Difference between revisions of "Talk:History of Written Language"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with 'I will not edit this page as it is JacobB's project, but I would like to mention something. Ancient Chinese was logographic, however modern characters are a mix of logograpic and...') |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I will not edit this page as it is JacobB's project, but I would like to mention something. Ancient Chinese was logographic, however modern characters are a mix of logograpic and phonographic radicals. I am researching this, and it looks like these mixed characters appeared first during the Qin-Han period as part of their standardizing efforts. Just letting you know.--[[User:Wuhao1911|Wuhao1911]] 00:28, 4 January 2010 (EST) | I will not edit this page as it is JacobB's project, but I would like to mention something. Ancient Chinese was logographic, however modern characters are a mix of logograpic and phonographic radicals. I am researching this, and it looks like these mixed characters appeared first during the Qin-Han period as part of their standardizing efforts. Just letting you know.--[[User:Wuhao1911|Wuhao1911]] 00:28, 4 January 2010 (EST) | ||
| + | :Wuhao, please. This is a wiki, it is meant to be collaborative! And even if this was "my project," I would be a fool to ignore your suggestions on the topic of the Chinese language. Please, please, improve the article however you like! [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 00:38, 4 January 2010 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 05:38, January 4, 2010
I will not edit this page as it is JacobB's project, but I would like to mention something. Ancient Chinese was logographic, however modern characters are a mix of logograpic and phonographic radicals. I am researching this, and it looks like these mixed characters appeared first during the Qin-Han period as part of their standardizing efforts. Just letting you know.--Wuhao1911 00:28, 4 January 2010 (EST)
- Wuhao, please. This is a wiki, it is meant to be collaborative! And even if this was "my project," I would be a fool to ignore your suggestions on the topic of the Chinese language. Please, please, improve the article however you like! JacobB 00:38, 4 January 2010 (EST)