). Eugenics Watch. Retrieved from August 1, 1997 archive at Internet Archive on September 24, 2014.
  9. ↑ United States Supreme Court (May 2, 1927). "Buck v. Bell", 274 U.S. 200, 207. Retrieved from FindLaw on September 24, 2014.
  10. ↑ 10.0 10.1 See Allen, Garland E. (August–September 1996). "Science misapplied: the eugenics age revisited". Technology Review, vol. 99, no. 6, at p. 22(10).
  11. ↑ Holmes, Oliver Wendell, Jr. (September 3, 1921). "Letter to Felix Frankfurter". For a detailed criticism of Justice Holmes' judicial Darwinism, see Professor Albert W. Alschuler's Law Without Values: The Life, Work, and Legacy of Justice Holmes (Univ. of Chicago Press 2000).
  12. ↑ United States Supreme Court (February 20, 1905). "Jacobson v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts", 197 U.S. 11. Retrieved from FindLaw on September 25, 2014.
  13. ↑ Haeckel, Ernst (1904). The Wonders of Life (New York: Harper), pp. 56-57.
  14. ↑ Carr, William (October 1991). A History of Germany 1815-1990 (London: Bloomsbury), 4th ed., p. 205.
  15. ↑ Holmes, Oliver Wendell, Jr. (February 26, 1922). "Letter to Sir Frederick Pollock".
  16. ↑ Barondess, Jeremiah A. (November 27, 1996). "Medicine against society: lessons from the Third Reich". The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 276, no. 20, p. 1657(5).
  17. ↑ McCarrick, Pat Milmoe and Coutts, Mary Carrington et al. (June 1995). "Introduction". Eugenics, Scope Note series, no. 28. Georgetown University/The Joseph and Rose Kennedy Institute of Ethics/National Reference Center for Bioethics Literature website. Retrieved from October 13, 2004 archive at Internet Archive on September 18, 2014.
  18. ↑ Kühl, Stefan (2002). The Nazi Connection: Eugenics, American Racism, and German National Socialism [preview] (Oxford: Oxford University Press). Preview retrieved from GoogleBooks on September 25, 2014.
  19. ↑ Kristof, Nicholas D. (July 4, 2003). "The new eugenics". The New York Times. Reprinted at CNN.com International/U. S. webpage. Retrieved on September 18, 2014.
  20. ↑ Hauskeller, Michael (November 2, 2005). "Review of Liberal Eugenics: In Defence of Human Enhancement", Agar, Nicholas (2004, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing). Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. Retrieved on September 25, 2014.