Talk:Greece

Was there something wrong with this source? JC 10:26, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

It's a lot of speculation, citing obscure names and sources, by a graduate student. It doesn't deserve to be the bulk of an entry about Greece. Maybe when the entry on Greece addresses far more significant aspects of its culture, then this could be a footnote near the end. It should not be the sum and substance, as there is no evidence that it was all that significant.--Aschlafly 10:30, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

Fair enough. Not being up to the high standard of homeschooler contributions it just lowers the tone of things.

JC 10:36, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

Let's see what they say at Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy [1]. So whatever you make of it, the facts are there. I'm not going to re-edit this article since I got a warning for that.--Sherman 10:39, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

That source is just the kind of liberal-bias Conservapedia is trying to avoid.

JC 10:44, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

So the conclusion could be: It's not proven that ancient greek scholars used gay practices, and it could even be a myth set free by the liberals in order to promote and glorify homosexuality?--Sherman 10:49, 14 March 2007 (EDT)