Difference between revisions of "Blakely v. Washington"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(added position of Justices) |
Aziraphale (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
This case concerned a state criminal proceeding. The [[U.S. Supreme Court]] extended this ''Blakely'' rule to the federal Sentencing Guidelines in ''[[United States v. Booker]]'', 543 U.S. 220 (2005). | This case concerned a state criminal proceeding. The [[U.S. Supreme Court]] extended this ''Blakely'' rule to the federal Sentencing Guidelines in ''[[United States v. Booker]]'', 543 U.S. 220 (2005). | ||
| − | [[category: | + | [[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] |
Revision as of 15:27, August 23, 2007
In Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004), the U.S. Supreme Court held that facts, other than a prior conviction, supporting a sentence above the standard sentencing range in a legislatively prescribed sentencing guidelines system must be found be a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the Court decision, while Justices Anthony Kennedy, Sandra Day O'Connor and Stephen Breyer and Chief Justice William Rehnquist were in dissent.
This case concerned a state criminal proceeding. The U.S. Supreme Court extended this Blakely rule to the federal Sentencing Guidelines in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005).