Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,941
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 101:
Line 101: − +
→Hurrah for revisionist history!: grammar
::::::::: Is that not obvious? I'm attempting to shame Mr. Schlafly in to realising his actions are hypocritical, in requiring a greater burden of proof of others than he does of himself. The easiest thing for him to do would be simply to back his assertions with testimony from a primary source. Unfortunately either he has no shame at all, or he has not the wit to realise just how hypocritical his actions are. I am certainly not willing to contribute to any discussion where the end result is not going to be a consensus, but simply whatever it is that Mr. Schlafly happens to believe. If the sort of edits that Mr. Schlafly made were made to the article by anyone else, they would be called vandalism and reverted. --[[User:Abrown|Abrown]] 15:49, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
::::::::: Is that not obvious? I'm attempting to shame Mr. Schlafly in to realising his actions are hypocritical, in requiring a greater burden of proof of others than he does of himself. The easiest thing for him to do would be simply to back his assertions with testimony from a primary source. Unfortunately either he has no shame at all, or he has not the wit to realise just how hypocritical his actions are. I am certainly not willing to contribute to any discussion where the end result is not going to be a consensus, but simply whatever it is that Mr. Schlafly happens to believe. If the sort of edits that Mr. Schlafly made were made to the article by anyone else, they would be called vandalism and reverted. --[[User:Abrown|Abrown]] 15:49, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
::::::::::Oh, so when you no longer have facts to support a pre-determined point of view, you turn to insults. Thanks for clarifying that. I was fearful if somebody postulated that is often what happens, they'd be accused of being biased. But now we have your first hand testimony that is indeed you intended to do. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:00, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
::::::::::Oh, so when you no longer have facts to support a pre-determined point of view, you turn to insults. Thanks for clarifying that. I was fearful if somebody postulated that is often what happens, they'd be accused of being biased. But now we have your first hand testimony that is indeed what you intended to do. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:00, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
:::::::: I am mainly asking that accusations of criminal behavior be specific and documented. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 03:22, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
:::::::: I am mainly asking that accusations of criminal behavior be specific and documented. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 03:22, 7 April 2007 (EDT)