Difference between revisions of "Talk:God"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
MatteeNeutra (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:::The definition of liberal is one who chooses right from wrong for themselves instead of accepting the objective right and wrong. Since Christianity is right, denial of that is liberalism. --[[User:Luke-Jr|Luke-Jr]] 16:06, 12 March 2007 (EDT) | :::The definition of liberal is one who chooses right from wrong for themselves instead of accepting the objective right and wrong. Since Christianity is right, denial of that is liberalism. --[[User:Luke-Jr|Luke-Jr]] 16:06, 12 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
::::Not only is that circular it is entirely beside the point. At the very least this article needs a clean up from the bog standard, unstructured text that we can see here at the moment.[[User:MatteeNeutra|MatteeNeutra]] 16:08, 12 March 2007 (EDT) | ::::Not only is that circular it is entirely beside the point. At the very least this article needs a clean up from the bog standard, unstructured text that we can see here at the moment.[[User:MatteeNeutra|MatteeNeutra]] 16:08, 12 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Once again we find ourselves in a position where a good, neutral, factual, better written and quite frankly more proper version of an article is being reverted for a reason that can not be backed up. Do you fancy explaining yourself NVConservative?[[User:MatteeNeutra|MatteeNeutra]] 16:28, 12 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:28, March 12, 2007
I think the "God" page of ALL pages should have just a LITTLE bit longer page --Elamdri 03:51, 12 March 2007 (EDT)--Elamdri
Fixed a vandal.--Elamdri 03:51, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
Wouldn't it be just "god" when referring to a deity other than the the Christian "God?" ColinR 16:24, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
Neutrality
Made this page talk about God as a deistic being as well as the Christian PoV.MatteeNeutra 15:49, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
- Conservapedia is not about neutrality. Conservapedia favors factual information over "neutral" information, and is written from a Christian point of view. Thus, the article on God should accurately say that God is the creator of the universe, not "neutrally" imply the Christians invented God's status as the creator of the universe. --NVConservative 16:00, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
- Actually, nowhere in the Conservapedia Commandments does it mention a Christian PoV. In fact its called Conservapedia and I'm fairly confident that not all Conservatives are Christians. Your reversion to the old very biased page is very strange to me. MatteeNeutra 16:04, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
- The definition of liberal is one who chooses right from wrong for themselves instead of accepting the objective right and wrong. Since Christianity is right, denial of that is liberalism. --Luke-Jr 16:06, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
- Not only is that circular it is entirely beside the point. At the very least this article needs a clean up from the bog standard, unstructured text that we can see here at the moment.MatteeNeutra 16:08, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
- The definition of liberal is one who chooses right from wrong for themselves instead of accepting the objective right and wrong. Since Christianity is right, denial of that is liberalism. --Luke-Jr 16:06, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
- Actually, nowhere in the Conservapedia Commandments does it mention a Christian PoV. In fact its called Conservapedia and I'm fairly confident that not all Conservatives are Christians. Your reversion to the old very biased page is very strange to me. MatteeNeutra 16:04, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
Once again we find ourselves in a position where a good, neutral, factual, better written and quite frankly more proper version of an article is being reverted for a reason that can not be backed up. Do you fancy explaining yourself NVConservative?MatteeNeutra 16:28, 12 March 2007 (EDT)