Difference between revisions of "Talk:Christopher Hitchens"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Is there any reason why Hitchens is described as "conservative"?) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Is there any reason why Hitchens is described as "conservative"? | + | Is there any reason why Hitchens is described as "conservative"? <small>previous unsigned comment added by [[User:The Four Deuces |The Four Deuces]]</small> |
| + | :Variously the article has described him as "conservative", "neo-conservative" and not at all. Hitchens is very much a paradox, and I for one wouldn't like to try to pin down exactly which part of the political spectrum he fits into. Several areas at once, probably. I'm not convinced that conservative or neo-conservative are accurate. Perhaps we should discuss here exactly who thinks he's what and why [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 09:09, 20 June 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 13:09, June 20, 2007
Is there any reason why Hitchens is described as "conservative"? previous unsigned comment added by The Four Deuces
- Variously the article has described him as "conservative", "neo-conservative" and not at all. Hitchens is very much a paradox, and I for one wouldn't like to try to pin down exactly which part of the political spectrum he fits into. Several areas at once, probably. I'm not convinced that conservative or neo-conservative are accurate. Perhaps we should discuss here exactly who thinks he's what and why File:User Fox.png Fox (talk|contribs) 09:09, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
