User contributions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This user is currently blocked. The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:
- 20:12, December 19, 2007 Learn together talk contribs blocked Puellanivis talk contribs with an expiration time of infinite (Violated 90/10, when I pointed out it out, he accused Andy of doing the same; trolling statements pretending to discuss what CP believes including intentional misspellings in articles driving away real inquiries)
- 20:03, December 19, 2007 diff hist +41 Toxin Copyedit, some unusual grammar used, most of the article has swapped around to make it more understandable, and some information has been added.
- 19:58, December 19, 2007 diff hist +224 User talk:Jeffsang not sarcastic at all, the site is obviously leftist, and contrary to the bible. Plus, non-American
- 19:55, December 19, 2007 diff hist +1,078 Debate:Can Conservapedia Succeed? →Possibly: this is why the topics aren't appropriate for CP
- 19:47, December 19, 2007 diff hist +142 Clostridium botulinum add some info, botulin (the nerve toxin) is perhaps the strongest in the world
- 19:36, December 19, 2007 diff hist +921 User talk:Puellanivis →90/10 Rule: I am a positive contributor at CP
- 19:22, December 19, 2007 diff hist +161 User talk:Jeffsang Not sarcastic or silly, but meant honestly, however, it's a very liberal POV
- 19:19, December 19, 2007 diff hist +1,017 User talk:Zmidponk The problem here is a "presumption of absolute truth"
- 19:11, December 19, 2007 diff hist +943 Debate:Can Conservapedia Succeed? →Possibly: "depth" is less the goal here, than presenting the conservative view point. Pop culture is not an important topic of an encyclopedia by CP standards.
- 18:03, December 19, 2007 diff hist +623 User talk:Physicsnut my apologies as well...
- 05:38, December 19, 2007 diff hist +217 User talk:DanH →User "Awesome": any way to note a block should be given?
- 05:27, December 19, 2007 diff hist +771 Talk:Theory of relativity →Reversion explained: point taken, my revert should have been good, and why liberals are attracted to this article
- 05:20, December 19, 2007 diff hist +370 New! User talk:Zmidponk no, seriously... just shut up...
- 05:17, December 19, 2007 diff hist +317 User talk:Puellanivis well, they're just stupid, liberal or not...
- 04:54, December 19, 2007 diff hist +233 Debate:Can Conservapedia Succeed? →The Annals of the World: go away
- 04:52, December 19, 2007 diff hist +236 Debate:Can Conservapedia Succeed? →''"There is only one thing in life worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about."'' - Oscar Wilde: go away
- 04:45, December 19, 2007 diff hist -176 Earth Undo revision 354754 by Special:Contributions/Jesusrules4ever (User talk:Jesusrules4ever) rv liberal vandalism, user is mocking and hiding behind a "christian" username
- 04:44, December 19, 2007 diff hist +205 Debate:Can Conservapedia Succeed? →The Annals of the World: agenda or not, the Bible is the truth, and you're wrong.
- 04:42, December 19, 2007 diff hist +339 Debate:Can Conservapedia Succeed? →''"There is only one thing in life worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about."'' - Oscar Wilde
- 04:20, December 19, 2007 diff hist +237 Debate:Can Conservapedia Succeed? →The Annals of the World: everyone has an agenda, just because you think you don't, doesn't mean you don't. It's the same as an accent.
- 04:18, December 19, 2007 diff hist +707 Debate:Can Conservapedia Succeed? →''"There is only one thing in life worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about."'' - Oscar Wilde: The Bible, seriously... it's the truth here
- 04:13, December 19, 2007 diff hist +359 Debate:Can Conservapedia Succeed? →The Annals of the World: uh... DUH! the Bible is truth, and it says he's the only Son of God.
- 03:33, December 19, 2007 diff hist +586 Debate:Can Conservapedia Succeed? →''"There is only one thing in life worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about."'' - Oscar Wilde: really? really? the credibility is everywhere!
- 03:30, December 19, 2007 diff hist +1,081 Debate:Can Conservapedia Succeed? →The Annals of the World: *sigh* they're really that retarded, right?
- 03:07, December 19, 2007 diff hist +120 Debate:Can Conservapedia Succeed? →When liberals spend time refuting an idea ... it's already a success: not sarcasm
- 03:01, December 19, 2007 diff hist +269 User talk:DanH User "Awesome"
- 02:59, December 19, 2007 diff hist -135 Bill Ritter Undo revision 354695 by Special:Contributions/Awesome (User talk:Awesome) rv liberal vandalism
- 02:58, December 19, 2007 diff hist -258 Colorado Undo revision 354692 by Special:Contributions/Awesome (User talk:Awesome) rv vandalism, report for block?
- 02:57, December 19, 2007 diff hist +363 Debate:Can Conservapedia Succeed? →The Annals of the World: *ick* :( they're everywhere
- 02:54, December 19, 2007 diff hist +438 Debate:Can Conservapedia Succeed? →''"There is only one thing in life worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about."'' - Oscar Wilde: another dumb liberal
- 02:51, December 19, 2007 diff hist +374 Debate:Can Conservapedia Succeed? →When liberals spend time refuting an idea ... it's already a success: are all liberals this stupid?
- 02:22, December 19, 2007 diff hist +265 Theory of relativity rv, STOP it with the liberal stuff!
- 02:21, December 19, 2007 diff hist +139 Talk:Theory of relativity stop pressing your liberal views!
- 01:52, December 19, 2007 diff hist +145 Theory of relativity →Pending research: again, this was a good edit... it's a stronger statement, and more accurate
- 19:21, December 18, 2007 diff hist +302 Talk:Theory of relativity →Reversion explained: disagreement is irrelevant
- 19:13, December 18, 2007 diff hist +354 Talk:Theory of relativity →Reversion explained: Footnote only because he didn't believe in GR
- 01:12, December 18, 2007 diff hist -635 Theory of relativity →Philosophical Impact of Relativity: *sigh* that totally slipped through, sorry, some grammar work
- 01:10, December 18, 2007 diff hist +547 Theory of relativity →Philosophical Impact of Relativity: fix the wording... oy, he made a mess... I'll be rechecking this after I submit it
- 01:04, December 18, 2007 diff hist +236 Talk:Theory of relativity →Reversion explained: no technobabble please!
- 01:02, December 18, 2007 diff hist +508 Talk:Theory of relativity →Reversion explained: stronger statement than "total failures"
- 01:00, December 18, 2007 diff hist +161 Theory of relativity →Pending research: "total failures" is just not as powerful as "it's crappy science already, and need a lot of stuff to make them work"
- 01:41, December 13, 2007 diff hist +2,107 Talk:Ich bin ein Berliner German clarification from someone who speaks German
- 22:15, December 11, 2007 diff hist +1 m Theory of relativity →Ostensible Paradoxes: "speed of like" -> "speed of light"
- 00:27, December 11, 2007 diff hist +603 Theory of relativity →Ostensible Paradoxes: Speed of light in an object is less than the speed of light in a vacuum, being able to decrease or increase the speed of light through an object is trivial.
- 22:02, December 10, 2007 diff hist +627 New! User:Puellanivis Initial page content. current
- 19:48, December 10, 2007 diff hist +356 User:Ed Poor/math Some more statistics on Wikipedia
- 00:09, December 8, 2007 diff hist +471 User talk:Puellanivis GENDER-related topics
- 23:40, December 7, 2007 diff hist +348 Talk:Lynn Conway Article has been merged with "The Man Who Would Be Queen" current
- 23:27, December 7, 2007 diff hist +3,229 Talk:Lynn Conway →My recent edits and justification: Conservapedia may not accept transsexualism, but the US legal system does. Considering that we're subject to that law, we should likely follow it.
- 21:50, December 7, 2007 diff hist +238 Lynn Conway Proper ref, and giving DEFAULTSORT as per manual of style
- 21:34, December 7, 2007 diff hist +525 Talk:Transgender activism Sex ed should not be given on Conservapedia. In order to detail the distinctions of the groups mentioned requires an invasive presentation of sexual information.