Difference between revisions of "Liberal logic"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(break one point into two)
(reinstate ferno's good edits which were reverted)
Line 19: Line 19:
 
# carrying an unborn child to birth reduces risk of breast cancer, but choosing [[abortion]] rather than childbirth somehow does not increase the relative risk
 
# carrying an unborn child to birth reduces risk of breast cancer, but choosing [[abortion]] rather than childbirth somehow does not increase the relative risk
 
# requesting increased spending by [[government]] to reduce poverty, when actually poverty is increased by the dependency
 
# requesting increased spending by [[government]] to reduce poverty, when actually poverty is increased by the dependency
−
# insisting that an [[atheistic]] culture cannot harm anyone, but also insisting that classroom prayer can cause harm
+
# claiming that an [[atheistic]] culture cannot harm anyone, but also insisting that classroom prayer can cause harm
−
# insisting that teaching [[abstinence]] does not reduce premarital sex and associated disease
+
# claiming that teaching [[abstinence]] does not reduce premarital sex and associated disease.<ref>http://media.www.mustangdaily.net/media/storage/paper860/news/2007/04/10/LettersToTheEditor/Teaching.AbstinenceOnly.Unrealistic-2831363.shtml</ref>
−
# insisting that premarital sex is fine
+
# claiming that premarital sex is fine
−
# insisting that increasing taxes must increase government revenue, when often people just work less and revenues then decline
+
# claiming that increasing taxes must increase government revenue,<ref>http://capwiz.com/acu/issues/alert/?alertid=11534766</ref> when often people just work less and revenues then decline
 
# denying that widespread ownership of guns, largely defensive weapons, can reduce crime
 
# denying that widespread ownership of guns, largely defensive weapons, can reduce crime
 
# Even though the [[Supreme Court]] overrules precedents every year by 5-4 votes, [[Roe v. Wade]] cannot be overruled, or can only be overruled if it is a unanimous 9-0 vote (this argument tries to make irreversible law out of the dicta in a weak majority opinion in ''[[Planned Parenthood v. Casey]]'', even though the very creation of that "secret opinion" was procured by [[liberal deceit]].)<ref>See Jeffrey Toobin's ''The Nine''.</ref>
 
# Even though the [[Supreme Court]] overrules precedents every year by 5-4 votes, [[Roe v. Wade]] cannot be overruled, or can only be overruled if it is a unanimous 9-0 vote (this argument tries to make irreversible law out of the dicta in a weak majority opinion in ''[[Planned Parenthood v. Casey]]'', even though the very creation of that "secret opinion" was procured by [[liberal deceit]].)<ref>See Jeffrey Toobin's ''The Nine''.</ref>
−
# The pronoun "he" has been used to include men and women collectively for centuries, but [[liberals]] find that illogical today. This does not mean to replace the word 'she' on the article for Hillary Clinton with 'he'.
+
# The pronoun "he" has been used to include men and women collectively for centuries, but [[liberals]] find that illogical today.
 
# Getting rid of a sadistic dictator by going into [[Iraq]] was wrong but stepping into [[Sudan]] is not.  
 
# Getting rid of a sadistic dictator by going into [[Iraq]] was wrong but stepping into [[Sudan]] is not.  
 
# The [[United Nations]] is better suited to judge and direct a country's actions rather than the country itself.
 
# The [[United Nations]] is better suited to judge and direct a country's actions rather than the country itself.

Revision as of 02:25, November 16, 2008

Liberal logic is an argument by liberals that is deceptively attractive to some, but is actually nonsensical. Here are some examples:

  1. frequent reliance on circular reasoning, as in demanding censorship of intelligent design while simultaneously citing the resulting silence as proof against it[1]
  2. insisting that someone needs to experience something (e.g., drugs, pornography, gambling, etc.) before being able to criticize it
  3. personal experience dictates personal views, rather than rising above bad and/or unusual experiences and basing one's views on logic
  4. claim that switching from heterosexual to homosexual is customary, but switching back is somehow impossible
  5. criticize Christians for literal interpretations of Genesis, but then insist on even more literal interpretations when it suits the liberal ideology[2]
  6. insisting that the Bible literally prohibits judging anything.
  7. no matter what happens in the weather, global warming caused it
  8. belief that a correlation and/or causation (e.g., between atheism and suicide) can be disproved by a counterexample (e.g., one atheist who remained sane)
  9. often a liberal responds to a logical comment or question with an (illogical) expression of personal like or dislike, as in "but I like it!"
  10. never admit shame for liberal behavior, but often tell others they should be ashamed of themselves
  11. Americans should "move on" past the misconduct of Bill Clinton and Ted Kennedy, but should dig up as much old dirt as possible about John McCain
  12. if [highly implausible assumption like "embryonic stem cell research will find the cure for paralysis"], then would you support it (without any consideration of alternatives)?
  13. Barack Obama on Afghanistan: with fewer soldiers, we didn't have enough ammo and humvees![3]
  14. free speech for anything and everything ... except the conservative truth, and religion.
  15. insisting on "tolerance" for anything that is anti-Christian, while censorship for anything is Christian
  16. Hollywood promotion of abortion is welcomed, but views of Hollywood actresses towards their own children are concealed
  17. carrying an unborn child to birth reduces risk of breast cancer, but choosing abortion rather than childbirth somehow does not increase the relative risk
  18. requesting increased spending by government to reduce poverty, when actually poverty is increased by the dependency
  19. claiming that an atheistic culture cannot harm anyone, but also insisting that classroom prayer can cause harm
  20. claiming that teaching abstinence does not reduce premarital sex and associated disease.[4]
  21. claiming that premarital sex is fine
  22. claiming that increasing taxes must increase government revenue,[5] when often people just work less and revenues then decline
  23. denying that widespread ownership of guns, largely defensive weapons, can reduce crime
  24. Even though the Supreme Court overrules precedents every year by 5-4 votes, Roe v. Wade cannot be overruled, or can only be overruled if it is a unanimous 9-0 vote (this argument tries to make irreversible law out of the dicta in a weak majority opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, even though the very creation of that "secret opinion" was procured by liberal deceit.)[6]
  25. The pronoun "he" has been used to include men and women collectively for centuries, but liberals find that illogical today.
  26. Getting rid of a sadistic dictator by going into Iraq was wrong but stepping into Sudan is not.
  27. The United Nations is better suited to judge and direct a country's actions rather than the country itself.
  28. It is a right to dissent against American policy but never take a stand if that logic moves beyond dissent and becomes treason.
  29. The wondrous, pristine national park of ANWR needs protection to keep its' beauty. Though, it is but a remote barren tundra that few visit. [7]
  30. It's not fair to the world that America keeps the thermostat at 72 degrees at all times. [8]
  31. It is ok to demean an African-American if they are a conservative, if they are a liberal then you are a racist.

See also

References