Difference between revisions of "Risky RINO Removal"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*[[David Valadao]] - Only Vote out if you can get RINO of exact same mold who would not backstab | *[[David Valadao]] - Only Vote out if you can get RINO of exact same mold who would not backstab | ||
*[[Tony Gonzales]] | *[[Tony Gonzales]] | ||
| − | |||
*[[Young Kim]] | *[[Young Kim]] | ||
*[[Beth Van Duyne]] - Moderate but generally Seems to Lean America First | *[[Beth Van Duyne]] - Moderate but generally Seems to Lean America First | ||
Revision as of 14:57, May 20, 2021
Risky RINO Removal is a term that applies to the notion of primarying Moderate Republicans or RINOs in extreme swing districts or democrat leaning districts. An example would be in Mike Castle, Mike Castle was an extreme RINO in policy (similar to Susan Collins in policy), he was successfully primaried by Christine O'Donnell, the Tea Party favorite for the race of state Senate. However, Tea Party candidates are much less electable in Delaware which cost that seat for the Republicans.[1]
A current example would be Primarying, Anti-Trump Representative, David Valadao who is in a D+5 District where Biden won by over ten points. Putting an America First Agenda Candidate would be a risky move which could cost the Republicans that seat.
Moderates/RINOs too Risky to Primary
- Susan Collins
- Carlos Gimenez
- Maria Elvira Salazar
- John Katko - Only Vote out if you can get RINO of exact same mold who would not backstab
- David Valadao - Only Vote out if you can get RINO of exact same mold who would not backstab
- Tony Gonzales
- Young Kim
- Beth Van Duyne - Moderate but generally Seems to Lean America First