Difference between revisions of "Atheism and evolution"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Notes) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
{{Nb Atheism}} | {{Nb Atheism}} | ||
| − | == | + | ==References== |
{{reflist|2}} | {{reflist|2}} | ||
[[Category:Atheism]] | [[Category:Atheism]] | ||
[[Category:Evolution]] | [[Category:Evolution]] | ||
Revision as of 18:51, May 18, 2008
In regards to atheism and evolution, a majority of the most prominent and vocal defenders of the evolutionary position which employs methodological naturalism since World War II have been atheists.[1][2] Creationist scientists assert that the theory of evolution is an inadequate explanation for the variety of life forms on earth.[3]
Creation scientists tend to win the Creation-Evolution debates and many debates have been held since the 1970's, particularly in the United States.
- Darwinian evolutionary theory, at least in the mind of John Q. Public, is the number one argument for atheism. [1]
See Also
References
- ↑ Dr. Don Batten, A Who’s Who of evolutionists Creation 20(1):32 December 1997.
- ↑ Jonathan Sarfati, Ph.D.,F.M., Refuting Evolution, Chapter 1, Facts and Bias
- ↑ http://www.icr.org/home/resources/resources_tracts_scientificcaseagainstevolution/