User contributions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- 04:13, September 24, 2012 diff hist -2,925 Rachel Maddow Undo revision 1008619 by Biblethumpinjosh (talk)
- 04:12, September 24, 2012 diff hist -1 Talk:Rachel Maddow →The article is devoid of any verifiable facts
- 04:11, September 24, 2012 diff hist -2,925 Rachel Maddow Undo revision 1008616 by Biblethumpinjosh (talk)
- 04:09, September 24, 2012 diff hist -2,925 Rachel Maddow Undo revision 1008611 by Biblethumpinjosh (talk)
- 04:06, September 24, 2012 diff hist +105 Talk:Rachel Maddow →The article is devoid of any verifiable facts
- 04:04, September 24, 2012 diff hist -2,925 Rachel Maddow The information that was removed is not supported by sources.
- 03:59, September 24, 2012 diff hist +19 Rachel Maddow Fixed citation so that it points to the indicated transcript
- 03:52, September 24, 2012 diff hist -3,301 Rachel Maddow Undo revision 1008592 by Dvergne (talk)
- 03:51, September 24, 2012 diff hist +344 Talk:Rachel Maddow
- 03:48, September 24, 2012 diff hist -3,301 Rachel Maddow I came here looking for a conservative depiction of the subject and found an article completely devoid of any verifiable facts. Perhaps we should source our claims before broadcasting them.
- 03:40, September 24, 2012 diff hist -3,301 Rachel Maddow
- 03:32, September 24, 2012 diff hist -3,299 Rachel Maddow We can certainly do a better job of sourcing our claims. Most of the article is not sourced at all, and the sources that are provided are totally irrelevant to the claims made. It make us look silly.
- 02:43, September 24, 2012 diff hist -3,324 Rachel Maddow Undo revision 1008526 by Dvergne (talk)
- 02:36, September 24, 2012 diff hist -3,324 Rachel Maddow Removed all claims that lacked proper sourcing and were not common knowledge.