Talk:Essay: Russian military weaknesses

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

“Leave me. That’s all. Give me [an opportunity] to die… Leave me. Let me die. Go away, please. I want to die alone. Thank you,” the Ukrainian service member said. “You were the best fighter in the world. Bye. You were better.”

Note: The "Russian" soldier is a Yakut, not North Korean. RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 15:45, January 4, 2025 (EST)

Full video (17 mins). Last minute contains elite NATO trained soldier blowing himself up with a grenade. RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 15:51, January 4, 2025 (EST)

Update: The Russiane says he shot the NATO-trained soldier anyway.

Note: "technological superiority" essentially means you can film your own demise with a GoPro.

English subtitles includes ending. Yakut soldier: "Us Russians and Yakuts in childhood they teach us in any situation you must remain human".

Note: The repeated screaming of the word "kaza" by the elite NATO trained Ukrainian soldier is essentially similar to use of the "n" word by Ukrainians about Russians or any Russian speaker (Russiane). RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 19:15, January 4, 2025 (EST)

The problem of User:Conservative leaning too much on his realist hero John Mearsheimer

Here, for example, is a problem with granting John Mearsheimer the level of credibility User:Conservative has vested in him in Conservapedia: [3]

“ [Trump]'s dead wrong on both World War I and World War II. I won't talk about World War I, but I will talk about World War II where of course he's dead wrong. And also I think he's showing great disrespect to Russia and to the former Soviet Union for the enormous price that they paid in defeating the Wehrmacht in World War II. ”
I warned against spamming too much or making Mearsheimer a credible and authoritive expert into dozens and dozens of Conservapedia Mainspace and talk pages for several years. Now Mearsheimer says President Trump is delusional and his so-called "peace" efforts are doomed to fail. So here we created a problem for ourselves which now has to be dealt with for the remainder of Trump's term.
And to argue against Mearsheimer is to place oneself into the warmonger and advocate of perpetual war camp. In User:Conservative's mind one or two words or phrases from Mearsheimer was sufficient to attack me. So much so, that he began calling himself a "realist", as he had called me "Machiavellian" 43 times in 24 hours on Andy Schlafly's talk page in an effort to provoke disciplinary action against me. Since it was pointed out to him that Machiavelli is considered one of the fathers of Realism, he's dropped that line of spam attack against me, but has also had to retain the title of "Realist" because of the volume of misinformation and spam he inserted into Conservapedia.
Despite all the evidence of spam attacks against other users and disruptive editing, Conservapedia owner Andy Schlafly has steadfastly refused any disciplinary action against User:Conservative.

Poor research: User:Conservative's Guns and Butter article came from information solely provided by the Ukrainian Nazi kill list

Deputy Ukrainian Interior Minister and Advisor to President Zelensky Anton Gerashchenko, curator of the Myrotvorets website.[1]

I finally had the opportunity to read this "ButterGate" article which was spammed into at least 17 Conservapedia pages. The Newsweek report was exclusively built around a single instance of 2 shoplifters who were apprehended, armed with knives. The information was first posted to X by Anton Gerashchenko, the notorious neo-nazi webmaster who maintains Myrotvorets, better known as the Ukrainian kill list. Sen Rand Paul & DNI Tulsi Gabbard are included in the list. Newsweek does not disclose Gerashchenko's background or activities.

Next time you hear Conservapedia is Nazi propaganda, don't laugh. A senior Admin, user:Conservative, made it so.

Conservapedia needs stronger anti-spamming enforcement. When an editor adds new content, it should be in a limited space, perhaps as low as only one mainspace - not 17 - and time given for other editors to vet the content. This in fact is the purpose of auto moderation. But even after an editor gains automated status, as a courtesy to other editors they need to allow time for vetting new content, and should not have a license to spam crap all over the wiki.

In the "John Joseph Mearsheimer" article - which User:Conservative created, contains this information:

Mearsheimer is in the Myrotvorets (English: Peacemaker) database, usually known as the Ukrainian Nazi kill list, which is an online database of what its owner, Anton Gerashchenko, declares as “enemies of Ukraine,” containing personal doxxing information and addresses.Ukrainian “Hit list” Publishes names and addresses of alleged “Russian propagandists:” Turns out to be based not in Ukraine but in Langley VA where CIA headquarters is located, By Jeremy Kuzmarov (Posted Sep 21, 2022). mronline.org The kill list is maintained by Gerashchenko, a member of the Ukrainian parliament (Rada) and deputy minister of the Interior. Its servers are located in Brussels, Belgium and operated by NATO and the CIA. For enforcement of the kill list, the Ukrainian Teroborona, SBU, and Neo-Nazi Azov Battalion are organizations within the Ukrainian Ministry of Interior, and not in the Ministry of Defense.
Of late, User:Conservative has been edit warring over A Nazi created the Nazi kill list on several pages he has posted redundant spam (see Wow. Neo-nazi sourcing in Conservapedia for instance). To any normal person or jury of his peers, this should be abundant evidence User:Conservative is an uncooperative editor and troll.


User:Conservative proven wrong, AGAIN

Russia did get rocket powered drones
Question: How did they "get" rocket powered drones? By innovation?
which are more effective, but it also keeps burning through its financial resources (Sovereign fund, gold reserves) and human capital (This war is making its demographic crisis worse). Russia also burned through much of its Soviet era military stockpiles.
No sh*t Sherlock, How many years ago? (except FAB 5000 glide bombs built in 1954; they still got a couple ten thousands of those).
On top of this, even if Russia were to receive a victory in Ukraine it most certainly will be a pyrrhic victory - especially when you count the distinct possibility of a Ukrainian insurgency in such a case.
"the distinct possibility of a Ukrainian insurgency". Really? This is why the West and the US needs to get spanked to insure it doesn't happen.
In short, this war of attrition in Ukraine is a Russian boondoggle.
ah, look up the meaning of "boondoggle". As usual, you don't know what you're talking about (a supercarrier is a "boondoggle". The people of Donbas are not "boondoggles").
I repeat myself - You don't seem to understand what a strategy of attrition is either, which bankrupted the United States and NATO.
Lastly, I wouldn't put too much stock in what a contemporary Englishman recently said since Englishmen are a bit mad and the UK has a massive pothole crisis. As Noël Coward said about the English, "mad dogs and Englishmen go out in the midday sun." Conservative (talk) 04:04, November 1, 2026 (EST)
Noel Coward was gay, no wonder you're a big fan.
Foghorn LeghornDo normal heterosexuals spend 20 yrs obsessing over gay bars, bathhouses and drag queens? 09:45, November 1, 2026 (EST)
One other matter, right now Russia is struggling more to find military recruits and its only fighting Ukrainians for the most part. So attacking the UK on an actual battlefield would stretch things even more. Putin would have to go to full mobilization rather than the "stealth mass mobilization" Putin is doing or expected to be doing in the future. In short, that UK defense minister is daft. Until the Russo-Ukraine War is over, there is little risk that Russia would attack the UK. On top of this, Russia would have to do an amphibious assault for a conventional war (The UK is an island nation) and those are much harder - especially since the Ukrainians have pared down the number of Russian ships in the Russian navy. Conservative (talk) 10:39, November 1, 2026 (EST)
bla bla bla. Get your head out of the propaganda sewer. The definition of insanity is swallowing crap and repeatedly doing it again. 10:42, November 1, 2026 (EST)

Question: Do you honestly believe the Russian Federation is planning an amphibious assault on the UK?

You will never get into the Mensa society leaving evidence on the internet like this, of how naive and ignorant you are. Foghorn LeghornDo normal heterosexuals spend 20 yrs obsessing over gay bars, bathhouses and drag queens? 10:54, November 1, 2026 (EST)

Your reading comprehension needs to be improved. I said the Russia-UK war was very unlikely - especially given the Russian navy is a bit of a joke.

I read your comments and thoughts clear. Your suggestion of a Russian amphibious assault on the British Isles (forget the motive or reason behind such an endeavor) is beyond being just poorly informed. For a guy who read Sun Tzu, I don't think you even understand what the nature of war is.

With that being said, I plan on following the Russia-Ukraine War far less in the future

You may not be interested in war, but war is interested in you. That crap you've spammed for 5 years now is possibly a war crime. We'll leave it to the victors to decide.

or not at all. The Europeans will probably reluctantly keep funding the Ukrainians and Russia's economy is rotting at accelerated rate (business/personal loans are failing at a higher and higher rate, etc. ).[4] Russians are pulling their money out of bank via a slow motion bank run.[5]

And in the meantime, USA LNG and military hardware sales will be up to the Europeans.

duh, what rock have you been hiding under for the past four years? duh, it's a global market. duh, LNG prices are up in the United States. duh, do you really think more war and defense spending in the United States is the solution, duh?

Other than me reading Doestevsky and Tolstoy in the near future, Russia will have no appreciable effect on my life which is not surprising given that itx a "weak major power" according to John Mearsheimer.[6] See also: The Putin Price Spike: Why Russia’s Impact on the Average American Is a Rounding Error in a Lifetime. Cultural impact of Russia on Americans is Negligible. Conservative (talk) 11:08, November 1, 2026 (EST)

QueerSIG will probably have you. They'll take anybody. Foghorn LeghornDo normal heterosexuals spend 20 yrs obsessing over gay bars, bathhouses and drag queens? 11:12, November 1, 2026 (EST)

More User:Conservative off topic narcissism about himself rather than the subject under discussion

If I take a Mensa test, I should have no problem passing it and will not have to join some gay group that helps people pass Mensa that may have some members that visited Russian underground gay bars and saunas.[7] They probably wouldn't even allow it given my straight as an arrow straightness and my muy machismo. My Yahoo chess score was 2200 which is high. On top of this, I am doing a 1,300 hour advanced learning and thinking bootcamp[8] which includes reading these 48 books: Book List For My Learning and Thinking Crash Course. On top of this, I will be reading 20 additional books related to this matter post bootcamp.[9][10] In short, at the end of my training, I will be a lean, mean learning and thinking machine! Olé! Olé! Olé! Conservative (talk) 11:25, November 1, 2026 (EST)
Ever since you got your cherry popped in a gay bathhouse, you need to do what Jesus said - forgive. Foghorn LeghornDo normal heterosexuals spend 20 yrs obsessing over gay bars, bathhouses and drag queens? 11:36, November 1, 2026 (EST)
Usually when people lose arguments badly - especially quite badly, they are very frustrated and engage in personal attacks. Our recent exchange is not an exception to this matter.
That's partially true, but your personal attacks against me as a "useful idiot" of an atheist website [11] were because you lost arguments against other wiki editors, not me. You & me were never in an argument. You wanted to cover up the fact that somebody asked me if I thought you were mentally ill - which I never responded to. But you were afraid they might brief me on something I was totally uninterested and uninvolved in - you and your retarded arguments. Foghorn LeghornDo normal heterosexuals spend 20 yrs obsessing over gay bars, bathhouses and drag queens? 12:12, November 1, 2026 (EST)
Now given the inconsequentialness of the weak major power Russia and given various newfound off wiki interests, you are going to have topical debates about Russia with someone else. But let me know if you take a Mensa test and suprise me by getting a high enough score to join Mensa. In the meantime, your self-proclaimed international politics expertise doesn't give me any confidence that you could pass a Mensa test. But the way, you called Andy Schlafly dumb too and I have the screen shot to show this. Do you still think Andy Schlafly is dumb? Conservative (talk) 12:10, November 1, 2026 (EST)
User:Conservative deleted the response.
Mensa will welcome an obese narcissist like yourself.
Nguyen Pham, President of the International Mensa Foundation [2]

I never lost a debate to an atheist and it wasn't due to my debating prowess, but to the utter weakness of the atheist worldview. And you pose no challenge in debates

I do not debate with you. At times I am forced to engage with you because of Andy's utter refusal to enforce Conservapedia:Guidelines.

too. Your lack of counter essays to my essays related to international politics

You mean trolling screeds. Andy only allowed you to publish that crap in Essay space cause you couldn't hold your own on Discussion pages or in Mainspace articles.

shows that you can't even cogently defend a thesis which many high school student can do. Instead you engage in a lot of deflection on the talk pages of my essays. Conservative (talk) 12:36, November 1, 2026 (EST)

I wouldn't know if you ever lost what you call a "debate" (a debate is not spamming the same crap over and over again and using personal attacks). I never paid attention to your retarded debates or criticism of your "debating" style. I do know your "Atheism and obesity" series of personal attacks against other people looks like a childish way for a grown-up who can't hold his own in discussions and has to resort to ad hominems. See for example Rational Media Board of Director and RationalWiki Moderater User: Spud and ultra-processed/unhealthy/junk food. I interacted with Spud for years, usually if not almost always in an adversarial working relationship, and never once did I imagine myself or him stooping to personal attacks about somebody's diet or eating. You are just sick and retarded. And it's spam like that personal attack in a Mainspace article why you have no credibility in anything, and why Andy needs to rethink Conservapedia's relationship with you.
And further: no way does your Atheism and obesity and your hyper analphilia articles have 800,000+ page views - unless you are proud of making yourself an idiot in front of 800,000 viewers and don't care about destroying Conservapedia's reputation.
Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:_Russian_military_weaknesses&oldid=2214418"