Difference between revisions of "Men"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Added period)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
'''Men''' is the plural for the male of the [[human]] species. The words "[[Man]]" or "Men" may also be used to represent the [[Human race]].
 
'''Men''' is the plural for the male of the [[human]] species. The words "[[Man]]" or "Men" may also be used to represent the [[Human race]].
  
−
== The Bible on Men ==
+
== On Men ==
−
According to the [[Bible]], men were created by God on the 6th day of [[Creation]].<ref>{{Bible ref|Genesis|1|26-31}}</ref>  
+
According to the [[Bible]], men were created by God on the 6th day of [[Creation]].<ref>{{Bible ref|Genesis|1|26-31}}</ref> Biologically, men have a minimal role in reproduction, acting as a "sperm dispenser". As overcompensation for this, they have created the Bible to justify patriarchy and deal with the pain of being unable to experience childbirth along with having a lesser role in the rearing of childern.
  
 
===Old Testament===
 
===Old Testament===

Revision as of 12:18, March 12, 2010

Men is the plural for the male of the human species. The words "Man" or "Men" may also be used to represent the Human race.

On Men

According to the Bible, men were created by God on the 6th day of Creation.[1] Biologically, men have a minimal role in reproduction, acting as a "sperm dispenser". As overcompensation for this, they have created the Bible to justify patriarchy and deal with the pain of being unable to experience childbirth along with having a lesser role in the rearing of childern.

Old Testament

The relationship between God and Men is tumultuous from the start. The first three men written of in Genesis are Adam, cast from Eden after eating fruit from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil [2] and Cain and his brother and victim Abel, the elder sons of Adam and Eve. [3].

New Testament

The New Testament states that man "is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man."[4]

Masculine identity

Dr. Joseph Nicolosi wrote:

Increasingly today, we are abandoning support of our boys’ formation of masculine identity; particularly the support needed from the parents. For the boy, the father is most significant in the identification process. If he is warm and receptive and inviting, the boy will disidentify with mother and bond with father to fulfill his natural masculine strings. If the father is cold, detached, harsh, or even simply disinterested, the boy may reach out, but eventually will feel hurt and discouraged and surrender his natural masculine strivings, returning to his mother. [5]

References

Related pages

External Links