(edit summary removed)
+174
Undo revision 1172080 by Conservative (talk) The theory does make sense, this statement is correct
+71
Undo revision 1170531 by Hess (talk)
-7,921
Undo revision 1170532 by Hess (talk) Has been like this way for many years, no need to change it imho.
+7,920
Undo revision 1170484 by YPATRICKSON (talk)
-239
Undo revision 1170483 by Conservativecrusader (talk)
+5
Hey: new section
+425
Undo revision 1170477 by Alithegeek (talk)
-12
Undo revision 1170455 by Christiankoch (talk)
-19
Undo revision 1170456 by Christiankoch (talk)
-18
Created page with "I'm a little confused about this template. I don't think this wiki really needs it. ~~~~"
no edit summary
+305
no edit summary
-4
no edit summary
+31
no edit summary
+22
Created page with "{{welcome}} Hi, your account name looks reasonably suspicious. Please don't vandalize the great wiki as you will be promptly blocked and your edits will be reverted, wasting..."
Created page with "Hi, please don't vandalize pages. It is unhelpful, unproductive and will get you banned. ~~~~"
Undo revision 1170009 by Sultrytemptress (talk) reverted vandalism
-73
no edit summary
-1
no edit summary
+1
no edit summary
-1
no edit summary
+180
no edit summary
+182
Created page with "Could someone please fix this Double Redirect ? ~~~~"
Redirected page to New Hampshire primary
-652
Created page with "The New Hampshire presidential primary for the 2016 cycle will be held on February 9, 2016. Republican primary voters are not as socially conservative in New Hampshire as..."
no edit summary
+421
Xephos: new section
+173
Undo revision 1167587 by Xephos (talk) Seems to be bad-faith edit
-188
Happy Hour: new section
+196
Losers
+70
no edit summary
+68
no edit summary
+26
no edit summary
+45
no edit summary
+2
no edit summary
+78
no edit summary
-1
no edit summary
+22
no edit summary
+93
no edit summary
+80
no edit summary
+105