Difference between revisions of "Twelve Angry Men"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Aziraphale (talk | contribs) (categorize) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Interestingly enough, the audience never finds out whether the defendant is guilty; this further stresses "innocence until proven guilty".<ref>'Most courtroom movies feel it necessary to end with a clear-cut verdict. But "12 Angry Men" never states whether the defendant is innocent or guilty. It is about whether the jury has a reasonable doubt about his guilt.' [http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20020929/REVIEWS08/209290301/1023 (Roger Ebert)] </ref> | Interestingly enough, the audience never finds out whether the defendant is guilty; this further stresses "innocence until proven guilty".<ref>'Most courtroom movies feel it necessary to end with a clear-cut verdict. But "12 Angry Men" never states whether the defendant is innocent or guilty. It is about whether the jury has a reasonable doubt about his guilt.' [http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20020929/REVIEWS08/209290301/1023 (Roger Ebert)] </ref> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
Revision as of 15:51, August 16, 2007
Originally a play by Reginald Rose, two movies have been made based on the script, about a jury in a murder trial. Initially, eleven jurors are ready to convict the defendant but one man wants to talk about it first. The movie follows the conversation of the jurors, as one lone man continues to insist that each juror explain and defend their reasoning.
Interestingly enough, the audience never finds out whether the defendant is guilty; this further stresses "innocence until proven guilty".[1]
External links
- Extensive quotes from the movie showing how Juror #8 (Henry Fonda) establishes reasonable doubt in the minds of the other jury members.
- ↑ 'Most courtroom movies feel it necessary to end with a clear-cut verdict. But "12 Angry Men" never states whether the defendant is innocent or guilty. It is about whether the jury has a reasonable doubt about his guilt.' (Roger Ebert)