48
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 102:
Line 102: + +
→Hurrah for revisionist history!
::::::::::Oh, so when you no longer have facts to support a pre-determined point of view, you turn to insults. Thanks for clarifying that. I was fearful if somebody postulated that is often what happens, they'd be accused of being biased. But now we have your first hand testimony that is indeed what you intended to do. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:00, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
::::::::::Oh, so when you no longer have facts to support a pre-determined point of view, you turn to insults. Thanks for clarifying that. I was fearful if somebody postulated that is often what happens, they'd be accused of being biased. But now we have your first hand testimony that is indeed what you intended to do. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:00, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
::::::::::: You're very good at putting words in other people's mouths aren't you? So, you believe Mr. Schlafly's version of events is the correct one? Then do the honest thing, and require him to support his point of view with a primary source or two. You say I'm not willing to support my view with facts, but I'm the only person who has edited the article to cite any sources at all. You may not agree with the conclusions I draw, but at the very least you could support the process instead of attempting just pointing and laughing at anyone who might attempt to get Schlafly to follow his own commandments. --[[User:Abrown|Abrown]] 16:07, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
:::::::: I am mainly asking that accusations of criminal behavior be specific and documented. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 03:22, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
:::::::: I am mainly asking that accusations of criminal behavior be specific and documented. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 03:22, 7 April 2007 (EDT)