User talk:TrueValues

That really has nothing to do with an Affirmative Action president does it? --TrueValues 19:52, 1 July 2008 (EDT)

Read the first sentence of the article, which defines an "affirmative action president" as one who benefits from their "race or gender", followed by the assertion that this has never happened. Also, facts aren't liberal or conservative. They're facts.Pluto 22:34, 1 July 2008 (EDT)

If the article means something other than what it says, it should be rewritten. As is, it's inaccurate.Pluto 22:47, 1 July 2008 (EDT)

Tell me what the liberal drivel is about winning a MacArthur Fellowship or being elected in the US National Academy of Sciences? Otherwise please stop removing my entries.--Argon 20:41, 30 June 2008 (EDT)

Please don't remove cited and relevant material. Thanks, HenryS 20:50, 30 June 2008 (EDT)

Thanks for the consideration. --Argon 20:56, 30 June 2008 (EDT)

Seeing no response, I can only conclude this is a "parody account" - blocked indefinitely. --Ed Poor ^Talk 21:16, 1 July 2008 (EDT)

Kangaroo Edits

What made you revert my change (485296) in the first place?--Rspeed 19:20, 1 July 2008 (EDT)

References

Sir/Ma'am: Why is it "liberal distortion" to request references that are required by the commandments of this encyclopedia? My citation request at the 'Liberal Creep' article was explicitly permitted by the guidelines so why does the request "make it seem untruthful"? I'm sure that if the assertion is truthful, the person asserting such truthfulness would have no problem providing the reference thus ensuring Conservapedia remains a trustworthy source. Wouldn't you agree?--Jimmy 20:32, 1 July 2008 (EDT)

Unblock

After discussion with another sysop, I've decided to unblock your account. He says I owe you an apology, too. Sorry! --Ed Poor ^Talk 17:36, 16 July 2008 (EDT)