Difference between revisions of "Idea of Progress"
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
Since liberals and even many [[establishment]] "conservatives" consider theologically conservative and orthodox Christianity to be "outdated," "archaic," or "narrow-minded," they believe that wiping out biblical Christian beliefs will only enhance human progress and remove an obstacle to the betterment of humanity. Thus, despite the total lack of evidence, biblical Christian beliefs thought in love are increasingly considered "[[hate speech]]" or a "[[hate crime]]." Policies such as banning [[homeschooling]]; persecuting and marginalizing Christians who oppose abortion, homosexuality, and [[universalism]] (such as forcing Christians to pay for abortions or baking wedding cakes for homosexuals); and using every opportunity to teach evolution as fact flow from this worldview. | Since liberals and even many [[establishment]] "conservatives" consider theologically conservative and orthodox Christianity to be "outdated," "archaic," or "narrow-minded," they believe that wiping out biblical Christian beliefs will only enhance human progress and remove an obstacle to the betterment of humanity. Thus, despite the total lack of evidence, biblical Christian beliefs thought in love are increasingly considered "[[hate speech]]" or a "[[hate crime]]." Policies such as banning [[homeschooling]]; persecuting and marginalizing Christians who oppose abortion, homosexuality, and [[universalism]] (such as forcing Christians to pay for abortions or baking wedding cakes for homosexuals); and using every opportunity to teach evolution as fact flow from this worldview. | ||
| − | [[ | + | Biological [[evolution]], which states that life is constantly evolving toward higher lifeforms, has been compared to the Idea of Progress.<ref>Shanahan, Timothy. [https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/50/5/451/264248 Evolutionary Progress?] ''BioScience'', Volume 50, Issue 5, 1 May 2000, Pages 451–459. Retrieved December 25, 2017.</ref><ref>Mason, S. F. [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1600-0498.1953.tb00523.x/abstract The Idea of Progress and Theories of Evolution in Science]. ''Centaurus'', Volume 3, Issue 1, September 1953, Pages 90–106. Retrieved December 25, 2017.</ref><ref>Taylor, Ian. [http://www.creationmoments.com/resources/articles/world-view/philosophy/idea-progress The Idea of Progress]. ''Creation Moments''. Retrieved December 25, 2017.</ref> |
==Comparison with biblical teaching== | ==Comparison with biblical teaching== | ||
Revision as of 23:16, December 25, 2017
The Idea of Progress is a worldview mainly promoted by globalists and liberals that argues "that the human condition has improved over the course of history and will continue to improve."[1] While popular in contemporary culture, this idea has several serious flaws.
History of the idea
Throughout history, most philosophers did not believe in any idea of progress, although some took various positions which mirrored aspects of the theory.[1] Philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle – who believed in a cyclical view of history – as well as the Christian philosopher Augustine – who believed in a linear view of history – held such positions despite never believing the theory.[1]
The formation of the Idea of Progress began during the Enlightenment Era, during the 1700s, through the seeds of this theory could be seen in philosophical writings from the 1600s.[1][2] These philosophers were inspired by the achievements of the Scientific Revolution and believed that the progress seen in scientific advancements could be applied in other fields such as the social or moral realm.[2] These philosophers, unsurprisingly, took an optimistic and positive view of humanity.[1] The idea of progress was promoted by philosophers such as Immanuel Kant, G. W. F. Hegel, Karl Marx, Auguste Comte, and John Stuart Mill.[1][2]
Events in the 20th century, such as World War I, World War II, the Holocaust, and the development of nuclear weapons, shook the belief in the idea of progress, leading many philosophers to either moderate their support for or to reject the Idea of Progress.[1][2]
Liberalism, globalism, secularism, and progress
While many philosophers have rethought their position on the Idea of Progress, most political leaders, as well as Western culture-at-large, has fully adopted the view that humanity is improving in the social, political, and moral sense. They reflect Kant's, Hegel's, and Marx's views that world peace and one-world government is within reach and that humanity must rid itself of any barriers to this desired utopia, including anything that is "outdated."
As they believe that the end result of progress will be world peace and the unification of humanity, many liberals and globalists support the eventual establishment of a one-world government and the end of nationalism and national sovereignty. Thus, they support the War on Sovereignty, mass migration which will help reduce nationalism, open borders, the establishment of international organizations such as the United Nations and European Union, and global disarmament.
Liberals, believing in the Idea of Progress, believe that big government policies and greater government involvement in society – which are used to push liberal values onto society – help advance human progress. Policies such as gun control, collectivism, single-payer healthcare, and the federalization of the government at the expense of states' rights flow from this "Progressive" ideology.
Since liberals and even many establishment "conservatives" consider theologically conservative and orthodox Christianity to be "outdated," "archaic," or "narrow-minded," they believe that wiping out biblical Christian beliefs will only enhance human progress and remove an obstacle to the betterment of humanity. Thus, despite the total lack of evidence, biblical Christian beliefs thought in love are increasingly considered "hate speech" or a "hate crime." Policies such as banning homeschooling; persecuting and marginalizing Christians who oppose abortion, homosexuality, and universalism (such as forcing Christians to pay for abortions or baking wedding cakes for homosexuals); and using every opportunity to teach evolution as fact flow from this worldview.
Biological evolution, which states that life is constantly evolving toward higher lifeforms, has been compared to the Idea of Progress.[3][4][5]
Comparison with biblical teaching
The Idea of Progress is strongly contradicted by the Bible, which argues against the notion that humanity is basically good and is progressing toward a better state.
According to biblical teaching, while God created the universe as perfect, including humanity (Genesis 1:31), due to Adam and Eve's decision to rebel against God, humanity, along with the entire universe, was cursed (Genesis 3; Romans 5:12, 8:20). Because of this, the state of humanity is hopelessly evil without the salvation provided through Jesus Christ. As God said to the prophet Jeremiah, "the heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately sick" (Jeremiah 17:9, ESV). King David stated that "Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, and in sin did my mother conceive me" (Psalm 51:5, ESV). When promising never to send a global flood, God still noted that "the intention of man's heart is evil from his youth" (Genesis 8:21, ESV).
This emphasis on the depravity of humanity is also clearly noted in the New Testament. The Apostle Paul devotes much of the Book of Romans to explaining the human condition and the need for God's salvation. For example, he explains how evil all people are – whether Jew or Gentile (Romans 3:9) – and that "all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God" (Romans 3:23, ESV). Not only is this the case, but Romans 8:7-8 makes clear that not only do unsaved people choose not to obey God, but they are literally unable to with their human strength.
While Salvation and freedom from this human condition is achieved through faith in Jesus Christ (Romans 3:21-31), this does not mean the human condition is now improving. In fact, biblical teaching states that until the second coming of Christ – when everything will be made perfect again – humanity will further deteriorate. 2 Thessalonians 2:1-12 makes this very clear and notes the coming of the Antichrist, who will come after the restraining force on Earth leaves and who will cause many to perish.
Thus, biblical teaching states that, contrary to the Idea of Progress, all of humanity is hopelessly corrupted and that it will remain that way until the second coming of Christ.
Other arguments against the Idea of Progress
- The most destructive and bloody conflicts and acts of genocide occurred in the 20th century, including the two world wars, the Holocaust, the atrocities committed under communism, the Eugenics Movement, abortion, euthanasia, and assisted suicide. Under the Idea of Progress, one would expect to progressively see less violence and death as time goes on.
- The 20th and 21st centuries have seen a growing decline and degeneration in Western morality, as seen by feminism, the Sexual Revolution, the advance of the homosexual agenda, gender confusion, popularization of compulsory public schools and the values promoted in them, and the marginalization of theologically conservative Christianity from the public sphere.
- Contrary to the notion of human progress, the geneticist Dr. John C. Sanford of Cornell University has found that human DNA is deteriorating rather than improving (genetic entropy).[6]
See also
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 Lange, Margaret Meek (February 17, 2011). Progress. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved December 25, 2017.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Progress, the Idea of. Encyclopedia.com (from the Encyclopedia of Philosophy). 2006. Retrieved December 25, 2017.
- ↑ Shanahan, Timothy. Evolutionary Progress? BioScience, Volume 50, Issue 5, 1 May 2000, Pages 451–459. Retrieved December 25, 2017.
- ↑ Mason, S. F. The Idea of Progress and Theories of Evolution in Science. Centaurus, Volume 3, Issue 1, September 1953, Pages 90–106. Retrieved December 25, 2017.
- ↑ Taylor, Ian. The Idea of Progress. Creation Moments. Retrieved December 25, 2017.
- ↑ Sanford, John C. Genetic Entropy. 4th ed. FMS Publications, 2014.