Difference between revisions of "Liberal logic"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(does hypocrisy count?) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Liberal logic''' is an argument by [[liberal]]s that is deceptively attractive to some, but is actually nonsensical. Here are some examples: | '''Liberal logic''' is an argument by [[liberal]]s that is deceptively attractive to some, but is actually nonsensical. Here are some examples: | ||
| + | #claiming that their viewpoints are being censored, while actually they are the ones censoring their opponents | ||
# frequent reliance on [[circular reasoning]], as in demanding censorship of [[intelligent design]] while simultaneously citing the resulting silence as proof against it<ref>See, e.g., [[Richard Sternberg]].</ref> | # frequent reliance on [[circular reasoning]], as in demanding censorship of [[intelligent design]] while simultaneously citing the resulting silence as proof against it<ref>See, e.g., [[Richard Sternberg]].</ref> | ||
# insisting that someone needs to experience something (e.g., drugs, pornography, gambling, etc.) before being able to criticize it | # insisting that someone needs to experience something (e.g., drugs, pornography, gambling, etc.) before being able to criticize it | ||
Revision as of 13:50, November 21, 2008
Liberal logic is an argument by liberals that is deceptively attractive to some, but is actually nonsensical. Here are some examples:
- claiming that their viewpoints are being censored, while actually they are the ones censoring their opponents
- frequent reliance on circular reasoning, as in demanding censorship of intelligent design while simultaneously citing the resulting silence as proof against it[1]
- insisting that someone needs to experience something (e.g., drugs, pornography, gambling, etc.) before being able to criticize it
- personal experience dictates personal views, rather than rising above bad and/or unusual experiences and basing one's views on logic
- claim that switching from heterosexual to homosexual is customary, but switching back is somehow impossible
- criticize Christians for literal interpretations of Genesis, but then insist on even more literal interpretations when it suits the liberal ideology[2]
- insisting that the Bible literally prohibits judging anything.
- no matter what happens in the weather, global warming caused it
- belief that a correlation and/or causation (e.g., between atheism and suicide) can be disproved by a counterexample (e.g., one atheist who remained sane)
- often a liberal responds to a logical comment or question with an (illogical) expression of personal like or dislike, as in "but I like it!"
- never admit shame for liberal behavior, but often tell others they should be ashamed of themselves
- Americans should "move on" past the misconduct of Bill Clinton and Ted Kennedy, but should dig up as much old dirt as possible about John McCain
- if [highly implausible assumption like "embryonic stem cell research will find the cure for paralysis"], then would you support it (without any consideration of alternatives)?
- Barack Obama on Afghanistan: with fewer soldiers, we didn't have enough ammo and humvees![3]
- free speech for anything and everything ... except the conservative truth, and religion.
- insisting on "tolerance" for anything that is anti-Christian, while censorship for anything is Christian
- Hollywood promotion of abortion is welcomed, but views of Hollywood actresses towards their own children are concealed
- carrying an unborn child to birth reduces risk of breast cancer, but choosing abortion rather than childbirth somehow does not increase the relative risk
- requesting increased spending by government to reduce poverty, when actually poverty is increased by the dependency
- claiming that an atheistic culture cannot harm anyone, but also insisting that classroom prayer can cause harm
- claiming that teaching abstinence does not reduce premarital sex and associated disease.[4]
- claiming that premarital sex is fine
- claiming that increasing taxes must increase government revenue,[5] when often people just work less and revenues then decline
- denying that widespread ownership of guns, largely defensive weapons, can reduce crime
- Even though the Supreme Court overrules precedents every year by 5-4 votes, Roe v. Wade cannot be overruled, or can only be overruled if it is a unanimous 9-0 vote (this argument tries to make irreversible law out of the dicta in a weak majority opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, even though the very creation of that "secret opinion" was procured by liberal deceit.)[6]
- The pronoun "he" has been used to include men and women collectively for centuries, but liberals find that illogical today.
- Getting rid of a sadistic dictator by going into Iraq was wrong but stepping into Sudan is not.
- The United Nations is better suited to judge and direct a country's actions rather than the country itself.
- It is a right to dissent against American policy but never take a stand if that logic moves beyond dissent and becomes treason.
- The wondrous, pristine national park of ANWR needs protection to keep its' beauty. Though, it is but a remote barren tundra that few visit. [7]
- It's not fair to the world that America keeps the thermostat at 72 degrees at all times. [8]
- It is ok to demean an African-American if they are a conservative, if they are a liberal then you are a racist.
- It is okay to demean a woman if they are a conservative, but if they are liberal then you are sexist.
See also
- Liberal
- Liberal bias
- Liberal hysteria
- Liberal hate speech
- Liberal style
- Liberal denial
- Liberal obfuscation
- Liberal quotient
- Liberal friendship
References
- ↑ See, e.g., Richard Sternberg.
- ↑ For example, liberals here insist that homeschooling can only mean being taught while in someone's own home.
- ↑ [1]
- ↑ http://media.www.mustangdaily.net/media/storage/paper860/news/2007/04/10/LettersToTheEditor/Teaching.AbstinenceOnly.Unrealistic-2831363.shtml
- ↑ http://capwiz.com/acu/issues/alert/?alertid=11534766
- ↑ See Jeffrey Toobin's The Nine.
- ↑ ANWR's Place In Our Energy Picture Townhall.com, July 24, 2008
- ↑ Freedom and the View From Obamaland American Spectator, July 1, 2008