48
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 66:
Line 66: + +
→Hurrah for revisionist history!
: If you want to put in some facts about MacFarlane, go ahead. There was nothing about him. I was removing some false allegations about others. MacFarlane wasn't even mentioned. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 13:40, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
: If you want to put in some facts about MacFarlane, go ahead. There was nothing about him. I was removing some false allegations about others. MacFarlane wasn't even mentioned. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 13:40, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
:: I'm confused, how does the process of removing "false allegations" also include adding uncited lies? You removed a direct and cited quote from president Reagan proving he lied to congress about the affair, and added in its place the the line that "the Reagan administration cooperated fully" without any reference to factual material. I don't call lying at every opportunity full cooperation. You simply edit these articles to support your own twisted world view. You challenge others to cite sources or have the material they write removed, but it's absolutely fine for you to express your own unsupported opinion. --[[User:Abrown|Abrown]] 13:51, 4 April 2007 (EDT)