Difference between revisions of "Atheism and evolution"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Eliminated unsourced, vague, fabricated claims.) |
(so you deny Creation scientists tend to win the Creation-Evolution debate?) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In regards to '''atheism and evolution''', a majority of the most prominent and vocal defenders of the [[Theory of evolution|evolutionary]] position which employs [[methodological naturalism]] since [[World War II]] have been [[Atheism|atheists]].<ref>Dr. [[Don Batten]], [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/737/ A ''Who’s Who'' of evolutionists] ''Creation'' 20(1):32 | In regards to '''atheism and evolution''', a majority of the most prominent and vocal defenders of the [[Theory of evolution|evolutionary]] position which employs [[methodological naturalism]] since [[World War II]] have been [[Atheism|atheists]].<ref>Dr. [[Don Batten]], [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/737/ A ''Who’s Who'' of evolutionists] ''Creation'' 20(1):32 | ||
December 1997.</ref><ref>[[Jonathan Sarfati]], Ph.D.,F.M., [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3830 ''Refuting Evolution'', Chapter 1, Facts and Bias]</ref> [[Creationism|Creationist]] scientists assert that the [[theory of evolution]] is an inadequate explanation for the variety of life forms on earth.<ref>http://www.icr.org/home/resources/resources_tracts_scientificcaseagainstevolution/</ref> | December 1997.</ref><ref>[[Jonathan Sarfati]], Ph.D.,F.M., [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3830 ''Refuting Evolution'', Chapter 1, Facts and Bias]</ref> [[Creationism|Creationist]] scientists assert that the [[theory of evolution]] is an inadequate explanation for the variety of life forms on earth.<ref>http://www.icr.org/home/resources/resources_tracts_scientificcaseagainstevolution/</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Atheism and Debate|Creation scientists tend to win the Creation-Evolution debates]] and many debates have been held since the 1970's, particularly in the [[United States]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Darwinian evolutionary theory]], at least in the mind of John Q. Public, is the number one argument for [[atheism]][http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/04/18/evolution-101/] and is something our [[public schools]] keep trying to indoctrinate into our children in place of Christian values. | ||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
Revision as of 20:11, August 28, 2008
In regards to atheism and evolution, a majority of the most prominent and vocal defenders of the evolutionary position which employs methodological naturalism since World War II have been atheists.[1][2] Creationist scientists assert that the theory of evolution is an inadequate explanation for the variety of life forms on earth.[3]
Creation scientists tend to win the Creation-Evolution debates and many debates have been held since the 1970's, particularly in the United States.
Darwinian evolutionary theory, at least in the mind of John Q. Public, is the number one argument for atheism[1] and is something our public schools keep trying to indoctrinate into our children in place of Christian values.
See Also
References
- ↑ Dr. Don Batten, A Who’s Who of evolutionists Creation 20(1):32 December 1997.
- ↑ Jonathan Sarfati, Ph.D.,F.M., Refuting Evolution, Chapter 1, Facts and Bias
- ↑ http://www.icr.org/home/resources/resources_tracts_scientificcaseagainstevolution/