User contributions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- 05:52, November 4, 2012 diff hist +102 User:PaulDiFoglio current
- 01:08, November 3, 2012 diff hist -298 Christopher Hitchens the silly comment in the caption sounds like parody. Putting it up on our website will only make people think we're a parody site and not take us seriously. Let's not fall for this
- 01:04, November 3, 2012 diff hist +9 You didn't build that This site needs some serious editorial help. You have no idea how annoying it is to have to clean up after everyone else's messes
- 01:01, November 3, 2012 diff hist -1 Patriotism I fail to see the point of having two periods at the end of a sentence.
- 01:01, November 3, 2012 diff hist +1 Hollywood values again, no consistency whatsoever in section order -- not very encyclopedic, eh?
- 00:57, November 3, 2012 diff hist -17 Pope Benedict XVI Unless something's changed in the last twenty-something hours, I believe "footnotes" go last and "also see" should be "see also." Why is there never any consistency here?
- 00:55, November 3, 2012 diff hist 0 Anderson Cooper Come one, people, let's get our period placement right
- 00:53, November 3, 2012 diff hist 0 Cable News Network →Well Known Bias: There's really no need to capitalize the first letter of every word in a section heading
- 00:51, November 3, 2012 diff hist -1 Mainstream media That is *not* how a cquote template's supposed to be used, people
- 00:49, November 3, 2012 diff hist +10 Barack Hussein Obama This should be a *reference*. It looks unbecoming of an encyclopedia to have a link like that just sitting at the end of a sentence.
- 00:48, November 3, 2012 diff hist -23 Formula One I honestly don't know why we bother putting in a "notes" heading (incorrect name, by the way -- it's "footnotes") if there are no references in the entire article
- 05:35, November 2, 2012 diff hist +4 Charles de Gaulle definitely seems like a word that could use an external link -- especially when it's in the first damn paragraph of the article
- 05:34, November 2, 2012 diff hist -1 Vichy regime extra spacing makes the article look a bit strange and isn't very aesthetically becoming of an encyclopedia
- 05:32, November 2, 2012 diff hist -29 T-34 tank not sure why we have a "references" heading if no one's going to bother adding any references
- 05:31, November 2, 2012 diff hist +15 Panther Tank could we please have the decency to add captions to pictures. This *is* an encyclopedia after all
- 02:40, November 2, 2012 diff hist +84 User talk:PaulDiFoglio →Disciplinary action... current
- 01:44, November 1, 2012 diff hist +185 User talk:PaulDiFoglio →Can you dial back the sarcasm a bit?
- 01:33, November 1, 2012 diff hist +276 User talk:PaulDiFoglio →Can you dial back the sarcasm a bit?
- 01:05, November 1, 2012 diff hist +526 User talk:PaulDiFoglio
- 01:00, November 1, 2012 diff hist +73 Nazi platform of 1925 giving the reader the simple encylopedic courtesy of an introductory sentence instead of letting them dive straight into material. Also had to add {{reflist}} because the original author didn't
- 00:53, November 1, 2012 diff hist +303 User talk:Snowy Undo revision 1016063 by Snowy (talk) Please do not delete important comments on talk pages. Please instead address the issue properly.
- 00:52, November 1, 2012 diff hist +147 Body Mass Index again, as a trustworthy encyclopedia I think it's important we include this relevant information. Not sure why we're struggling to do that current
- 00:49, November 1, 2012 diff hist +74 Uruguay →Economy: a plain picture looks bad an isn't very becoming of an encyclopedia
- 00:47, November 1, 2012 diff hist +303 User talk:Snowy →Bumblebee: new section
- 00:46, November 1, 2012 diff hist +8 Bumblebee please put at least a little effort into making articles consistent in their formatting -- this is getting ridiculous
- 00:43, November 1, 2012 diff hist +15 Daniel Webster because *his* name isn't in the picture, it is okay to put it in the caption. I'd like to see more consistency here
- 00:42, November 1, 2012 diff hist 0 Dartmouth College again, really not that difficult
- 00:41, November 1, 2012 diff hist -16 Dinesh D'Souza don't need name in caption when it's already in the picture
- 00:41, November 1, 2012 diff hist -6 Affirmative Action again, the title only needs to be bolded once in the text
- 00:40, November 1, 2012 diff hist +92 University of California, Los Angeles unfairness of their love of affirmative action. Also, please remember to put a simple bullet point before each item under see also -- not that hard
- 00:39, November 1, 2012 diff hist 0 Theodore Kaczynski simple grammar: in English the period goes inside the quotation marks. I'll assume the homeschooled students who write these articles haven't reached that lesson in their education yet
- 00:37, November 1, 2012 diff hist +20 Al Qaeda →See also: adding former leader to see also
- 00:37, November 1, 2012 diff hist +59 Amoral surprised no one had the decency to add this. It's the "Trustworthy Encyclopedia" for a reason, people.
- 00:35, November 1, 2012 diff hist +27 Essay: New Ordeal adding see also, continued needed improvement
- 00:33, November 1, 2012 diff hist +4 Franklin D. Roosevelt →notes: trying to add at least a little bit of consistency to these articles. Again, "footnotes." Not just "notes."
- 00:31, November 1, 2012 diff hist 0 Agricultural Adjustment Administration →References: one column is *way* too long
- 00:30, November 1, 2012 diff hist -1 Mitt Romney →2012 Presidential campaign: really not that hard
- 00:29, November 1, 2012 diff hist 0 Mitt Romney →Economic Agenda: periods go before the reference, not after -- not that hard
- 00:28, November 1, 2012 diff hist +10 Mitt Romney mentioning Obama's incumbency for the debate he lost
- 00:26, November 1, 2012 diff hist +37 New! Kenneth Grahame redirect to The Wing in the Willows current
- 00:26, November 1, 2012 diff hist +4 Winnie the Pooh book titles get italicized -- not that hard
- 00:24, November 1, 2012 diff hist +10 Electrical resistance better like this
- 00:23, November 1, 2012 diff hist +88 User talk:PaulDiFoglio →An article you might want to write: re:
- 00:23, November 1, 2012 diff hist +237 New! User talk:RayfordCry welcoming new user current
- 22:11, October 31, 2012 diff hist +129 User:PaulDiFoglio
- 22:09, October 31, 2012 diff hist +4 Andrew Schlafly I believe "Conservapedia" is supposed to be italicized. People, this is your encyclopedia, at least learn to write its name properly
- 22:07, October 31, 2012 diff hist 0 Senate Conservatives Fund internal link for Jim DeMint in the article's first mention of him, not a later one
- 22:06, October 31, 2012 diff hist 0 Senate Elections 2012 yeah they're evil, but as an encyclopedia we should at least make the effort to capitalize their name
- 22:05, October 31, 2012 diff hist +2 Burger Court its *infamous* for Roe v. Wade, not just "famous"
- 22:04, October 31, 2012 diff hist +19 Supreme Court of the United States →Decisions by Term: presumably we're going to add to this small list -- this is an encyclopedia after all