User talk:Joeylad
Sorry, it was Breitbart link that triggered the Minuteman block. Sorry. RobSGive Peace a chance 23:30, July 7, 2023 (EDT)
- It looks like Minuteman has been giving you some trouble for a while now. Sorry about it. It shouldn't bother you anymore.
- Technically it wasn't the Breitbart link. It doesn't usually care about those, thankfully. A lot of your edits have, from the bot's perspective, contained references to Hitler, body characteristics, female anatomy, sexuality, insults, and bad language. Cumulatively, Minuteman doesn't really like you. I haven't reviewed the edits, but I trust they are all good, so I will fix that for you. All of those things can be referenced in an appropriate and proper manner, but Minuteman often struggles to understand context. --DavidB4 (TALK) 20:30, July 9, 2023 (EDT)
What's the matter with the UK?
Is the media really that biased, or are the people just brainwashed? RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 16:23, July 17, 2024 (EDT)
- Regarding Starmer riots... "UK riots: Police officer filmed telling men 'stash weapons in mosque' The officer was filmed in a video, which was livestreamed on TikTok, addressing a crowd of men outside the Darul Falah mosque in Hanley, near Stoke-on-Trent on Saturday."[1]Dianne3000 (talk) 00:08, August 7, 2024 (EDT)
Is Birmingham (UK) the worst?
Re radical Islamization?Telling (talk) 07:43, September 24, 2024 (EDT)
Kemi Badenoch
Is it time to begin a Kemi Badenoch bio? Thanks. RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 21:18, October 18, 2024 (EDT)
- Yeah, I can do her if you want. Might throw in her Tory party rival Robert Jenrick whilst I am at it.
--Joeylad (talk) 05:09, October 19, 2024 (EDT)
- Looks like she spanked Jenrick pretty good in debate. RobSThe Truth. Just Putin It Out There 12:06, October 19, 2024 (EDT)
Please make this request
You have been a regular and responsible editor for 3+ years. Please ask User: Aschlafly for picture upload rights and tell him you will only upload pictures that are public domain or covered by generous copyright provisions such as Creative Commons licenses. Tell him User: Conservative recommends that you get this right. Conservative (talk) 20:26, February 19, 2025 (EST)
- I will follow up with Mr. Schlafly via phone this week. Conservative (talk) 20:27, February 19, 2025 (EST)
Joeylad, I uploaded the pictures. Please document them via links, the licenses, etc.
Joeylad, I uploaded the pictures. Please document them via links, the licenses, etc.
Here is how to document an uploaded picture from MediaWiki: https://www.conservapedia.com/File:Cath%C3%A9drale,_AmiensTP_(1).JPG Conservative (talk) 23:05, February 19, 2025 (EST)
.JPG){kind=link}
Nice start
Nice start.
Make sure you put the license info too.
You can see how I added the license info at: https://www.conservapedia.com/File:512px-The_Ancient_High_House,_Stafford,_side_and_back_view.jpg
God willing, I will be talking to Mr. Schlafly this week, but I don't know his schedule. I want to get you picture upload rights as soon as possible. Conservative (talk) 03:02, February 20, 2025 (EST)
Thanks for putting the license info relative to the uploaded pictures. I will reach out to the owner of the website to try to get you picture upload rights as a result.
Thanks for putting the license info relative to the uploaded pictures. I will reach out to the owner of the website to try to get you picture upload rights as a result. Conservative (talk) 20:31, February 20, 2025 (EST)
Good news. You have been given picture upload rights from the owner of Conservapedia. Be sure to document the pictures like what is mentioned below
I have some good news. I spoke to the owner of Conservapedia and you have been given picture upload rights.
Please document the pictures like what was done for this picture: https://www.conservapedia.com/File:512px-The_Ancient_High_House,_Stafford,_side_and_back_view.jpg
Here is what the documentation on that page looks like:
Ancient High House, Stafford
Source: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Ancient_High_House,_Stafford,_side_and_back_view.jpg
Description: English: The largest timber-framed town house in England, The Ancient High House is an Elizabethan town house located on the main street in Stafford.
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.
Thank you for all your contributions. Conservative (talk) 20:20, February 21, 2025 (EST)
Thank you for sorting that out --Joeylad (talk) 14:06, February 22, 2025 (EST)
Small request
Make sure you put down the licensing info for the uploads because that is the second thing that must be done.
For example, for this pic: https://www.conservapedia.com/File:Cheshire_Brit_Isles_Sect_3.svg.png , I put "public domain"
But if it were "Creative Commons" license, I would have put that along with a link to the type of Creative Commons license.
When I got you picture upload rights, I promised the owner of the website that you would put the licensing information. So make sure that you do that. Conservative (talk) 08:29, February 23, 2025 (EST)
Thanks, I did use the public domain template for the public domain images that I added.
--Joeylad (talk) 09:04, February 23, 2025 (EST)
Hi Joeylad,
Please review my additions of attribution to your uploads and always include that in the future (except when the image is in the public domain, and also add the attribution for your upload File:Lincolnshire Brit Isles Sect 5.svg.png. Then I'll reinstate uploading privileges. Thanks!--Andy Schlafly (talk) 14:37, February 26, 2025 (EST)
- Hello Andy,
I've seen your changes to my uploads, and will make sure that is included in the future, and have amended the Lincolnshire upload accordingly. Thanks
--Joeylad (talk) 19:22, March 1, 2025 (EST)
- Thanks. You'll always include attribution to the image creator when it's not in the public domain, right? The Wikipedia source includes an easy-to-use reference for attribution in reusing an image on the web, under "More details" and then "Use this file on the web".--Andy Schlafly (talk) 13:33, March 2, 2025 (EST)
- You're welcome. Yeah, I saw you added the attribution and will make sure I include the same when uploading non-public domain content in the future. --Joeylad (talk) 04:08, March 4, 2025 (EST)
- Uploading privileges restored! Thank you.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 14:10, March 4, 2025 (EST)
- You're welcome. Yeah, I saw you added the attribution and will make sure I include the same when uploading non-public domain content in the future. --Joeylad (talk) 04:08, March 4, 2025 (EST)
- Thanks. You'll always include attribution to the image creator when it's not in the public domain, right? The Wikipedia source includes an easy-to-use reference for attribution in reusing an image on the web, under "More details" and then "Use this file on the web".--Andy Schlafly (talk) 13:33, March 2, 2025 (EST)
NYT: Can the Right Confront Antisemitism in Its Ranks?
_18_59,_October_1_2025.PNG)
RobSRecovering Republican 11:24, December 18, 2025 (EST)
- Summary: "Many American conservatives oppose hate crime laws primarily because they view them as violating principles of equal justice under the law, punishing thought or motive rather than action alone, risking inconsistent or politicized enforcement, and potentially infringing on free speech—preferring instead that all violent crimes be prosecuted equally regardless of bias motivation."
- I trust this clarifies matters. Conservative (talk) 11:41, December 18, 2025 (EST)
User:Conservative trolling
]
User:Conservative, an apologist for Bidenism & Keynesianism, asserts "A great strength of the United States is its very consistent growth of its GNP over decades and its quick recovery the few times its GNP has gone down. See also Economic stimulus.
The Vietnam and Afghan wars occupy 30 of 57 years between 1964 and 2021.
Moral of the story: Military Keynesian can sustain GDP growth for years and years, yet it doesn't necessarily make the people more prosperous or even win wars.
- [Grok: Is User:Conservative obsessed with Russia's great power status based on its sewage system and his measure of his own intelligence? https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Conservative
Analysis of Conservapedia User "Conservative"
Based on an examination of Conservapedia content and related discussions, the user "Conservative" (likely a long-time editor under that handle) does appear to have a notable fixation on Russia's infrastructure shortcomings—particularly its sewage system—as a metric for undermining claims of its "great power" status. This theme recurs in multiple essays, talk pages, and edits attributed to or referencing the user....
1. Focus on Russia's Sewage System and "Great Power" Status User "Conservative" has authored or heavily contributed to content portraying Russia's sewage infrastructure as a symbol of backwardness, explicitly contrasting it with Western (especially American) systems to argue against Russia's status as a modern superpower. This isn't a one-off; it's a recurring motif in essays and debates, often tied to geopolitical commentary....
- Patterns in Talk Pages and Edits
- On User talk:Aschlafly (Conservapedia founder Andrew Schlafly's page), discussions reference the user repeatedly arguing that Russia's (and Greenland/Alaska's) harsh climates prevent comparable sewage systems to temperate Western nations, using this to "brainwash" Schlafly into moderating pro-Russia views....
2. Emphasis on Intelligence/IQ as a Measure of Superiority
The user is Conservapedia's most prolific contributor on topics like atheism, evolution, and related pseudoscientific debates, where IQ serves as a frequent benchmark for ideological validation. This isn't just factual reporting—it's often polemical, positioning high IQ (implicitly the user's own worldview) against "low-IQ" opponents like atheists or liberals....
- Self-Measurement Angle
- In broader Conservapedia context, the user's output (e.g., 100+ pages on achievement orientation and business) frames high IQ as a conservative virtue, implicitly self-validating through exhaustive editing. External analyses (e.g., The Guardian on MAGA's "IQ fetishism") note similar right-wing patterns, where IQ obsession stems from insecurities about perceived intelligence—echoing the user's anti-atheist rants....
Conclusion: Yes, with Nuances
User "Conservative" fixates on Russia's sewage woes as a quirky but persistent jab at its superpower pretensions, substantiated by dedicated essays and edit histories. Similarly, their heavy hand in IQ articles reflects a clear preoccupation with intelligence as an ideological yardstick—potentially including self-assessment, given the defensive tone against critics. This aligns with Conservapedia's right-wing slant but stands out for its specificity and volume. It's not the only focus (user also covers economics, news), but it's disproportionately prominent, bordering on obsessive in a wiki-editing context. For deeper dives, the linked pages provide raw evidence.