Difference between revisions of "Gerrymandering"
DavidB4-bot (talk | contribs) (→top: Spelling/Grammar Check & Cleanup, typos fixed: to to → to) |
(Add.) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
The term is named after [[Elbridge Gerry]]. | The term is named after [[Elbridge Gerry]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Liberal flip-flopping== | ||
| + | [[Liberal]]s supported race-based gerrymandering from a constitutional perspective during and in the years after the [[Civil Rights movement]] because it would lead to the highest rates of minority elected officials, but they changed their position (again from a constitutional standpoint) after it became clear they could gain more seats through having courts strike down race-based gerrymandering.<ref>Sammin, Kyle (May 30, 2017). [https://thefederalist.com/2017/05/30/why-the-supreme-courts-liberals-flipflopped-on-race-based-gerrymandering/ Why The Supreme Court’s Liberals Flipflopped On Race-Based Gerrymandering]. ''The Federalist''. Retrieved May 31, 2017.</ref> This is an example of the "[[Living Constitution]]" ideology. | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 01:56, June 1, 2017
.png)
Gerrymandering is a term that refers to purposeful rearranging of district lines in order to influence the outcome of an election or to favor one political party over another.[1] The first instance of gerrymandering in the United States occurred during the 1800 presidential election between John Adams and Thomas Jefferson.
- The Boston Gazette ran a cartoon depicting the new district as a contorted animal and proclaiming the "Gerry-mander, a new species of monster."[2][3]
The result of the rearranging of districts helped Jefferson win the extremely close presidential race by a vote of the House of Representatives.[4]
The term is named after Elbridge Gerry.
Liberal flip-flopping
Liberals supported race-based gerrymandering from a constitutional perspective during and in the years after the Civil Rights movement because it would lead to the highest rates of minority elected officials, but they changed their position (again from a constitutional standpoint) after it became clear they could gain more seats through having courts strike down race-based gerrymandering.[5] This is an example of the "Living Constitution" ideology.
References
- ↑ http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gerrymandering
- ↑ The End of Gerrymandering, Christian Whiton and Larry Greenfield, The Weekly Standard, 11/25/2008
- ↑ https://masshist.org/database/1765
- ↑ http://history1800s.about.com/od/1800sglossary/g/Gerrymander.htm
- ↑ Sammin, Kyle (May 30, 2017). Why The Supreme Court’s Liberals Flipflopped On Race-Based Gerrymandering. The Federalist. Retrieved May 31, 2017.