User contributions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- 01:12, November 11, 2008 diff hist +644 Medical marijuana Evidence that supporters smoke marijuana? Analgesia is proven.
- 23:15, October 29, 2008 diff hist +650 Russell's teapot Fallacy is misleading, the rebuttal would completely change the original argument so that any conclusion is irrelevant.
- 02:35, October 29, 2008 diff hist +262 m Logical fallacy Examples made more clear.
- 02:29, October 29, 2008 diff hist +63 m Logical fallacy Example flawed.
- 01:55, October 9, 2008 diff hist +1,220 Talk:God Confused, seeks a complete explanation.
- 13:08, August 21, 2008 diff hist +740 m Talk:God omnipotence?
- 17:15, August 20, 2008 diff hist -121 m Vestigial structures Lack of understanding of evolution, devolution is not a word
- 00:16, August 10, 2008 diff hist -103 m The Da Vinci Code Irrelevant, not neutral
- 14:10, August 6, 2008 diff hist +446 Talk:The Da Vinci Code Learn together wanted me to discuss
- 14:00, August 6, 2008 diff hist +546 Talk:God Attribute section needs to be changed?
- 00:54, August 6, 2008 diff hist -35 Profanity Less awkward word choice
- 00:51, August 6, 2008 diff hist -54 The Da Vinci Code If it's alternate history, then isn't it a given that it will change the record? It's redundant. Religious experience line is awkward and uses slightly loaded word choice.
- 23:56, August 5, 2008 diff hist +690 The Catcher in the Rye Undo revision 457292 by Deborah (Talk)
- 23:56, August 5, 2008 diff hist -679 The Catcher in the Rye Undo revision 495647 by Jhan (Talk)
- 01:11, August 5, 2008 diff hist +679 The Catcher in the Rye Argumentative, biased, short
- 00:24, August 5, 2008 diff hist -21 m The Da Vinci Code Redundancy, no evidence of intentional attack, quotes around "novel" unneeded and confusing.
- 17:58, August 3, 2008 diff hist +54 The Da Vinci Code Argumentative, rewrote lines about historical accuracy to be more neutral.