User talk:Aschlafly

Please impose a topic ban on User:Conservative's foreign policy and defense related contributions, at least through 2024 primary election season. His deliberate CP:Trolling, "employing redundant arguments intended to occupy and waste the time, efforts, or energies of other users or to distract them from productive editing and making mainspace article contributions" occupies a minimum of 3 hours, and sometimes as much as 6-8 hours of my time DAILY, prohibiting me from making substantive contributions on election and foreign policy matters.

User:Conservative has stated on dozens of occasions, over many years, that he has no interest in politics, and has repeatedly violated his own pledges to cease contributing on those subjects. His contributions are solely and specifically intended to irritate and waste the time of other editors, a violation of CP Commandments and Guidelines.

I have no objection to him contributing on election matters, where he can spew his neocon racist content to his heart's content. Thank you. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 17:27, December 28, 2023 (EST)

Andy told you on your talk page: "...I think there should be more leeway for strong editors to create essays and categorize them as they think best. That includes you too. Essays are a valuable part of this website (in contrast with the tyranny at Wikipedia which prohibits them). The essay author is easily identified from the entry history.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 21:26, December 22, 2023 (EST)"

Andy likes that I create essays (including political essays) - some of which have tens of thousands or thousands of page views. Conservative (talk) 17:43, December 28, 2023 (EST)

I have evidence that you are running a bot on some of your trolling Essays to rack up page views. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 17:47, December 28, 2023 (EST)

Disagreeing with you is not trolling. This is not RobSmithPedia. You are not infallible and you are not God. Conservative (talk) 17:52, December 28, 2023 (EST)

(ec) Note: You do not dispute the allegation that you are contributing "neocon racist content" to Conservapedia. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 17:47, December 28, 2023 (EST)

Let's examine this edit today User:Conservative calls "motivational": "The only way we can compete with the Eastern Bloc...". The "Eastern Bloc" was a political and military alliance that ceased to exist in 1991. The ideology of the "Eastern Bloc" - communism - was defeated by the Russian Orthodox Church in 1991, yet User:Conservative created another Russophobic cut n paste screed this morning based upon highly dubious, racist, and neocon sources with false, inflammatory, and exaggerated information.

One can only assume User:Conservative is "motivated" by the same racial fear and disdain for the "Slavic hordes" of Eastern Europe that his sources broadcast.RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 18:14, December 28, 2023 (EST)

Conservapedia Essay space should not be a platform for Liberal fascism, and that is all User:Conservative's Geopolitical Essays amount to, not based upon any knowledge or expertise in the area, but rather motivated by spite and a personal vendetta toward another editor. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 13:03, December 29, 2023 (EST)

Andy, Please instruct the trolling Admin to cease and desist. Thank you. [2] RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 15:33, February 27, 2024 (EST)

Can you explain what happened with User:BHathorn as far as his recent blocking spree and apparent vandalism of templates?

It seems puzzling given his past editing. He appears to be a longstanding good-faith editor. Maybe if you have the time to look at his past edits that will explain things.

I have a deadline to meet so I don't have time to investigate matters. But via email I did ask you to look into things. Conservative (talk) 07:54, January 4, 2024 (EST)

Please finish the unblocking of people. I did as much unblocking as I could do. Conservative (talk) 07:56, January 4, 2024 (EST)

I am guessing that his password was hacked. I will let you come up with the best solution to solve this issue. User: PeterKa blocked him for a year. I changed the block to 3 days so that gives you time to come up with a solution. I also gave User:BHathorn my Conservapedia email address on his talk page. Conservative (talk) 09:43, January 4, 2024 (EST)

P.S. The User: Conservative account password is unhackable. Rest assured that no hacker will ever hack it! The odds of the dead atheist movement resurrecting is likelier and that is nearly impossible! Conservative (talk) 10:01, January 4, 2024 (EST)

It appears as if there was a hacker who hacked into User:BHathorn's account. The hacker appears to be from a northern state in the USA. I am awaiting hearing a reply from User:BHathorn. Conservative (talk) 10:27, January 4, 2024 (EST)

I unblocked User:BHathorn. He was hacked and he changed his password. I confirmed that the new IP address was from the right editor. Conservative (talk) 10:51, January 4, 2024 (EST)

Not a problem. Unfortunately, I was in bed asleep at the time that hacker/vandal managed to seize control of BHathorn's account to go on that vandalism/blocking spree so I didn't get to catch it as it happened, but I did manage to unblock the accounts that had not already been unblocked (including your own) after getting blocked during the vandalism spree. As to the templates that got vandalized (via the vandal putting up that fake message at the top of the page in such a way as to block access to the editing tools as well as the view of the templates themselves), I think those edits should be oversighted to prevent their being shown in the editing history (if I were able to do oversighting myself on those edits, I would, but I don't have Oversight user rights). Northwest (talk) 02:25, January 5, 2024 (EST)

Tremendous work, Northwest, thank you! Oversighting is a great idea for this at a convenient time.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 02:55, January 5, 2024 (EST)

Hello Mr. Schlafly,

I am wondering if I could declare Lindsey Graham RINO of the Year. I created the page late this year and there has not been much discussion. However, Lindsey Graham was suggested as being a good pick for RINO of the Year. I hope you had a wonderful Christmas and New Year!

Thank you!--TheNewRight (talk) 23:08, January 5, 2024 (EST)

Yes, terrific choice for the winner of this ignominious award! Please post!--Andy Schlafly (talk) 23:59, January 5, 2024 (EST)

TheNewRight, I've checked your contribution history. Since the article's creation on Monday, you have made zero effort to reach out to other editors and make sure they at least knew about the article's existence. That's why there hasn't been much discussion. Until now, nobody except you knew about the article's existence.

Now that I myself know about of the article's existence, I will be making my own contributions to the article sometime this weekend. In the meantime, I strongly suggest you start promoting the article on the main talk page so other editors have an opportunity to contribute as well.--Geopolitician (talk) 01:34, January 6, 2024 (EST)

Is there a reason Sodomy doesn't simply redirect to Sodom? Cazle (talk) 17:09, January 11, 2024 (EST)

Fixed.

User: Cazle, thank for the input. In the future, don't be reticent to take the initiative and fix Conservapedia shortcomings yourself. Conservative (talk) 17:28, January 11, 2024 (EST)

I couldn't, I don't have the necessary permissions. Cazle (talk) 17:33, January 11, 2024 (EST)

Thank you. Cazle (talk) 17:34, January 11, 2024 (EST)

Andy, please give the User:BHathorn2 account SkipCaptcha ‎permission.

I appreciate you giving the User:BHathorn this permission, but I actually wanted it for the User:BHathorn2 account. Conservative (talk) 02:35, January 12, 2024 (EST)

I did this correctly as requested, thanks.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 02:57, January 12, 2024 (EST)

I got my new glasses, but I need to get them fixed. I am awaiting to getting this issue fixed. Bear with me in the meantime! Conservative (talk) 03:02, January 12, 2024 (EST)

Please give NishantXavier picture upload rights. I gave him some coaching on the licensing/posting issue.

In addition, I will look at some of the pictures he posts to make sure he is doing things right.

Also, I gave him various sources of public domain pictures and Creative Commons type pictures on his user talk pages so he should be able to find lot of pictures. Conservative (talk) 22:25, January 15, 2024 (EST)

I created a number of very constructive and useful articles and the articles can be seen at:

• Essay: Achievement related articles

Andy, User:Conservative is being deceptive right here: I am the editor who had to move this "article" into Essay space. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 07:45, January 21, 2024 (EST)

User:Conservative seems to approve of my improvements. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 07:50, January 21, 2024 (EST)

I did it because there is a war on meritocracy and achievement by liberals and leftists.

Now RobSmith has gone on a temper tantrum and is vandalizing these articles.

I think I need your assistance.

I will call you today about this matter. Conservative (talk) 07:28, January 21, 2024 (EST)

The articles/Essay's are non-collaborative, and the editor refuses to discuss his contributions, despite the fact that the articles/Essays are all about collaboration and teamwork. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 07:31, January 21, 2024 (EST)

He is in fact building more algorithms aimed at suppressing other editor's contributions. Duplicity and maliciousness seem to be his two personal star personal accomplishments - while refusing offers to discuss and collaborate. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 07:38, January 21, 2024 (EST)

Andy, User:Conservative's maliciously motivated trolling is still occupying an inordinate amount of my time and ability to make mainspace contributions. I renew my request that User:Conservative be topic banned from foreign policy and defense related matters. Thank you. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 08:10, January 21, 2024 (EST)

I will accept User:Conservative's apology at anytime for, once again, casting aspersions upon my real-life name and reputation.

Andy, note: User:Conservative is not "adding content" or "creating content"; he is creating an internal algorithm of uplinks in his latest series "Essay: Achievement related articles" (click on anyone of these "related changes", and they are nothing but external uplinks - no content) to promote himself (and also suppress other editors' contributions).

In his Russophobic series, he has nothing but neocon and globalist uplinks. He did not promote conservativism or conservative ideals, rather was motivated by a personal feud with other editors (as is most of his series on Category:RationalWiki). RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 14:18, January 24, 2024 (EST)

Andy knows that I wrote a pro-isolationist, noninterventionist essay at Conservapedia which is at: [[Essay: Isolationalism is growing in the United States. Is this a good thing?|Isolationalism is growing in the United States. Is this a good thing?]].

You haven't written such an essay. I suggest you stop embarrassing yourself with your nonsensical labeling of me as a neocon. Nobody is buying what you are selling - including Andy.

"There is no instance of a country having benefited from prolonged warfare." - Sun Tzu. Conservative (talk) 00:43, January 25, 2024 (EST)

All you've written is a bunch of contradictory nonsense - with uplinks to neocon & globalist sources. And by your own admission have no interest in the subject, only an intent to harass people you get into feuds with on the internet, harming CP's reputation as a viable source.

You do not create or add original content; you might occasionally cut n paste a quote from a source, and in the area of foreign affairs you do not have the requisite judgement to discern neocon and globalist sourcing. The idea that you somehow are qualified to write on "collaboration" and "teamwork" is a joke. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 01:35, January 25, 2024 (EST)

A person who often engages in logical fallacies such as yourself is in no position to accuse others of writing "contradictory nonsense".

[[User: SamHB]] said regarding your unreasonableness: "Now let me get to the point for real. Why do you continue engaging with this person?? ...You have better things to do than bang your head against the wall. - SamHB (talk) 11:49, July 28, 2023 (EDT)".

[[User: Karajou]] told you: "The "we" in your silly posting is just you. You are the one who needed to be civil, but refused to do so the past two years. You returned to this site expecting to take it from Andy, to run it your way, to have everyone follow your brand of rules, and all I'm seeing from this silly posting of yours...." - [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 08:09, October 1, 2023 (EDT)".

Now please feel free to engage in last wordism. Conservative (talk) 01:54, January 25, 2024 (EST)

Andy, as you can see, User:Conservative cannot address issues, he can only quote, verbatim, and carry, personal grudges for a long time. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 02:01, January 25, 2024 (EST)

If you spent half of the time improving your content writing skills that you engage in picking fights, malignant posting, paranoid accusations, axe-grinding, and envious brooding maybe your content would get more views.

Don't engage in "excusitis" and blame your content's low page views on someone "suppressing your content". Get off the mat and start training! In the next 30 days, I am going to be reading various books on grammar and writing.

"I hated every minute of training, but I said, 'Don't quit. Suffer now and live the rest of your life as a champion.'." - Mohammed Ali. Conservative (talk) 02:13, January 25, 2024 (EST)

More personal attacks. You came here to Andy/talk to accuse me of "vandalizing" a mainspace article you started that I moved to Essay space, which you apparently are quite happy with now. Is that teamwork? is that collaboration? Is that "picking fights, malignant posting, paranoid accusations, or axe-grinding"? RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 02:29, January 25, 2024 (EST)

Bottomline, and I think Andy will agree with me: malicious editing and motivations, and vendettas ARE NOT conservative values. And that's all I see in your contributions, as per your own words to me more than 10 years ago, beginning with your Atheism article and series, and virtually everything since. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 02:35, January 25, 2024 (EST)

As to trolling, User:Conservative has severely disrupted my ability since July 2023 to chronical daily war reports (which I had done for 18 months prior with 30 additions to Conservapedia proven right); without a topic ban on User:Conservative writing on foreign policy and defense related issues, I will be unable to make a commitment to chronical the impending conflicts with Iran and China. (And Conservapedia will be at the mercy of the MSM neocon garbage User:Conservative recycles). RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 22:10, January 28, 2024 (EST)

Something about something or other...

Why Gen Z Is Ditching The Girlboss For The Tradwife, The Federalist, 2024. See also: Traditional gender roles are making a comeback

The tradwives are winning! Another glorious victory by Phyllis Schlafly! First she defeated the Equal Rights Amendment and now this! As much as I hate to do it, on behalf of all Christian traditionalists, I hereby declare total victory!

For details, please see: Essay: Andy Schlafly, Phyllis Schlafly and the Amish. All they do is win against secular leftists (Rap song). Conservative (talk) 10:16, January 25, 2024 (EST)

The new BHathorn2 account needs the Upload tag restored. Thanks. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 19:04, January 28, 2024 (EST)

In the recent changes log, I just saw this: "Obesity‎; 21:25 . . (-24)‎ . . ‎Aschlafly (Talk | contribs | block)‎ (trim, improve further) [rollback 7 edits]."

I got a good laugh out of this edit. You made the Conservapedia obesity article more trim!

Post USA Today and prominent atheists citing my Atheism and obesity article in the beginning of 2011, Conservapedia is known for covering the obesity issue.

It has become a big issue since then (Pardon the pun). In March of 2023, the World Obesity Federation (WOF) released a report stating that by 2035 over 4 billion people – more than half the world’s population – will be obese (see: https://www.uclahealth.org/news/worldwide-obesity-rise).Conservative (talk) 17:31, January 29, 2024 (EST)

Ha ha ha. I appreciate the humor! I'll add that amazing prediction that more than half the world will be obese in a decade.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 17:57, January 29, 2024 (EST)

I just added the material to the obesity article. Conservative (talk) 23:06, January 29, 2024 (EST)

Thank you!--Andy Schlafly (talk) 00:19, January 30, 2024 (EST)

User:BHathorn2 would like his picture uploading rights to be restored. He was able to upload pictures with his previous account. Conservative (talk) 00:39, February 17, 2024 (EST)

Done as requested. Thanks for asking.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 20:24, February 17, 2024 (EST)

OK. I will tell him. Conservative (talk) 20:45, February 17, 2024 (EST)

I saw your post about Japan and its demographic crisis.

I think it's time for the Amish or quiverful Christians to move to Japan. It would be a win-win situation! Conservative (talk) 00:59, March 3, 2024 (EST)

Great idea! There are Amish communities in Canada and South America!--Andy Schlafly (talk) 03:49, March 3, 2024 (EST)

Debate: Is Codex Vaticanus superior in reliability to the Textus Receptus —LT ^{Rev. 22:13} Sunday, 10:08, March 10, 2024 (EDT)

Please take a look at the talk page history of the Emmanuel Macron article at Talk:Emmanuel Macron.

I made a good argument that the allegation that Macron's wife is a transexual was a spurious allegation that has no business being in the second section of the article plus an excellent case that the lede section is poor the article which is preventing it from reaching the 100,000 page view threshold at this time. So many of our articles about prominent political figures now have poor lede paragraphs and sections which is artificially suppressing the traffic to the website. Conservative (talk) 19:30, March 16, 2024 (EDT)

Andy,

De-sysop him. His relentless, malicious, trolling and inability to do basic research and work with others without crying to you like a baby is out of control.

This is the same guy who spends months and months writing about gay atheists and their French Fry eating, naming them by name, or makes a big deal on the Obama page about Michelle Obama eating a 2,400 calorie burger (which isn't even in her current bio). Now he complains about worldwide MSM reporting stories that may offend a globalist warmonger. Topic ban. Or de-sysop. Now. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 19:45, March 16, 2024 (EDT)

NYPost thought it was worthy reporting: Mar 9, 2024: French President Emmanuel Macron, 46, fires back for first time at claims wife, 70, was born a man. User:Conservative is trolling both you and me, preventing both of us from productive editing while he writes screeds about how Russia should be criticized because it is LESS tolerant of gay rights than the United States. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 19:55, March 16, 2024 (EDT)

Andy,

He's got you bamboozled into thinking he's an SEO expert. He's not. All he's done is run robots on his pages to promote himself and suppress other's contributions.

He's led you to believe that Homosexuality and bestiality is of more popular interest on a conservative website than Phyllis Schlafly. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 20:09, March 16, 2024 (EDT)

Homosexuality and bestiality still outranks Phyllis Schlafly. Nice work, Cons. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 11:39, March 20, 2024 (EDT)

Andy, I am no fan of Richard Dawkins who is far less prominent figure than Emmanuel Macron that I am also not a fan of. And yet, the far less prominent figure of Richard Dawkins was able to have a 1,500,000 page view article at Conservapedia (As you know, the view counter was accidentally reset which caused the article to lose 500,000 page views on the counter), but the Macron article on a prominent political figure has yet to hit near 100,000 page views.

Your page views are inorganic plus a bunch of leftist trolls you constantly bait to vandalize Conservapedia. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 20:18, March 16, 2024 (EDT)

Why is this so? The article calls Macron a fascist in the lede section despite that this is highly improbable given that his nation was overrun by German fascists in WWII. In addition, the lede has a hyper partisan, speculative tone/material in the lede one of which is a link to a dead forum link. In the second section of the article rather than having evergreen content, has some gossipy allegation that Macron is married to a transexual (Donald Trump, who is married, owned a beauty pageant and is known for his woman chasing past, said Macron's wife had a nice figure on a visit to France. Conservative (talk) 20:13, March 16, 2024 (EDT)

Here's the problem right here: instead of fixing the problem, he comes whining here like a little brat. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 22:19, March 16, 2024 (EDT)

Robsmith, you wrote above: "Your page views are inorganic".

Social media shares for Conservapedia's atheism article: Screen capture taken on November 3, 2017 from the website Sharedcount.com:

Social media shares for Conservapedia's atheism article. The above graphic is a screen capture taken on November 3, 2017 from the website Sharedcount.com

The Conservapedia atheism article has been shared at the Freedom From Atheism Foundation Facebook page.

RobSmith, you can say until you are blue in the face that "Your page views are inorganic", but I have a screen share from Sharedcount.com indicating that Conservapedia's atheism article, which I largely wrote, was shared at least 6K times at Facebook which is only one of several social media websites. In addition, it has been repeatedly been cited by Shockofgod on YouTube plus elsewhere.

Andy believes that Conservapedia's atheism article is its most popular article. And he has the server logs and other data backing this up. Conservative (talk) 02:06, March 17, 2024 (EDT)

317 shares on gay talk forums you trigger to vandalize CP doesn't add up to 7 million. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 02:09, March 17, 2024 (EDT)

Well, you welcome to assert until your blue in the face that my view counts are not organic, but sharedcount.com doesn't lie. Andy is a Harvard Law School trained lawyer and good lawyers respect proof and evidence.

"You teach yourselves the law, but I train your minds. You come in here with a skull full of mush; you leave thinking like a lawyer." - Charles W. Kingsfield Jr., The Paper Chase (1973).[3] Conservative (talk) 02:22, March 17, 2024 (EDT)

Let's do the math: 7,000,000 / (6k + 371 + 6.3) = 522, meaning each share generated 522 hits outside of Lewis Black giving you a nod. Impressive. Now, I know you keep figures on global atheism. It would be interesting to see how many (whom you singlehandedly defeated and are non-existent now) visited CP, or maybe how many times each one did to rack up 7 million (being they are so few in number).

Oh, and the plug you got from Lewis Black must've been like a Billy Graham Crusade, with thousands coming forward to give their lives to Christ. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 02:46, March 17, 2024 (EDT)

Hello Andy! Thank you, once again, for the help yesterday.

I have just performed an edit to Mark Chapter 1 to use the ideal font for phonics learning: 28-point Century Schoolbook. I have also decreased the width of the page, so a student do not "lose" his place. Should I perform a similar edit on Mark Chapter 2, Mark Chapter 3, etc.? In Christ, MayGodBless (talk) 12:13, April 10, 2024 (EDT)

Very nice! A similar improvement on the fonts for the other chapters of Mark would be wonderful! Thank you!--Andy Schlafly (talk) 13:38, April 10, 2024 (EDT)

Done! I am also considering looking through the image archives on Conservapedia to illustrate the chapters. MayGodBless (talk) 19:21, April 10, 2024 (EDT)

As you know, a Conservapedian suggested that we create a page so Conservapedia web visitors can sign up and to be a new editor to Conservapedia. And that we feature a link to this page on main page left.

I designed a page using the KISS approach which stands for Keep It Simple Stupid (KISS).

Please look at this sample page and then contact me with your feedback. The sample page is at: User:Conservative/Sign up to be a new editor sample page.

After we agree on the page content and what the invitation on main page left looks like, we can have the other Conservapedian give us his feedback because it was his idea and because he is a sharp individual with good judgment. Conservative (talk) 03:06, April 12, 2024 (EDT)

"new editors can sign up to be a new editor". Your new editors can sign up to be a new editor needs editing. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 10:39, April 12, 2024 (EDT)

Do you not believe in the shifting of tectonic plates along fault lines? What would you suggest causes earthquakes then? Cazle (talk) 03:20, April 14, 2024 (EDT)

The evidence does not support the tectonic-plate theory for earthquakes. The atheistic science promoting the tectonic plate theory is repeatedly contradicted by earthquakes where there is no fault line (e.g., recently in New Jersey), and the lack of large earthquakes where they have long been predicted (e.g., California).

What does cause earthquakes? Could be the increasing instability in the Earth's orbit, as predicted by the Second Law of Thermodynamics, or a cause not yet discovered (notice how a false scientific theory obstructs development of a correct one). A non-materialistic cause is also possible, as with other phenomenon such as butterflies migrating thousands of miles to the same locations each year. Satan as the cause is a possibility, too, and it may be impossible to explain his behaviour materialistically or rationally.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 15:13, April 14, 2024 (EDT)

China is Sinking, 270 Million People are in danger

• China is Sinking, 270 Million People are in danger. Here’s why, Video

Did the China build on bad/weak land? Did they build too many heavy ghost cities? Does China have to solve its obesity problem in order to take some of the weight off of China's land (See: China and obesity)? Or is God smiting China's China'a land and its godless communist leaders/citizens? See: China and atheism

It's a mystery!!! And given atheists poor understanding of science, China's godless leader Xi Jinping doesn't understand the GRAVITY of the situation!

Secular Europe is having bad economies and energy price hikes among its countries. China has a host of economic problems. And now this! Conservative (talk) 15:48, April 25, 2024 (EDT)

Wow. Ok. I'll play along: "What? Do you think it's caused by climate change?" RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 15:52, April 25, 2024 (EDT)

Okay, let me get this straight: atheism is causing the Chinese landmass to sink. Believing in God - which is not the same as trusting Jesus for your salvation, will stop it? RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 16:31, April 25, 2024 (EDT)

Hello again Andy! I have a suggestion for improving the Conservapedia:Commandments. The 4th commandment reads:

When referencing dates based on the approximate birth of Jesus, give appropriate credit for the basis of the date (B.C. or A.D.). "BCE" and "CE" are unacceptable substitutes because they deny the historical basis. See CE.

I think it should make a general point about avoiding liberal bias, liberal deceit, and liberal claptrap, because that is not currently reflected elsewhere in the commandments. For example,

Avoid liberal style, including as liberal bias, liberal deceit, and liberal claptrap. For example, when referencing dates based on the approximate birth of Jesus, give appropriate credit for the basis of the date (B.C. or A.D.). "BCE" and "CE" are unacceptable substitutes because they deny the historical basis. See CE.

Do you have an opinion on this improvement? In Christ, MayGodBless (talk) 13:09, April 15, 2024 (EDT)

Yah, it turns the Commandments into liberal claptrap if you link to those pages cause anybody can edit those pages. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 13:37, April 15, 2024 (EDT)

Thanks for your material on friendship, loneliness, marriage, conservative values and liberalism over the years. As one gets older, one understands the importance of these things. And along the way of writing various articles, I have made some friendships at Conservapedia.

Today, I added some content related to some of these topics that you may find informative.

Post pandemic, I am in the midst of pouring myself into various endeavors where I will be much more in contact with friends, family, church members, colleagues, clients, etc. It's a shame that people are often creatures of habit and many people will continue to self-impose isolation on themselves - even though the pandemic is over. One of my business associates who refused to change his life one iota due to the pandemic got Covid three times, but he was never lonely, his business was better for it and he helped restaurants during the pandemic. Damn the torpedoes - full speed ahead! Conservative (talk) 10:14, April 16, 2024 (EDT)

Here is the archive chrome extension that will give you clickable links on the page: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/archive-page/gcaimhkfmliahedmeklebabdgagipbia

Glad to be of help. Conservative (talk) 20:26, April 25, 2024 (EDT)

Here is an example of what it can do: https://archive.ph/uTWCb

You can see that the links on the page are clickable. Conservative (talk) 20:28, April 25, 2024 (EDT)

Here is the article on the company that you wanted: Archive.Today. Conservative (talk) 20:36, April 25, 2024 (EDT)

I will reach out to you tomorrow or this week. DavidB4 is designing the "sign up to be a new Conservapedia page" using a template.

I was talking to DavidB4 and we have a quick question for you about the upcoming page. Conservative (talk) 22:56, April 29, 2024 (EDT)

Also, I will also have a good report about Operation Afterburner II 😁 Conservative (talk) 11:06, April 30, 2024 (EDT)

The conservative movement has not been able to speak with one voice on Conservapedia due to User:Conservative's advocacy for globalism and neoconservativism in multiple Essays and mainspace entries. He has justified war and Russophobia together with its devastating effects on world peace and the US economy. As the next vote for House Speaker approaches, I suggest implementing a topic ban on his adding content on foreign policy, international relations, and geopolitics to stop the confusion he has sown among our conservative reader base. The outcome of the Speaker vote will have an impact on Trump and Republican prospects in the 2024 elections. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 10:59, May 1, 2024 (EDT)

Evidence I advocate for globalism or neoconservativism? Just because you say or even believe something to be true, doesn't make it true. Personal remark removed

Your incessant claiming that I am a globalist or neoconservative has never convinced Andy that I am either of these things. Nor has Andy imposed a topic ban on me. Personal remark removed

I never said you were a globalist or neocon. I said you are fouling up Conservapedia and misleading conservative readers with poorly researched neocon and globalist sources. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 20:13, May 1, 2024 (EDT)

By the way, have you read my isolationism-leaning essays at Essay: Isolationalism is growing in the United States. Is this a good thing? and Essay: Business is more powerful than military might. All REAL Americans know this!

Also, ask Andy if he thinks that you are a conservative. You might be surprised at the answer he gives you. Conservative (talk) 13:25, May 1, 2024 (EDT)

Evidence Exhibit 1: Liberal triumphalism, which is an unfinished effort to rehabilitate your globalist neocon talking points cut n pasted into at least 3 dozen other mainspaces. Andy has even participated in the effort to clean up this mess. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 13:43, May 1, 2024 (EDT)

Personal remark removed Conservative (talk) 14:09, May 1, 2024 (EDT)

User:Conservative: If you wish to make insulting or derogatory personal attacks toward other users the appropriate place would be your own user talk page or mailbox where you can govern content (within limits) over what's being said, and not other people's talk pages. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 17:02, May 1, 2024 (EDT)

Exhibit 2: Cherrypicking his neocon sources and hiding direct evidence (just today). RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 20:00, May 1, 2024 (EDT)

Exhibit 3. Then, when shown his poorly qualified and unresearched sources are Never Trumpers, he misquotes them rather than remove the content. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 21:49, May 1, 2024 (EDT)

Bottomline: Conservapedia is not going to get anywhere in adding content on election news, election fraud (pre or post-election), or international relations this year until User:Conservative's trolling on foreign affairs is reined in. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 20:22, May 1, 2024 (EDT)

I hope you are not trying to get my attention Personal remark removed Conservative (talk) 22:00, May 1, 2024 (EDT)

It's not about you. This posting is addressed to Andy.

I am demonstrating to Andy why it is useless to try to contribute anything positive to Conservapedia because of the tens of thousands of bytes of unresearched globalist and liberal claptrap that User:Conservative adds daily, intended to negate efforts by other contributors. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 22:30, May 1, 2024 (EDT)

Tens of thousands of bytes of globalist content daily? Evidence? Lately, most of my content has been on religion/business/investing/achievement/etc. content.

The truth is that you have an unhealthy obsession with me and I suggest that you shake that obsession. Develop some hobbies, etc. Do whatever it takes. But being myopically focused on me is rather strange. Conservative (talk) 13:57, May 2, 2024 (EDT)

Please take a look at DavidB4's work on the "sign up to contribute to Conservapedia page".

It is at: User:DavidB4/invite.

I also have some very good and unexpected news about this matter.

I will touch base with you this week. Conservative (talk) 01:28, May 2, 2024 (EDT)

DavidB4 expects to finish a prototype in about a week. I will keep you updated. Conservative (talk) 06:27, May 13, 2024 (EDT)

If you could be so kind to check your email, I would appreciate it. It covers DavidB4's work, an offer to you and another matter.

Also, feel free to give me a call. Conservative (talk) 22:48, May 10, 2024 (EDT)

Please call me. Conservative (talk) 23:43, May 10, 2024 (EDT)

Hi Andy. I just noticed that our article on RW is actually located at Category:RationalWiki. Would you be able to move the category to the RationalWiki (in the articlespace)? I can then perform a quick edit which will transform the category into an actual category which contains RationalWiki (the article) as well as everything else there is to know about that particular troll site. Thanks, and God bless! MayGodBless (talk) 18:31, May 11, 2024 (EDT)

Done as requested!--Andy Schlafly (talk) 18:43, May 11, 2024 (EDT)

Thank you so much! It appears that Category:RationalWiki was automatically protected by the software when you made the move, which is preventing me from breaking the redirect from the category to the page. Would you be able to unprotect Category:RationalWiki? (I have done a non-redirecting link for your convenience.) Thanks again!! MayGodBless (talk) 21:32, May 11, 2024 (EDT)

Oh, and one other thing: would you be able to add RationalWiki (the page) to Category:RationalWiki (the category)? Sorry for the trouble!! MayGodBless (talk) 21:34, May 11, 2024 (EDT)

I think your requests have all been satisfied now. Please let me know anything further is sought on this. Thanks.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 00:07, May 12, 2024 (EDT)

Awesome. Again, sorry for the interruption!!! God bless you and God bless Conservapedia. MayGodBless (talk) 01:10, May 12, 2024 (EDT)

Regarding our conversation about growth topics: Please review my additions to Conservapedia:Growth topics and Conservapedia talk:Growth topics

I would work on the election related topics first as its an election year. Conservative (talk) 06:31, May 13, 2024 (EDT)

Here is the information that I promised you: Advantages and disadvantages of the Brave browers, Geeksforgeeks.org

Download the Brave browser at: https://brave.com/download/

The company was founded by a conservative who got booted from Firefox when he was a CEO for the company due to his political contribution which was for an organization that was against the homosexual agenda.

It's a great, lightning-fast browser that has more privacy than the Google Chrome browser plus it is faster than the Chrome browser too. Conservative (talk) 09:41, May 13, 2024 (EDT)

Conservapedia is an encyclopedia, not a collection of offsite spam links. We need text in mainspace articles, not copy paste spam links . RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 16:01, May 19, 2024 (EDT)

You requested that I create some content on the transgender agenda and transgender activism

"Because we can't continue to allow China to rape our country." - Donald Trump[1]

You requested that I create some content on the Transgender agenda and Transgender activism. Today, I added some content to these articles plus created the essay at: Essay: China's promotion of the transexual agenda in the USA

As you know, I was successful in terms of creating informative and highly viral content on homosexuality and the homosexual agenda/homosexual activism.

In addition, you know I have some knowledge/talents related to viral marketing and SEO.

Unfortunately, there is a Conservapedia admin who is trying to thwart and suppress my efforts to promote my Conservapedia content on transgender activism. This is very unfortunate given the importance of family values and the harmful effects of transgenderism on societies.

I look forward to talking to you soon about this matter and another matter. Conservative (talk) 16:14, May 19, 2024 (EDT)

As you know, Cons runs bots to inflate his page views to give inorganic counts.

Donald Trump does not want war with China, which runs counter to the neo-liberal claptrap User:Conservative is trying to link from MPL to his latest warmongering screed. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 16:29, May 19, 2024 (EDT)

Let's hope the assertive Donald Trump privately confronts the communist Xi Jinping about promoting transgenderism in the USA, holds him accountable and puts an end to it.

By the way, here are quotes of RobSmith:

"IOWs, if you don't have anything positive to say about socialists and communists, just shut up, at least for the duration of the war. Read the bios of Bill Donovan, Frank Knox, and Henry Stimson. And if you don't know what I'm talking about, you especially need to just shut up. RobSGive Peace a chance 17:54, January 21, 2023 (EST)".

User:Conservative: The more you quote this, the more it makes you look like a Nazi apologist. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 17:26, May 19, 2024 (EDT)

"Fascism is both socialism and capitalism; and User:Conservative is glad to have Karajou back to defend User:Conservative's brand of "capitalism". RobSGive Peace a Chance! 22:06, October 2, 2023 (EDT)"Conservative (talk) 16:50, May 19, 2024 (EDT)

Unlike the Marxist-Leninists, the fascists did not "seize the means of production" and allowed the propertied class to keep their businesses and make profits. Fascism is both socialism and capitalism. For this cause, User:Conservatitve deserves a topic ban in foreign relations in that he admits he does not understand what capitalism, socialism, or fascism is and has become an uncooperative, persistent troll. RobS^{The Truth. Just Putin It Out There} 17:40, May 19, 2024 (EDT)

User:Conservative says: "Donald Trump is very anti-China bla bla bla". This is misleading. Trump said: