Difference between revisions of "User talk:Jeffsang"
From Conservapedia
Puellanivis (Talk | contribs) (not sarcastic at all, the site is obviously leftist, and contrary to the bible. Plus, non-American) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::I agree that the edit wasn't sarcastic or silly. (Though I hope Peullanavis' comment about disallowing liberal sources was...) [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 14:49, 19 December 2007 (EST) | ::I agree that the edit wasn't sarcastic or silly. (Though I hope Peullanavis' comment about disallowing liberal sources was...) [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 14:49, 19 December 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::Sorry, I clarify, the source is a liberal non-American site from a "science" foundation. Such material that contradicts the Bible is inappropriate for CP. --[[User:Puellanivis|Puellanivis]] 14:58, 19 December 2007 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 19:58, December 19, 2007
Sarcastic or silly edits will result in a removal from the site. Please refrain from doing so. Karajou 14:17, 19 December 2007 (EST)
- While reviewing his edit, it was in complete earnest, and not a sarcastic or silly edit, quoting a liberal source as a reference should simply be not allowed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Puellanivis (talk)
- Sorry, I clarify, the source is a liberal non-American site from a "science" foundation. Such material that contradicts the Bible is inappropriate for CP. --Puellanivis 14:58, 19 December 2007 (EST)
