RSchlafly
→Hurrah for revisionist history!: No shame is needed. Of course there is a greater burden of proof for assertions of criminal wrongdoing
+357
Abrown
→Hurrah for revisionist history!
m-11
Abrown
→Hurrah for revisionist history!
+663
RobSmith
→Hurrah for revisionist history!: grammar
+5
RobSmith
→Hurrah for revisionist history!: Thanks for clarifying that
+366
Abrown
→Hurrah for revisionist history!
+772
RSchlafly
→Hurrah for revisionist history!: I am mainly asking that accusations of criminal behavior be specific and documented
+150
RobSmith
→Hurrah for revisionist history!: What purpose does that serve
+280
Abrown
no edit summary
+451
RSchlafly
→Hurrah for revisionist history!: I am not posting any opinion
+406
Abrown
no edit summary
+130
Ed Poor
Talk:Iran-Contra Affair moved to Talk:Iran-Contra affair
mRobSmith
→Hurrah for revisionist history!: two more comments
+395
RobSmith
→Hurrah for revisionist history!: Yes, indeed
+525
Wikinterpreter
no edit summary
+353
RSchlafly
→Hurrah for revisionist history!: Yes, the Reagan administration cooperated fully
+268
Abrown
→Hurrah for revisionist history!
+507
RobSmith
→Hurrah for revisionist history!: I don't see where the Walsh Report has anymore weight then the Starr Report has
+471
Abrown
→Hurrah for revisionist history!
+671
RSchlafly
→Hurrah for revisionist history!: If you want to put in some facts about MacFarlane, go ahead
+234
Abrown
→Hurrah for revisionist history!
+173
Abrown
no edit summary
+51
Abrown
no edit summary
+616
RobSmith
Pul-leeez
+833
Wikinterpreter
no edit summary
+1,656
RobSmith
typo
RobSmith
yes, they can be removed
+616
RobSmith
Wikiinterpreter, sorry....
+570
Wikinterpreter
no edit summary
+244
RSchlafly
What details of laws being broken?
+205
RobSmith
Not surprising
-1
RobSmith
Not surprising
+454
Abrown
no edit summary
+117
RSchlafly
I took out some cocaine stuff
+257
RobSmith
need sources
+965