Difference between revisions of "Talk:Liberal creep"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
TrueValues (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:True: I was asking about the second example, any chance it could be referenced? The statement about Reagan doesn't state he had the highest approval ratings prior to the election of George H W Bush. Now if you want to make that claim and provide the reference, I will not object. Yet is will be a distortion of history not to include Clinton's higher rating and this is supposed to be a trustworthy encyclopedia, not a blog that distorts the truth.--[[User:Jimmy|Jimmy]] 20:51, 1 July 2008 (EDT) | :True: I was asking about the second example, any chance it could be referenced? The statement about Reagan doesn't state he had the highest approval ratings prior to the election of George H W Bush. Now if you want to make that claim and provide the reference, I will not object. Yet is will be a distortion of history not to include Clinton's higher rating and this is supposed to be a trustworthy encyclopedia, not a blog that distorts the truth.--[[User:Jimmy|Jimmy]] 20:51, 1 July 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Of course a source could be found for it. But instead of complaining about it and putting a fact tag on it, you should contribute by finding that source, as opposed to taking the liberal view that "someone else will do it". --[[User:TrueValues|TrueValues]] 20:56, 1 July 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 00:56, July 2, 2008
References
Any chance the second example could be referenced? The commandments and trustworthiness of this encyclopedia demand a reference for such a sweeping claim.--Jimmy 20:34, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
- Be more specific: which claim do you mean?
- Be more respectful: it is not for newcomers such as yourself to issue demands - or to interpret the rules.
- This is a warning - make helpful comments and contributions, or be elsewhere. --Ed Poor Talk 20:37, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
When he left, Bill Clinton had never been president, therefore that claim is useless. --TrueValues 20:27, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
- Ed: I am talking about all of the unreferenced claims made in the second example. Please accept my apologies if I wasn't being specific enough by asking if the completely referenced second example could be referenced. I was being perfectly respectful; please don't read more into my comments than what is actually there. I was not making any demands; I was merely pointing out the commandments demand references for every claim. According to the guidelines, it is entirely permissible and helpful to make requests for references by using the[Citation Needed] tag. If you are saying the guidelines are in error or there is a problem with my interpretation of them, please let me know. I consider myself an experienced user of this encyclopedia based on the number of edits and length of time posting articles.
- True: I was asking about the second example, any chance it could be referenced? The statement about Reagan doesn't state he had the highest approval ratings prior to the election of George H W Bush. Now if you want to make that claim and provide the reference, I will not object. Yet is will be a distortion of history not to include Clinton's higher rating and this is supposed to be a trustworthy encyclopedia, not a blog that distorts the truth.--Jimmy 20:51, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
- Of course a source could be found for it. But instead of complaining about it and putting a fact tag on it, you should contribute by finding that source, as opposed to taking the liberal view that "someone else will do it". --TrueValues 20:56, 1 July 2008 (EDT)