User talk:Aschlafly
Topic ban
Please impose a topic ban on User:Conservative's foreign policy and defense related contributions, at least through 2024 primary election season. His deliberate CP:Trolling, "employing redundant arguments intended to occupy and waste the time, efforts, or energies of other users or to distract them from productive editing and making mainspace article contributions" occupies a minimum of 3 hours, and sometimes as much as 6-8 hours of my time DAILY, prohibiting me from making substantive contributions on election and foreign policy matters.
User:Conservative has stated on dozens of occasions, over many years, that he has no interest in politics, and has repeatedly violated his own pledges to cease contributing on those subjects. His contributions are solely and specifically intended to irritate and waste the time of other editors, a violation of CP Commandments and Guidelines.
I have no objection to him contributing on election matters, where he can spew his neocon racist content to his heart's content. Thank you. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 17:27, December 28, 2023 (EST)
- Andy told you on your talk page: "...I think there should be more leeway for strong editors to create essays and categorize them as they think best. That includes you too. Essays are a valuable part of this website (in contrast with the tyranny at Wikipedia which prohibits them). The essay author is easily identified from the entry history.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 21:26, December 22, 2023 (EST)"
- Andy likes that I create essays (including political essays) - some of which have tens of thousands or thousands of page views. Conservative (talk) 17:43, December 28, 2023 (EST)
- I have evidence that you are running a bot on some of your trolling Essays to rack up page views. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 17:47, December 28, 2023 (EST)
- Disagreeing with you is not trolling. This is not RobSmithPedia. You are not infallible and you are not God. Conservative (talk) 17:52, December 28, 2023 (EST)
- (ec) Note: You do not dispute the allegation that you are contributing "neocon racist content" to Conservapedia. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 17:47, December 28, 2023 (EST)
- I have evidence that you are running a bot on some of your trolling Essays to rack up page views. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 17:47, December 28, 2023 (EST)
- REDIRECT Template:Hide collapse
Let's examine this edit today User:Conservative calls "motivational": "The only way we can compete with the Eastern Bloc...". The "Eastern Bloc" was a political and military alliance that ceased to exist in 1991. The ideology of the "Eastern Bloc" - communism - was defeated by the Russian Orthodox Church in 1991, yet User:Conservative created another Russophobic cut n paste screed this morning based upon highly dubious, racist, and neocon sources with false, inflammatory, and exaggerated information.
One can only assume User:Conservative is "motivated" by the same racial fear and disdain for the "Slavic hordes" of Eastern Europe that his sources broadcast.RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 18:14, December 28, 2023 (EST)
- REDIRECT Template:Hide collapse
Conservapedia Essay space should not be a platform for Liberal fascism, and that is all User:Conservative's Geopolitical Essays amount to, not based upon any knowledge or expertise in the area, but rather motivated by spite and a personal vendetta toward another editor. RobSZelensky didn't kill himself 13:03, December 29, 2023 (EST)
Can you explain this?
Can you explain what happened with User:BHathorn as far as his recent blocking spree and apparent vandalism of templates?
It seems puzzling given his past editing. He appears to be a longstanding good-faith editor. Maybe if you have the time to look at his past edits that will explain things.
I have a deadline to meet so I don't have time to investigate matters. But via email I did ask you to look into things. Conservative (talk) 07:54, January 4, 2024 (EST)
- Please finish the unblocking of people. I did as much unblocking as I could do. Conservative (talk) 07:56, January 4, 2024 (EST)
- I am guessing that his password was hacked. I will let you come up with the best solution to solve this issue. User: PeterKa blocked him for a year. I changed the block to 3 days so that gives you time to come up with a solution. I also gave User:BHathorn my Conservapedia email address on his talk page. Conservative (talk) 09:43, January 4, 2024 (EST)
- P.S. The User: Conservative account password is unhackable. Rest assured that no hacker will ever hack it! The odds of the dead atheist movement resurrecting is likelier and that is nearly impossible! Conservative (talk) 10:01, January 4, 2024 (EST)
- It appears as if there was a hacker who hacked into User:BHathorn's account. The hacker appears to be from a northern state in the USA. I am awaiting hearing a reply from User:BHathorn. Conservative (talk) 10:27, January 4, 2024 (EST)
- P.S. The User: Conservative account password is unhackable. Rest assured that no hacker will ever hack it! The odds of the dead atheist movement resurrecting is likelier and that is nearly impossible! Conservative (talk) 10:01, January 4, 2024 (EST)
- I am guessing that his password was hacked. I will let you come up with the best solution to solve this issue. User: PeterKa blocked him for a year. I changed the block to 3 days so that gives you time to come up with a solution. I also gave User:BHathorn my Conservapedia email address on his talk page. Conservative (talk) 09:43, January 4, 2024 (EST)
I unblocked User:BHathorn. He was hacked and he changed his password. I confirmed that the new IP address was from the right editor. Conservative (talk) 10:51, January 4, 2024 (EST)
Re: Thank you
Not a problem. Unfortunately, I was in bed asleep at the time that hacker/vandal managed to seize control of BHathorn's account to go on that vandalism/blocking spree so I didn't get to catch it as it happened, but I did manage to unblock the accounts that had not already been unblocked (including your own) after getting blocked during the vandalism spree. As to the templates that got vandalized (via the vandal putting up that fake message at the top of the page in such a way as to block access to the editing tools as well as the view of the templates themselves), I think those edits should be oversighted to prevent their being shown in the editing history (if I were able to do oversighting myself on those edits, I would, but I don't have Oversight user rights). Northwest (talk) 02:25, January 5, 2024 (EST)
- Tremendous work, Northwest, thank you! Oversighting is a great idea for this at a convenient time.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 02:55, January 5, 2024 (EST)
RINO Of The Year, 2023
Hello Mr. Schlafly,
I am wondering if I could declare Lindsey Graham RINO of the Year. I created the page late this year and there has not been much discussion. However, Lindsey Graham was suggested as being a good pick for RINO of the Year. I hope you had a wonderful Christmas and New Year!
Thank you!--TheNewRight (talk) 23:08, January 5, 2024 (EST)