Difference between revisions of "Talk:Electron"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Why was the information about electrons making up atoms removed? Also, I believe it would be a positive move if the article can be worded in a way that lay people can understand and follo...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Why was the information about electrons making up atoms removed? Also, I believe it would be a positive move if the article can be worded in a way that lay people can understand and follow what is being said. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 04:12, 2 September 2007 (EDT) | Why was the information about electrons making up atoms removed? Also, I believe it would be a positive move if the article can be worded in a way that lay people can understand and follow what is being said. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 04:12, 2 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | :The information wasn't removed, but the first sentence was kinda wordy and redundant. "Fundamental particle" already implies that they make up atoms, and "fundamental subatomic particle" is more specific. I agree it's a little technical right now, I'll try to work on that in a bit.[[User:Fantasia|Fantasia]] 11:50, 2 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 15:50, September 2, 2007
Why was the information about electrons making up atoms removed? Also, I believe it would be a positive move if the article can be worded in a way that lay people can understand and follow what is being said. Learn together 04:12, 2 September 2007 (EDT)
- The information wasn't removed, but the first sentence was kinda wordy and redundant. "Fundamental particle" already implies that they make up atoms, and "fundamental subatomic particle" is more specific. I agree it's a little technical right now, I'll try to work on that in a bit.Fantasia 11:50, 2 September 2007 (EDT)