Difference between revisions of "Deliberate ignorance"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* [[pro-life]] individuals refusing to acknowledge that most fertilized eggs are spontaneously aborted by the woman's body | * [[pro-life]] individuals refusing to acknowledge that most fertilized eggs are spontaneously aborted by the woman's body | ||
* Advocates of the [[global warming theory]] refuse to consider any scientific evidence which shows that natural causes have always had a greater effect on terrestrial air temperature than human activity. | * Advocates of the [[global warming theory]] refuse to consider any scientific evidence which shows that natural causes have always had a greater effect on terrestrial air temperature than human activity. | ||
| + | * [[Christians]] refusing to acknowledge that the Bible often supported slavery. | ||
(add more) | (add more) | ||
| − | |||
Common expressions of [[deliberate ignorance]] include: | Common expressions of [[deliberate ignorance]] include: | ||
Revision as of 20:21, August 28, 2008
Deliberate ignorance is the practice of refusing to consider or discuss logic or evidence disproving ideologically motivated positions. Examples include:
- Howard Dean, a physician, former Governor, and longtime politician, refusing to recognize that taxpayer-funded abortion increases the number of abortions[1]
- refusing to acknowledge the inferior credentials of the critics of Richard Sternberg, whom they ostracize for having published an intelligent design article
- Democrats refusing to acknowledge Barack Obama's appeal to unpatriotic donors and supporters
- materialists refuse to address the impossibility of material explanation for migration and homing
- creationists refusing to acknowledge the wealth of information supporting evolution, including fossil, DNA, radiodating, and cladistic data
- evolutionists refuse to address the lack of a plausible evolutionary path for the whale[2]
- liberals refuse to address how socialism destroys productivity
- abortionists refuse to address the undisclosed harm to the mothers who have abortions
- pro-life individuals refusing to acknowledge that most fertilized eggs are spontaneously aborted by the woman's body
- Advocates of the global warming theory refuse to consider any scientific evidence which shows that natural causes have always had a greater effect on terrestrial air temperature than human activity.
- Christians refusing to acknowledge that the Bible often supported slavery.
(add more)
Common expressions of deliberate ignorance include:
- "I find that hard to believe!" (Howard Dean, June 11, 2008, in response to a fact ignored by liberals[3])
- "I'm not aware of that!" (without admitting a failure to look)
- "I've never seen that in the New York Times!"
- "I believe this by faith."
- "That's not what it said in my (public school) textbook!"
- "Let's talk about something else!"
- "I'm not interested in that!"
- "They hate us for our freedom!"
- "Complete suspension of disbelief!"
Crime of Deliberate Ignorance
Deliberate ignorance can be a crime. For example, jurors were instructed "to consider whether ... former Enron Corp. executives deliberately ignored accounting fraud as the energy trader fell into bankruptcy."[4]
References
- ↑ http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/210vssua.asp?
- ↑ This is disputed by evolutionists at a blog worth reviewing further for plausibility here.
- ↑ http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/210vssua.asp?
- ↑ http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2006/05/11/enron_jury_to_consider_deliberate_ignorance/