Difference between revisions of "No Child Left Behind"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Educator Criticism: lack of student ownership)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
'''No Child Left Behind''' is a 2001 law signed by President [[George W. Bush]] that holds public schools accountable for their students' test scores.
+
'''No Child Left Behind''' (or '''NCLB''')is a 2001 law signed by President [[George W. Bush]] that holds public schools accountable for their students' test scores.
  
−
Under the law, a school whose students consistently fail [[standardized tests]] will be subject to disciplinary action, including giving [[vouchers]] to the students to study at more efficient [[private school]]s, or even firing the administration and teachers of the school and having the state government assume control.
+
Under the law, a school whose students consistently fail [[standardized tests]] will be subject to disciplinary action, including giving [[vouchers]] to the students to study at more efficient [[private school]]s or even firing the administration and teachers of the school and having the state government assume control.
  
−
Also it requires schools to allow displaced students to finish out the school year, which has been lauded by outreach counselors. The law has been claimed to be effective in ensuring that underprivileged youth receive the same standard of education as every other student by some, but many teachers say that the standards are not an accurate measure of student or district performance.
+
It also requires schools to allow displaced students to finish out the school year, which has been lauded by outreach counselors. The law has been claimed to be effective in ensuring that underprivileged youth receive the same standard of education as every other student by some, but many teachers say that the standards are not an accurate measure of student or district performance.
  
 
==Educator Criticism==
 
==Educator Criticism==
Line 25: Line 25:
 
*There is no national standardized test, and results can vary wildly.  For instance, a child who scores 'proficient' in [[Mississippi]] reading test would fail the [[Massachusetts]] test.  A child who scored 'proficient' in the [[Tennessee]] math test would fail the [[Missouri]] test. <ref>[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19099906/ MSNBC States vary widely on pass, fail marks on tests]</ref>
 
*There is no national standardized test, and results can vary wildly.  For instance, a child who scores 'proficient' in [[Mississippi]] reading test would fail the [[Massachusetts]] test.  A child who scored 'proficient' in the [[Tennessee]] math test would fail the [[Missouri]] test. <ref>[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19099906/ MSNBC States vary widely on pass, fail marks on tests]</ref>
  
−
*Students suffer no penalty nor gain any reward for test results.  A high school student could deliberately fail a test with no punishment.
+
*Students suffer no penalty nor gain any reward for test results.  A high school student could deliberately fail a test with no punishment.  Some states and districts are looking into changing this.
  
 
== See also ==
 
== See also ==
Line 35: Line 35:
 
[http://www.nea.org/esea/index.html NEA]
 
[http://www.nea.org/esea/index.html NEA]
  
−
[http://media.www.californiaaggie.com/media/storage/paper981/news/2006/05/22/CityNews/All-Fifty.States.Fail.To.Meet.Guidelines.Of.No.Child.Left.Behind.Act-2012761.shtml All Fifty States Fail to Meet Guidlines of Not Child Left Behind Act]
+
[http://media.www.californiaaggie.com/media/storage/paper981/news/2006/05/22/CityNews/All-Fifty.States.Fail.To.Meet.Guidelines.Of.No.Child.Left.Behind.Act-2012761.shtml All Fifty States Fail to Meet Guidlines of No Child Left Behind Act]
 
[[category:United States Government]]
 
[[category:United States Government]]
 
[[category:United States Law]]
 
[[category:United States Law]]

Revision as of 22:00, September 18, 2008

No Child Left Behind (or NCLB)is a 2001 law signed by President George W. Bush that holds public schools accountable for their students' test scores.

Under the law, a school whose students consistently fail standardized tests will be subject to disciplinary action, including giving vouchers to the students to study at more efficient private schools or even firing the administration and teachers of the school and having the state government assume control.

It also requires schools to allow displaced students to finish out the school year, which has been lauded by outreach counselors. The law has been claimed to be effective in ensuring that underprivileged youth receive the same standard of education as every other student by some, but many teachers say that the standards are not an accurate measure of student or district performance.

Educator Criticism

  • The scores of students who move into the district just before the standardized test are counted with the others'. For instance, a school could be penalized if a child of illegal immigrants moved into the district and scored poorly.
  • There is little leeway allowed for mentally disabled students, non-native English speakers, students with emotional problems, etc. The test scores are looked at with no interpretive data.
  • Not only must the school have high test scores, each racial group must as well. A school could be penalized if their minority students perform poorly, even if they make up a small fraction of the overall school population.
  • Teachers must sacrifice class time to prepare students for the test, practice the test, and give the test. Many teachers feel they are 'teaching the test' instead of the curriculum.
  • Standardized tests often reflect how well a student can take a standardized test, not their critical thinking or problem solving abilities.
  • NCLB hurts dropout prevention. High schools are less likely to encourage low functioning students to stay in school, if their test scores will penalize the district.
  • Students have no stake in the exam. It does not affect their grades nor appear on their transcript, which does not excourage students to try very hard.
  • As of 2007, all states have failed to meet the teacher qualification standards outlined in NCLB.
  • There is no national standardized test, and results can vary wildly. For instance, a child who scores 'proficient' in Mississippi reading test would fail the Massachusetts test. A child who scored 'proficient' in the Tennessee math test would fail the Missouri test. [1]
  • Students suffer no penalty nor gain any reward for test results. A high school student could deliberately fail a test with no punishment. Some states and districts are looking into changing this.

See also

References

NEA

All Fifty States Fail to Meet Guidlines of No Child Left Behind Act