User talk:Aschlafly

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RobSmith (talk | contribs) at 12:55, October 20, 2026. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Are you ever going to act to end this trolling and harassment?

[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] [22][23] Here's an example of him spamming personal attacks from user space into Mainsapce, which he only does cause he knows you allow it: [24][25][26] Andy, Do you believe killing people for profit is ethical? -->[27][28][29][30][31][32][33]

Andy, Are you going to delete any of these?

Why don't you delete this stuff, or are you going to continue encouraging your personal attack dog/troll?

okay, Mr. Schlafly, I'll demonstrate what happens when you allow anonymous users who do not edit under their real name to spam other editor's names into Mainspace Titles. [34][35][36][37]


That' just a few. Why do you regard personal attacks against editors more precious than encyclopedic content? RobSDo heterosexual normies spend 20 yrs obsessing over gay bars, bathhouses and drag queens? 18:36, July 30, 2026 (EDT)

I get the message loud and clear - so does everybody else. Ken's trolling and personal attacks in Mainspace are "encyclopedic".

Conservapedia:Guidelines#User pages and user space

“ Your user pages, user talk, and user space are indeed your castle, from which you can agree, disagree and discuss issues in a civil manner. However, you cannot use them to bully, ridicule (make fun of) or attack (denigrate) Conservapedia, or other users, and their opinions even if generated by AI. Users are free to remove comments from their own user talk pages. ”

User:Conservative cannot rationally or intelligently debate or discuss issues. He is focused on attacking and destroying his "enemies". That's how Conservapedia gets filled with spam about UK potholes or Russian gay bathhouses, as if his "enemies" are personally responsible for such things (by such reasoning, Andy Schlafly and User:Conservative are responsible for Epstein Island by virtue of either being American, or sympathetic to American culture and society). And it is only because you allow it, to the detriment of editors and Conservapedia overall. RobSDo heterosexual normies spend 20 yrs obsessing over gay bars, bathhouses and drag queens? 11:40, August 19, 2026 (EDT)

Spamming AI slop to multiple user talk pages is by definition trolling

and impedes editor's productive editing. See User:Conservative contribs. We've perrmabanned other editors for less. RobSDo heterosexual normies spend 20 yrs obsessing over gay bars, bathhouses and drag queens? 01:24, August 27, 2026 (EDT)

Here's an example of him spamming personal attacks from user space into Mainsapce, which he only does cause he knows you allow it: [38] [39]

According to AI, Andy Schlafly is User:Conservative.

Grok 9-20-25.PNG
Has Andy Schlalfy ever edited under the User:Conservative account?

User:Conservative in the Conservapedia article and elsewhere has repeatedly said more than one editor uses the User:Conservative account. Two Questions: (1) Have you ever edited under the User:Conservative account? If so, (2) is this why you steadfastly refuse to delete spam postings and personal attacks and discipline Ken/Mark Miller for his persistent violations of Conservapedia Commandments and civility? RobSWWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war? 16:23, July 3, 2026 (EDT)

No answer. RobSDo heterosexual normies spend 20 yrs obsessing over gay bars, bathhouses and drag queens? 17:44, August 1, 2026 (EDT)
8 weeks. No answer. RobSDo heterosexual normies spend 20 yrs obsessing over gay bars, bathhouses and drag queens? 01:51, August 27, 2026 (EDT)
No, I've never edited from another editor's account.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 01:56, August 27, 2026 (EDT)
Then why don't you delete his ad hominem attacks against a Senior Admin in user space which blatantly violate both Guidelines and Conservapedia:Administrator's Guide? All you need to do is enforce standing Conservapedia policy a few times. The fact that you have steadfastly refused for 16 years since 2011 only encourag