Difference between revisions of "Talk:Monte Cassino"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
HeartOfGold (talk | contribs) (clarification on sources) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::No, that's okay. I am not disputing the accuracy of this article; it is well written. Should we crank out articles without taking the time provide sources for the time being? Or was this a special case that I should not emulate? [[User:HeartOfGold|HeartOfGold]] 16:31, 18 May 2007 (EDT) | ::No, that's okay. I am not disputing the accuracy of this article; it is well written. Should we crank out articles without taking the time provide sources for the time being? Or was this a special case that I should not emulate? [[User:HeartOfGold|HeartOfGold]] 16:31, 18 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | *It was a special case, as Andy had included an item on the Main Page about this date in history, etc. No one was thinking you were doing anything other than what a good and fair editor would do, see it lacking sources, and suggesting they be added. --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 16:49, 18 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:49, May 18, 2007
Nice article. Can you add the sources? HeartOfGold 15:46, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
- Andy needed something added in a hurry, Heart. I am sure RobS and I will get back to add the cites soon. You can feel free, if you want, to Google any appropriate. --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 15:48, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
- No, that's okay. I am not disputing the accuracy of this article; it is well written. Should we crank out articles without taking the time provide sources for the time being? Or was this a special case that I should not emulate? HeartOfGold 16:31, 18 May 2007 (EDT)