Difference between revisions of "Atheistic Logic"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by Muslimerican (Talk); changed back to last version by J00ni)
(A number of logical and factual error were either removed or corrected.)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Here is a growing list of logical contradictions in [[atheism]]:
 
Here is a growing list of logical contradictions in [[atheism]]:
  
−
* [[Atheists]] say they do not believe that any [[God]] or equivalent deity exists, but then are often hostile to [[Christians]], as in censoring classroom prayer even when everyone wants to participate.
+
* [[Atheists]] say they do not believe that any [[Gods]] exist, and accordingly are often hostile to religious proselytization, and support the US Constitution in preventing schools from forcing students to pray.
  
−
* Atheist often state that god does not exist, however there is much biblical evidence (which is infallible) which attests to the opposite conclusion.
+
* Atheist often state that gods do not exist, and do not accept the circular reasoning which argues that the Bible is true because god revealed it and we know god revealed it because the Bible is true.
  
−
* Atheists believe that all truths can be derived via reason and deny the efficacy of revelation
+
* Atheists believe that truths can be derived only from reason and doubt the truth of revelation that cannot be substantiated through reason.
  
 
(add more)
 
(add more)

Revision as of 17:44, August 10, 2010

Here is a growing list of logical contradictions in atheism:

  • Atheists say they do not believe that any Gods exist, and accordingly are often hostile to religious proselytization, and support the US Constitution in preventing schools from forcing students to pray.
  • Atheist often state that gods do not exist, and do not accept the circular reasoning which argues that the Bible is true because god revealed it and we know god revealed it because the Bible is true.
  • Atheists believe that truths can be derived only from reason and doubt the truth of revelation that cannot be substantiated through reason.

(add more)

See also