48
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 74:
Line 74: + +
→Hurrah for revisionist history!
::::I don't see where the Walsh Report has anymore weight in the history of the Reagan administration then the Starr Report has in the Clinton administration. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:12, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
::::I don't see where the Walsh Report has anymore weight in the history of the Reagan administration then the Starr Report has in the Clinton administration. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 14:12, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
::::: Hah, that's the most ridiculous excuse I've ever heard. Yes, he retired in 1986, before his conviction, but the crimes he committed were while he was National Security Advisor. This is exactly the reason I don't even dare to mention Poindexter, I just know that someone like you will point out his conspiracy conviction was reversed. Of course, what you'd fail to mention that the case against him was water tight, and he got off on a technicality. --[[User:Abrown|Abrown]] 14:23, 4 April 2007 (EDT)