User contributions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- 15:29, June 28, 2008 diff hist +137 Conservapedia talk:Lenski dialog →More replies to archived comments: afterthought
- 15:27, June 28, 2008 diff hist +423 Conservapedia talk:Lenski dialog →More replies to archived comments: good point, not necessarily contradictory, but "evidence" is just speculating
- 17:06, June 27, 2008 diff hist +103 Talk:Deceit →Nixon, Libby, and Enron: hate to ask, but that seems to be the trend
- 01:15, June 27, 2008 diff hist +6 Starlight problem well it's an interesting hypothesis, I guess...
- 21:04, June 26, 2008 diff hist +261 Talk:Pornography Undo revision 482353 by Bugler (Talk) ...ok then? does that mean it's alright...?
- 19:24, June 21, 2008 diff hist +538 Talk:Barack Hussein Obama →He's Gay Too: agree, similar to muslim issue (only a suggestion though)
- 00:49, June 21, 2008 diff hist +18 m Integral welcome, and good luck with your math edits
- 06:00, June 9, 2008 diff hist +390 Talk:Classroom prayer could we have... both?
- 21:29, May 26, 2008 diff hist -607 m Talk:Evolution and liberalism meh, no point
- 22:32, May 25, 2008 diff hist +25 Talk:Hollywood values →Rob Knox: it's no one's fault! but it need's to be changed...
- 22:32, May 25, 2008 diff hist +198 Talk:Hollywood values →Rob Knox: here's the subtitle... this boy demonstrated exemplary bravery and self-sacrifice, strong conservative values even
- 22:30, May 25, 2008 diff hist +248 Talk:Hollywood values →Rob Knox: I agree with Tom Moore... this is a misunderstanding
- 22:20, May 25, 2008 diff hist +98 Talk:Evolution and liberalism well... I was just late then, wasn't I?
- 22:18, May 25, 2008 diff hist +158 Talk:Evolution and liberalism just read Dan's post
- 22:17, May 25, 2008 diff hist +351 Talk:Evolution and liberalism a little confused about the stats
- 19:08, May 18, 2008 diff hist +133 User talk:Ikrase and even then I doubt they'd be welcome current
- 19:05, May 18, 2008 diff hist +13 User talk:ELeger just though I'd add a "welcome" to your talk page... I think you'll be considered a very welcome editor to this site :) current
- 04:27, May 16, 2008 diff hist +54 m Liberal gullibility fix link to explanatory articles
- 04:23, May 16, 2008 diff hist +351 Liberal gullibility another example, with a link to another article
- 03:12, May 15, 2008 diff hist +25 Talk:Ann Coulter →Feigning offence: clarifying
- 03:11, May 15, 2008 diff hist +763 Talk:Ann Coulter →Feigning offence: yep, I agree with that example, and I'm not saying she's wrong, but... offense at these comments completely feigned?
- 02:45, May 15, 2008 diff hist +639 Talk:Ann Coulter →Feigning offence: perhaps, um... no, I don't understand -_-
- 22:52, May 14, 2008 diff hist +241 Talk:Painting →Christo: [EDIT CONFLICT] that is interesting, again; thanks (though I do not plan to enter the debate myself)
- 22:23, May 14, 2008 diff hist +178 Talk:Painting →Ruined: I almost didn't notice, welcome back
- 23:45, May 13, 2008 diff hist +9 Faux it's true, I've seen them call it this a lot... wonder if I should add a "liberal deceit" category
- 04:59, May 13, 2008 diff hist +419 Censorship I really don't see it staying this way for long... but at least now this version contains all revisions
- 22:52, May 9, 2008 diff hist +115 Talk:Intelligent design and Richard Dawkins ...but perhaps it can be improved! ...if you'd like current
- 22:48, May 9, 2008 diff hist +465 New! Talk:Intelligent design and Richard Dawkins well, we don't want these to appear... quote-mined
- 19:58, May 9, 2008 diff hist +121 Talk:Mystery:Young Hollywood Breast Cancer Victims →Question / Cause: oh. ok. hmm.
- 03:17, May 9, 2008 diff hist +345 Talk:Mystery:Young Hollywood Breast Cancer Victims →Question / Cause: it's a mystery! we're just not sure if there is an explanation... ideas?
- 22:03, May 5, 2008 diff hist +339 Talk:Liberal bias Undo revision 447696 by Special:Contributions/Cal05000 (User talk:Cal05000) you shouldn't remove other people's comments...
- 22:01, May 5, 2008 diff hist +227 Talk:Mystery:Young Hollywood Breast Cancer Victims →Question / Cause: ...are you not telling us because we're not open minded? :(
- 17:18, May 5, 2008 diff hist +187 Talk:Mystery:Young Hollywood Breast Cancer Victims →Question / Cause: possible explanations... or maybe liberalism just causes cancer, haha
- 03:10, April 30, 2008 diff hist +340 User talk:ITSAMEMARIO ...hoping I won't regret this... but in any case... welcome to Conservapedia!
- 02:56, April 30, 2008 diff hist +87 User talk:ITSAMEMARIO apologies if I am mistaken
- 01:33, April 30, 2008 diff hist +116 Talk:Essay:Finding A Topic not quite college level, but, uh...
- 01:25, April 30, 2008 diff hist +429 Liberal hate speech small introduction, hope it satisfies... can reword if it seems inappopriate
- 03:11, April 28, 2008 diff hist +33 Public school culture I hope these links help improve the entry
- 03:10, April 28, 2008 diff hist +119 Talk:Barack Hussein Obama →Affirmative action: so that really is where the term came from... nice to have that affirmed
- 03:06, April 28, 2008 diff hist +44 m User talk:AndrasK there, forgot signature...
- 03:05, April 28, 2008 diff hist +348 New! User talk:AndrasK hello, here is a tip...
- 02:52, April 28, 2008 diff hist +3 Talk:Compulsive profanity yeah, maybe I had best be clarifying this...
- 02:51, April 28, 2008 diff hist +109 Talk:Compulsive profanity well... part of the article was meant to be humorous, right?
- 05:38, April 18, 2008 diff hist +207 Talk:Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed →Leader's Guide: actually a rather large PDF file, but nevertheless...
- 04:51, April 18, 2008 diff hist +220 Talk:Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed a good idea to link to?
- 00:00, April 18, 2008 diff hist +18 Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed interesting qualification of critics...
- 23:11, April 16, 2008 diff hist -2 Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed yeah, it's absurd, but the wording here...
- 13:13, April 9, 2008 diff hist +321 User talk:HelpJazz →Night-Editing: good luck! you've put in a lot of hard work and I'm sure Andy recognizes that
- 23:37, March 31, 2008 diff hist +14 Feminism so is this ok, Andy? I tried to base it off your comment in the talk page, which I felt helped there to clarify the matter
- 03:16, March 30, 2008 diff hist +258 Talk:Feminism →"Ideological Edits": alternative wording...?