Difference between revisions of "The Clash of Civilizations and Remaking of World Order"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(See also)
(11 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The Clash of Civilizations is a book written by [[Harvard]] professor [[Samuel P. Huntington]] in which he states that it is his belief that the conflict of the Post Cold War era is going to be derived from religious/cultural differences.
+
[[Image:Clash civilizations.jpg|right|thumb]]
 +
'''The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order''' is a book written by [[Harvard]] professor [[Samuel P. Huntington]] in which he states that it is his belief that the conflict of the Post Cold War era is going to be derived from religious/cultural differences.
  
The book was met with consternation and anger by many academicians, who saw this work as an oversimplification of the incredible complexity of international affairs.  There were many errors to point in this direction; for example, Huntington classified [[Israel]] as a nation in the [[Muslim Culture]].  The academic journal [[Foreign Affairs]] published a refutation of the book, entirely in verse, quoted below:
+
The book was met with consternation and anger by some, who saw this work as an oversimplification of the incredible complexity of international affairs.  There were many errors to point in this direction; for example, Huntington classified [[Israel]] as a nation in the Muslim Culture.  The academic journal ''Foreign Affairs'' published a refutation of the book, entirely in verse, quoted below:
  
 
:''"We owe to Samuel Huntington a potent provocation,''
 
:''"We owe to Samuel Huntington a potent provocation,''
Line 14: Line 15:
 
:''Huntington has been undone by paradigm-amour."''
 
:''Huntington has been undone by paradigm-amour."''
  
Although partly a joke, the poem encapsulates most of the criticisms of Huntington's work.[http://www.foreignaffairs.org/19970301facomment3764/frederick-s-tipson/culture-clash-ification-a-verse-to-huntington-s-curse.html]
+
Although partly a joke - a jab that the book can be so easily dismissed as with a poem - the poem encapsulates most of the criticisms of Huntington's work.[http://www.foreignaffairs.org/19970301facomment3764/frederick-s-tipson/culture-clash-ification-a-verse-to-huntington-s-curse.html]
 +
 
 +
==See also==
 +
*[[A Study of History]]
 +
*[[Near abroad]]
 +
 
 +
==External links==
 +
*[http://www.foreignaffairs.org/19930601FAESSAY5188-faarticles/samuel-p-huntington/the-clash-of-civilizations.html The Clash of Civilizations?,] Samuel P. Huntington, ''Foreign Affairs'', Summer 1993.
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Political Books|Clash of Civilizations]]

Revision as of 20:27, May 12, 2021

Clash civilizations.jpg

The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order is a book written by Harvard professor Samuel P. Huntington in which he states that it is his belief that the conflict of the Post Cold War era is going to be derived from religious/cultural differences.

The book was met with consternation and anger by some, who saw this work as an oversimplification of the incredible complexity of international affairs. There were many errors to point in this direction; for example, Huntington classified Israel as a nation in the Muslim Culture. The academic journal Foreign Affairs published a refutation of the book, entirely in verse, quoted below:

"We owe to Samuel Huntington a potent provocation,
A trenchant tract to counteract a clear exaggeration:
The notion that the West has won, its culture now supreme,
His book rejects--and then corrects--as wishful in extreme.
For, he insists, our world consists of cultural formations
Arising (and revising) out of eight great civilizations.
He sets our pulses pounding and our wisdom teeth to gnashing
With come-to-blows scenarios of different cultures clashing.
This is of course a tour de force, but somewhere in the tour,
Huntington has been undone by paradigm-amour."

Although partly a joke - a jab that the book can be so easily dismissed as with a poem - the poem encapsulates most of the criticisms of Huntington's work.[1]

See also

External links