Difference between revisions of "Talk:Abbreviationism"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Can this article be deleted please? "Abbreviationism" isn't a word. Normally I wouldn't mind, but it's such an ugly word I'd hate to think that some people might take this seriously and start using it. --[[User:JamesK|JamesK]] 10:18, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
 
Can this article be deleted please? "Abbreviationism" isn't a word. Normally I wouldn't mind, but it's such an ugly word I'd hate to think that some people might take this seriously and start using it. --[[User:JamesK|JamesK]] 10:18, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
(Edit) I suppose it could be moved to the correct term, "initialism" instead.

Revision as of 14:23, March 25, 2007

Can this article be deleted please? "Abbreviationism" isn't a word. Normally I wouldn't mind, but it's such an ugly word I'd hate to think that some people might take this seriously and start using it. --JamesK 10:18, 25 March 2007 (EDT)

(Edit) I suppose it could be moved to the correct term, "initialism" instead.