Blakely v. Washington

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by FernoKlump (talk | contribs) at 23:51, April 29, 2008. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004), the U.S. Supreme Court held that facts, other than a prior conviction, supporting a sentence above the standard sentencing range in a legislatively prescribed sentencing guidelines system must be found be a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.

Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the Court decision, while Justices Anthony Kennedy, Sandra Day O'Connor and Stephen Breyer and Chief Justice William Rehnquist were in dissent.

This case concerned a state criminal proceeding. The U.S. Supreme Court extended this Blakely rule to the federal Sentencing Guidelines in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005).

External Links

  • Case at FindLaw (registration may be required)