Essay:Vaccine Statistics Concerning Women
Vaccine Statistics Concerning Women
By Nancy Thorner
Girls are born with all the eggs they will ever have. Does the shot damage them? That is not really known.
HealthImpact told us a few months ago, citing from the National Vaccine Information Center, that “There have been 2,433 fetal deaths recorded in VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) from pregnant women who have been injected with one of the COVID-19 shots. The vast majority of these have been from the Pfizer shot (1,862 deaths), and the Moderna shot (656 deaths.) There have been more fetal deaths in the past 11 months following COVID-19 shots than there have been for the past 30+ years following ALL vaccines.
That total, per MedAlerts.org, was updated on Dec. 24, 2021, and found 5,258 cases of some type of abortion, ectopic pregnancy, stillbirth, or the like.
Recall that historically, all other vaccines have had a black box warning at five deaths, and pulled from the market at 50. What gives? Perhaps it's just some mere depopulation agenda… all, of course, for the “greater good.” (Most genocides always use that “greater good” gambit, from Kim Il Sung to Pol Pot to Stalin to Hitler… and now it appears the same “logic” is coming from our modern Spartiate leaders.)
Abortion numbers
Impact on fertility is a big driver in the whole equation. October 2021, the New England Journal of Medicine admitted in Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons that the study used to justify the CDC and FDA in recommending the shots to pregnant women was flawed. These findings were corroborated in a New Zealand study, Spontaneous Abortions and Policies on COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Use During Pregnancy, which showed a cumulative incidence of spontaneous abortion ranging from 82% (104/127) to 91% (104/114), 7–8 times higher than the original authors’ results.
Even with these numbers, the shots are still deemed “safe and effective. After all, “only” perhaps “82% to 91% of pregnant women will suffer miscarriages if their unborn child is less than 20 weeks old” per the New Zealand study. And, of course, breastfeeding babies are dying and becoming sick following mothers’ COVID shots in massive numbers.
Miscarriage and stillbirth data from Nov. 12, 2021, showed there were 2,620 cases of fetal death or stillbirth among women who received a COVID-19 injection reported to the VAERS, which is reported to capture only 1 – 10% of actual issues.
Health Impact News ran the same VAERS search, but this time excluded COVID-19 injections — to look for fetal deaths in women who had been vaccinated with any vaccine other than a COVID-19 jab over the last 30+ years.
Here’s what Brian Shilhavy reported in his article entitled 2,620 Dead Babies in VAERS After COVID Shots – More Fetal Deaths in 11 Months than Past 30 Years Following ALL Vaccines as Scotland Begins Investigation.
We are currently on pace to see a yearly total of 2,838 recorded fetal deaths following COVID-19 shots, while the yearly average of recorded fetal deaths following the vaccination of pregnant women for the past 30 years has been an average of 74 fetal deaths per year.
Mr. Shilhavy also adds that in shot-happy Scotland, as reported here by BBC, an unusual rise in infant death rates had been experienced. During September 2021, at least 21 babies under 4 weeks old died — a rate of 4.9 per 1,000 births. The average death rate among newborns in Scotland is about 2 per 1,000 births.
Public Health Scotland (PHS), which is investigating the deaths, stated in the BBC article: Exceeding the upper control limit indicates there is a higher likelihood that there are factors beyond random variation that may have contributed to the number of deaths,” adding that there was “currently no indication of links between these deaths and Covid-19 infection.
Janci Chunn Lindsay: Molecular Biologist on the Shot and Fertility
Janci Chunn Lindsay, Ph.D., a molecular biologist, and toxicologist, in discussing ovaries, female reproductive issues, etc., is concerned that the COVID jabs will cross-react with syncytin (a retroviral envelope protein) and reproductive genes in sperm, ova, and placenta in ways that may impair fertility and reproductive outcomes… not to mention that important animal studies that help ascertain toxic and systemic effects were not done. https://justicetruthnews.com/2021/12/05/toxicologist-warns-against-covid-jabs/
At present, not a single study has disproven the syncytin hypothesis. Preliminary safety results of mRNA COVID shots used in pregnant women, published in April 2021, revealed an 82% miscarriage rate when the jab was administered during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy.
Note that Lindsay is the one who helped develop a contraceptive vaccine in the 1990s that ended up causing unintended autoimmune destruction and sterility in animals which, despite careful pre-analysis, had not been predicted. Lindsay says about that: We were developing what was meant to be a temporary contraceptive vaccine, which was very attractive because it prevented fertilization rather than preventing implantation — or it should have; that was the idea. Unfortunately, even though quite a bit of analysis was done in different animal models to make sure that it did not have an autoimmune action, it did end up having an autoimmune action and caused complete ovarian destruction.
Another theory Lindsay discusses is how the Covid injections might impair fertility can be found in a 2006 study at Research Gate, which showed sperm can take up foreign mRNA, convert it into DNA, and release it as little pellets (plasmids) in the medium around the fertilized egg. The embryo then takes up these plasmids and carries them (sustains and clones them into many of the daughter cells) throughout its life, even passing them on to future generations. It’s possible that the pseudo-exosomes that are the mRNA contents would be perfect for supplying the sperm with mRNA for the spike protein. So, potentially, a vaccinated woman who gets pregnant with an embryo that can (via the sperms’ plasmids) synthesize the spike protein according to the instructions in the vaccine, would have an immune capacity to attack that embryo because of the “foreign” protein it displays on its cells. This then would cause a miscarriage.
We could potentially be sterilizing an entire generation, Lindsey warned, all to stop a virus that has close to zero mortality in young women.
Lindsay further warns that the fact that there have been live births following COVID-19 vaccination is not proof that these injections do not have a reproductive effect. Menstrual irregularities and vaginal hemorrhaging in women who have received the injections number in the thousands, and this too hints at reproductive effects.
Mercola also cites the preliminary safety results of mRNA COVID shots used in pregnant women, based on data from the V-Safe Registry, published in The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) in April 2021. According to this paper, the miscarriage rate within the first 20 weeks of pregnancy was 12.5%, which is only slightly above the normal average of 10%.
Medical News Today says the risk of miscarriage drops from an average risk rate of 21.3% for the duration of the pregnancy as a whole to just 5% between Weeks 6 and 7, all the way down to 1% between Weeks 14 and 20.) However, much like counting votes in Arizona’s last election, there’s a problem with this calculation, as highlighted by Drs. Ira Bernstein and Sanja Jovanovic. In a May 28, 2021, letter to the editor, they pointed out that:
In table 4, the authors report a rate of spontaneous abortions <20 weeks (SA) of 12.5% (104 abortions/827 completed pregnancies). However, this rate should be based on the number of women who were at risk of an SA due to vaccine receipt and should exclude the 700 women who were vaccinated in their third trimester (104/127 = 82%).
Thus, say, Bernstein and Jovanovic, if you exclude women who got the shot in their third trimester (since the third trimester is after week 20 and therefore should not be counted when determining miscarriage rate among those injected before week 20), the miscarriage rate is a whopping 82%. Of those 104 miscarriages, 96 of them occurred before 13 weeks of gestation, which strongly suggests that getting a COVID shot during the first trimester is an absolute recipe for disaster.
Lindsay summarizes the legerdemain of the vax happy nuts ( 2006 study at Research Gate ): They concluded, very fraudulently, in my estimation, that it was safe to vaccinate in the third trimester, and said nothing about the clear safety signal in the first trimester. It’s just so dishonest, so purposefully manipulative.
As for the women who get the shot in their third trimester, Lindsay warns there’s still no telling what the ramifications might be in the long term.
We just don’t know, and that’s the problem. There are all kinds of things that can go wrong with these types of therapies and have gone wrong in animal models. We don’t know what will happen in the future for these women or for their children. This could be passed on. We’re now seeing a lot of mention of constitutive expression, whether that’s a failure of the mRNA to degrade or integration into the genome. That’s still being investigated.
Population control?
Are the shots a population control subterfuge? Lindsay says: I certainly think that to discount that it is a form of population-wide contraceptive would be naïve.
There’s a paper that came out in 2005. It’s called ‘Evaluation of Fusogenic Trophoblast Surface Epitopes as Targets for Immune Contraception.’ This paper tried to find contraceptive peptides in persons that had infertility problems already that were isolated to placentation. So, it was taking a backwards approach, getting the sera from people who had fertility problems and trying to see what they had antibodies to that was causing the fertility problems …This work was sponsored by the WHO and the Rockefeller Foundation [and the National Institutes of Health]. No surprise there. It was then picked up by a company called AplaGen that took it to patent in 2007.
These are 12-mer peptides, and there’s a series of eight of them that can be used to induce sterility. When they patented it, they also said that it could be used to ameliorate sterility.
Interestingly, it was also associated with all of the things that we know syncytin is associated with, — lupus, skeletal muscle disorders, bipolar depression [and] a number of other things. Even though they don’t name syncytin proteins as the proteins that are targeted, they worked backwards from these peptides, and then said they were a series of other proteins. Sometimes we know that proteins can be called the same thing in different discovery realms.
What the 2002 paper really points out is that there were efforts to use peptides or immunocontraceptive means at the placental trophoblast interface to cause sterilization … So, it would be naïve to think that this was not on the plate for future use.”
How long does the shot lasts in young women
Simply put, we still don’t really know. Lindsay says the mRNA is very fragile, which is why a nano lipid with a polyethylene glycol delivery system is used. https://justicetruthnews.com/2021/12/05/toxicologist-warns-against-covid-jabs/
In addition, about 30% of the mRNA has been genetically modified to decrease degradation. As a result, the mRNA being injected is magnitudes sturdier than natural mRNA. What’s more, the nanoliposomes allow for superior penetration into tissues. We now know it spreads throughout your body, including a woman's uterus. It doesn’t stay in your deltoid. However, how long this modified and stabilized mRNA remains viable is still unknown.
A corollary question is whether this mRNA might be integrated into your genome to become a permanent fixture. Per Lindsay: The answer is, we don’t know for sure. Of course, with the adenoviral vector vaccines [Janssen and AstraZeneca], they’re more prone to integration into the genome. We know that from animal studies and past experiments. https://justicetruthnews.com/2021/12/05/toxicologist-warns-against-covid-jabs/
With the mRNA technology, we’ve never stabilized something like this in this manner. What we do know is that recent studies have come out — Bruce Patterson’s group and another group — both came out with the finding that the spike protein is being expressed, [it’s] present on monocytes, as far out as from the time that the people were given the gene therapy. So, that gives us an indication that it is resistant, for sure, to degradation. The longer it stays around, and is resistant to degradation, the more likely that genomic integration events can occur. But I don’t know the answer to whether or not it will become a permanent feature.”
Vaccines as treatments
Lindsay then adds, “If all these gene therapies do is lessen the diseases, then they’re not a vaccine; they are a treatment. You have to use your common sense to say, why wouldn’t I use a treatment that has been known to be safe over 70 years as opposed to one that is brand-new, that is experimental? https://justicetruthnews.com/2021/12/05/toxicologist-warns-against-covid-jabs/
"Because of the rabid vitriol, the 'Hate has no home here' yard sign types have, even to the point of letting tens of thousands die from lack of access to hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin, all to indulge in their media orgy of hate. https://justicetruthnews.com/2021/12/05/toxicologist-warns-against-covid-jabs/
"All of this, for what again? The risk of a pregnant mother dying from Covid? Probably around 0.01% (and less than that if the mother would simply optimize her vitamin D, get off seed oils, exercise, and eliminate sugar and processed foods)."
Lindsay concludes: Many scientists and physicians feel as I do, and are trying to figure out where we go from here, because our typical safety and regulatory agencies have been compromised. We need to stand together as one people and say we’re not going to accept this, especially not for our children, and try to get to the bottom of this and see what’s really behind all these efforts. Is it really about a virus, or is it more about other political motivations and campaigns, as it seems to be?
Why take the risk for basically zero benefit?
Well, here’s one reason: Woman 5 Months Pregnant, I Face Losing My Job, And Healthcare For Not Vaxxing.
Truth is, there is simply no human face, no human dignity, and no compassion with the vax police state for us poor, unwashed masses in flyover country… and they never intended for there to be. Just ask the Australians and the Kiwis. Or ask the Helots in Sparta.
Post Script
As you can see, there are major concerns relative to fertility. And we are just seeing the tip of this catastrophe, with more to come.
Before that dear young woman you know gets another shot, they may want to look at Lifesite News, which has an utterly damning report on miscarriages in their Dec 23, 2021 report, also reported by GreenmedInfo here cited DIRECTLY from From Pfizer’s own data, where a judge ruled that the FDA and Pfizer would have to answer their FOIA requests.
Among the first reports handed over by Pfizer was THEIR OWN “Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports” describing events reported to Pfizer up until February 2021. Read Pfizer in its OWN study.