Twelve Angry Men
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ed Poor (talk | contribs) at 15:48, April 12, 2007. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Two excellent movies about a jury in a murder trial. Initially, eleven jurors are ready to convict the defendant and are getting increasingly angry at the lone man who still has reasonable doubt. The movie follows the conversation of the jurors. Interestingly enough, the audience never finds out whether the defendant is guilty; this further stresses "innocence until proven guilty".
The movie illustrates three particulars of justice unique to American democracy:
- the defendant does not have to demonstrate his innocence. He is innocent until proved guilty.
- the verdict must be unanimous, since unanimity guards against a miscarriage of justice.
- the defendant can be convicted only in the absence of reasonable doubt on the part of the jury. [1]
External links
- Extensive quotes from the movie showing how Juror #8 (Henry Fonda) establishes reasonable doubt in the minds of the other jury members.