Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hypocrites"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "==Redirect== I think it would be better to have this redirected to Hypocrite or Hypocrisy instead of it being plural. We have Liberals, Conservatives, Atheis...") |
(→Redirect: included behavior, distinct from the practice of accusations) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Redirect== | ==Redirect== | ||
I think it would be better to have this redirected to [[Hypocrite]] or [[Hypocrisy]] instead of it being plural. We have [[Liberals]], [[Conservatives]], [[Atheists]], etc. all redirected. Just a thought, thanks~ --[[User:Pinely|<font color="#6666FF">Pinely</font>]] <sup><small>([[User talk:Pinely|TALK]])</small></sup> 23:22, 24 January 2017 (EST) | I think it would be better to have this redirected to [[Hypocrite]] or [[Hypocrisy]] instead of it being plural. We have [[Liberals]], [[Conservatives]], [[Atheists]], etc. all redirected. Just a thought, thanks~ --[[User:Pinely|<font color="#6666FF">Pinely</font>]] <sup><small>([[User talk:Pinely|TALK]])</small></sup> 23:22, 24 January 2017 (EST) | ||
| + | :Thanks, Pinely. I already agreed with you on the same point for the same reasons before I created the article, but the page [[Hypocrite]] was protected and locked as a redirect when I accessed it. I did the next best thing and added an "s" to the word hypocrite in the search window, solely for the purpose of creating the article, and generating a separate page. <br>See explanation for separate article (without redirect) on my '''[[User talk:Dataclarifier#New Article, Old Title Hypocrites|Talk page: New Article, Old Title Hypocrites]]'''--[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] ([[User talk:Dataclarifier|talk]]) 03:12, 25 January 2017 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Additional point> the article [[Hypocrisy]] is limited to negative "criticism of others" by the applying of a "double standard". This article, [[Hypocrites]], details the ''characteristics'' of hypocrites, their own personal behavior, going beyond simply political and cultural criticism of others according to a duplicitous double standard. Read both again, and compare the difference. Again, thank you for your observation, Pinely. God be with you. --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] ([[User talk:Dataclarifier|talk]]) 03:25, 25 January 2017 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 08:36, January 25, 2017
Redirect
I think it would be better to have this redirected to Hypocrite or Hypocrisy instead of it being plural. We have Liberals, Conservatives, Atheists, etc. all redirected. Just a thought, thanks~ --Pinely (TALK) 23:22, 24 January 2017 (EST)
- Thanks, Pinely. I already agreed with you on the same point for the same reasons before I created the article, but the page Hypocrite was protected and locked as a redirect when I accessed it. I did the next best thing and added an "s" to the word hypocrite in the search window, solely for the purpose of creating the article, and generating a separate page.
See explanation for separate article (without redirect) on my Talk page: New Article, Old Title Hypocrites--Dataclarifier (talk) 03:12, 25 January 2017 (EST)
- Additional point> the article Hypocrisy is limited to negative "criticism of others" by the applying of a "double standard". This article, Hypocrites, details the characteristics of hypocrites, their own personal behavior, going beyond simply political and cultural criticism of others according to a duplicitous double standard. Read both again, and compare the difference. Again, thank you for your observation, Pinely. God be with you. --Dataclarifier (talk) 03:25, 25 January 2017 (EST)