Difference between revisions of "User:Iduan"
m (update with newer work) |
m (removing what described my old editing style - now the vast majority of my article-space edits are not minor) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
I put a lot of work into [[Nigeria#Structure]] - where I described the structure of the executive, judiciary and legislature. The judiciary is probably the most detailed part I have, simply because I'm most interested in judicial aspects. Ditto with [[John Jay#The Jay Court]]. | I put a lot of work into [[Nigeria#Structure]] - where I described the structure of the executive, judiciary and legislature. The judiciary is probably the most detailed part I have, simply because I'm most interested in judicial aspects. Ditto with [[John Jay#The Jay Court]]. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
====Templates==== | ====Templates==== | ||
Revision as of 17:30, March 13, 2011
I am IDuan of Arlington, Virginia - a suburb right next to the District of Columbia.
Conservapedia
I joined Conservapedia in late April 2007 and started seriously editing in August.
What I'm Currently Working on
An extensive navigation box documenting the history of the Supreme Court. After creating this, I plan on using Template:officeholder to the Associate Justices' pages. I also plan on adding party chairman to Template:Officeholder.
Highlights of work
Contest
In four contests, I have compiled 2336 points. My record is in the Conservapedia:Contest5 - where I compiled 1131.
Pages
A few of the many articles I've really worked on are Frank Murphy, Marquis de Lafayette, Majoritarianism, Waves, Eddystone Lighthouse, XYZ Affair, Congressional Page, William R. Day and HTML table formatting. I've also done many universities, including UMD, Boston, Arizona, UNC, UConn, Penn St., Johns Hopkins, Howard and NIU. Beyond that I like to spread my edits around and vary them.
I put a lot of work into Nigeria#Structure - where I described the structure of the executive, judiciary and legislature. The judiciary is probably the most detailed part I have, simply because I'm most interested in judicial aspects. Ditto with John Jay#The Jay Court.
Templates
I have created a few templates, the ones I'm most proud of are: Template:Template, Baseball, Template:USState, Template:NBA, Template:NFLDraft, Template:Officeholder (and a bunch of sub-pages for that), Template:Supreme Court (and every subpage from the Jay to Roberts Courts), Template:MLBTeam (which I've added to every MLB team) and Template:University (which I have put on about 131 articles so far). Some templates that I did not create but I did do a lot of work on are Template:Country and Template:Taxonomy.
Categories
I don't work much in this area, but I did help User:TK clean out Category:Navigation box (which was full because of missing <noinclude> tags on templates - this took a while to find everything, and I also worked a lot on cleaning up Category:Information technology - it's now much cleaner because there are specific categories and pages are better organized.
Full list of major works
My editing style/preferences
Basic page format:
Body ==Notes== (if there are references not used with <ref> tags ==References== ==See also== ==External links==
The above is the same as the format in the Conservapedia:Manual of Style, and it makes the most sense. References are most pertinent to the article text itself, so they go first; see also links are internal, so they go second, and external links go last.
As far as minor edits go: I do not use French spacing, and I usually remove it where I see it (the wiki software renders it as one space anyway, so it's just an extra character); I also remove serial commas.
References always go outside grammar marks (punctuation).
Punctuation does not always go inside quotation marks. For example, periods. If the text enclosed within the quotation marks is a full sentence - the period goes inside the quotation marks. "John said, 'My name is John.'" If not, then the period goes outside: "John said that he was '17 going on 18'."
Images, unless they are within templates/tables, should always go in thumbs - they should not stand alone.
I have a fairly hard to explain view of categories - but I firmly believe it should be the universal view. Say there is a Category, Category:Apple Inc., that is part of a larger Category, Category:Information technology. The article that is specifically on Apple Inc, and thus encompasses all of aspects of the Category, should be the ONLY article within that category to be in the super-categories that Category:Apple Inc. is in (i.e. Category:Information technology).
Large blocks of text should usually be split up by sections - no one wants to read what looks like 2 paragraphs with 50 sentences. Wiki sections allow emphasis to be added and they allow clear organization.
My Computing World
I'm a pretty big fan of Mac OSX Leopard, but before it came out I was definitely an XP guy. I think that Spotlight just puts Macs miles ahead of PCs. I use Safari, XCode (for python) and Smultron (for html).