Talk:World of Warcraft
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dpbsmith (talk | contribs) at 22:56, June 21, 2007. It may differ significantly from current revision.
I think we are too dignified to have such lengthy articles about video games. I propose that we do not have any articles on video games at all. What say you? ---Be not dismayed XXI June 2007
- It's a pretty significant cultural phenomenon. I am about to apply my personal test. I am about to see whether it's been mentioned in The New York Times. If so, I think it's important. And if it's "fit to print," it's probably fit for an encyclopedia. Here goes. Dpbsmith 18:46, 21 June 2007 (EDT)
- A search on the exact phrase "World of Warcraft" plus "Blizzard" in The New York Times since 2000 turns up 26 hits. On a quick eyeballing, virtually all appear to be relevant and many of which are clear news articles about the game. Here are a few:
- December 9, 2004: "Thousands of Opponents Await In a New Virtual Fantasy World"
- February 10, 2005: "The Game Is a Hit, But the Work Isn't Done"
- August 6, 2005: "Social Significance in Playing Online? You Betcha!" "Yet outside my romantic and family life, nothing this year has given me more satisfaction than helping my guild in World of Warcraft defeat Ragnaros for the first time early Tuesday morning. World of Warcraft has been the video game world's breakout phenomenon since its introduction last November, signing up more than 3.5 million paying subscribers worldwide...."
- December 9, 2005:" Ogre to Slay? Outsource It To Chinese," about the "gold farming" phenomenon
- May 11, 2006: "A Major Online Game Galaxy Gets a New Race of Characters"
- September 5, 2006: "An Online Game, Made in America, Seizes the Globe"
- January 17, 2007 "World of Warcraft Expands"
- Speaking as someone who has never played World of Warcraft or any other MMORPG, nor Dungeons & Dragons, the evidence would seem to suggest that "World of Warcraft" is a significant cultural phenomenon. Dpbsmith 18:56, 21 June 2007 (EDT)