Living Constitution
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SkipJohnson (talk | contribs) at 17:10, September 20, 2007. It may differ significantly from current revision.
A living Constitution is one that changes based on perceptions of the changing views of the public. As a practical matter, it means the U.S. Constitution should be interpreted however a majority of the U.S. Supreme Court feels.
The phrase "living Constitution" was expressly used by the liberal four-Justice dissent in Rummel v. Estelle, 445 U.S. 263 (1980), and it has been implicitly embraced by the left side of the Court in numerous rulings. The term is frequently used by activist judges trying to justify their attempts to legislate from the bench.